ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03335800Updated Mar 30, 2020Results posted

Apple Heart Study: Assessment of Wristwatch-Based Photoplethysmography to Identify Cardiac Arrhythmias

An interventional study of Apple Heart Study App in Atrial Fibrillation, Arrhythmias, Cardiac and Atrial Flutter, sponsored by Apple Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-30.

Sponsored by Apple Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
419,927
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Apple Heart Study (AHS) is a research study conducted to evaluate whether the Apple Heart Study App can use data collected on the Apple Watch to identify irregular heart rhythms, including those from potentially serious heart conditions such as atrial fibrillation. Up to 500,000 can participate in the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac
  • Atrial Flutter
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

4,009 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 961 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 419,927 is above the median of 150 across 2,476 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Apple Inc. is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Possession of the following at time of eligibility screening, ascertained from automatic hardware/software/device pairing check:

  • iPhone (5s or later) with iOS version 11.0 or later defined as iPhone model/iOS version used to complete screening eligibility.
  • Apple Watch (Series 1 or later) with watchOS version 4.0 or later defined as Apple Watch model/watchOS paired with iPhone used to complete screening eligibility.
  • Current resident of the United States at time of eligibility screening, defined by self-reported state of residence within the 50 states of the United States or District of Columbia.
  • Proficient in written and spoken English, defined by self-report of comfort reading, writing, and speaking English on iPhone.
  • Valid phone number associated with iPhone, ascertained from self-report.
  • Valid email address, ascertained from self-report.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation.
  • Self-reported diagnosis of Atrial Flutter.
  • Currently on anti-coagulation therapy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
419,927 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Apple Heart Study App

    Device: Apple Heart Study App

Interventions

  • DeviceApple Heart Study App

    The Apple Heart Study app is a mobile medical app that analyzes pulse rate data. The app identifies episodes of irregular heart rhythms consistent with atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Atrial Fibrillation (AF) of Greater Than 30 Seconds

    Proportion of notified participants who received an irregular pulse notification and that had AF detected on the ambulatory ECG.

    Time frame: During ambulatory ECG monitoring (up to 8 days)

  2. Confirmed AF With a Detection by a Component of the App

    Simultaneous ambulatory ECG monitoring indicating an irregular rhythm consistent with AF during time intervals when an app component (tachogram) is positive for an irregular pulse among those who received an irregular heartbeat notification.

    Time frame: During ambulatory ECG monitoring (up to 8 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Concordant AF With App Algorithm Notification

    Simultaneous ambulatory ECG monitoring indicating an irregular rhythm consistent with AF when the app based algorithm is positive for an irregular pulse among those who received a notification.

    Time frame: During ambulatory ECG monitoring (up to 8 days)

  2. Self-reported Contact With a Health Care Provider

    Percentage of participant who self-reported contact with a health care provider within 90 days following an irregular pulse watch notification. Participants could self-report this health-care provider contact from 90 days following notification until the study survey went offline at end of study.

    Time frame: 90 days to 15 months

07

Results

Posted Mar 30, 2020

Participant flow

Participants downloaded the app; those with irregular pulse notification had a first teleconference visit with telehealth provider; an ECG patch was shipped to eligible participants to wear for 7 days, then they returned the patch for analysis and had a second teleconference visit to review the findings with the telehealth provider.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneApple Heart Study (AHS) App Users
Started419927
Received irregular pulse notification2161
Attended first study visit945
Ecg patch shipped658
Ecg patch returned for analysis450
Attended second study visit396
Completed396
Not completed419531

Outcome measures

PrimaryAtrial Fibrillation (AF) of Greater Than 30 Seconds

Proportion of notified participants who received an irregular pulse notification and that had AF detected on the ambulatory ECG.

Time frame:
During ambulatory ECG monitoring (up to 8 days)
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of participants
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) of Greater Than 30 Seconds
Proportion of participantsApple Heart Study (AHS) App Users
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) of Greater Than 30 Seconds0.34 (0.29 to 0.39)
PrimaryConfirmed AF With a Detection by a Component of the App

Simultaneous ambulatory ECG monitoring indicating an irregular rhythm consistent with AF during time intervals when an app component (tachogram) is positive for an irregular pulse among those who received an irregular heartbeat notification.

Time frame:
During ambulatory ECG monitoring (up to 8 days)
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of Tachograms with AF
Confirmed AF With a Detection by a Component of the App
Proportion of Tachograms with AFApple Heart Study (AHS) App Users
Confirmed AF With a Detection by a Component of the App0.71 (0.69 to 0.74)
SecondaryConcordant AF With App Algorithm Notification

Simultaneous ambulatory ECG monitoring indicating an irregular rhythm consistent with AF when the app based algorithm is positive for an irregular pulse among those who received a notification.

Time frame:
During ambulatory ECG monitoring (up to 8 days)
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of Participants
Concordant AF With App Algorithm Notification
Proportion of ParticipantsApple Heart Study (AHS) App Users
Concordant AF With App Algorithm Notification0.84 (0.76 to 0.92)
SecondarySelf-reported Contact With a Health Care Provider

Percentage of participant who self-reported contact with a health care provider within 90 days following an irregular pulse watch notification. Participants could self-report this health-care provider contact from 90 days following notification until the study survey went offline at end of study.

Time frame:
90 days to 15 months
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Self-reported Contact With a Health Care Provider
Percentage of participantsApple Heart Study (AHS) App Users
Self-reported Contact With a Health Care Provider57 (54 to 60)

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year, 2 months and 14 days (participants may have reported adverse events at any time from enrollment to close of study). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Apple Heart Study (AHS) App Users2/419,927 (0%)62/419,927 (0%)0/419,927 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 27
Most frequent serious events
EventApple Heart Study (AHS) App Users
Atrial FibrilationCardiac disorders40/419927
Chest PainCardiac disorders3/419927
SyncopeCardiac disorders3/419927
PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders2/419927
Allergic reactionImmune system disorders1/419927
Atrial FlutterCardiac disorders1/419927
Atrial Septal Defect diagnosedCongenital, familial and genetic disorders1/419927
Chest PainGeneral disorders1/419927
Coronary Artery DiseaseCardiac disorders1/419927
DeathCardiac disorders1/419927

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Apple Heart Study (AHS) App Users
Mean41 ± 13
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Apple Heart Study (AHS) App Users
Female177087
Male238700
Other396
Not Reported3114
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Apple Heart Study (AHS) App Users
White286190
Hispanic48775
Black32275
Asian26156
American Indian4696
Pacific Islander1493
Middle Eastern3652
Other or mixed race7958
Not Reported8102
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Apple Heart Study (AHS) App Users
United States419927
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford University
    Stanford, California 94304, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Garcia A, Balasubramanian V, Lee J, Gardner R, Gummidipundi S, Hung G, Ferris T, Cheung L, Granger C, Kowey P, Rumsfeld J, Russo A, Hills MT, Talati N, Nag D, Stein J, Tsay D, Desai S, Mahaffey K, Turakhia M, Perez M, Hedlin H, Desai M. Lessons learned in the Apple Heart Study and implications for the data management of future digital clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat. 2022 May 4;32(3):496-510. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2022.2080698. Epub 2022 Jun 12. PubMed 35695137 ↗
  • Perez MV, Mahaffey KW, Hedlin H, Rumsfeld JS, Garcia A, Ferris T, Balasubramanian V, Russo AM, Rajmane A, Cheung L, Hung G, Lee J, Kowey P, Talati N, Nag D, Gummidipundi SE, Beatty A, Hills MT, Desai S, Granger CB, Desai M, Turakhia MP; Apple Heart Study Investigators. Large-Scale Assessment of a Smartwatch to Identify Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 14;381(20):1909-1917. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901183. PubMed 31722151 ↗
  • Turakhia MP, Desai M, Hedlin H, Rajmane A, Talati N, Ferris T, Desai S, Nag D, Patel M, Kowey P, Rumsfeld JS, Russo AM, Hills MT, Granger CB, Mahaffey KW, Perez MV. Rationale and design of a large-scale, app-based study to identify cardiac arrhythmias using a smartwatch: The Apple Heart Study. Am Heart J. 2019 Jan;207:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 8. PubMed 30392584 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Feb 2019, 14 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2020, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

Of 255 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Atrial Fibrillation, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 36. This study's 14 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,051 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 54.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 2, 2017
First posted
Nov 8, 2017
StartActual
Nov 29, 2017
Primary completionActual
Feb 21, 2019
CompletionActual
Feb 21, 2019
Results first posted
Mar 30, 2020
Last update
Mar 30, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03335800
Lead sponsor
Apple Inc.
Collaborators
Stanford University
Responsible party
Minang (Mintu) Turakhia (Associate Professor of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 8, 2017
Start date
Nov 29, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 21, 2019
Completion
Feb 21, 2019
Results posted
Mar 30, 2020
Last update
Mar 30, 2020

Study contacts

Minang (Mintu) Turakhia, MD, MAS
principal investigator · Stanford University
Marco V. Perez, MD
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion