ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03321149RiseTxUpdated Oct 25, 2017

Reducing Sedentary Behavior Among Prostate Cancer Survivors on Androgen Deprivation Therapy

An interventional study of RiseTx in Prostate Cancer, Prostate Neoplasm and Cancer, sponsored by University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Completed. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-25.

Sponsored by University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2015, registered Oct 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The current study aimed to develop and assess an easy-to-use, highly accessible mobile and web-based application intervention to reduce sedentary behavior and increase physical activity in the hope of reducing the side effects of treatment and improving quality of life for the 13,000 or more prostate cancer survivors who are prescribed ADT each year in Canada. The study was conducted in two phases, where Phase one was focused on finding out about the attitudes and perceptions of sedentary behavior and the use of mobile applications among prostate cancer survivors using semi-structured interviews. Together with professional experts and a group of men who were diagnosed with prostate cancer, we developed RiseForTx - an application that is used on a smartphone or tablet to reduce time spent in, and to change patterns of, sedentary behaviour each day (Phase two). Part of the intervention was also focused on increasing daily steps to improve physical activity. We tested the intervention to examine (i) how the application works, (ii) if prostate cancer survivors like it and use it; and (iii) if sedentary behaviour and physical activity can reduce the impact of the side effects for treatment and improve quality of life among men on ADT.

Read the detailed description

In the first 10 days following recruitment, participants met with the research coordinator and were provided with an accelerometer (GT3X) and completed self-report baseline measures. Provided along with the RiseTx application is the Jawbone, which is a wrist-worn device that can assess activity patterns throughout the day and provide sensory alerts to stand after prolonged sitting (i.e., ≥30 minutes of sedentary time). The intervention consisted of five phases following initial data collection, including a baseline phase (weeks 1-2) where participants self-monitored their typical leisure time PA (i.e., step counts) and were asked to 'sync' their Jawbone with the RiseTx application to view their daily progress and steps. This daily self-monitoring process continued over the remaining intervention period. Based on a previously tested ramped step count approach that focuses on increasing walking by an extra 1000 daily steps over a set period, participants attempted to increase daily steps by 1000 over the average of their baseline week. Phases I-III involved progressive release of self-regulatory strategies (e.g., action planning) on the application and targeted changes in both sitting time (and breaks in sitting time) and step counts. Phase I (weeks 3-4) focused on increasing low intensity, incidental movement, through the use of an alerting device, and the Jawbone (reminder to break SED). At this time, an additional +1000 daily step increment was set above baseline. Phase II (weeks 5-6) targeted shorter planned PA (of up to 10 mins) by having participants form action plans on the application for both reducing SED and increasing PA. An additional +1000 daily step increment was set above Phase I. Phase III (weeks 7-8) focused on promoting longer, moderate intensity PA (>10 min), where participants used the application to form coping plans for barriers to reducing sitting time or engaging in PA. An additional +1000 daily step increment was set above Phase II step target. A 4-week consolidation phase (Phase IV and V; weeks 9-12) followed, where participants received weekly reminders that encouraged them to continue to use the RiseTx application to practice combining the different self-regulatory strategies learned in Phases I-III. Following the intervention, there was a 12-week maintenance period (weeks 13-24) where participants no longer received weekly self-regulatory practice reminders, yet still had access to the application.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer
  • Prostate Neoplasm
  • Cancer
  • Sedentary Lifestyle

Keywords

  • Web-based intervention
  • Sedentary behavior
  • Lifestyle intervention
  • Feasibility
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

7,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,580 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 46 is below the median of 60 across 5,348 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is the lead sponsor of 191 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Men with localized or asymptomatic primary prostate cancer (Stage I-III)
  • Currently receiving ADT (continuous and/or intermittent) for at least 6 months
  • Active e-mail address to access the intervention website
  • Proficient in English
  • Physically inactive (\< 150 minutes of moderate-intensity PA/week)
  • No uncontrolled co-morbidities
  • Medical clearance from the primary healthcare provider
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
46 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    RiseTx

    Participants were given access to the RiseTx application and an activity monitor to participate in the five phase intervention.

    Other: RiseTx

Interventions

  • OtherRiseTx

    Participants were given access to the RiseTx application, as well as given a Jawbone, a wrist-worn device that can assess activity patterns throughout the day and provide sensory alerts to stand after prolonged sitting (i.e., ≥30 minutes of sedentary time). The intervention consisted of five phases following initial data collection that comprised of self-regulatory strategies to reduce sitting time and self-monitoring of step counts.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility measures

    Intervention adherence was tracked through website analytics such as number of logins (≥ 3 visits by participants each week to the RiseTx platform)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physical Activity (PA)

    PA was measured by ActiGraph Model GT3X accelerometers

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 Weeks, 24 week follow-up

  2. Step counts

    Weekly step counts were collected using the Jawbone UP24.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 Weeks

  3. Sedentary Behavior (SED)

    Volume of SED was measured by ActiGraph Model GT3X accelerometers.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 Weeks, 24 week follow-up

  4. Quality of life

    Quality of life was assessed by the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G).

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 Weeks, 24 week follow-up

  5. Cancer-specific quality of life

    FACT-Prostate contains 12 questions that assess the most important targeted symptoms and concerns for participants.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 Weeks, 24 week follow-up

Other outcomes

  1. Feasibility measures

    Measurement completion was assessed by evaluating whether ≥75% of participants completed baseline, 12-weeks, and 24-week follow-up measures

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 Weeks, 24 week follow-up

  2. Feasibility measures

    Acceptability was measured through an intervention satisfaction survey completed at post-intervention assessing perceptions and overall impressions of the RiseTx intervention (\>75% rate their participation as satisfactory or very satisfactory)

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  3. Feasibility measures

    Attrition was assessed by evaluating whether there was a ≤20% drop-out rate

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 Weeks, and 24 week follow-up

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gilson ND, Faulkner G, Murphy MH, Meyer MR, Washington T, Ryde GC, Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Dillon KA. Walk@Work: An automated intervention to increase walking in university employees not achieving 10,000 daily steps. Prev Med. 2013 May;56(5):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.022. Epub 2013 Feb 13. PubMed 23415624 ↗
  • Mitchell MS, Goodman JM, Alter DA, John LK, Oh PI, Pakosh MT, Faulkner GE. Financial incentives for exercise adherence in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Nov;45(5):658-67. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.06.017. PubMed 24139781 ↗
  • Arain M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, Lancaster GA. What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jul 16;10:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-67. PubMed 20637084 ↗
  • Kuijpers W, Groen WG, Aaronson NK, van Harten WH. A systematic review of web-based interventions for patient empowerment and physical activity in chronic diseases: relevance for cancer survivors. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 20;15(2):e37. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2281. PubMed 23425685 ↗
  • Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Mar;11(3):570-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570. PubMed 8445433 ↗
  • Esper P, Mo F, Chodak G, Sinner M, Cella D, Pienta KJ. Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the functional assessment of cancer therapy-prostate instrument. Urology. 1997 Dec;50(6):920-8. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00459-7. PubMed 9426724 ↗
  • Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res. 2011 May;45(5):626-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008. Epub 2010 Oct 28. PubMed 21035130 ↗
  • Trinh L, Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Sabiston CM, Berry SR, Loblaw A, Alibhai SMH, Jones JM, Faulkner GE. RiseTx: testing the feasibility of a web application for reducing sedentary behavior among prostate cancer survivors receiving androgen deprivation therapy. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jun 7;15(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0686-0. Erratum In: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Dec 4;15(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0757-2. PubMed 29880049 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03321149
Collaborators
University of Toronto, Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 25, 2017
Start date
Jul 1, 2015
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2016
Completion
Oct 1, 2016
Last update
Oct 25, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion