ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03327649Updated Jan 23, 2026Results posted

Neuromodulation to Treat Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

An interventional study of low level transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction, sponsored by University of Oklahoma. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-23.

Sponsored by University of Oklahoma · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a leading cause of mortality in the elderly. Outcomes of patients with HFpEF are poor and so far, no treatment has been shown to decrease morbidity or mortality. Recent animal and human studies suggest that a systemic proinflammatory state, produced by comorbidities, including aging, plays a central role in the development of HFpEF, supporting the notion that attenuating the proinflammatory state is an attractive therapeutic target for HFpEF. We have previously shown that low-level transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve (tVNS) suppresses inflammation in patients with atrial fibrillation. The overall objective of this proposal is to examine the effects of tVNS on diastolic dysfunction, exercise capacity and inflammation in patients with HFpEF. Our specific aims include: 1. To examine the effect of intermittent (1 hour daily for 3 months) tVNS on diastolic dysfunction and exercise capacity, relative to sham stimulation, in patients with HFpEF and 2. To examine the effect of intermittent (1 hour daily for 3 months) LLTS on inflammatory cytokines relative to sham stimulation, in patients with HFpEF. The proposed proof-of-concept studies will provide the basis for the design of further human studies using LLTS among populations with HFpEF. In light of the increasing number of elderly patients with HFpEF and the poor success of the currently available treatment options, an alternative and novel approach such as tVNS has the potential to impact clinical practice and improve health outcomes among a large number of patients. It is anticipated that these investigations will contribute to the broader understanding of the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of HFpEF and how its inhibition can be used to provide therapeutic effects. Moreover, it is anticipated that a better understanding of how modulation of inflammation affects one of the hallmarks of HFpEF, diastolic dysfunction, will lead to the development of novel pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches to treat this disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
  • inflammation
03

In context

Inflammation

3,536 studies on the registry are indexed under Inflammation; 642 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 52 is close to the median of 50 across 2,577 interventional studies indexed under Inflammation.

Browse Inflammation studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Oklahoma is the lead sponsor of 432 studies on the registry; 100 are open to participants now.

Of its 42 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (38%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • HFpEF, defined as signs and symptoms of heart failure, LV ≥50%, brain natriuretic peptide ≥35pg/mL and echocardiographic evidence of diastolic dysfunction (left atrial volume index ≥34mL/m2, mitral E-wave velocity/mitral annular velocity ratio [E/e']≥13 and e'\<9cm/s) plus 2 of the following 4 comorbidities:

    • age ≥ 65,
    • diabetes,
    • hypertension and
    • obesity, defined as ≥30kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • LV \<40%
  • significant valvular disorder (i.e., prosthetic valve or hemodynamically significant valvular diseases)
  • recent (\<6 months) stroke, myocardial infarction or hospitalization for heart failure
  • severe heart failure (class III or IV)
  • end stage kidney disease
  • recurrent vasovagal syncope
  • history of vagotomy
  • pregnancy
  • sick sinus syndrome and 2nd or 3rd degree AV block (without a pacemaker).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
52 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Sham control

    Patients will receive 1 hour of sham transcutaneous low level vagal stimulation daily for 3 months

    Device: low level transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation

  • Experimental
    Active treatment

    Patients will receive 1 hour of active transcutaneous low level vagal stimulation daily for 3 months

    Device: low level transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation

Interventions

  • Devicelow level transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation

    Stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. E/e' (Early Mitral Inflow Doppler Velocity to the Early Diastolic Mitral Annulus Velocity)

    E/e' was measured by echocardiography. E/e' correlates very well with left ventricular end diastolic pressure. Higher numbers indicate elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Global Longitudinal Strain

    Global longitudinal strain was measured by echocardiography. It is a measure of longitudinal shortening of the myocardium as a percentage (change in length as a proportion to baseline length), thus explaining the negative values. Reduced global longitudinal strain has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Exercise Capacity

    6 minute walk test

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Inflammatory Cytokines

    Serum inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha)

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire

    The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire is a well validated measure of quality of life in patients with heart failure. It can have a score 0 to 105, with higher scores reflecting worse quality of life.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Results

Posted Sep 22, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSham ControlActive Treatment
Started2626
Completed2424
Not completed22

Outcome measures

PrimaryE/e' (Early Mitral Inflow Doppler Velocity to the Early Diastolic Mitral Annulus Velocity)

E/e' was measured by echocardiography. E/e' correlates very well with left ventricular end diastolic pressure. Higher numbers indicate elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
E/e' (Early Mitral Inflow Doppler Velocity to the Early Diastolic Mitral Annulus Velocity)
ratioSham ControlActive Treatment
E/e' (Early Mitral Inflow Doppler Velocity to the Early Diastolic Mitral Annulus Velocity)10.4 ± 1.59.9 ± 1.5
PrimaryGlobal Longitudinal Strain

Global longitudinal strain was measured by echocardiography. It is a measure of longitudinal shortening of the myocardium as a percentage (change in length as a proportion to baseline length), thus explaining the negative values. Reduced global longitudinal strain has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of myocardial shortening
Global Longitudinal Strain
percentage of myocardial shorteningSham ControlActive Treatment
Global Longitudinal Strain-16.1 ± 2.5-18.6 ± 2.5
SecondaryExercise Capacity

6 minute walk test

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · meters
Exercise Capacity
metersSham ControlActive Treatment
Exercise Capacity326.9 ± 140.4352.7 ± 158.8
SecondaryInflammatory Cytokines

Serum inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha)

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Inflammatory Cytokines
pg/mLSham ControlActive Treatment
Inflammatory Cytokines11.3 ± 2.58.7 ± 2.2
SecondaryMinnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire

The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire is a well validated measure of quality of life in patients with heart failure. It can have a score 0 to 105, with higher scores reflecting worse quality of life.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire
units on a scaleSham ControlActive Treatment
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire36.6 ± 14.823.8 ± 14.8

Adverse events

Collected over 3 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sham Control0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)3/24 (12.5%)
Active Treatment0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)4/24 (16.7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSham ControlActive Treatment
hospitalizationCardiac disorders3/244/24

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Sham ControlActive TreatmentTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years8715
>=65 years161733
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Sham ControlActive TreatmentTotal
Mean70.3 ± 9.169.8 ± 8.870.1 ± 8.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sham ControlActive TreatmentTotal
Female161632
Male8816
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Sham ControlActive TreatmentTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American448
White201939
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Sham ControlActive TreatmentTotal
United States242448
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Goggins E, Inoue H, Okusa MD. Neuroimmune Control of Inflammation in Acute Kidney Injury and Multiorgan Dysfunction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 Dec 1;36(12):2473-2484. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000813. Epub 2025 Jul 7. PubMed 40622772 ↗
  • Stavrakis S, Elkholey K, Morris L, Niewiadomska M, Asad ZUA, Humphrey MB. Neuromodulation of Inflammation to Treat Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Feb;11(3):e023582. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023582. Epub 2022 Jan 13. PubMed 35023349 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — A biologic repository will be maintained and consideration of its use for future research (linked only to de-identified data) will be integrated into the initial informed consent process for this study. Data needed for independent verification of research results will be made publicly available within 12 months of the end of the funding period (and any no-cost extension).

Time frame: 12 months after study completion

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2017 to primary completion in Mar 2021, 39 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2022, 1 year 5 months after primary completion.

Of 877 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Inflammation, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36. This study's 39 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 924 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 27, 2017
First posted
Oct 31, 2017
StartActual
Dec 12, 2017
Primary completionActual
Mar 30, 2021
CompletionActual
Sep 30, 2021
Results first posted
Sep 22, 2022
Last update
Jan 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03327649
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 31, 2017
Start date
Dec 12, 2017
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2021
Completion
Sep 30, 2021
Results posted
Sep 22, 2022
Last update
Jan 23, 2026

Study contacts

Stavros Stavrakis, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Oklahoma

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion