ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03356834SWITAFUpdated Mar 26, 2025

Change of Renal Function and Bone Mineral Density in CHB Patients Switch From TDF to TAF vs. Maintaining TDF

A Phase 4 interventional study of Tenofovir alafenamide(TAF) and Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF) in Chronic Hepatitis B, sponsored by Humanity and Health Research Centre. Completed at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-26.

Sponsored by Humanity and Health Research Centre · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
575
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients receiving long-term sequential Neucleos(t)ides(NAs), majority of these CHB patients experienced drug resistance and switched to Tenofovir disoproxil fumaratate(TDF). However, some of patients on long term TDF experienced impairment of renal function and bone mineral density. After Tenofovir alafenamide(TAF) was in clinical practice, these group of patients got an clinical option to switch from TDF to TAF. The investigators designed a prospective cohort study to evaluate the real life effectiveness and safety in participants with chronic HBV infection switch from TDF to TAF vs. maintaining on TDF.

Read the detailed description

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF) have been associated with renal toxicity and reduced bone mineral density. Tenofovir alafenamide(TAF) is a novel tenofovir prodrug that reduces tenofovir plasma concentrations by 90%, thereby decreasing off-target side-effects. The investigators aimed to assess whether efficacy, safety, and tolerability were non-inferior in participants switched to TAF versus in those remaining on TDF. This is a prospective clinical study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Hepatitis B

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Chronic hepatitis B
  • Efficacy, safety, and tolerability
  • Tenofovir alafenamide
03

In context

Hepatitis B, Chronic

895 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis B, Chronic; 151 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 575 is above the median of 100 across 659 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis B, Chronic.

Browse Hepatitis B, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

Humanity and Health Research Centre is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Chronic ,
  2. Antiviral experienced,
  3. Currently on long term TDF anti-HBV treatment,
  4. HBV DNA \< 6 log IU/ml (LLOD)
  5. Able to sign the consent form of anticipating in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Co-infected with , or other viral hepatitis,
  2. Diagnosis of HCC
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
575 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TDF switch to TAF

    Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate(TDF) 300mg daily switch to Tenofovir Alafenamide(TAF) 25mg daily

    Drug: Tenofovir alafenamide(TAF)

  • Active comparator
    Maintaining on TDF

    Maintaining on Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate(TDF) 300mg daily

    Drug: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF)

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Antiviral response of TAF

    Anti-HBV effectiveness of TAF compared with TDF in treatment experienced CHB patients

    Time frame: 60 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Improvement of renal function and bone mineral density in CHB patients switching to TAF

    Change of renal function and bone mineral density from baseline in CHB patients of TAF a group compared with TDF group

    Time frame: 60 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Humanity and Health GI and Liver Centre
    Hong Kong, 00852, Hong Kong
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2017 to primary completion in Oct 2024, 82 months.

Of 46 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Hepatitis B, Chronic, half reached primary completion within 47 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 40 and three quarters within 83. This study's 82 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 63 studies reached it within 43 months; a quarter within 30 and three quarters within 64.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 20, 2017
First posted
Nov 29, 2017
StartActual
Dec 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Oct 31, 2024
CompletionActual
Oct 31, 2024
Last update
Mar 26, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03356834
Lead sponsor
Humanity and Health Research Centre
Responsible party
George Lau (Humanity & Healthy Medical Group President, Humanity and Health Research Centre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 29, 2017
Start date
Dec 1, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2024
Completion
Oct 31, 2024
Last update
Mar 26, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tenofovir alafenamide

Start the discussion