CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03350087Updated Aug 18, 2020

Efficacy of rTMS and VCT on Upper Limb Function in Patients With Stroke

An interventional study of intermittent theta burst stimulation and continuous theta burst stimulation in Cerebral Vascular Accident, sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-18.

Sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Stroke is the major cause of motor impairment and physical disabilities in the adult population. Spasticity and loss of dexterity are the common problems in stroke. Recently, current interventions, such as cycling training, virtual reality (VR) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), were used for the treatment of upper extremity (UE) dysfunction in patients with stroke. However, few studies investigated the effects of the combinations of different treatment strategies using by integrating brain imaging and motor control studies. This project proposes different novel treatment strategies in the treatment of UE dysfunction in patients with stroke: combined inhibitory/facilitatory rTMS, VR-based cycling training (VCT), and combined rTMS and VCT. We hypothesize that the treatment effect of the combined protocol (optimal rTMS protocol and VCT) is more effective than single treatment due to integration of central and peripheral effects. Different treatment protocols will induce different changes in the brain reorganization and motor control, which further improve motor function, activity, participation, and health related quality of life (HRQOL).

Read the detailed description

This study aims to 1. identify the immediate effects of different treatment protocols in for UE training in these patients through brain image, motor control and clinical measures; 2. to determine the maintaining therapeutic effects; 3. to elucidate the most optimal treatment protocols; 4. to determine the neuro-motor control mechanism underlying clinical improvement; 5. to determine the clinimetric properties of the brain imaging and motor control measure that are responsive and valid for detecting changes after treatment protocol intervention, and 6. to identify clinical predictors influencing the outcome for treatment protocols.

The research will offer valuable motor control biomarkers for outcome prediction and targeting patients who benefit from new protocols. This project is significant for the translational and evidence-based medicine on stroke neurorehabilitation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Vascular Accident

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • stroke
  • optimal treatment protocol
  • VR-based cycling training (VCT)
  • randomized controlled trial
  • motor control
  • clinical predictors
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • first stroke
  • chronic stroke (onset > 3 months)
  • unilateral cerebral lesion with hemiparesis or hemiplegia
  • age of 20-80 years
  • no epileptic spikes on the EEG

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • brain stem or cerebellum stroke
  • epilepsy
  • aneurysm
  • arteriovenous malformation
  • psychiatric disease
  • degenerative disease
  • severe cognitive and communicative impairment or aphasia
  • severe medical disease
  • active medical problems
  • metal implant in the body
  • pregnancy
  • poor cooperation with assessments
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    iTBS group

    In intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS group), they received iTBS (80% of active motor threshold) on affected hemisphere.

    Device: intermittent theta burst stimulation

  • Experimental
    cTBS group

    In continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS group), they received cTBS (80% of active motor threshold) on unaffected hemisphere.

    Device: continuous theta burst stimulation

  • Experimental
    iTBS+cTBS group

    Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS group) at first followed by intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS group).

    Device: iTBS+cTBS group

  • Sham comparator
    sham TBS group

    In sham theta burst stimulation (sham TBS group), they received sham TBS stimulation.

    Device: sham theta burst stimulation

  • Experimental
    VCT group

    VCT group received the VCT training in addition to traditional rehabilitation. Each UE VCT session involved upper limb cycling training followed by UE training in addition to home program. The cycling program consisted of a warm-up exercise, twenty repetitions of hand push-up movements in the sitting position, UE cycling, and a cool-down exercise.

    Device: VCT

  • Experimental
    VCT+optimal rTMS group

    VCT+optimal rTMS group received the VCT training and optimal rTMS in addition to traditional rehabilitation.

    Device: VCT+optimal rTMS group

Interventions

  • Deviceintermittent theta burst stimulation

    In intermittent theta burst stimulation pattern (iTBS) will intermittently give a 2 s train of TBS every 10s repeated 2 times for a total of 40 times (low pulse: 1200 pulses in total) Other Names: intermittent theta burst stimulation

  • Devicecontinuous theta burst stimulation

    In continuous burst stimulation pattern (cTBS) will intermittently give a cTBS treatment consists of a continuous train of TBS for 40 seconds repeated for 2 times(low pulse: 1200 pulses in total). Other Names: continuous burst stimulation

  • DeviceiTBS+cTBS group

    In iTBS+cTBS pattern, continuous cTBS will be followed by intermittent iTBS (low pulse; 1200 pulses in total)

  • Devicesham theta burst stimulation

    In sham burst stimulation pattern (sham TBS) will intermittently give a sham TBS treatment consists of a continuous train of TBS for 40 seconds(almost no pulse: 1200 pulses in total). Other Names: sham theta burst stimulation

  • DeviceVCT

    The UE VCT programs were conducted three times per week, for 12 weeks. Each UE VCT session involved upper limb cycling training followed by UE training in addition to home program. The cycling program consisted of a warm-up exercise, twenty repetitions of hand push-up movements in the sitting position, UE cycling, and a cool-down exercise. The warm-up and cool-down exercises involved stretching and relaxing the head, neck, and the upper and lower body. Other Names: The upper extremity programs virtual cycling training program

  • DeviceVCT+optimal rTMS group

    In VCT+optimal rTMS group, VCT will be combined with optimal rTMS, which has the best outcome in phase 1.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline of mechanical measurement for stroke after 3 weeks treatment and 3 months follow-up

    Kinematic analysis for upper limb

    Time frame: baseline, after 3 weeks of treatment, 3 months

  2. Change from baseline of severity for stroke after 3 weeks treatment and 3 months follow-up

    Brunnstrom stage classification(by severity from stage 1 to stage 6), Modified Ashworth Scale (tension of upper limb from min(0) to max (4)) and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (severity from min(0) to max(4))

    Time frame: baseline, after 3 weeks of treatment, 3 months

  3. Change from baseline of Muscle tone measurement for stroke after 3 weeks treatment and 3 months follow-up

    Muscle tone

    Time frame: baseline, after 3 weeks of treatment, 3 months

  4. Change from baseline of Muscle strength measurement for stroke after 3 weeks treatment and 3 months follow-up

    Muscle strength

    Time frame: baseline, after 3 weeks of treatment, 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline of body composition for stroke in after 3 weeks treatment and 3 months follow-up

    InBodyS10 Body Composition Analyzer

    Time frame: baseline, after 3 weeks of treatment, 3 months

  2. Change from baseline of activity for stroke in after 3 weeks treatment and 3 months follow-up

    Barthel Index

    Time frame: baseline, after 3 weeks of treatment, 3 months

  3. Change from baseline of ABAS for stroke in after 3 weeks treatment and 3 months follow-up

    Adaptive behavior assessment system

    Time frame: baseline, after 3 weeks of treatment, 3 months

  4. Change from baseline of quality of life for stroke in after 3 weeks treatment and 3 months follow-up

    Stroke Impact Scale

    Time frame: baseline, after 3 weeks of treatment, 3 months

  5. Change from baseline of WMFT for stroke in after 3 weeks treatment and 3 months follow-up

    Wolf motor function test

    Time frame: baseline, after 3 weeks of treatment, 3 months

  6. Change from baseline of MAL for stroke in after 3 weeks treatment and 3 months follow-up

    Motor activity log

    Time frame: baseline, after 3 weeks of treatment, 3 months

  7. Change from baseline of TUG for stroke in after 3 weeks treatment and 3 months follow-up

    Timed 'Up \& Go' test

    Time frame: baseline, after 3 weeks of treatment, 3 months

  8. Change from baseline of FIM for stroke in after 3 weeks treatment and 3 months follow-up

    Functional Independence Measure

    Time frame: baseline, after 3 weeks of treatment, 3 months

  9. Change from baseline of participation for stroke in after 3 weeks treatment and 3 months follow-up

    Nottingham Health Profile

    Time frame: baseline, after 3 weeks of treatment, 3 months

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
    Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
    • Chia-Ling Chen, MD, PhD · Contact · clingchen@gmail.com · +886-3-3281200
    • Chia-Ling Chen, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Chen YH, Chen CL, Huang YZ, Chen HC, Chen CY, Wu CY, Lin KC. Augmented efficacy of intermittent theta burst stimulation on the virtual reality-based cycling training for upper limb function in patients with stroke: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 May 31;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00885-5. PubMed 34059090 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03350087
Lead sponsor
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Collaborators
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 22, 2017
Start date
Aug 2016
Primary completion
Feb 11, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 18, 2020

Study contacts

Chia-Ling Chen, MD, PhD
Contact
clingchen@gmail.com
+886-3-3281200 ext. 8148
Chia-Ling Chen, MD, PhD
study director · Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion