ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03326297Updated Nov 13, 2020

Physiotherapy and Osteopathy on Infant Colic

An interventional study of Osteopathy manual therapy and Measures to support and education to the family in Infantile Colic and Manual Therapy, sponsored by Universidad de Almeria. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-13.

Sponsored by Universidad de Almeria · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2017, registered Oct 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Weeks to 6 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares the effectiveness of manual therapy (osteopathy) on infant colic versus education to the family, and a third group with no specific intervention.

Read the detailed description

Infant colic is a problem that affects 10-30% of babies in their first months of life. This research project aims to verify the effectiveness of manual therapy on infant colic. The sample is divided in three groups, performing in the firts one osteopathy manual therapy; in the second one, measures to support and education to the family; and in the third, there is no specific intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infantile Colic
  • Manual Therapy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Infant Colic
  • Osteopathy
  • Stress
  • Physiotherapy
03

In context

Colic

127 studies on the registry are indexed under Colic; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is above the median of 76 across 110 interventional studies indexed under Colic.

Browse Colic studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad de Almeria is the lead sponsor of 72 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Weeks to 6 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being diagnosed if Infant Colic.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Babies diagnosed of other pathologies that justify cries, such as reflux, food intolerances or neurological syndromes.
  • Premature babies less than 37 weeks gestation, who may be involved in other concomitant pathologies.
  • Mothers (families) with language barriers, due to the difficulty of collecting data.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Osteopathy manual therapy

    Osteopathy manual therapy applying the following treatment: Technique for the treatment of parasympathetic innervation, Techniques for the treatment of sympathetic innervation of the digestive system, Functional visceral techniques.

    Other: Osteopathy manual therapy

  • Active comparator
    Measures to support and education to the family

    Measures to support and education to the family that consist on pedagogical intervention in parents, health education.

    Behavioral: Measures to support and education to the family

  • No intervention
    No specific intervention

    No specific intervention, prescriptions by pediatrician

Interventions

  • OtherOsteopathy manual therapy

    Technique for the treatment of parasympathetic innervation, Techniques for the treatment of sympathetic innervation of the digestive system, Functional visceral techniques.

  • BehavioralMeasures to support and education to the family

    Pedagogical intervention in parents and health education

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline FCL Questionnaire at 12 weeks of infants' life.

    FCL (Fisioterapia en el Cólico del Lactante) QUESTIONNAIRE: Infant colic assessment questionnaire. Group CTS (Ciencias y Técnicas de la Salud) 305 of the University of Seville.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 4 weeks, at 8 weeks, at 12 weeks of infants' life and at 3 months of infants' life

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maternal stress in the last month.

    Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ).

    Time frame: At baseline and at 12 weeks of infants' life.

  2. Intensity of irritability

    Analogue visual scale from 0 to 6.

    Time frame: At baseline and at 12 weeks of infants' life

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Universidad de Almería
    Almería, 04120, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gudmundsson G. Infantile colic: is a pain syndrome. Med Hypotheses. 2010 Dec;75(6):528-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.07.014. Epub 2010 Aug 21. PubMed 20729004 ↗
  • Kim JS. Acute abdominal pain in children. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2013 Dec;16(4):219-24. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2013.16.4.219. Epub 2013 Dec 31. PubMed 24511517 ↗
  • Cohen-Silver J, Ratnapalan S. Management of infantile colic: a review. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009 Jan;48(1):14-7. doi: 10.1177/0009922808323116. Epub 2008 Oct 2. PubMed 18832537 ↗
  • Akman I, Kuscu K, Ozdemir N, Yurdakul Z, Solakoglu M, Orhan L, Karabekiroglu A, Ozek E. Mothers' postpartum psychological adjustment and infantile colic. Arch Dis Child. 2006 May;91(5):417-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.083790. Epub 2006 Feb 1. PubMed 16452109 ↗
  • Alcantara J, Alcantara JD, Alcantara J. The chiropractic care of infants with colic: a systematic review of the literature. Explore (NY). 2011 May-Jun;7(3):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2011.02.002. PubMed 21571236 ↗
  • Miller-Loncar C, Bigsby R, High P, Wallach M, Lester B. Infant colic and feeding difficulties. Arch Dis Child. 2004 Oct;89(10):908-12. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.033233. PubMed 15383432 ↗
  • Anabrees J, Indrio F, Paes B, AlFaleh K. Probiotics for infantile colic: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr. 2013 Nov 15;13:186. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-186. PubMed 24238101 ↗
  • Levitzky S, Cooper R. Infant colic syndrome--maternal fantasies of aggression and infanticide. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2000 Jul;39(7):395-400. doi: 10.1177/000992280003900703. PubMed 10914303 ↗
  • Hall B, Chesters J, Robinson A. Infantile colic: a systematic review of medical and conventional therapies. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Feb;48(2):128-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02061.x. Epub 2011 Apr 7. PubMed 21470331 ↗
  • Sung V, Collett S, de Gooyer T, Hiscock H, Tang M, Wake M. Probiotics to prevent or treat excessive infant crying: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Dec;167(12):1150-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2572. PubMed 24100440 ↗
  • Cetinkaya B, Basbakkal Z. The effectiveness of aromatherapy massage using lavender oil as a treatment for infantile colic. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):164-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02015.x. PubMed 22435980 ↗
  • Tekgunduz KS, Gurol A, Apay SE, Caner I. Effect of abdomen massage for prevention of feeding intolerance in preterm infants. Ital J Pediatr. 2014 Nov 14;40:89. doi: 10.1186/s13052-014-0089-z. PubMed 25394549 ↗
  • Savino F, Ceratto S, De Marco A, Cordero di Montezemolo L. Looking for new treatments of Infantile Colic. Ital J Pediatr. 2014 Jun 5;40:53. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-40-53. PubMed 24898541 ↗
  • Skjeie H, Skonnord T, Fetveit A, Brekke M. Acupuncture for infantile colic: a blinding-validated, randomized controlled multicentre trial in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013 Dec;31(4):190-6. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2013.862915. Epub 2013 Nov 15. PubMed 24228748 ↗
  • Savino F, Tarasco V. New treatments for infant colic. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010 Dec;22(6):791-7. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32833fac24. PubMed 20859207 ↗
  • Ernst E. Chiropractic treatment for gastrointestinal problems: a systematic review of clinical trials. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;25(1):39-40. doi: 10.1155/2011/910469. PubMed 21258667 ↗
  • Wiberg KR, Wiberg JM. A retrospective study of chiropractic treatment of 276 danish infants with infantile colic. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Sep;33(7):536-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.08.004. PubMed 20937431 ↗
  • Miller JE, Newell D, Bolton JE. Efficacy of chiropractic manual therapy on infant colic: a pragmatic single-blind, randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Oct;35(8):600-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.09.010. PubMed 23158465 ↗
  • Miller JE, Phillips HL. Long-term effects of infant colic: a survey comparison of chiropractic treatment and nontreatment groups. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Oct;32(8):635-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.08.017. PubMed 19836599 ↗
  • Olafsdottir E, Forshei S, Fluge G, Markestad T. Randomised controlled trial of infantile colic treated with chiropractic spinal manipulation. Arch Dis Child. 2001 Feb;84(2):138-41. doi: 10.1136/adc.84.2.138. PubMed 11159288 ↗
  • Wiberg JM, Nordsteen J, Nilsson N. The short-term effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of infantile colic: a randomized controlled clinical trial with a blinded observer. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Oct;22(8):517-22. doi: 10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70003-5. PubMed 10543581 ↗
  • Posadzki P, Lee MS, Ernst E. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for pediatric conditions: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2013 Jul;132(1):140-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3959. Epub 2013 Jun 17. PubMed 23776117 ↗
  • Dobson D, Lucassen PL, Miller JJ, Vlieger AM, Prescott P, Lewith G. Manipulative therapies for infantile colic. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD004796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004796.pub2. PubMed 23235617 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2017 to primary completion in Jun 2020, 41 months.

Of 32 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Colic, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 40. This study's 41 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 44 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 40.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 17, 2017
First posted
Oct 31, 2017
StartActual
Jan 2017
Primary completionActual
Jun 2020
CompletionActual
Nov 2020
Last update
Nov 13, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 13, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03326297
Lead sponsor
Universidad de Almeria
Responsible party
Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez (PhD, Universidad de Almeria) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 31, 2017
Start date
Jan 2017
Primary completion
Jun 2020
Completion
Nov 2020
Last update
Nov 13, 2020

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion