ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03352089PASSUpdated Jun 11, 2024

Positron Emission Tomography / Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Aortic Stenosis

An observational study in Aortic Stenosis and Transthyretin Amyloidosis, sponsored by University of Edinburgh. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 70 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-11.

Sponsored by University of Edinburgh · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
22
Ages
70 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-15

Among 107 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in United Kingdom — 20 open to participants now, 34 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Aortic Valve Stenosis · United Kingdom.

Enrollment
56th of 61
22 · median 252
Started
2017
with 7 others
Observational
61 of 107
9 open now
Registered
56th of 107
by date
Lead sponsor
9 of 107
University of Edinburgh

Among the 107 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in United Kingdom, this one is the 56th largest by enrollment of the 61 observational ones that give a count, is one of 8 that started in 2017, is one of 61 observational ones, and was the 56th registered.

Aortic Valve Stenosis

1,026 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 294 are open to participants now.

Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →

Open to participants now

20 of the 107 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in United Kingdom are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

15 more — sign in →

All 20 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United Kingdom have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United Kingdom →

Who these studies take

Of the 209 Aortic Valve Stenosis studies recruiting now, 163 (78%) set no upper age limit and 9 (4%) stop at 75 or younger; 25 take children under 18; 14 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 70 Years and older · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Get alerts for this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 107 studies in Aortic Valve Stenosis with a site in United Kingdom, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Aortic stenosis is the most common valve disease requiring surgery in the Western world. It is defined by progressive calcification and fibrosis of the valve leaflets and restricted valve opening. This in turn exposes the heart muscle (left ventricle) to increasing pressure leading to heart muscle thickening (left ventricular hypertrophy, LVH) to normalise wall stress and maintain heart output (stroke volume). The only treatment available is relief of pressure overload by surgical or minimally invasive valve replacement (TAVI).

Transthyretin (TTR) amyloidosis is a condition characterised by deposition of insoluble transthyretin protein (a small protein tetramer produced in the liver) in various tissues, predominantly in the heart. Although there are inherited forms caused by specific TTR gene mutations, most cases occur in older individuals with non-mutated TTR (wild-type). The finding of TTR plaques in elderly individuals is relatively common; in a post-mortem study 22-25% of patients over the age of 80 had evidence of cardiac amyloid deposition. However, there is significant progressive amyloid accumulation in a small percentage of individuals leading to heart muscle thickening and heart failure. No medical treatments are currently licensed although several agents are at advanced stages of clinical trials.

As both the above conditions are increasingly common in the elderly population and characterised by increased heart muscle thickening, there is the potential for them to coexist unrecognised in individual patients. The prevalence of cardiac amyloidosis in clinical populations with significant aortic stenosis is not known however small series have estimated somewhere in the region of 6-29%. Other data have suggested that patients with aortic stenosis and concurrent cardiac amyloidosis have an adverse prognosis even despite AVR. It is therefore important to identify aortic stenosis patients with coexistent amyloidosis both in terms of predicting prognosis and because it may influence decisions about whether to proceed to valve intervention.

PET/MR is an emerging technique, which combines the excellent temporal and spatial resolution of MRI with the sensitive molecular imaging of PET. PET/MR has significant advantages over PET/CT (the currently more widely used approach) in that it offers superior tissue characterisation, improved correction for cardiac and respiratory motion and major reductions in radiation exposure. Whilst there are concerns about its ability to provide reliable attenuation correction of the PET data, these issues appear to have been largely overcome with recent techniques proposed by our group. MR is also more naturally suited to the imaging of certain tissues in the body compared to CT including the left ventricular myocardium.

In aortic stenosis, MRI has become the gold-standard technique for examining the heart muscle (myocardium) with the unique ability to assess its tissue composition. In particular both late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and T1 mapping based techniques are able to detect heart scarring (fibrosis) which act as biomarkers of left ventricular decompensation and are strongly associated with poor patient outcomes. CMR is also the gold-standard non-invasive technique for detecting cardiac amyloid, which is associated with both a characteristic pattern of LGE and high native T1 values. However it is not currently able to differentiate between the two different types of cardiac amyloid TTR and AL amyloidosis, which have different prognoses and treatments. Preliminary studies conducted by our group have suggested that 18F-NaF PET when added to CMR can make this distinction on the basis that this tracer binds to TTR deposits but not AL deposits, may be able to differentiate between the two. Importantly we have also used the same PET tracer as a marker of calcification activity in the aortic valve, demonstrating its ability to predict disease progression and cardiac events.

In this study, we will investigate whether PET/MR could be used as "one-stop" imaging in aortic stenosis in whom valve intervention is being considered to assess in detail functional and structural properties of both the valve and myocardium and identify cases of significant cardiac TTR amyloid deposition.

03

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Stenosis
  • Transthyretin Amyloidosis

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Positron emission tomography
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

AS group: patients at NHS Lothian referred for aortic valve intervention

Healthy volunteer group: healthy volunteers from South-East Scotland who meet the inclusion criteria

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria (AS group)

  • Severe aortic stenosis
  • Referred for aortic valve intervention (surgical AVR / TAVI)
  • High clinical suspicion of amyloid (e.g. low-flow low-gradient AS, inappropriate LVH)
  • Age >70 years
  • Willing and able to comply with study protocol

Exclusion Criteria (AS group)

  • Inability to give
  • to MRI scanning (e.g. permanent pacemaker)
  • Significant renal impairment ( \<30 ml/min/1.73 m2)
  • Coexistent moderate or severe aortic regurgitation or mitral stenosis
  • Acute valvular heart disease (e.g. acute mitral regurgitation or endocarditis)
  • Acute pulmonary oedema or cardiogenic shock

Inclusion Criteria (Healthy volunteers)

  • No symptoms suggesting current cardiovascular disease
  • Age >70
  • Willing and able to comply with study protocol

Exclusion Criteria (Healthy volunteers)

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Contraindication to MRI scanning (e.g. permanent pacemaker)
  • Significant renal impairment (eGFR \<30 ml/min/1.73 m2)
  • Known significant valvular heart disease (more than mild regurgitant valve lesion or any stenotic lesion)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorized to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
None retained

Groups and cohorts

  • Aortic stenosis group

    Patients with severe aortic stenosis \>70 years of age referred for aortic valve intervention

  • Healthy volunteer group

    Patients with no history of symptoms to suggest current cardiovascular disease \>70 years of age

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PET signal intensity quantified by calculation of standard uptake values

    Time frame: Pre surgery scan

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Edinburgh / NHS Lothian
    Edinburgh, Midlothian EH164SB, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Aug 2018, 9 months.

Of 206 non-industry observational studies under Aortic Valve Stenosis, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 120. This study's 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 243 studies reached it within 44 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 86.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 20, 2017
First posted
Nov 24, 2017
StartActual
Nov 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Aug 23, 2018
CompletionActual
Aug 23, 2018
Last update
Jun 11, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03352089
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 24, 2017
Start date
Nov 1, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 23, 2018
Completion
Aug 23, 2018
Last update
Jun 11, 2024

Study contacts

Russell J Everett, MBBS
principal investigator · University of Edinburgh / NHS Lothian

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion