ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03325192RAPIDUpdated May 8, 2020

Rapid Pleurodesis Through an Indwelling Pleural Catheter

An interventional study of Rapid pleurodesis protocol and Placebo in Pleural Effusion, Malignant, Pleurodesis and Pleural Diseases, sponsored by University of Pennsylvania. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-08.

Sponsored by University of Pennsylvania · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Slow enrollment
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether the use of a rapid pleurodesis protocol using 10% iodopovidone immediately after tunneled pleural catheter placement improves time to IPC removal compared to patients who receive an IPC alone.

Read the detailed description

Patients will be screened throughout the year as part of the clinical referral process to the Interventional Pulmonology service at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania for the management of a malignant pleural effusion. Patients eligible for inclusion based on the clinical evaluation will be approached for enrollment. Written consent will be obtained. Patients will subsequently undergo placement of a IPC under MAC as per standard clinical practice followed by complete drainage of the pleural space. Patients randomized to the rapid pleurodesis protocol arm will received 20mL of 10% iodopovidone mixed with 80mL of normal saline instilled intrapleurally through the IPC. Patients randomized to the standard of care arm will have 100mL of normal saline (placebo) instilled intrapleurally through the IPC. The mixture will be allowed to dwell for 2 hours and then completely evacuated through the IPC and the patient will be discharged home.

After discharge, all patients will continue to drain their IPC on a daily basis for 7 days. Following this, all patients will continue to drain their IPC on an every-other-day basis until total IPC output is less than 50ml per session over 3 consecutive sessions. At which point they will be asked to undergo a clamp trial of no drainage for 7 days followed by a reattempt at drainage. Patients without return of symptoms over those 7 days and minimal drainage afterwards (\<50ml) will be seen in the office for possible IPC removal. Patients with return of symptoms during those 7 days or more than minimal drainage afterwards (>50mL) will be asked to continue drainage until total IPC output is again less than 50mL per session over 3 sessions.

After a passed clamp trial, patients will be evaluated in the office with a bedside ultrasound to assess for pleural apposition in 5 of 6 designated points and the absence of pleural effusions. If all criteria are met, the IPC is removed. If there is evidence of residual effusion, continued drainage will be advised.

All patients will be evaluated in the office on day 7, day 14, day 30, day 60 and day 90 after IPC placement. On each visit they will be assessed for pleural apposition with ultrasound. At day 30, 60, and 90 all patients will receive a global health related questionnaire (EORTC QLQ30) and a symptom questionnaire. At 90 days, complications rate will be assessed for the entire study period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pleural Effusion, Malignant
  • Pleurodesis
  • Pleural Diseases

Keywords

  • Indwelling Pleural Catheter
  • Pleurodesis
  • Iodopovidone
  • Pleural Effusion, Malignant
03

In context

Pleural Effusion, Malignant

169 studies on the registry are indexed under Pleural Effusion, Malignant; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 55 across 125 interventional studies indexed under Pleural Effusion, Malignant.

Browse Pleural Effusion, Malignant studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania is the lead sponsor of 1,668 studies on the registry; 235 are open to participants now.

Of its 158 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 109 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosis of MPE as defined by

    1. A diagnosis a pleural effusion in the setting of known . AND
    2. Confirmed malignant involvement of the pleural space by fluid cytology or pleural . OR
    3. Evidence of pleural disease on radiographic imaging. OR
    4. A recurrent effusion with no other identifiable cause after thorough workup.
  2. Symptomatic from the pleural effusions (shortness of breath, cough, or chest pain)
  3. Prior thoracentesis with post procedure symptomatic relief
  4. Recurrence of symptoms with re-accumulation of pleural effusion
  5. Lung re-expansion after thoracentesis on chest imaging within last 30 days

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Malignant pleural effusion due to a hematologic
  2. >4
  3. Any history of trapped lung
  4. Prior attempted pleurodesis on the affected site
  5. Age \<18
  6. Pregnant or lactating
  7. Known allergy to iodopovidone (Betadine)
  8. Unable or unwilling to provide consent
  9. Uncorrectable coagulopathy ( > 1.5, aPTT > 1.5 x the ) or thrombocytopenia (\< 50,000)
  10. Anatomic to IPC (overlying skin abnormalities)
  11. Unable or unwilling to care for IPC and adhere to drainage protocol
  12. Need for bilateral IPC placement
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Standard of care

    Subjects in this arm will receive placebo only (100mL of normal saline) into the pleural space delivered via the newly placed tunneled intrapleural catheter

    Other: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Rapid pleurodesis protocol

    Subjects in this arm will receive the chemical pleurodesing agent of 10% iodopovidone solution delivered to the pleural space via the newly placed tunneled intrapleural catheter

    Drug: Rapid pleurodesis protocol

Interventions

  • DrugRapid pleurodesis protocol

    * The pleural space will be evacuated completely through the newly placed IPC * 20mL of 10% iodopovidone and 80mL of normal saline will be instilled into the pleural space * The patient will be transferred to the recovery unit * Two hours after instillation the pleural space will be drained * After recovery from anesthesia and complete drainage of the pleurodesis mix, the subject will be discharged * Subjects will be asked to drain their effusion on a daily basis for the next 7 days and then on an every other day basis.

    Also known as: iodine pleurodesis

  • OtherPlacebo

    * The pleural space will be evacuated completely through the newly placed IPC * Only placebo (normal saline) will be instilled into the pleural space * The patient will be transferred to the recovery unit * Two hours after instillation the pleural space will be drained * After recovery from anesthesia and complete drainage of the pleurodesis mix, the subject will be discharged * Subjects will be asked to drain their effusion on a daily basis for the next 7 days and then on an every other day basis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to catheter removal

    Time to IPC removal will be measured in days from the day of IPC placement to the day of IPC removal after meeting removal criteria as listed above.

    Time frame: 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Global Health Related Quality of Life

    The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQC30) will be used to assess global health-related quality of life. This is a 30-item questionnaire validated for use in patients with cancer. The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.

    Time frame: 30 days, 60 days, and 90 days after catheter placement

  2. Change in symptoms of pain and breathlessness

    We will use a 5 point Likert scale (5PLS) that has been created for the trial. Patients will be asked to indicate their degree of shortness of breath or chest pain during sitting, walking and lying down/sleeping on that specific day. Thus, a total of 6 scales will be utilized. Point 1 will be described as "no shortness of breath" or "no chest pain." Point 2 will be described as "mild shortness of breath" or "mild chest pain." Point 3 will be described as "moderate shortness of breath" or "moderate chest pain." Point 4 will be described as "severe shortness of breath" or "severe chest pain." Point 5 will be described as "Worst shortness of breath possible" or "Worst chest pain possible."

    Time frame: 30 days, 60 days, and 90 days after catheter placement

  3. Time to return of clinically significant pleural effusion

    This will be measured in days from the day of IPC removal to the day of return of a clinically significant pleural effusion in the same hemithorax that originally required IPC placement. A clinically significant reaccumulation of pleural fluid will be defined as an effusion with a maximum fluid depth greater than 25% of the AP window on chest CT or 1cm thoracic ultrasound along the lateral 1/3 of the thorax that is associated with shortness of breath or chest pain

    Time frame: 90 days

  4. Rate of successful pleurodesis at 90 days

    Successful pleurodesis will be defined as removal of the IPC with no clinically significant reaccumulation of pleural fluid as evaluated by chest CT or thoracic ultrasound. A clinically significant reaccumulation of pleural fluid will be defined as an effusion with a maximum fluid depth greater than 25% of the AP window on chest CT or 1cm thoracic ultrasound along the lateral 1/3 of the thorax that is associated with shortness of breath or chest pain.

    Time frame: 90 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Antunes G, Neville E, Duffy J, Ali N; Pleural Diseases Group, Standards of Care Committee, British Thoracic Society. BTS guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions. Thorax. 2003 May;58 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii29-38. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.suppl_2.ii29. No abstract available. PubMed 12728148 ↗
  • American Thoracic Society. Management of malignant pleural effusions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Nov;162(5):1987-2001. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.5.ats8-00. No abstract available. PubMed 11069845 ↗
  • Davies HE, Mishra EK, Kahan BC, Wrightson JM, Stanton AE, Guhan A, Davies CW, Grayez J, Harrison R, Prasad A, Crosthwaite N, Lee YC, Davies RJ, Miller RF, Rahman NM. Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2383-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5535. PubMed 22610520 ↗
  • Roberts ME, Neville E, Berrisford RG, Antunes G, Ali NJ; BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Management of a malignant pleural effusion: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii32-40. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.136994. No abstract available. PubMed 20696691 ↗
  • Wahidi MM, Reddy C, Yarmus L, Feller-Kopman D, Musani A, Shepherd RW, Lee H, Bechara R, Lamb C, Shofer S, Mahmood K, Michaud G, Puchalski J, Rafeq S, Cattaneo SM, Mullon J, Leh S, Mayse M, Thomas SM, Peterson B, Light RW. Randomized Trial of Pleural Fluid Drainage Frequency in Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusions. The ASAP Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 15;195(8):1050-1057. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201607-1404OC. PubMed 27898215 ↗
  • Lui MM, Thomas R, Lee YC. Complications of indwelling pleural catheter use and their management. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2016 Feb 5;3(1):e000123. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2015-000123. eCollection 2016. PubMed 26870384 ↗
  • Reddy C, Ernst A, Lamb C, Feller-Kopman D. Rapid pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions: a pilot study. Chest. 2011 Jun;139(6):1419-1423. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1868. Epub 2010 Oct 7. PubMed 20930006 ↗
  • Krochmal R, Reddy C, Yarmus L, Desai NR, Feller-Kopman D, Lee HJ. Patient evaluation for rapid pleurodesis of malignant pleural effusions. J Thorac Dis. 2016 Sep;8(9):2538-2543. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.08.55. PubMed 27747006 ↗
  • Boujaoude Z, Bartter T, Abboud M, Pratter M, Abouzgheib W. Pleuroscopic Pleurodesis Combined With Tunneled Pleural Catheter for Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Prospective Observational Study. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2015 Jul;22(3):237-43. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000186. PubMed 26165894 ↗
  • Ahmed L, Ip H, Rao D, Patel N, Noorzad F. Talc pleurodesis through indwelling pleural catheters for malignant pleural effusions: retrospective case series of a novel clinical pathway. Chest. 2014 Dec;146(6):e190-e194. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0394. PubMed 25451360 ↗
  • King MT. The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 1996 Dec;5(6):555-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00439229. PubMed 8993101 ↗
  • Sivakumar P, Douiri A, West A, Rao D, Warwick G, Chen T, Ahmed L. OPTIMUM: a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing Out Patient Talc slurry via Indwelling pleural catheter for Malignant pleural effusion vs Usual inpatient Management. BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 18;6(10):e012795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012795. Erratum In: BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e012795corr1. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012795corr1. PubMed 27798020 ↗
  • Neto JD, de Oliveira SF, Vianna SP, Terra RM. Efficacy and safety of iodopovidone pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusions. Respirology. 2010 Jan;15(1):115-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01663.x. Epub 2009 Nov 23. PubMed 19947987 ↗
  • Agarwal R, Paul AS, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Jindal SK. A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of cosmetic talc compared with iodopovidone for chemical pleurodesis. Respirology. 2011 Oct;16(7):1064-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01999.x. PubMed 21605278 ↗
  • Olivares-Torres CA, Laniado-Laborin R, Chavez-Garcia C, Leon-Gastelum C, Reyes-Escamilla A, Light RW. Iodopovidone pleurodesis for recurrent pleural effusions. Chest. 2002 Aug;122(2):581-3. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.2.581. PubMed 12171835 ↗
  • Godazandeh G, Qasemi NH, Saghafi M, Mortazian M, Tayebi P. Pleurodesis with povidone-iodine, as an effective procedure in management of patients with malignant pleural effusion. J Thorac Dis. 2013 Apr;5(2):141-4. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.02.02. PubMed 23585939 ↗
  • Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Jindal SK. Efficacy and safety of iodopovidone in chemical pleurodesis: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Respir Med. 2006 Nov;100(11):2043-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.02.009. Epub 2006 Mar 30. PubMed 16574389 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 8, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03325192
Responsible party
Kevin Ma, MD (Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine, University of Pennsylvania) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 30, 2017
Start date
Dec 12, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 9, 2019
Completion
Jul 9, 2019
Last update
May 8, 2020

Study contacts

Kevin C Ma
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion