CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03348969NICSAUpdated Mar 3, 2026

Neoadjuvant Short-term Intensive Chemoresection Versus Standard Adjuvant Intravesical Instillations in NMIBC

A Phase 4 interventional study of Mitomycin c in Bladder Cancer, sponsored by Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-03.

Sponsored by Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A randomized controlled trial aiming to investigate neoadjuvant, short-term intensive chemoresection with Mitomycin C compared to standard treatment with TURB and adjuvant intravesical instillation therapy in patients with recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

Read the detailed description

Background:

Bladder cancer is the 11th most common cancer in the world and one of the most costly cancers on a per patient basis, due to the cost of operative procedures, follow-up cystoscopies and instillation therapy. Furthermore there is a risk of progression to invasive and hence deadly cancer why efficient and immediate treatment is crucial. Treatment today consists of surgical removal of tumours (TURB) and adjuvant intravesical treatment. There is a chance; neoadjuvant intravesical treatment with chemotherapy can supersede surgical removal in chemo-sensitive tumours while however some tumours will not respond to intravesical chemotherapy. Currently it is not possible to predict which tumours are chemo-sensitive and which are not.

Objectives:

To assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant, short-term intensive chemoresection with Mitomycin C compared to standard treatment with TURB and adjuvant intravesical instillation therapy in patients with recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

To investigate the ability to predict chemo-response in patients with recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

Methods:

A randomised clinical controlled trial will include 120 patients with recurrent NMIBC.

The control group of 60 patients will receive standard care with TURB and adjuvant intravesical treatment. The intervention group of 60 patients will be submitted to neoadjuvant short-term intensive chemoresection with three instillations with Mitomycin C per week for two weeks. Remnant tumour tissue will be evaluated by flexible cystoscopy after four weeks.

To investigate the ability to predict chemo-response in patients with recurrent NMIBC, a connection between biomarkers of the initial tumour tissue and tumour response will be assessed.

Samples of the latest resected tumour prior to inclusion will be collected from all participants treated with neoadjuvant chemoresection and assessed against the tumour response seen in the trial.

Perspectives:

Validation of biomarkers to predict chemo-response will be an important step to integrate biomarkers in daily clinical practice and to individualize the treatment of NMIBC.

In some cases surgery could be avoided while ineffective chemotherapy could be avoided in others.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bladder Cancer

Keywords

  • Mitomycin C
  • Neoadjuvant
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Known history of urothelial non-invasive Ta-tumour low-grade or high-grade.
  • ≥18 years old
  • Mentally healthy individual
  • The ability to understand Danish orally and in writing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known history of invasive tumour of the bladder (T1+)
  • Known history of CIS of the bladder
  • Previous BCG-treatment within the last 24 months
  • Previous Mitomycin C-treatment (except single-shot postoperative instillation)
  • Known allergy or intolerance to Mitomycin C
  • Solid tumour with suspicions of invasion
  • Single tumour of more than 2 cm in diameter
  • Suspicion of CIS (positive cytology with high-grade neoplastic cells combined with suspicious cystoscopy for flat lesions).
  • Small bladder volume (less than 100 ml) or incontinence
  • Acute cystitis
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Not willing to use secure contraception with regard to men with partners and premenopausal women
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Neoadjuvant Mitomycin C

    Drug: Mitomycin c

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Adjuvant Mitomycin C

    Drug: Mitomycin c

Interventions

  • DrugMitomycin c

    Neoadjuvant Mitomycin C

    Also known as: Mitomycin "Medac"

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 2-year recurrence rate

    The primary outcome is the number of patients in need for a TURB or tumour fulguration in the first 2 years following randomization. TURBs included as primary endpoint are the initial TURB in the control group, the prospective TURB in the intervention group for patients without complete chemoresection as well as TURB due to recurrence in both study groups. In case a TURB is recommended, but a subject refuses to undergo surgery, the recommended TURB is also registered.

    Time frame: within 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tumour response rate

    Number of patients with complete, partial and incomplete tumour response on neoadjuvant, short-term intensive chemoresection with Mitomycin C.

    Time frame: 6 months after complete enrollment

  2. 5-year recurrence rate

    The number of patients in need of a TURB or tumour fulguration in the outpatient clinic in the first 5 years following randomization. TURBs included are the initial TURB in the control group, the prospective TURB in the intervention group for patients without complete chemoresection as well as TURB due to recurrence in both study groups. In case a TURB is recommended, but a subject refuses to undergo surgery, the recommended TURB is also registered.

    Time frame: within 5 years

  3. Adverse events

    Proportion of patients with adverse events related to neoadjuvant, short-term intensive chemoresection

    Time frame: 6 months after complete enrollment

  4. Biomarkers

    Composition of 650 cancer-associated genes expressed on the last resected tumour

    Time frame: within 2 years

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Aarhus University Hospital
    Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Herr H. Re: Marko Babjuk, Andreas Bohle, Maximilian Burger, et al. EAU Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016. Eur Urol 2017;71:447-61. Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):e171-e172. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.030. Epub 2016 Dec 12. No abstract available. PubMed 27979427 ↗
  • Maffezzini M. Re: Richard J. Sylvester, Adrian P.M. van der Meijden, Willem Oosterlinck, J. Alfred Witjes, Christian Bouffioux, Louis Denis and Donald W.W. Newling. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 2006;49:466-77. Eur Urol. 2006 Sep;50(3):623-4; author reply 624-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.005. Epub 2006 May 4. No abstract available. PubMed 16707208 ↗
  • Kaasinen E, Wijkstrom H, Rintala E, Mestad O, Jahnson S, Malmstrom PU. Seventeen-year follow-up of the prospective randomized Nordic CIS study: BCG monotherapy versus alternating therapy with mitomycin C and BCG in patients with carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder. Scand J Urol. 2016 Oct;50(5):360-8. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1210672. Epub 2016 Aug 15. PubMed 27603424 ↗
  • Lamm DL. Preventing progression and improving survival with BCG maintenance. Eur Urol. 2000;37 Suppl 1:9-15. doi: 10.1159/000052376. PubMed 10575266 ↗
  • Shelley MD, Wilt TJ, Court J, Coles B, Kynaston H, Mason MD. Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin is superior to mitomycin C in reducing tumour recurrence in high-risk superficial bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. BJU Int. 2004 Mar;93(4):485-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04655.x. PubMed 15008714 ↗
  • Shida K, Shimasaki J, Takahashi H, Kurihara H, Sato J. [Therapy and prognosis of bladder tumors--result of injection of mitomycin C into the bladder]. Gan No Rinsho. 1970 Jul;16(7):737-44. No abstract available. Japanese. PubMed 5465489 ↗
  • Colombo R, Rocchini L, Suardi N, Benigni F, Colciago G, Bettiga A, Pellucchi F, Maccagnano C, Briganti A, Salonia A, Rigatti P, Montorsi F. Neoadjuvant short-term intensive intravesical mitomycin C regimen compared with weekly schedule for low-grade recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: preliminary results of a randomised phase 2 study. Eur Urol. 2012 Nov;62(5):797-802. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.032. Epub 2012 May 18. PubMed 22633362 ↗
  • Sousa A, Inman BA, Pineiro I, Monserrat V, Perez A, Aparici V, Gomez I, Neira P, Uribarri C. A clinical trial of neoadjuvant hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) for treating intermediate and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Int J Hyperthermia. 2014 May;30(3):166-70. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2014.900194. Epub 2014 Apr 3. PubMed 24697672 ↗
  • Miyata Y, Sakai H. Predictive Markers for the Recurrence of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated with Intravesical Therapy. Dis Markers. 2015;2015:857416. doi: 10.1155/2015/857416. Epub 2015 Nov 23. PubMed 26681820 ↗
  • Seo HK, Cho KS, Chung J, Joung JY, Park WS, Chung MK, Lee KH. Prognostic value of p53 and Ki-67 expression in intermediate-risk patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer receiving adjuvant intravesical mitomycin C therapy. Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2):512.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.040. Epub 2010 Jun 26. PubMed 20579709 ↗
  • Chen JX, Deng N, Chen X, Chen LW, Qiu SP, Li XF, Li JP. A novel molecular grading model: combination of Ki67 and VEGF in predicting tumor recurrence and progression in non-invasive urothelial bladder cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(5):2229-34. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.5.2229. PubMed 22901199 ↗
  • Karam JA, Lotan Y, Ashfaq R, Sagalowsky AI, Shariat SF. Survivin expression in patients with non-muscle-invasive urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. Urology. 2007 Sep;70(3):482-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.05.009. PubMed 17905101 ↗
  • Bracci L, Schiavoni G, Sistigu A, Belardelli F. Immune-based mechanisms of cytotoxic chemotherapy: implications for the design of novel and rationale-based combined treatments against cancer. Cell Death Differ. 2014 Jan;21(1):15-25. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2013.67. Epub 2013 Jun 21. PubMed 23787994 ↗
  • Hugo W, Zaretsky JM, Sun L, Song C, Moreno BH, Hu-Lieskovan S, Berent-Maoz B, Pang J, Chmielowski B, Cherry G, Seja E, Lomeli S, Kong X, Kelley MC, Sosman JA, Johnson DB, Ribas A, Lo RS. Genomic and Transcriptomic Features of Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma. Cell. 2017 Jan 26;168(3):542. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.010. No abstract available. PubMed 28129544 ↗
  • Lindgren MS, Hansen E, Azawi N, Nielsen AM, Dyrskjot L, Jensen JB. DaBlaCa-13 Study: Oncological Outcome of Short-Term, Intensive Chemoresection With Mitomycin in Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Primary Outcome of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 10;41(2):206-211. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00470. Epub 2022 Oct 12. PubMed 36223555 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03348969
Lead sponsor
Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
Responsible party
Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen (Professor, MD, Aarhus University Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 21, 2017
Start date
Nov 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 11, 2019
Completion
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Mar 3, 2026

Study contacts

Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen, MD
principal investigator · Aarhus University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion