ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03336034Updated May 25, 2022

Assessment of Responsiveness to Treatment by Experience Sampling Method

An observational study in Constipation-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome, sponsored by Maastricht University Medical Center. Terminated at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-25.

Sponsored by Maastricht University Medical Center · Observational

Why this study was terminated
Slow inclusion rate.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
16
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 12 studies in Abdominal Pain with a site in Netherlands — none open to participants now, 1 under way, none of them phase 3. Abdominal Pain · Netherlands.

Started
2018
the only one that year
Observational
3 of 12
none open now
Registered
10th of 12
by date
Lead sponsor
7 of 12
Maastricht University Medical Center

Among the 12 studies in Abdominal Pain with a site in Netherlands, this one is the only one that started in 2018, is one of 3 observational ones, and was the 10th registered.

Abdominal Pain

387 studies on the registry are indexed under Abdominal Pain; 58 are open to participants now.

Browse Abdominal Pain studies →

Open to participants now

None of the 12 studies in Abdominal Pain with a site in Netherlands is open now. The open studies under Abdominal Pain, anywhere →

Who these studies take

Of the 33 Abdominal Pain studies recruiting now, 13 (39%) set no upper age limit and 17 (52%) stop at 75 or younger; 10 take children under 18; 7 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 75 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Download CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: the 12 studies in Abdominal Pain with a site in Netherlands as a file.
02

Study summary

Reliable evaluation of symptoms and their improvement during treatment is crucial in both diagnosing and evaluating response to treatment in IBS. Currently used end-of-day evaluations are considered sub-optimal and the Experience Sampling Method (ESM) was proposed previously as a more accurate symptom assessment method. Aim of this study is to evaluate the responsiveness of the developed ESM-PROM in assessing changes in abdominal pain and stool frequency after linaclotide treatment of IBS-C patients.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to assess the internal and external responsiveness of the ESM-PROM in examining changes in symptom scores between baseline and post-treatment. Secondary objectives are to identify differences in characteristics between responders and non-responders to linaclotide and to assess for side effects of linaclotide treatment, using the ESM-PROM. This is a prospective, observational, single-group, open-label study, initiated and performed in Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+). The study population will conclude 30 IBS-C subjects that are newly prescribed with linaclotide by their treating physician at the outpatient department of gastroenterology and hepatology in the Maastricht UMC+. Primary study outcomes are the weekly average of the mean and maximum abdominal pain scores per day on the ESM-PROM per period (i.e. baseline, after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks). The ESM-PROM is completed during 7 consecutive days at each period and therefore, the measurements start one week before linaclotide treatment (baseline) and end one week after finishing linaclotide treatment (after 12 weeks). Further endpoints are the change scores of abdominal pain between pre- and post-treatment, measured using the ESM-PROM. Additionally, the proportion of overall responders to linaclotide treatment after 4 and 12 weeks assessed using the conventional end-of-day diary will be used to evaluate external responsiveness. Further endpoints are symptom scores as reported using the ESM-PROM, concerning abdominal pain, bloating, abdominal fullness, fecal urgency, stool consistency, straining, CSBM frequency and SBM frequency. Secondary outcomes are other factors measured using the ESM-PROM, i.e. non-GI physical symptoms, psychological status at the moment of symptom assessment, contextual information regarding the moment of symptom assessment as well as information on food and substance intake.

03

Conditions studied

  • Constipation-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Keywords

  • IBS-C
  • Experience sampling method
  • Ecological momentary assessment
  • Abdominal pain
  • Constipation
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients visiting the outpatient department of the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology in MUMC+, diagnosed with constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome (Rome IV), and newly prescribed with linaclotide 290µg once daily are eligible for inclusion.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 75 years;
  • A diagnosis of IBS-C according to Rome IV criteria:

Recurrent abdominal pain, on average, at least 1 day per week in the last 3 months, associated with 2 or more of the following criteria: 1) Relation to defecation; 2) Association with a change in stool frequency; 3) Association with a change in stool form (appearance). Criteria fulfilled for the last 3 months with symptom onset at least 6 months ago. Reported stool consistency over the last 3 months: At least 25% of bowel movements are hard and lumpy stools (BSFS 1 or 2) and less than 25% of bowel movements are watery stools (BSFS 6 or 7).

  • Negative colonoscopy in the past 5 years prior to inclusion;
  • Treatment in primary care unsuccessful for 12 months;
  • Ability to understand, read and speak the Dutch language;
  • Ability to understand how to utilize the MEASuRE app on a smartphone.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Appendectomy or cholecystectomy within 2 months or other abdominal surgeries within 6 months before entry into the study;
  • A history of laxative abuse;
  • Current use of drugs that could initiate constipation (e.g. narcotics);
  • Use of any IBS-related drugs possibly causing constipation (e.g. tricyclic antidepressants) are a reason for exclusion, unless usage is on a stable dose for at least 30 days before inclusion and there is no plan to change the dose during the study period.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • IBS-C

    Constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean abdominal pain scores as measured by the ESM tool.

    Weekly average of mean abdominal pain scores per day on the ESM-PROM per period (i.e. baseline, after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks). Mean scores per day will be calculated, followed by calculating the mean of those 7 scores.

    Time frame: 14 weeks (i.e. once during one week before linaclotide treatment, once during one week during linaclotide treatment and once during one week after the 12 week treatment period).

  2. Maximum abdominal pain scores as measured by the ESM tool.

    Weekly average of the maximum abdominal pain scores per day on the ESM-PROM per period (i.e. baseline, after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks). Maximum scores per day will be determined, followed by calculating the mean of those 7 scores.

    Time frame: 14 weeks (i.e. once during one week before linaclotide treatment, once during one week during linaclotide treatment and once during one week after the 12 week treatment period).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of bowel movements.

    Number of complete spontaneous bowel movements per week, as measured by the ESM tool.

    Time frame: 14 weeks (i.e. once during one week before linaclotide treatment, once during one week during linaclotide treatment and once during one week after the 12 week treatment period).

  2. Symptom scores for other symptoms than abdominal pain, as measured by the ESM tool.

    Symptom scores for non-GI physical symptoms, psychological symptoms, contextual information and information on food and drug intake.

    Time frame: 14 weeks (i.e. once during one week before linaclotide treatment, once during one week during linaclotide treatment and once during one week after the 12 week treatment period).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Maastricht University Medical Center
    Maastricht, 6229ER, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in May 2022, 52 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 25, 2017
First posted
Nov 8, 2017
StartActual
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
May 1, 2022
CompletionActual
May 1, 2022
Last update
May 25, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 25, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03336034
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 8, 2017
Start date
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completion
May 1, 2022
Completion
May 1, 2022
Last update
May 25, 2022

Study contacts

Ad AM Masclee, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Maastricht University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion