ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03339336Updated May 5, 2021

Efficacy and Safety Study of BIIB074 in Participants With Small Fiber Neuropathy

A Phase 2 interventional study of BIIB074 and Placebo in Small Fiber Neuropathy and Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Biogen. Terminated at 97 sites in 14 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-05.

Sponsored by Biogen · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Sponsor decision to close study early; not due to safety concerns
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
265
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of BIIB074 in treating pain experienced by participants with confirmed small fiber neuropathy (SFN) that is idiopathic or associated with diabetes mellitus. A secondary endpoint that relates to the primary objective is the change from Randomization to Week 12 of the double-blind period in mean average daily pain score.

The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate the effect on worst pain, neuropathic pain quality, sleep interference due to pain, patient global impression, use of rescue medication, and SFN symptoms in participants treated with BIIB074; to investigate the safety and tolerability of BIIB074 in participants with SFN; and to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of BIIB074 in participants with SFN.

02

Conditions studied

  • Small Fiber Neuropathy
  • Diabetes Mellitus
03

In context

Small Fiber Neuropathy

50 studies on the registry are indexed under Small Fiber Neuropathy; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 265 is above the median of 31 across 31 interventional studies indexed under Small Fiber Neuropathy.

Browse Small Fiber Neuropathy studies →

Lead sponsor

Biogen is the lead sponsor of 511 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Of its 100 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 50 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. This study will be conducted in subjects who have had a diagnosis of at least probable SFN, length-dependent distribution, for 6 months and ≤10 years prior to screening, defined as a history of the symptoms and clinical signs based on discussions at the ACTTION CONCEPPT meeting on diagnosis of SFN, Washington, DC March 2018, and confirmed by intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) values, and weekly mean average daily pain (ADP) score of ≥5 and ≤9 on an 11-point Pain Intensity Numeric Rating Scale (PI-NRS) over the last 7 days of prior to the Screening visit.
  2. In addition to these criteria, subjects with diabetes will be required to have ≤11%, treated with oral hypoglycemics and/or subcutaneous insulin or diet, no evidence of ulcers, advanced retinopathy (defined as greater than State 3 [moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy]) (DCCT/EDIC Research Group 2017), severe nephropathy, or obstructive atherosclerotic disease or current class IV heart failure to be eligible for the study.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous exposure to BIIB074 (formerly known as CNV1014802 or GSK1014802).
  2. Use of capsaicin patch within 3 months prior to Screening.
  3. Unable or unwilling to discontinue concomitant medications for SFN pain prior to Day 1.
  4. Unable or unwilling to comply with the prohibited concomitant medication restrictions, including but not limited to UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) inducers and inhibitors, monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), and Nav blockers.
  5. Use of over-the-counter medications, vitamin and mineral supplements, herbal remedies (including St. John's wort), dietary supplements, or foods (including grapefruit juice) that affect and UGTs.
  6. Unable or unwilling to discontinue medications that are P-glycoprotein substrates with a narrow therapeutic index, including but not limited to digoxin.
  7. History of hemophilia or Von Willebrand's disease, or use of anticoagulants that may result in bleeding risk during the skin .
  8. Any , as determined by the Investigator, to performing a skin biopsy for intraepidermal nerve fiber analysis.

NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
265 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BIIB074 350 mg

    Taper Period (if applicable) from neuropathic pain medication, followed by a washout period, then BIIB074 350 mg tablets orally twice daily (BID) Open-Label Run-In Period, then BIIB074 350 mg tablets orally BID Double-Blind Treatment Period.

    Drug: BIIB074

  • Experimental
    BIIB074 200 mg

    Taper Period (if applicable) from neuropathic pain medication, followed by a washout period, then BIIB074 350 mg tablets orally twice daily (BID) Open-Label Run-In Period, then BIIB074 200 mg tablets orally BID Double-Blind Treatment Period.

    Drug: BIIB074

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Taper Period (if applicable) from neuropathic pain medication, followed by a washout period, then BIIB074 350 mg tablets orally twice daily (BID) Open-Label Run-In Period, then BIIB074 placebo-matching tablets orally BID Double-Blind Treatment Period.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Administered as specified in the treatment arm.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Administered as specified in the treatment arm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in Weekly Mean Average Daily Pain (ADP) Score

    Participants will rate their ADP using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain) and record their score in an electronic diary (eDiary). Weekly mean ADP scores for Baseline (the 5 days prior to the first dose of study treatment in the open-label run-in period) and Week 12 (the 7 days prior to the visit at the end of Week 12) will be derived from the ADP scores and calculated as the mean of the daily scores over the last 7 days.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12 of the Double-Blind Period

  2. Change from Randomization in Weekly Mean ADP Score

    Participants will rate their ADP using an 11-point NRS (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain) and record their score in an eDiary. Weekly mean ADP scores for Randomization (the 7 days prior to the first dose of study treatment in the double-blind period) and Week 12 (the 7 days prior to the visit at the end of Week 12) will be derived from the ADP scores and calculated as the mean of the daily scores over the last 7 days.

    Time frame: Randomization and Week 12 of the Double-Blind Period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in Weekly Mean Worst Daily Pain (WDP) Score

    Participants will rate their WDP using an 11-point NRS (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain) and record their score in an eDiary. Weekly mean WDP scores for Baseline (the 5 days prior to the first dose of study treatment in the open-label run-in period) and Week 12 (the 7 days prior to the visit at the end of Week 12) will be derived from the WDP scores and calculated as the mean of the daily scores over the last 7 days.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12 of the Double-Blind Period

  2. Change from Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Interference Numerical Rating Scale (S-NRS)

    Participants will rate their S-NRS using an 11-point NRS (0=pain does not interfere with sleep and 10= pain completely interferes with sleep) and record their score in an eDiary. Weekly mean S-NRS scores for Baseline (the 5 days prior to the first dose of study treatment in the open-label run-in period) and Week 12 (the 7 days prior to the visit at the end of Week 12) will be derived from the daily S-NRS scores and calculated as the mean of the daily scores over the last 7 days.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12 of the Double-Blind Period

  3. Change from Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Total Score and Sum Score

    Participant will use the NPSI questionnaire to rate different symptoms of neuropathic pain. The NPSI includes ten items related to different pain descriptors (e.g. burning and pressure) that are rated on an 11-point NRS (0=no symptoms to 10=worst symptoms imaginable). A score in each dimension and also a total score (from 0-100) is generated using data from the questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12 of Double-Blind Period

  4. Proportion of Participants with at least a 2-point Reduction from Baseline in Weekly Mean ADP

    Participants will rate their ADP using an 11-point NRS (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain) and record their score in an electronic diary (eDiary). Weekly mean ADP scores for Baseline (the 5 days prior to the first dose of study treatment in the open-label run-in period) and Week 12 (the 7 days prior to the visit at the end of Week 12) will be derived from the ADP scores and calculated as the mean of the daily scores over the last 7 days.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12 of the Double-Blind Period

  5. Proportion of Participants with at least a 30% Reduction from Baseline in Weekly Mean ADP

    Participants will rate their ADP using an 11-point NRS) (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain) and record their score in an electronic diary (eDiary). Weekly mean ADP scores for Baseline (the 5 days prior to the first dose of study treatment in the open-label run-in period) and Week 12 (the 7 days prior to the visit at the end of Week 12) will be derived from the ADP scores and calculated as the mean of the daily scores over the last 7 days.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12 of Double-Blind Period

  6. Mean Weekly Amount of Rescue Medication

    Use of rescue medication (paracetamol/acetaminophen) will be monitored and dosage will be recorded on a daily basis by the participant using an electronic Diary (eDiary). Mean weekly amount of rescue medication used for neuropathic pain during the double-blind period.

    Time frame: Weekly from Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-Blind Period

  7. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    PGIC is a 7-point self-administered scale that depicts changes in a participant's overall status. Participants will rate their change as "1=very much improved," "2=much improved," "3=minimally improved," "4=no change," "5=minimally worse," "6=much worse," or "7=very much worse."

    Time frame: Week 12 of the Double-Blind Period

  8. Change from Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Interference Score

    The BPI-SF is a 7-item self-administered questionnaire that measures how much pain has interfered with daily functioning. Participants will rate the level of pain interference on daily functioning on an 11-point NRS where 0=does not interfere and 10=completely interferes.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12 of the Double-Blind Period

  9. Percentage of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During Double-Blind Period

    AEs: any sign, symptom, or diagnosis/disease that is unfavorable or unintended, that is new, or if pre-existing, worsens in participants administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAEs: an event that results in death; an event that, in the view of the investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event); an outcome that results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect diagnosed in a child of a participant; an event that requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization; an event that results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity. Any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the investigator, may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above.

    Time frame: Week 5 to Week 17

  10. Area Under the Concentration-time Curve at Steady State

    Time frame: Week 1, 3, 5, 9, 13 and 17 prior to dosing and 1 to 2 hours after dosing, and at Day 123 (Follow-up clinic visit)

  11. Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) at Steady State

    Time frame: Week 1, 3, 5, 9, 13 and 17 prior to dosing and 1 to 2 hours after dosing, and at Day 123 (Follow-up clinic visit)

07

Study locations

97 sites
  • Research Site
    Byala, Bulgaria
  • UMHAT 'Dr Georgi Stranski' EAD
    Pleven, Bulgaria
  • Research Site
    Plovdiv, Bulgaria
  • Research Site
    Sofia, Bulgaria
  • Vancouver General Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Toronto General Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Research Site
    Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada
  • Research Site
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Recherche Médicale St-Jérôme Inc.
    St-Jerome, Quebec, Canada
  • Research Site
    Kingston, Canada
  • Research Site
    Winnipeg, Canada
  • Fakultni Nemocnice Brno
    Brno, Czechia
  • Fakultni Nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brne
    Brno, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Hradec Kralove, Czechia
  • Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava
    Ostrava-Poruba, Czechia
  • Nemocnice Pardubickeho kraje a.s. Pardubicka nemocnice
    Pardubice, Czechia
  • Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
    Prague, Czechia
  • Research Site
    Aarhus, Denmark
  • Research Site
    Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Research Site
    Herlev, Denmark
  • OUH
    Odense, Denmark
  • Research Site
    Brest, Finistere, France
  • CHU Saint Etienne - Hôpital Nord
    Saint Priest En Jarez, Loire, France
  • Hopital Salengro - CHRU de Lille
    Lille, Nord, France
  • CHU Clermond Ferrand - Hopital Gabriel Montpied
    Clermont Ferrand, Puy De Dome, France
  • Research Site
    Venissieux, Rhone, France
  • Hôpital Ambroise Paré - Boulogne-Billancourt
    Boulogne-Billancourt, France
  • Research Site
    Corbeil-Essonnes, France
  • Hopital Henri Mondor
    Creteil, France
  • Research Site
    Le Creusot, France
  • Groupement Hospitalier Sud - Hôpital Bicêtre
    Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
  • CHU Nice - Hôpital de l'Archet 1
    Nice, France
  • Hopital Lariboisiere
    Paris, France
  • Clinical Research
    Böblingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
  • Research Site
    Aschaffenburg, Bayern, Germany
  • Research Site
    Kuenzing, Bayern, Germany
  • Clinical Research
    Westerstede, Niedersachsen, Germany
  • Clinical Research
    Muenster, Nord Rhein Westfalen, Germany
  • Gemeinschaftspraxis Diabeteszentrum Dortmund Dr.med. Klaus Busch
    Dortmund, Nordrhein Westfalen, Germany
  • Hausarzt- und Diabetologische Schwerpunktpraxis
    Lage, Sachsen Anhalt, Germany
  • Zentrum fur Klinische Forschung
    Bad Homburg, Germany
  • Gemeinschaftspraxis für Neurologie
    Berlin, Germany
  • Research Site
    Essen, Germany
  • Diabetologische Schwerpunktpraxis Harburg
    Hamburg, Germany
  • Research Site
    Mainz, Germany
  • DKD Helios Klinik Wiesbaden
    Wiesbaden, Germany
  • Research Site
    Wurzburg, Germany
  • Research Site
    Athens, Greece
  • Research Site
    Heraklion, Greece
  • Research Site
    Patras, Greece
  • AHEPA General Hospital of Thessaloniki
    Thessaloniki, Greece
  • Research Site
    Baja, Hungary
  • Bekes Megyei Kozponti Korhaz Dr. Rethy Pal Tagkorhaz
    Bekescsaba, Hungary
  • UNO Medical Trials Kft.
    Budapest, Hungary
  • Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mor Oktato Korhaz
    Kaposvar, Hungary
  • Research Site
    Nyiregyhaza, Hungary
  • Research Site
    Pecs, Hungary
  • Research Site
    Szeged, Hungary
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (Presidio Spedali Civili)
    Brescia, Italy
  • Research Site
    Genova, Italy
  • Research Site
    Milan, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Univeraitaria Pisana
    Pisa, Italy
  • Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma
    Roma, Italy
  • Research Site
    Telese Terme, Italy
  • Amsterdam UMC, Locatie AMC
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Maastricht UMC+
    Maastricht, Netherlands
  • Research Site
    Bydgoszcz, Poland
  • Research Site
    Chorzow, Poland
  • PRATIA MCM Kraków
    Kraków, Poland
  • Research Site
    Lublin, Poland
  • Research Site
    Oswiecim, Poland
  • Praktyka Lekarska Ewa Krzyzagorska
    Poznan, Poland
  • Research Site
    Warszawa, Poland
  • Regionalna Poradnia Diabetologiczna Zytkiewicz-Jaruga,Stasinska
    Wroclaw, Poland
  • Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
    Alicante, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Research Site
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
    Cordoba, Spain
  • Research Site
    La Coruna, Spain
  • Research Site
    Madrid, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda
    Majadahonda, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe
    Valencia, Spain
  • CHUV - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
    Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Ospedale Regionale di Lugano
    Lugano, Switzerland
  • Kantonspital St. Gallen
    St. Gallen, Switzerland
  • Research Site
    Zurich, Switzerland
  • Royal Hallamshire Hospital
    Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom
  • Clinical Reseach
    Bath, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Ipswich, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • Guy's Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • King's College Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • St Pancras Clinical Research
    London, United Kingdom
  • The Royal London Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Manchester, United Kingdom
  • John Radcliffe Hospital
    Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Swansea, United Kingdom
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2018 to primary completion in Apr 2021, 34 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 8, 2017
First posted
Nov 13, 2017
StartActual
May 31, 2018
Primary completionActual
Apr 12, 2021
CompletionActual
Apr 12, 2021
Last update
May 5, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 5, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03339336
Lead sponsor
Biogen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 13, 2017
Start date
May 31, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 12, 2021
Completion
Apr 12, 2021
Last update
May 5, 2021

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Biogen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Vixotrigine

Start the discussion