ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03324009Updated May 5, 2020

2-stage Cervical Cancer Screening in Botswana

An interventional study of 2-stage screen in Cervical Cancer and HIV/AIDS, sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Botswana. Open to female participants aged 25 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-05.

Sponsored by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
239
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
25 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among women in Botswana. The burden of cervical cancer is largely related to the high prevalence of HIV in Botswana (22%), as HIV is known to be a significant risk factor for cervical cancer. Cervical cancer screening is life-saving and has been shown to reduce cervical cancer incidence in multiple settings. Yet, there is no consensus on appropriate screening algorithms for women living with HIV, across resource settings. Botswana is in a unique position, relative to its neighbors in Sub-Saharan Africa, in that there exists capacity for advanced screening modalities, including primary high risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV) testing and cytology-based screening. To address this issue, this study seeks to evaluate two-stage cervical cancer screening algorithms for women living with HIV in Botswana using hrHPV testing. The protocols include hrHPV testing followed by Pap Smear evaluation, VIA and colposcopy. These same participants will be invited back at one-year for cervical cancer screening using hrHPV testing (followed by triage testing) in order to inform guidelines on the frequency of HPV testing in women living with HIV. The evidence generated will be critical to guiding cervical cancer screening in HIV-infected women across resource settings.

Read the detailed description

Cervical cancer screening programs vary across settings and there is no clear guidance for effective screening programs for HIV-positive women. Evaluating the performance of algorithms that include human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing as first stage screening in high HIV prevalence settings like Botswana is essential for establishing an evidence-based strategy for cervical cancer screening in HIV-positive women.

This study seeks to evaluate the performance of two-stage cervical cancer screening algorithms using primary HPV testing in women living with HIV in Botswana. Second stage screening modalities include Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and colposcopy.

The study will enroll 300 HIV positive women. For all 300 participants, gynecologic speculum exam will be performed and provider-collected cervical swabs will be collected for HPV testing and Pap smear preparation. HPV testing will be performed with either the commercially-available Cepheid Xpert® HPV Assay or a high throughput PCR platform. Pap smear will be prepared using standard technique at the site of collection.

Participants who test HPV-negative will have their Pap smear sent to the National Health Lab (NHL) for staining and pathologist evaluation. If the Pap smear is abnormal, they will be referred to colposcopy per current Botswana Cervical Cancer Prevention Guidelines.

Participants who test HPV-positive will also have their Pap smear reviewed, and will also be asked to return for colposcopy and will undergo further diagnosis and treatment for cervical cancer per national guidelines. At the colposcopy visit, a trained nurse will conduct VIA using the Botswana standard protocol. After application of acetic acid to the cervix, the nurse will record visual results as positive or negative. If VIA is positive based on assessment of the lesion(s), the nurse will record a recommendation for either cryotherapy or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Since all of these HPV-positive participants will undergo colposcopy, the participants will not be informed of the VIA results, as neither cryotherapy nor LEEP will be administered based on the VIA results. Rather, the participants will proceed to colposcopy and results of colposcopy will determine further diagnosis and treatment. This design enables us to assess the utility of the two-stage algorithms while providing the highest-quality follow-up to cervical cancer screening abnormalities in Botswana.

These same participants will be invited back at one-year for repeat cervical cancer screening using the same screening methods as at baseline. The data will inform guidelines on the frequency of hrHPV testing in women living with HIV.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

2,366 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; 677 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 239 is above the median of 100 across 1,738 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms.

Browse Uterine Cervical Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 568 studies on the registry; 79 are open to participants now.

Of its 76 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 62 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥25 years of age
  • -positive
  • Competent to understand study procedures and give .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently pregnant
  • Currently menstruating or having persistent vaginal discharge
  • Previous hysterectomy
  • Previous diagnosis of cervical cancer
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
239 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    2-stage screen

    All patients will be enrolled in the two-stage cervical cancer screening protocol

    Diagnostic Test: 2-stage screen

Interventions

  • Diagnostic test2-stage screen

    Pap smear is currently the standard of care for cervical cancer screening in Botswana. In this study, participants will undergo HPV DNA testing at the time of Pap smear collection. If HPV DNA test is positive, they will be referred for colposcopy. Patients who have an HPV negative test but positive Pap smear will be referred for colposcopy per Botswana cervical cancer screening guidelines.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Performance of HPV-Pap screening algorithm

    Measurement of the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of Pap smear in predicting cervical precancer and cancer in HPV positive, HIV positive women.

    Time frame: 2 months

  2. Performance of HPV-VIA screening algorithm

    Measurement of the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of VIA in predicting cervical precancer and cancer in HPV positive, HIV positive women.

    Time frame: 2 months

  3. Performance of HPV-Colposcopy screening algorithm

    Measurement of the sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of Colposcopy in predicting cervical precancer and cancer in HPV positive, HIV positive women.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Incident and persistent HPV infection at one-year follow-up

    Time frame: 18 months

  5. Incidence, persistence and progression of histopathologic abnormality at one-year follow-up

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Princess Marina Hospital
    Gaborone, Botswana
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4. PubMed 25651787 ↗
  • Grover S, Raesima M, Bvochora-Nsingo M, Chiyapo SP, Balang D, Tapela N, Balogun O, Kayembe MK, Russell AH, Monare B, Tanyala S, Bhat J, Thipe K, Nchunga M, Mayisela S, Kizito B, Ho-Foster A, Gaolebale BE, Gaolebale PA, Efstathiou JA, Dryden-Peterson S, Zetola N, Hahn SM, Robertson ES, Lin LL, Morroni C, Ramogola-Masire D. Cervical Cancer in Botswana: Current State and Future Steps for Screening and Treatment Programs. Front Oncol. 2015 Nov 3;5:239. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00239. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26579491 ↗
  • Ellerbrock TV, Chiasson MA, Bush TJ, Sun XW, Sawo D, Brudney K, Wright TC Jr. Incidence of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-infected women. JAMA. 2000 Feb 23;283(8):1031-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.8.1031. PubMed 10697063 ↗
  • Chin KM, Sidhu JS, Janssen RS, Weber JT. Invasive cervical cancer in human immunodeficiency virus-infected and uninfected hospital patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jul;92(1):83-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00140-9. PubMed 9649099 ↗
  • Peirson L, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Ciliska D, Warren R. Screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2013 May 24;2:35. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-35. PubMed 23706117 ↗
  • Gibb RK, Martens MG. The impact of liquid-based cytology in decreasing the incidence of cervical cancer. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011;4(Suppl 1):S2-S11. PubMed 21617785 ↗
  • de Martel C, Ferlay J, Franceschi S, Vignat J, Bray F, Forman D, Plummer M. Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2008: a review and synthetic analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):607-15. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70137-7. Epub 2012 May 9. PubMed 22575588 ↗
  • McCredie MR, Sharples KJ, Paul C, Baranyai J, Medley G, Jones RW, Skegg DC. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2008 May;9(5):425-34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70103-7. Epub 2008 Apr 11. PubMed 18407790 ↗
  • Wheeler CM. Natural history of human papillomavirus infections, cytologic and histologic abnormalities, and cancer. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008 Dec;35(4):519-36; vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2008.09.006. PubMed 19061814 ↗
  • Denny LA, Franceschi S, de Sanjose S, Heard I, Moscicki AB, Palefsky J. Human papillomavirus, human immunodeficiency virus and immunosuppression. Vaccine. 2012 Nov 20;30 Suppl 5:F168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.045. PubMed 23199960 ↗
  • de Sanjose S, Diaz M, Castellsague X, Clifford G, Bruni L, Munoz N, Bosch FX. Worldwide prevalence and genotype distribution of cervical human papillomavirus DNA in women with normal cytology: a meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Jul;7(7):453-9. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70158-5. PubMed 17597569 ↗
  • Banura C, Franceschi S, Doorn LJ, Arslan A, Wabwire-Mangen F, Mbidde EK, Quint W, Weiderpass E. Infection with human papillomavirus and HIV among young women in Kampala, Uganda. J Infect Dis. 2008 Feb 15;197(4):555-62. doi: 10.1086/526792. PubMed 18237268 ↗
  • Dunne EF, Unger ER, Sternberg M, McQuillan G, Swan DC, Patel SS, Markowitz LE. Prevalence of HPV infection among females in the United States. JAMA. 2007 Feb 28;297(8):813-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.8.813. PubMed 17327523 ↗
  • Clifford GM, Smith JS, Plummer M, Munoz N, Franceschi S. Human papillomavirus types in invasive cervical cancer worldwide: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2003 Jan 13;88(1):63-73. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600688. PubMed 12556961 ↗
  • Smith JS, Lindsay L, Hoots B, Keys J, Franceschi S, Winer R, Clifford GM. Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high-grade cervical lesions: a meta-analysis update. Int J Cancer. 2007 Aug 1;121(3):621-32. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22527. PubMed 17405118 ↗
  • de Sanjose S, Quint WG, Alemany L, Geraets DT, Klaustermeier JE, Lloveras B, Tous S, Felix A, Bravo LE, Shin HR, Vallejos CS, de Ruiz PA, Lima MA, Guimera N, Clavero O, Alejo M, Llombart-Bosch A, Cheng-Yang C, Tatti SA, Kasamatsu E, Iljazovic E, Odida M, Prado R, Seoud M, Grce M, Usubutun A, Jain A, Suarez GA, Lombardi LE, Banjo A, Menendez C, Domingo EJ, Velasco J, Nessa A, Chichareon SC, Qiao YL, Lerma E, Garland SM, Sasagawa T, Ferrera A, Hammouda D, Mariani L, Pelayo A, Steiner I, Oliva E, Meijer CJ, Al-Jassar WF, Cruz E, Wright TC, Puras A, Llave CL, Tzardi M, Agorastos T, Garcia-Barriola V, Clavel C, Ordi J, Andujar M, Castellsague X, Sanchez GI, Nowakowski AM, Bornstein J, Munoz N, Bosch FX; Retrospective International Survey and HPV Time Trends Study Group. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Nov;11(11):1048-56. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70230-8. Epub 2010 Oct 15. PubMed 20952254 ↗
  • Ramogola-Masire D, McGrath CM, Barnhart KT, Friedman HM, Zetola NM. Subtype distribution of human papillomavirus in HIV-infected women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia stages 2 and 3 in Botswana. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2011 Nov;30(6):591-6. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e31821bf2a6. PubMed 21979597 ↗
  • Macleod IJ, O'Donnell B, Moyo S, Lockman S, Shapiro RL, Kayembe M, van Widenfelt E, Makhema J, Essex M, Wester C. Prevalence of human papillomavirus genotypes and associated cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-infected women in Botswana. J Med Virol. 2011 Oct;83(10):1689-95. doi: 10.1002/jmv.22178. PubMed 21837784 ↗
  • Ginsburg O, Badwe R, Boyle P, Derricks G, Dare A, Evans T, Eniu A, Jimenez J, Kutluk T, Lopes G, Mohammed SI, Qiao YL, Rashid SF, Summers D, Sarfati D, Temmerman M, Trimble EL, Padela AI, Aggarwal A, Sullivan R. Changing global policy to deliver safe, equitable, and affordable care for women's cancers. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):871-880. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31393-9. Epub 2016 Nov 1. PubMed 27814964 ↗
  • Lazcano-Ponce E, Lorincz AT, Cruz-Valdez A, Salmeron J, Uribe P, Velasco-Mondragon E, Nevarez PH, Acosta RD, Hernandez-Avila M. Self-collection of vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer prevention (MARCH): a community-based randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Nov 26;378(9806):1868-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61522-5. Epub 2011 Nov 1. PubMed 22051739 ↗
  • Chatzistamatiou K, Moysiadis T, Angelis E, Kaufmann A, Skenderi A, Jansen-Duerr P, Lekka I, Kilintzis V, Angelidou S, Katsiki E, Hagemann I, Tsertanidou A, Koch I, Boecher O, Soutschek E, Maglaveras N, Agorastos T. Diagnostic accuracy of high-risk HPV DNA genotyping for primary cervical cancer screening and triage of HPV-positive women, compared to cytology: preliminary results of the PIPAVIR study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1247-1257. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4324-x. Epub 2017 Mar 23. PubMed 28337594 ↗
  • Cuzick J, Clavel C, Petry KU, Meijer CJ, Hoyer H, Ratnam S, Szarewski A, Birembaut P, Kulasingam S, Sasieni P, Iftner T. Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 2006 Sep 1;119(5):1095-101. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21955. PubMed 16586444 ↗
  • Jeronimo J, Castle PE, Temin S, Shastri SS. Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Resource-Stratified Clinical Practice Guideline Summary. J Oncol Pract. 2017 Feb;13(2):129-133. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.017889. Epub 2016 Nov 15. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Oncol Pract. 2017 Jul;13(7):466. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.025296. PubMed 27845871 ↗
  • Wright TC Jr, Ellerbrock TV, Chiasson MA, Van Devanter N, Sun XW. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women infected with human immunodeficiency virus: prevalence, risk factors, and validity of Papanicolaou smears. New York Cervical Disease Study. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct;84(4):591-7. PubMed 8090399 ↗
  • Mustafa RA, Santesso N, Khatib R, Mustafa AA, Wiercioch W, Kehar R, Gandhi S, Chen Y, Cheung A, Hopkins J, Ma B, Lloyd N, Wu D, Broutet N, Schunemann HJ. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the accuracy of HPV tests, visual inspection with acetic acid, cytology, and colposcopy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Mar;132(3):259-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.024. Epub 2015 Nov 12. PubMed 26851054 ↗
  • Arbyn M, Sankaranarayanan R, Muwonge R, Keita N, Dolo A, Mbalawa CG, Nouhou H, Sakande B, Wesley R, Somanathan T, Sharma A, Shastri S, Basu P. Pooled analysis of the accuracy of five cervical cancer screening tests assessed in eleven studies in Africa and India. Int J Cancer. 2008 Jul 1;123(1):153-60. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23489. PubMed 18404671 ↗
  • Sankaranarayanan R, Esmy PO, Rajkumar R, Muwonge R, Swaminathan R, Shanthakumari S, Fayette JM, Cherian J. Effect of visual screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Tamil Nadu, India: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2007 Aug 4;370(9585):398-406. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61195-7. PubMed 17679017 ↗
  • Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfstrom KM, Tunesi S, Snijders PJ, Arbyn M, Kitchener H, Segnan N, Gilham C, Giorgi-Rossi P, Berkhof J, Peto J, Meijer CJ; International HPV screening working group. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2014 Feb 8;383(9916):524-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62218-7. Epub 2013 Nov 3. Erratum In: Lancet. 2015 Oct 10;386(10002):1446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00411-0. PubMed 24192252 ↗
  • Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS, Jayant K, Muwonge R, Budukh AM, Hingmire S, Malvi SG, Thorat R, Kothari A, Chinoy R, Kelkar R, Kane S, Desai S, Keskar VR, Rajeshwarkar R, Panse N, Dinshaw KA. HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 2;360(14):1385-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808516. PubMed 19339719 ↗
  • Denny L, Kuhn L, De Souza M, Pollack AE, Dupree W, Wright TC Jr. Screen-and-treat approaches for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settings: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Nov 2;294(17):2173-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.17.2173. PubMed 16264158 ↗
  • Denny L, Kuhn L, Hu CC, Tsai WY, Wright TC Jr. Human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer prevention: long-term results of a randomized screening trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Oct 20;102(20):1557-67. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq342. Epub 2010 Sep 30. PubMed 20884893 ↗
  • Denny LA, Sankaranarayanan R, De Vuyst H, Kim JJ, Adefuye PO, Alemany L, Adewole IF, Awolude OA, Parham G, de Sanjose S, Bosch FX. Recommendations for cervical cancer prevention in sub-saharan Africa. Vaccine. 2013 Dec 29;31 Suppl 5:F73-4. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.077. No abstract available. PubMed 24331750 ↗
  • Santesso N, Mustafa RA, Schunemann HJ, Arbyn M, Blumenthal PD, Cain J, Chirenje M, Denny L, De Vuyst H, Eckert LO, Forhan SE, Franco EL, Gage JC, Garcia F, Herrero R, Jeronimo J, Lu ER, Luciani S, Quek SC, Sankaranarayanan R, Tsu V, Broutet N; Guideline Support Group. World Health Organization Guidelines for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3 and screen-and-treat strategies to prevent cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Mar;132(3):252-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.038. Epub 2015 Dec 14. PubMed 26868062 ↗
  • Denny L, Kuhn L, Risi L, Richart RM, Pollack A, Lorincz A, Kostecki F, Wright TC Jr. Two-stage cervical cancer screening: an alternative for resource-poor settings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;183(2):383-8. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.105871. PubMed 10942474 ↗
  • Naucler P, Ryd W, Tornberg S, Strand A, Wadell G, Elfgren K, Radberg T, Strander B, Forslund O, Hansson BG, Hagmar B, Johansson B, Rylander E, Dillner J. Efficacy of HPV DNA testing with cytology triage and/or repeat HPV DNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jan 21;101(2):88-99. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn444. Epub 2009 Jan 13. PubMed 19141778 ↗
  • Bigoni J, Gundar M, Tebeu PM, Bongoe A, Schafer S, Fokom-Domgue J, Catarino R, Tincho EF, Bougel S, Vassilakos P, Petignat P. Cervical cancer screening in sub-Saharan Africa: a randomized trial of VIA versus cytology for triage of HPV-positive women. Int J Cancer. 2015 Jul 1;137(1):127-34. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29353. Epub 2014 Dec 5. PubMed 25420434 ↗
  • Ramogola-Masire D, de Klerk R, Monare B, Ratshaa B, Friedman HM, Zetola NM. Cervical cancer prevention in HIV-infected women using the "see and treat" approach in Botswana. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Mar 1;59(3):308-13. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182426227. PubMed 22134146 ↗
  • Kuhn L, Denny L, Pollack A, Lorincz A, Richart RM, Wright TC. Human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 May 17;92(10):818-25. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.10.818. PubMed 10814677 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2018 to primary completion in Jan 2020, 21 months.

Of 446 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 71. This study's 21 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 462 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 71.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 12, 2017
First posted
Oct 27, 2017
StartActual
Apr 20, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jan 31, 2020
CompletionActual
Jan 31, 2020
Last update
May 5, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 5, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03324009
Responsible party
Rebecca Luckett (Instructor in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 27, 2017
Start date
Apr 20, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2020
Completion
Jan 31, 2020
Last update
May 5, 2020

Study contacts

Rebecca Luckett, MD MPH
principal investigator · Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion