ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03341234Updated Nov 14, 2017

Superficial Serratus Plane Block for Modified Radical Mastectomy and Axillary Lymph Node Disection

An interventional study of Bupivacaine and Saline in Postoperative Analgesia, Pain, Postoperative and Opioid Consumption, sponsored by Ataturk University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-14.

Sponsored by Ataturk University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2016, registered Nov 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women. Mastectomy and axillary lymph node disection are commonly performed as part of the cancer management. This surgery can cause significant postoperative pain. The serratus plane block (SPB) has been described for analgesia of the hemithorax and reported for many cases such as thoracoscopy, shoulder arthroscopy, breast surgery and axillary lymph node dissections. Serratus plane block may be a viable alternative to current regional anaesthetic techniques such as thoracic paravertebral and central neuraxial blockade.

The aim of this study is to determine effectiveness of ultrasound guided superficial serratus plane block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Analgesia
  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Opioid Consumption

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Superficial Serratus Plane Block
  • Modified Radical Mastectomy
  • Axillary Lymph Node Disection
  • bupivacaine
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 48 is below the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Ataturk University is the lead sponsor of 458 studies on the registry; 124 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 's physiologic state I-III patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy and Axillary Lymph Node Disection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • chronic pain, bleeding disorders, renal or hepatic insufficiency,patients on chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group SPB

    Ultrasound guided serratus plane block with 30 ml %0,25 bupivacaine

    Drug: Bupivacaine · Device: Ultrasound

  • Active comparator
    Group Control

    Ultrasound guided sham block with 2 ml saline subcutaneously

    Drug: Saline · Device: Ultrasound

Interventions

  • 30 ml %0,25 bupivacaine

  • DrugSaline

    2 ml saline subcutaneously

  • DeviceUltrasound

    Ultrasound guided block

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Opioid Consumption

    First 24 hours total fentanyl consumption with patient controlled analgesia

    Time frame: First 24 hours total opioid consumption

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual analog pain score

    Post operative pain will be evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 0-10 (0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain) at first hour postoperatively.

    Time frame: postoperative first hour

  2. Visual analog pain score

    Post operative pain will be evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 0-10 (0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain) at second hour postoperatively.

    Time frame: postoperative second hour

  3. Visual analog pain score

    Post operative pain will be evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 0-10 (0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain) at 4th hour postoperatively.

    Time frame: postoperative 4th hour

  4. Visual analog pain score

    Post operative pain will be evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 0-10 (0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain) at 8th hour postoperatively.

    Time frame: postoperative 8th hour

  5. Visual analog pain score

    Post operative pain will be evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 0-10 (0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain) at 12th hour postoperatively.

    Time frame: postoperative 12th hour

  6. Visual analog pain score

    Post operative pain will be evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 0-10 (0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain) at 24th hour postoperatively.

    Time frame: postoperative 24th hour

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Regional Training and Research Hospital
    Erzurum, 25070, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Blanco R, Parras T, McDonnell JG, Prats-Galino A. Serratus plane block: a novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block. Anaesthesia. 2013 Nov;68(11):1107-13. doi: 10.1111/anae.12344. Epub 2013 Aug 7. PubMed 23923989 ↗
  • Ahiskalioglu A, Alici HA, Yayik AM, Celik M, Oral Ahiskalioglu E. Ultrasound guided serratus plane block for management of acute thoracic herpes zoster. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017 Oct;36(5):323-324. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 21. No abstract available. PubMed 28336228 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2016 to primary completion in Mar 2017, 4 months.

Of 2,089 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23. This study's 4 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,102 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 9, 2017
First posted
Nov 14, 2017
StartActual
Nov 1, 2016
Primary completionActual
Mar 1, 2017
CompletionActual
Aug 1, 2017
Last update
Nov 14, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 14, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03341234
Lead sponsor
Ataturk University
Responsible party
Ahmet Murat Yayik (Principal Investigator, Ataturk University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 14, 2017
Start date
Nov 1, 2016
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2017
Completion
Aug 1, 2017
Last update
Nov 14, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Bupivacaine

Start the discussion