ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03342716RESORPUpdated Mar 28, 2022

Resolution of Organ Injury in Acute Pancreatitis - RESORP

An observational study in Pancreatitis, Acute, sponsored by University of Edinburgh. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-28.

Sponsored by University of Edinburgh · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
229
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is inflammation of the pancreas usually triggered by gallstones or drinking excessive alcohol. 80% of people who have an episode of AP will recover without complications. However, 20% will require treatment in high dependency or intensive care for multiple organ dysfunction (AP-MODS). It is known that this negatively affects recovery and can have a lasting effect on health although it is incompletely understood what causes this.

Aim: To recruit 500 patients with acute pancreatitis. Participants will be assessed at recruitment and and again at 3 and 36 months. Recovery of organ function will be serially measured and the presence of novel factors important in recovery assessed.

Read the detailed description

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common and devastating disease with an annual incidence of 22-30 per 100,000 in the UK. The incidence is increasing. AP is most commonly triggered by gallstones or alcohol excess and has a range of outcomes, from complete resolution to death, with an overall mortality in Scotland of 5.2%. AP is characterised by acute inflammation of the pancreas, which initiates a cascade of inflammatory events throughout the body that can lead to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in approximately 25% of AP patients. Mortality in AP is greatest in those patients who develop MODS, with death rates reported to be up to 28%.

The development of persistent organ failure characterises severe AP (SAP) as defined in the revised Atlanta classification, and is strongly predictive of a fatal outcome. A significant proportion of research has focussed on reducing mortality and morbidity in the first week. As a consequence, it remains to be seen whether the patterns of early organ dysfunction are reflected in the causes of long-term mortality and morbidity.

Recently published data from a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh with acute pancreatitis has shown that the early development of MODS is associated with an increased mortality rate up to 10 years after the index presentation. This strongly suggests that MODS in acute pancreatitis (AP-MODS) has a persistent and deleterious impact on patients' physiological status, though the exact nature of this pathology remains to be characterised. Recent data has indicated that the severity of the first attack of AP significantly influences the risk of progression to chronic pancreatitis, and therefore subsequent long-term morbidity.

This observational clinical cohort study aims to characterise the nature and extent of the pathophysiological impact of SAP on organ function over the first 3 years following the index event and the long-term deleterious effect of SAP. This will be achieved by prospectively evaluating the pathophysiological consequences of an episode of AP by measuring organ system function in patients recruited during a hospital admission with AP. We will obtain an in-depth assessment of patients' health at presentation, and at 3 months and 36 months after the first episode of AP using markers of organ function and/or disease in the peripheral blood. In a nested cohort within the main study cohort, we will conduct cardiorespiratory evaluation tests (including exercise testing), specialised blood tests of the immune system, tests for precision medicine, and imaging to assess structure and function of key organ systems.

The results of this study will inform the design of future interventions designed to improve the long-term prognosis of patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatitis, Acute

Keywords

  • Pancreatitis
  • Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome
03

In context

Pancreatitis

557 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatitis; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 229 is above the median of 200 across 192 observational studies indexed under Pancreatitis.

Browse Pancreatitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Edinburgh is the lead sponsor of 403 studies on the registry; 64 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients treated at the Royal Infirmary Edinburgh with a clinical or radiological diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

All patients treated at Royal Infirmary Edinburgh with a clinical or radiological diagnosis of acute pancreatitis will be recruited where possible.

For the potential clinical diagnosis of acute pancreatitis an appropriate clinical history based on compatible clinical features, will be required (i.e. abdominal pain, nausea and/or vomiting), supported by the finding of elevated serum amylase greater than 3x the upper limit of the reference range for the laboratory (currently 300 U/L).

For the radiological diagnosis, if applicable, computerised tomography (CT) and/or ultrasound scan (USS) evidence of acute pancreatitis will be accepted.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

The following exclusion criteria will be adhered to:

i. Patients under the age of 16 years will be excluded from the present study. ii. Prisoners will be excluded from the present study. iii. Patients lacking the capacity to consent will be excluded but can be included if they regain capacity.

Additional exclusions will apply only to those patients being considered for the nested cohort study:

iv. Patients not able to undergo MRI scanning for technical reasons will be excluded (e.g. those with cochlear implants, implanted pacemaker) v. Patients with a known allergy to salbutamol

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
229 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Main cohort

    Patients with a clinical or radiological diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (AP)

  • Nested cohort

    Subgroup of patients with a clinical or radiological diagnosis of acute pancreatitis (AP) who will undergo additional assessments and scans

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Annual incidence of new-onset type 3c diabetes mellitis in patients with AP

    Do patients that have had AP develop type 3c diabetes mellitis more frequently?

    Time frame: 66 months

  2. Nested cohort only - difference in the 3 month to 36 month change in pancreatic fibrosis index between participants with AP with MODS and those with AP without MODS

    Assess any damage to pancreas at 3 and 36 months and monitor how this changes throughout the course of the trial comparing participants with AP only and those with AP and MODS

    Time frame: 66 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Specific gene and promoter sequence variation between participants with AP and AP-MODS

    Define any gene and promoter sequence variation between participants with AP and AP-MODS; machine learning approach

    Time frame: 66 months

  2. miRNA signatures of disease severity and resolution

    Comparing patterns of gene expression in mild/moderate/severe cases of AP; machine learning approach

    Time frame: 66 months

  3. Metabolomic profiling of AP resolution.

    Comparing patterns of metabolite expression in mild/moderate/severe cases of AP; machine learning approach

    Time frame: 66 months

  4. Incidence of premature cellular senescence as a pathological consequence of AP-MODS.

    Investigating pathological consequences of AP-MODS compared to AP without MODS

    Time frame: 66 months

  5. Alteration in immune cell subset phenotype as a long-term response to AP-MODS

    Investigating changes to the phenotype of immune cell subsets following an episode of AP; descriptive statistics

    Time frame: 66 months

  6. Cardiorespiratory dysfunction as a legacy of endothelial injury during AP-MODS

    Determination of cardiorespiratory function following AP using physiological measures including cardiopulmonary exercise testing to determine anaerobic threshold. Descriptive measures.

    Time frame: 66 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
    Edinburgh, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sherif AE, McFadyen R, Boyd J, Ventre C, Glenwright M, Walker K, Zheng X, White A, McFadyen L, Connon E, Damaskos D, Steven M, Wackett A, Thomson E, Cameron DC, MacLeod J, Baxter S, Semple S, Morris D, Clark-Stewart S, Graham C, Mole DJ; RESORP research team. Study protocol for resolution of organ injury in acute pancreatitis (RESORP): an observational prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 7;10(12):e040200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040200. PubMed 33293311 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Jan 2022, 50 months.

Of 82 non-industry observational studies under Pancreatitis, half reached primary completion within 50 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 133. This study's 50 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 86 studies reached it within 50 months; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 133.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 29, 2017
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
StartActual
Nov 27, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jan 31, 2022
CompletionActual
Feb 16, 2022
Last update
Mar 28, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 28, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03342716
Collaborators
Medical Research Council
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
Start date
Nov 27, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2022
Completion
Feb 16, 2022
Last update
Mar 28, 2022

Study contacts

Damian J Mole, MB ChB
study director · University of Edinburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion