An observational study in Retinopathy of Prematurity, sponsored by San Ni Chen. Completed. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 3 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-07.
Sponsored by San Ni Chen · Observational
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
The investigators compared long-term refractive and biometric outcomes in children with retinopathy of prematurity who received two different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents.
Purpose:
To compare refractive and biometric outcomes in patients with type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated with intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab (IVR), versus bevacizumab (IVB), at a corrected age of 3 years.
Methods:
A retrospective case series compared cycloplegic refractive statuses and biometric statuses in patients who received either IVR or IVB for Type 1 ROP, from April 2011 to April 2014.
Comparison of refractive errors and biometric findings between the two groups was performmed and multivariate analysis of possible factors contributive to visual acuity was also performmed
169 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinopathy of Prematurity; 27 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 35 is below the median of 175 across 57 observational studies indexed under Retinopathy of Prematurity.
Browse Retinopathy of Prematurity studies →San Ni Chen is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
infants who received intravitreal injection of ranibizumab or bevacizumab as the primary treatment
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
children with retinopathy of prematurity received either bevacizumab or ranibizumab
Drug: Bevacizumab · Drug: Ranibizumab
intravitreal injection of bevacizumab
Also known as: avastin
intravitreal injection of ranibizumab
Also known as: lucentis
spherical equivalent
spherical power + half of cylinder power
Time frame: at corrected age of 3 year-old
astigmatism
in cylinder power
Time frame: at corrected age of 3 year-old
axial length
axial length in mm
Time frame: at corrected age of 3 year-old
cornea radius
cornea radius in mm
Time frame: at corrected age of 3 year-old
anterior chamber depth
anterior chamber depth in mm
Time frame: at corrected age of 3 year-old
lens thickness
lens thickness in mm
Time frame: at corrected age of 3 year-old
No study locations are listed for this record.
Ran from Apr 2011 to primary completion in Apr 2014, 36 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
San Ni Chen