ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03358160Updated Nov 30, 2017

Motor Representations in Orthopedic Patients

An observational study in Orthopedic Disorder, Motor Disorder and Perceptual Disorders, sponsored by I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio. Status unknown at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-30.

Sponsored by I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
200
Ages
45 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the possible effects that a motor limitation at the peripheral level might have on the ability to visually discriminate others' actions.

Previous literature has shown that specific motor skills (motor expertise) facilitate the visual discrimination of domain-specific actions, and that these motor experts' superior abilities might be mediated by areas not only responsible for the visual recognition of movements (as it happens in non-expert subjects) but also involved in motor planning. Similarly, impairment in the motor system due to neurological damage modulates not only the ability to perform movements but also the ability to discriminate and predict the temporal course of observed actions.

Based on these findings, it has been hypothesized that the motor representations of gait, despite being a hyper-learned motor pattern, might be subjected to modification as a result of an impairment of walking caused by a peripheral functional limitation in the lower limbs as the one characterizing orthopaedic patients who underwent a surgical operation for total knee arthroprosthesis. In this protocol, patients are thus required to perform visual discrimination tasks based on the observation of movements performed with either the upper or lower limbs, and their performance is expected to correlated with their functional impairments in movement execution.

These results would indicate that the (in)ability to perform a movement might have an impact on its representation at the central level and on internal motion simulation capabilities, which also influence the ability to visual discriminate others' actions through action-perception transfer: this would suggest that rehabilitation in orthopaedic patients should take into account (and restore) such a central impairment in motor representations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Orthopedic Disorder
  • Motor Disorder
  • Perceptual Disorders
03

In context

Musculoskeletal Diseases

752 studies on the registry are indexed under Musculoskeletal Diseases; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 120 across 207 observational studies indexed under Musculoskeletal Diseases.

Browse Musculoskeletal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio is the lead sponsor of 160 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Orthopaedic patients and age-matched healthy controls.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants must be able to understand instructions and have no history of neurological or psychiatric disorders.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of neurological or psychiatric disorders.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • TKA

    Orthopaedic patients who underwent surgical operation for total knee arthroprothesis.

    Behavioral: Action discrimination tasks.

  • Rizoarthrosis

    Orthopaedic patients who underwent surgical operation to treat chronic arthrosis of the thumb.

    Behavioral: Action discrimination tasks.

  • Healthy Controls

    Healthy age-matched controls.

    Behavioral: Action discrimination tasks.

Interventions

  • BehavioralAction discrimination tasks.

    The investigators will compare the groups' performance during action discrimination tasks related to movements of the upper vs. lower limbs.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Group Differences in action discrimination performance.

    Group Differences in action discrimination performance depending on the impairment in movement execution.

    Time frame: End 2018.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Hospital
    Milan, 20161, Italy
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2016 to primary completion in Mar 2017, 9 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 21, 2017
First posted
Nov 30, 2017
StartActual
May 31, 2016
Primary completionActual
Mar 30, 2017
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2018
Last update
Nov 30, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 30, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03358160
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 30, 2017
Start date
May 31, 2016
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2017
Completion
Dec 30, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 30, 2017

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion