ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03336762ISCoPE-TMUpdated Jan 11, 2021

Injured Spinal Cord Pressure Evaluation Study - Transverse Myelitis

An observational study in Transverse Myelitis, sponsored by St George's, University of London. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-11.

Sponsored by St George's, University of London · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

ISCoPE-TM will use intra spinal monitoring techniques to assess cord perfusion and metabolism in patients with severe spinal cord damage from transverse myelitis

Read the detailed description

Transverse myelitis (TM) is a rare inflammatory condition of the spinal cord. It is characterised by rapid onset of motor, sensory or autonomic dysfunction causing neurological deficit. It has a diverse range of causes; most commonly it is associated with multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica also known as Devic's disease or Devic's syndrome, is a heterogeneous condition consisting of the simultaneous inflammation and demyelination of the optic nerve (optic neuritis) and the spinal cord (myelitis). It affects approximately 1900 adults and children in the UK annually, with 350 cases per year of unknown cause.

Outcome in TM is variable; e.g. neuromyelitis optica mortality can be 30% . There is a relationship between the severity of neurological symptoms at presentation and the eventual outcome. When a patient is ASIA (American spinal injuries association) A or tetraplegic at presentation, they are less likely to recover than when ASIA B/C or paraplegic. Approximately 30% of patients will be ASIA A-C after a TM episode.

There are several pathological mechanisms which could increase the risk of decreased blood supply and further neurological deficit in TM. The ISCoPE study has shown that in traumatic spinal cord injury when swelling causes mechanical compression of the cord against the dura there is increased intra spinal pressure (ISP).

The Investigators propose to monitor the ISP and spinal cord metabolites in 10 TM patients with MRI evidence of a swollen enlarged spinal cord. There has never been a study looking at ISP in TM patients before. The optimum blood pressure in patients with TM is not known.

The investigators aim to observe a previously unrecognised pathological mechanism of injury in TM. In the future this could lead on to novel treatments to improve drug delivery and neurological outcome in a condition otherwise associated with a poor outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Transverse Myelitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Myelitis, Transverse

32 studies on the registry are indexed under Myelitis, Transverse; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 98 across 12 observational studies indexed under Myelitis, Transverse.

Browse Myelitis, Transverse studies →

Lead sponsor

St George's, University of London is the lead sponsor of 106 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Inpatients with formal diagnosis of transverse myelitis

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Transverse myelitis (as defined by TM working group 2002)
  • MRI evidence of swollen enlarged spinal cord. Defined as a larger cord diameter compared to the adjacent normal signal intensity spinal cord, with loss of cerebrospinal fluid space between cord and dura mater.
  • Age 18 - 70
  • Severe spinal cord injury (ASIA A - B)
  • Monitoring to start within 72 h of MRI
  • Capacity for

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major co-morbidities likely to influence outcome
  • High anaesthetic risk precluding surgery
  • Multiple separate lesions on MRI spine
  • Lacking capacity or Unable to consent
  • Pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1 participant (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testIntra spinal pressure monitoring

    Sub dural pressure monitoring using a FDA approved intracranial pressure monitor

  • Diagnostic testIntra spinal microdialysis monitoring

    Sub arachnoid microdialysis monitoring using a FDA approved hepatic microdialysis catheter

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with treatment related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0

    To assess whether intraspinal pressure and metabolism monitoring in Transverse Myelitis patients is feasible and safe

    Time frame: Through study completion, up to 1 year.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intra spinal pressure in mmHg

    To determine whether the swollen, enlarged spinal cord in patients with transverse myelitis causes raised intra spinal pressure, low spinal cord perfusion pressure

    Time frame: Up to 7 days

  2. Injury site metabolism measured using surface microdialysis.

    To determine whether the swollen, enlarged spinal cord in patients with transverse myelitis causes deranged spinal cord metabolites (glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glycerol, glutamate)

    Time frame: Up to 7 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • St George's, University of London
    London, SW17 0RE, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2017 to primary completion in Aug 2020, 41 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 1, 2017
First posted
Nov 8, 2017
StartActual
Feb 14, 2017
Primary completionActual
Aug 1, 2020
CompletionActual
Aug 1, 2020
Last update
Jan 11, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 11, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03336762
Collaborators
Wings for Life, Neurosciences Research Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 8, 2017
Start date
Feb 14, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2020
Completion
Aug 1, 2020
Last update
Jan 11, 2021

Study contacts

Marios Papadopoulos, MD
principal investigator · St George's, University of London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion