ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03366636Updated Jan 3, 2024

Project Legacy Impact Evaluation Study

An interventional study of Project Legacy in Pregnancy Prevention, Sexual Behavior and Contraception Behavior, sponsored by Children's Hospital Los Angeles. Completed at 12 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 19 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-03.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital Los Angeles · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
571
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
14 Years to 19 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will design and rigorously evaluate the efficacy of Project Legacy, a five week positive youth development intervention to decrease sexual risk for unintended pregnancies and STIs among youth experiencing homelessness or at risk of homelessness aged 14-19. This randomized control trial will compare Project Legacy to a usual services control.

Read the detailed description

The study uses a multi-site randomized group trial (RGT) cohort design to evaluate the Project Legacy intervention curriculum for reducing sexual risk behaviors among homeless youth age 14-19. CHLA project staff will work with 6 homeless youth serving sites in Southern California (Los Angeles, San Diego) to recruit 600 youth. Randomization to the intervention or control condition will occur at the group level and will be stratified by site. Field staff will survey all eligible homeless youth who provide consent to participate in the study at baseline (before randomization and implementation) and at 3 and 9 months post intervention (5-5.5 and 11-11.5 months post-baseline). The program group will receive an additional intervention-based survey immediately upon completion of the program.

Youth in the control condition will receive the normal standard of care provided at the recruitment sites. Services available as standard of care at the recruitment sites include: medical care; mental health services; substance abuse services; educational, career, and vocational services. Intervention participants will not be excluded from receiving these services as well. Surveys will capture mental and physical health care service utilization and services to reduce substance use across both groups. The study team will monitor HIV and pregnancy prevention programming and other similar goal-planning/decision-making interventions offered to homeless youth in the study areas during the program implementation and follow-up period via interviews with site staff. The study team will include selected program exposure items on the follow up surveys to assess youth's self-reported exposure to similar goal-planning/decision-making and sexual health (pregnancy prevention and STI/HIV) education.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnancy Prevention
  • Sexual Behavior
  • Contraception Behavior
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Keywords

  • Pregnancy Prevention
  • Adolescents
  • STIs/STDs
  • Self-sufficiency
03

In context

Sexual Behavior

224 studies on the registry are indexed under Sexual Behavior; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 571 is above the median of 264 across 179 interventional studies indexed under Sexual Behavior.

Browse Sexual Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 152 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 19 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Served or identified on outreach by one of our partner homeless youth serving agencies in Los Angeles or San Diego
  • 14-19 years of age
  • English-language speaker (able to complete consent and survey in English)
  • not currently pregnant
  • no immediate travel plans (are planning on being in the area for the length of the intervention - 8 weeks).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Outside of age range
  • Currently pregnant
  • Not planning to be in the area for the length of the intervention
  • Previously enrolled in the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
571 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    The control/comparison group will be receiving only their usual services which are offered at the agencies they frequent, including mental health services, case management, job training, educational services, and, in specific venue contexts, may receive HIV risk reduction or other "sex education" interventions such as Street Smart. These same services are also open to the intervention group. Usage of these services varies by site (residential vs drop-in; city (San Diego vs Los Angeles) and type of service (case management, mental health, health care, etc.).

  • Experimental
    Project Legacy

    The experimental/intervention arm will receive the Project Legacy intervention

    Behavioral: Project Legacy

Interventions

  • BehavioralProject Legacy

    Project Legacy - Project Legacy is a 5-week, twice a week, 10 sessions small group intervention that encourages homeless and at-risk of homeless youth ages 14-19 to imagine a positive future and discuss how current risk behaviors can be a barrier to a successful adulthood. The program includes thinking about the future, the importance of positive social supports, short and long-term goal planning, and decision making. The program also includes life skills building, addressing past and current risk behaviors, linking to resources and navigating service systems, information on contraception and condoms, a healthy life plan and self-sufficiency. The 5 content core elements are the following: * 1. Thinking about the future * 2. Present actions to achieve future success * 3. Safeguarding one's future * 4. Creating a Healthy Life Plan * 5. Navigating service systems

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline lack of consistent current use (<80%) of contraception (including condoms) at 11 months

    Current use of contraception (including condoms) is defined as using contraception at \>80% of instances of vaginal intercourse in the past 3 months.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 11 months post-baseline

  2. Change from baseline in current vaginal and anal sex without condom at 11 months

    This outcome measure is defined as the proportion of instances of vaginal and anal sex without a condom in the past 3 months.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 11 months post-baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sexual initiation / activity (vaginal)

    Ever engaged in vaginal sex.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 5 months post-baseline, and 11 months post-baseline

  2. Current birth control use (vaginal sex)

    Current birth control use is defined as the number of instances of vaginal sex during which contraception was used (including condoms) in the past 3 months.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 5 months post-baseline, and 11 months post-baseline

  3. Current condom use (vaginal sex)

    Current condom use for vaginal sex is defined as: the number of instances of vaginal sex during which condoms were used in the past 3 months

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 5 months post-baseline, and 11 months post-baseline

  4. Proportion of youth who have vaginal intercourse without the consistent use of contraception

    This outcome is defined as using contraception for less than 80% of instances of vaginal sex in the past 3 months. 1. "In the past 3 months, how many times did you have vaginal sex?" 2. "When you had vaginal sex in the past 3 months, how many times did you and your partner(s) have sex and NOT use any type of contraception (in other words, EITHER a condom OR other method of birth control)? By birth control, we mean using condom, birth control pills, the shot, the patch, the ring, IUD, or implant".

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 5 months post-baseline, and 11 months post-baseline

  5. Current contraception use (among females)

    Current contraception use is defined as the use of one or more methods of effective contraception in the past 3 months

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 5 months post-baseline, and 11 months post-baseline

  6. Current marijuana or alcohol use

    Current marijuana or alcohol use is defined as marijuana or alcohol use in the past 3 months

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 5 months post-baseline, and 11 months post-baseline

  7. Stable living environment at the time of the follow-up (current)

    Stable living defined as living in a parents', relatives' or foster parents' home; a group home or residential facility or a tenant of an apartment.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 5 months post-baseline, and 11 months post-baseline

  8. Employment experience (current)

    Employed part or full-time since baseline; certificate, post-high school or college completed;

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 5 months post-baseline, and 11 months post-baseline

  9. Engagement in job-readiness services

    Services defined as job preparedness skill-building, job internships, or educational services

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 5 months post-baseline, and 11 months post-baseline

  10. Social support (current)

    Social support is measured using The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Total scores range from 7 to 84 and each subscale score ranges from 4 to 28, with a higher score indicating greater social support. which are averaged together to get the total score.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 5 months post-baseline, and 11 months post-baseline

07

Study locations

12 sites
  • Five Keys
    Boyle Heights, California 90033, United States
  • Youth Program
    Long Beach, California 90712, United States
  • Century Villages at Cabrillo
    Long Beach, California 90810, United States
  • Da Vinci Rise High
    Los Angeles, California 90011, United States
  • LA CAUSA Youth Build
    Los Angeles, California 90022, United States
  • Covenant House
    Los Angeles, California 90027, United States
  • Los Angeles LGBT Center
    Los Angeles, California 90038, United States
  • YMCA of San Diego County
    Oceanside, California 92054, United States
  • San Diego Central Library
    San Diego, California 92101, United States
  • San Diego Youth Services
    San Diego, California 92110, United States
  • Monarch School
    San Diego, California 92113, United States
  • Safe Place for Youth
    Venice, California 90291, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • De Rosa CJ, Montgomery SB, Kipke MD, Iverson E, Ma JL, Unger JB. Service utilization among homeless and runaway youth in Los Angeles, California: rates and reasons. J Adolesc Health. 1999 Mar;24(3):190-200. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(98)00081-0. PubMed 10195802 ↗
  • Edidin JP, Ganim Z, Hunter SJ, Karnik NS. The mental and physical health of homeless youth: a literature review. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2012 Jun;43(3):354-75. doi: 10.1007/s10578-011-0270-1. PubMed 22120422 ↗
  • Rotheram-Borus MJ, Song J, Gwadz M, Lee M, Van Rossem R, Koopman C. Reductions in HIV risk among runaway youth. Prev Sci. 2003 Sep;4(3):173-87. doi: 10.1023/a:1024697706033. PubMed 12940468 ↗
  • Tucker JS, Sussell J, Golinelli D, Zhou A, Kennedy DP, Wenzel SL. Understanding pregnancy-related attitudes and behaviors: a mixed-methods study of homeless youth. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Dec;44(4):252-61. doi: 10.1363/4425212. Epub 2012 Nov 13. PubMed 23231333 ↗
  • Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095. PubMed 2280326 ↗
  • Chen P, Vazsonyi AT. Future orientation, impulsivity, and problem behaviors: a longitudinal moderation model. Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;47(6):1633-45. doi: 10.1037/a0025327. Epub 2011 Sep 5. PubMed 21895358 ↗
  • Oyserman D, Terry K, Bybee D. A possible selves intervention to enhance school involvement. J Adolesc. 2002 Jun;25(3):313-26. doi: 10.1006/jado.2002.0474. PubMed 12128042 ↗
  • Thompson, S., Pollio, D., Constantine, J., Reid, D., Nebbitt, V. Short-term outcomes of youth receiving runaway and homeless shelter services. Research on Social Work Practice. 2002 Sept; 12: 589-603
  • Juntunen, C.L., & Wettersten, K. Work hope: Development and initial validation of a measure. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2006; 53(1): 94-106.
  • Robitschek, C. Personal growth initiative: The construct and its measure. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development: American Counseling Association. 1998; 30(4): 183-198.
  • Strauman, T.J. (2006). Adolescent Regulatory Focus Questionnaire. Unpublished questionnaire, Duke University, Durham, NC.
  • Rice E, Milburn NG, Monro W. Social networking technology, social network composition, and reductions in substance use among homeless adolescents. Prev Sci. 2011 Mar;12(1):80-8. doi: 10.1007/s11121-010-0191-4. PubMed 21194011 ↗
  • Hansen WB, Paskett ED, Carter LJ. The Adolescent Sexual Activity Index (ASAI): a standardized strategy for measuring interpersonal heterosexual behaviors among youth. Health Educ Res. 1999 Aug;14(4):485-90. doi: 10.1093/her/14.4.485. PubMed 10557519 ↗
  • Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception. 2011 May;83(5):397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.021. Epub 2011 Mar 12. PubMed 21477680 ↗
  • Oyserman D, Bybee D, Terry K, & Hart-Johnson T. Possible selves as roadmaps. Journal of Research in Personality 38: 130-149, 2004.
  • Higgins ET. Beyond pleasure and pain. Am Psychol. 1997 Dec;52(12):1280-300. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.12.1280. PubMed 9414606 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 3, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03366636
Collaborators
ETR Associates
Responsible party
Mona Desai (Principal Investigator, Children's Hospital Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 8, 2017
Start date
Oct 30, 2017
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2021
Completion
Mar 30, 2021
Last update
Jan 3, 2024

Study contacts

Leslie F Clark, PhD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Southern California

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion