ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05223491Updated Jan 16, 2026

En Bloc Transurethral Resection of Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

An interventional study of En Bloc resection and Conventional TURB in Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer, sponsored by Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen. Completed at 11 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-16.

Sponsored by Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
220
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim: To compare the surgical method of En Bloc resection to the conventional transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in terms of complete removal of tumour, specimen quality, and pathological certainty.

Background: NMIBC is a common disease with a 5-year recurrence rate reported as high as 64%. The cornerstone in the treatment of NMIBC is transurethral resection (TURB) where the tumour is dissected in pieces, removed from the bladder, and pathologically examined for potential muscle invasion. As the tumour is fragmented before removal, the method violates basic oncological principles and compromises pathological examination. Hence, TURB is possibly part of the mechanism causing recurrences. En Bloc resection (EBR), where the tumour is removed in toto, can potentially overcome the flaws of conventional TURB, but large randomized trials are needed.

Methods: This project will be a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial comparing EBR to conventional TURB. Patients with suspected NMIBC tumours with largest tumour diameter ≥1cm and ≤6cm will be randomised to either the intervention group, thus undergoing EBR, or the control group, undergoing conventional TURB. The investigators intend to include 220 patients in total, 110 patients in each group. The RCT will be initiated in 2022.

Perspectives: If EBR can be shown to remove bladder tumours with better pathological quality and certainty, this could potentially spare patients from undergoing surgeries in the future, thereby reducing costs for both patients and society.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Keywords

  • en bloc
  • TURB
03

In context

Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms

294 studies on the registry are indexed under Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms; 126 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 220 is above the median of 62 across 231 interventional studies indexed under Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms.

Browse Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Demographics: all , smokers and non-smokers
  • Primary, papillary, non-solid bladder tumour visualised by flexible cystoscopy
  • Tumour diameter measured on CT-scan ≥2cm ≤6cm at largest diameter
  • Ability to fully comprehend the information provided and comply with protocol
  • Signed consent form
  • Patients with multiple tumours can be included if it seems feasible to resect them in one procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically suspected muscle invasive bladder cancer (invasion in to bladder muscle or extravesical extension visible on CT or solid tumour without papillary elements seen at cystoscopy)
  • Tumour located in a bladder diverticulum
  • Investigating physician concludes that en bloc resection is not technically possible
  • Pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
220 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    En Bloc

    The bladder tumour will be resected en bloc and removed in total, if possible.

    Procedure: En Bloc resection

  • Active comparator
    Conventional TURB

    The bladder tumour will be removed by conventional piecemeal resection.

    Procedure: Conventional TURB

Interventions

  • ProcedureEn Bloc resection

    Tumour is resected and removed from the bladder in one piece, if possible.

  • ProcedureConventional TURB

    Tumour is resected piecemeal.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Unaltered pathological T-stage

    Proportion of patients with unaltered pathological T-stage following central pathology revision, reTURB, or cystectomy compared to initial T-stage description from TURB.

    Time frame: 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Detrusor muscle in specimen

    Prevalence of detrusor muscle in specimen by pathological examination

    Time frame: Within one week from surgery

  2. Recurrence free survival

    Proportion of patients with recurrences at 4 months follow-up cystoscopy

    Time frame: 4 months

07

Study locations

11 sites
  • Department of Urology, Aalborg University Hospital
    Aalborg, 9100, Denmark
  • Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital
    Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
  • Department of Urology, Herlev Hospital
    Herlev, Denmark
  • Department of Urology, Regional Hospital Gødstrup
    Holstebro, 7500, Denmark
  • Department of Urology, Odense University Hospital
    Odense, 5000, Denmark
  • Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital
    Roskilde, 4000, Denmark
  • Dept. of Urology, Hospital Lilelbælt, Vejle
    Vejle, 7100, Denmark
  • Dept. of Urology, North Estonia Medical Centre
    Tallinn, 13419, Estonia
  • Dept. of Urology, Turku University Hospital
    Turku, 20521, Finland
  • Urological Center, Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital
    Riga, LV-1002, Latvia
  • Department of Urology, Vestfold Hospital
    Tønsberg, 3103, Norway
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2022 to primary completion in Dec 2025, 45 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 7, 2022
First posted
Feb 4, 2022
StartActual
Mar 17, 2022
Primary completionActual
Dec 19, 2025
CompletionActual
Dec 19, 2025
Last update
Jan 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05223491
Lead sponsor
Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
Collaborators
University of Aarhus, Novo Nordisk Foundation
Responsible party
Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen (Professor, DMSc, Aarhus University Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 4, 2022
Start date
Mar 17, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 19, 2025
Completion
Dec 19, 2025
Last update
Jan 16, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion