ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03345537MOGUpdated Aug 25, 2022

Initial Clinical Presentation of Inflammatory Optic Neuritis Associated or Not With Autoantibodies Anti-Myelin-oligodendrocyte-glycoprotein

An observational study in Optic Neuritis, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Completed at 8 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-25.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
103
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In eight ophthalmic units, the investigator will include all inflammatory optic neuritis (ON) during acute phase and rank them in two groups: 1/ ON with autoantibodies anti-myelin-oligodendrocyte-glycoprotein (ON MOG+) 2/ ON MOG-. The investigators will measure incidence of MOG-Ab in our prospective population of inflammatory ON. Then the investigator will compare clinical and radiological presentation of ON MOG+ versus ON MOG-.

Read the detailed description

Optic neuritis (ON) have a broad clinical spectrum ranging from a single episode (clinically isolated ON) to demyelinating diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS), Chronic Relapsing Inflammatory Optic Neuritis (CRION), acute demyelination encephalomyelitis (ADEM), neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) is a myelin antigen exclusively expressed on the surface of oligodendrocytes and myelin in the central nervous system (CNS). MOG-Ab are associated with demyelinating diseases with a good specificity. Using cell-based assays, MOG-Ab were rarely found in healthy control and other neurological inflammatory disease. They were mostly identified in subgroups of NMO/NMOSD seronegative to auto antibodies against Aquaporin 4 (anti-AQP4): 8-39%, but also in MS (0-28%) ADEM and idiopathic ON. ON MOG + have a specific clinical presentation compare with ON associated with multiple sclerosis (SEP): older patient, less female preponderance, more often bilateral, more often optic disc swelling, worse initial visual loss, much more often recurrent with severe sequelae. ON MOG+ are more similar to ON associated with NMOSD AQP4+ which have some particularities: similar age, clear female preponderance, less optic disc swelling, more severe initial visual loss and visual sequelae. No prospective study has measured incidence of

MOG-Ab in population of Inflammatory ON. And no prospective study has ever compared ON MOG+ with all others inflammatory ON. The purpose of our study is to measure incidence of MOG-Ab in population of acute inflammatory ON. All consenting adults with suspicion of ON followed in the 8 ophthalmic units who participate will be screened. They will have, as usual, clinical follow-up, blood test with MOG-Ab research, encephalic and optic nerves MRI, and steroid treatment if necessary. At the end of the acute phase, all patients diagnosed with inflammatory ON will be included and rank in 2 groups: 1/ ON with MOG-Ab (ON MOG+) 2/ ON without MOG-Ab (ON MOG-). Clinical data will be register at this inclusion visit. There will be no additional visit and no intervention. After measuring incidence of MOG-Ab, the investigator will compare clinical and radiological data of ON MOG+ and ON MOG-.

02

Conditions studied

  • Optic Neuritis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Inflammatory
  • Optic neuritis
  • autoantibodies anti MOG
03

In context

Optic Neuritis

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Optic Neuritis; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 103 is below the median of 150 across 25 observational studies indexed under Optic Neuritis.

Browse Optic Neuritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 839 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Phe patients included will be mostly young adults between 18 and 40 years old, consultant in the ophthalmology department of the University Hospital of Nantes for an inflammatory optic neuropathy

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • legally adult patient
  • acute inflammatory optic neuritis
  • consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient under tutorship
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
103 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Interventions

  • OtherNon interventional study

    Non interventional study - only data collected and one blood sample additional

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of anti-Myelin-oligodendrocyte-glycoprotein (MOG-ab)

    Time frame: the day of inclusion

07

Study locations

8 sites
  • Chu Angers
    Angers, France
  • Ch Challans
    Challans, France
  • Ch Cholet
    Cholet, France
  • Chd La Roche Sur Yon
    La Roche-sur-Yon, France
  • Ch Laval
    Laval, France
  • Chr Le Mans
    Le Mans, France
  • CHU Nantes
    Nantes, France
  • Ch Saint Nazaire
    Saint-Nazaire, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ramanathan S, Dale RC, Brilot F. Anti-MOG antibody: The history, clinical phenotype, and pathogenicity of a serum biomarker for demyelination. Autoimmun Rev. 2016 Apr;15(4):307-24. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.12.004. Epub 2015 Dec 17. PubMed 26708342 ↗
  • Akaishi T, Nakashima I, Takeshita T, Kaneko K, Mugikura S, Sato DK, Takahashi T, Nakazawa T, Aoki M, Fujihara K. Different etiologies and prognoses of optic neuritis in demyelinating diseases. J Neuroimmunol. 2016 Oct 15;299:152-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Sep 14. PubMed 27725114 ↗
  • Ramanathan S, Reddel SW, Henderson A, Parratt JD, Barnett M, Gatt PN, Merheb V, Kumaran RY, Pathmanandavel K, Sinmaz N, Ghadiri M, Yiannikas C, Vucic S, Stewart G, Bleasel AF, Booth D, Fung VS, Dale RC, Brilot F. Antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein in bilateral and recurrent optic neuritis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2014 Oct 29;1(4):e40. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000040. eCollection 2014 Dec. PubMed 25364774 ↗
  • Havla J, Kumpfel T, Schinner R, Spadaro M, Schuh E, Meinl E, Hohlfeld R, Outteryck O. Myelin-oligodendrocyte-glycoprotein (MOG) autoantibodies as potential markers of severe optic neuritis and subclinical retinal axonal degeneration. J Neurol. 2017 Jan;264(1):139-151. doi: 10.1007/s00415-016-8333-7. Epub 2016 Nov 14. PubMed 27844165 ↗
  • Sato DK, Callegaro D, Lana-Peixoto MA, Waters PJ, de Haidar Jorge FM, Takahashi T, Nakashima I, Apostolos-Pereira SL, Talim N, Simm RF, Lino AM, Misu T, Leite MI, Aoki M, Fujihara K. Distinction between MOG antibody-positive and AQP4 antibody-positive NMO spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2014 Feb 11;82(6):474-81. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000101. Epub 2014 Jan 10. PubMed 24415568 ↗
  • Jarius S, Ruprecht K, Kleiter I, Borisow N, Asgari N, Pitarokoili K, Pache F, Stich O, Beume LA, Hummert MW, Ringelstein M, Trebst C, Winkelmann A, Schwarz A, Buttmann M, Zimmermann H, Kuchling J, Franciotta D, Capobianco M, Siebert E, Lukas C, Korporal-Kuhnke M, Haas J, Fechner K, Brandt AU, Schanda K, Aktas O, Paul F, Reindl M, Wildemann B; in cooperation with the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). MOG-IgG in NMO and related disorders: a multicenter study of 50 patients. Part 2: Epidemiology, clinical presentation, radiological and laboratory features, treatment responses, and long-term outcome. J Neuroinflammation. 2016 Sep 27;13(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0718-0. PubMed 27793206 ↗
  • Hoftberger R, Sepulveda M, Armangue T, Blanco Y, Rostasy K, Calvo AC, Olascoaga J, Ramio-Torrenta L, Reindl M, Benito-Leon J, Casanova B, Arrambide G, Sabater L, Graus F, Dalmau J, Saiz A. Antibodies to MOG and AQP4 in adults with neuromyelitis optica and suspected limited forms of the disease. Mult Scler. 2015 Jun;21(7):866-874. doi: 10.1177/1352458514555785. Epub 2014 Oct 24. PubMed 25344373 ↗
  • The clinical profile of optic neuritis. Experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Optic Neuritis Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991 Dec;109(12):1673-8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080120057025. PubMed 1841573 ↗
  • Stiebel-Kalish H, Lotan I, Brody J, Chodick G, Bialer O, Marignier R, Bach M, Hellmann MA. Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer May Be Better Preserved in MOG-IgG versus AQP4-IgG Optic Neuritis: A Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):e0170847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170847. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28125740 ↗
  • Beck RW, Cleary PA, Anderson MM Jr, Keltner JL, Shults WT, Kaufman DI, Buckley EG, Corbett JJ, Kupersmith MJ, Miller NR, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute optic neuritis. The Optic Neuritis Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1992 Feb 27;326(9):581-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199202273260901. PubMed 1734247 ↗
  • Elsone L, Panicker J, Mutch K, Boggild M, Appleton R, Jacob A. Role of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of acute relapses of neuromyelitis optica: experience in 10 patients. Mult Scler. 2014 Apr;20(4):501-4. doi: 10.1177/1352458513495938. Epub 2013 Aug 28. PubMed 23986097 ↗
  • Optic Neuritis Study Group. Visual function 15 years after optic neuritis: a final follow-up report from the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Ophthalmology. 2008 Jun;115(6):1079-1082.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Nov 5. PubMed 17976727 ↗
  • Garcia-Martin E, Ara JR, Martin J, Almarcegui C, Dolz I, Vilades E, Gil-Arribas L, Fernandez FJ, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pablo LE, Satue M. Retinal and Optic Nerve Degeneration in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Followed up for 5 Years. Ophthalmology. 2017 May;124(5):688-696. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Feb 7. PubMed 28187977 ↗
  • Beck RW, Gal RL, Bhatti MT, Brodsky MC, Buckley EG, Chrousos GA, Corbett J, Eggenberger E, Goodwin JA, Katz B, Kaufman DI, Keltner JL, Kupersmith MJ, Miller NR, Moke PS, Nazarian S, Orengo-Nania S, Savino PJ, Shults WT, Smith CH, Trobe JD, Wall M, Xing D; Optic Neuritis Study Group. Visual function more than 10 years after optic neuritis: experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan;137(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00862-6. Erratum In: Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;137(4):following 793. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Aug;138(2):following 321. PubMed 14700647 ↗
  • Pache F, Zimmermann H, Mikolajczak J, Schumacher S, Lacheta A, Oertel FC, Bellmann-Strobl J, Jarius S, Wildemann B, Reindl M, Waldman A, Soelberg K, Asgari N, Ringelstein M, Aktas O, Gross N, Buttmann M, Ach T, Ruprecht K, Paul F, Brandt AU; in cooperation with the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). MOG-IgG in NMO and related disorders: a multicenter study of 50 patients. Part 4: Afferent visual system damage after optic neuritis in MOG-IgG-seropositive versus AQP4-IgG-seropositive patients. J Neuroinflammation. 2016 Nov 1;13(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0720-6. PubMed 27802824 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Mar 2022, 49 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 14, 2017
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
StartActual
Feb 12, 2018
Primary completionActual
Mar 31, 2022
CompletionActual
Mar 31, 2022
Last update
Aug 25, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03345537
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
Start date
Feb 12, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2022
Completion
Mar 31, 2022
Last update
Aug 25, 2022

Study contacts

Pierre Lebranchu, Dr
principal investigator · Nantes University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion