ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03315286Updated Dec 18, 2019Results posted

Validation of SHADE a Mobile Technology for Monitoring of Ultraviolet Exposure

An interventional study of SHADE Ultraviolet Sensor and Standard of care counseling in Skin Cancer, Actinic Keratoses and Ultraviolet-Induced Change in Normal Skin, sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-18.

Sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
111
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Shade for the management of UV-induced skin complications and data collected from this study will be used to support the proposed indications for use.

Read the detailed description

The incidence of non-melanoma skin cancers, due to increased ultraviolet (UV) exposure, has increased by 300% over the past 2 decades. The innovative UV sensor, Shade, is designed to help people manage their UV exposure by quantifying their UV exposure levels through a linked smartphone application. In order to validate the effectiveness of Shade, we propose conducting a study communicating the level of UV exposure and correlating it with the development of actinic keratosis (AK), a precancerous lesion of the skin. We will recruit patients with multiple repeat AK's, as this population continues to develop AKs every year. We will include renal transplant patients. The risk of developing squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in renal transplant patients is 65 times higher than normal patients. They are an ideal patient population for this study. We will evaluate the UV monitor's effectiveness in decreasing the number of AKs over a summer. This randomized partially blinded study will recruit 120 patients with a recent history of AK lesions and evaluate the incidence of new AKs after one summer. We will perform a control versus study group analysis. Half of the subjects (study group) will be randomly assigned to use the sensor along with its smartphone application, while the other half (control group) will receive standard of care treatment involving counseling to avoid sun exposure. Subjects will have regular standard of care visits with the dermatologist who will follow the number of actinic keratosis via clinical exam and photography. The primary outcome will be a statistically significant reduction by at least 25% of the cumulative number of newly occurred AK lesions between the control and the study group over one summer, counted at enrollment and follow-up. In subjects at one study site, skin DNA damage will also be assessed using cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) levels measured by ELISA in both sun exposed (cheek) and sun protected skin (buccal mucosa) in both the study and control groups. Secondary outcomes will look at clinical decreases by 25% in CPD levels after using the sensor.

02

Conditions studied

  • Skin Cancer
  • Actinic Keratoses
  • Ultraviolet-Induced Change in Normal Skin
  • Behavior, Health
  • Behavior, Risk Reduction

Keywords

  • ultraviolet light
  • dosimetry
  • actinic keratosis
  • skin cancer
  • sun counseling
  • wearable device
03

In context

Skin Neoplasms

604 studies on the registry are indexed under Skin Neoplasms; 126 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 111 is above the median of 55 across 408 interventional studies indexed under Skin Neoplasms.

Browse Skin Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University is the lead sponsor of 892 studies on the registry; 165 are open to participants now.

Of its 123 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 94 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • between 18-80 years of age
  • given a diagnosis of actinic keratosis in the past year and/or has had a history of >5 actinic keratosis over the past 5 years
  • has a compatible smartphone ((Apple version >= 7, Android version >= 4.4.2; no Jitterbug or Samsung Galaxy J3)
  • willing to commit to dermatology visits (including standard of care visits) every 3 months for 6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • received UV therapy within the past 6 months
  • work/lifestyle incompatible with wearing a UV sensor over the course of 1 year
  • has difficulty controlling UV exposure
  • has a medical condition judged incompatible with the study by the enrolling physician including the presence of an ICD or an existing plan for extended inpatient treatment
  • has received field therapy (i.e., entire face or scalp) for the treatment of actinic keratosis (i.e., topical imiquimod, 5-fluorouracil, photodynamic therapy) in the past 3 months
  • is an employee or direct relative of an employee of the site or study sponsor
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
111 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Device: SHADE Ultraviolet Sensor

    Patients will receive an Ultraviolet (UV) sensor that will quantify their UV exposure through a linked smartphone application. Patients will also receive clinical counseling by their dermatologist regarding sun protection and avoidance

    Device: SHADE Ultraviolet Sensor · Behavioral: Standard of care counseling

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care Counseling

    Patients will receive clinical counseling by their dermatologist regarding sun protection and avoidance

    Behavioral: Standard of care counseling

Interventions

  • DeviceSHADE Ultraviolet Sensor

    Patients will wear device for 6 months in addition to their own method of photo-protection.

    Also known as: SHADE

  • BehavioralStandard of care counseling

    Patients will use their own method of photo-protection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quantification of Actinic Keratosis Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group

    Clinical counting of new actinic keratosis at 3 month intervals for a total duration of 6 months. Patient's actinic keratosis were counted at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 months. The average number of actinic keratosis at 6 months is only reported.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quantification of Non Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group

    Clinical counting of new non melanoma skin cancers at 3 month intervals for a total duration of 6 months. Patient's non melanoma skin cancers were counted at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 months. The average number of non melanoma skin cancers at 6 months is only reported.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Impact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Depression

    PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) surveys will be given to patients at at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 month . Specifically we will include questions about anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. The surveys will be scored on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 indicates never, 5 indicates always. An example of a question would be "I felt fearful" and the patient would score this question on a scale of 1-5 as indicated above. The results are scored using item-level calibrations via HealthMeasures.net Scoring Service. The total raw score (aggregate of the scores) is rescaled into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months. data at baseline and 6 months will be reported

  3. Impact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Anxiety

    PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) surveys will be given to patients at at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 month . Specifically we will include questions about anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. The surveys will be scored on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 indicates never, 5 indicates always. An example of a question would be "I felt fearful" and the patient would score this question on a scale of 1-5 as indicated above. The results are scored using item-level calibrations via HealthMeasures.net Scoring Service. The total raw score (aggregate of the scores) is rescaled into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months. data at baseline and 6 months will be reported

  4. Impact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities

    PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) surveys will be given to patients at at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 month . Specifically we will include questions about anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. The surveys will be scored on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 indicates never, 5 indicates always. An example of a question would be "I felt fearful" and the patient would score this question on a scale of 1-5 as indicated above. The results are scored using item-level calibrations via HealthMeasures.net Scoring Service. The total raw score (aggregate of the scores) is rescaled into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months. data at baseline and 6 months will be reported

  5. Quantification of Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group

    Clinical counting of new non melanoma skin cancers at 3 month intervals for a total duration of 6 months. Patient's melanoma skin cancers were counted at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 months. The number of melanoma skin cancers at each time point is reported.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Nov 7, 2019
Limitations and caveats
Transplant patient population was limited, too small a size. Ideally, we would have liked to monitor patients over 1 year. Secondary outcomes of melanomas:, could not power the statistical analysis due to small number of diagnosed melanomas.

Participant flow

We recruited 14 patients with kidney transplantation \& actinic keratosis from 10/2018 to 4/2018. We recruited another 97 patients with only a history of actinic keratosis without a history of kidney transplantation between 4/2018 and 7/2018. Patient were all recruited at one academic institution. We are presenting the data of the 97 patients.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDevice: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorStandard of Care Counseling
Started5047
Completed4943
Not completed14
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up03
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: Protocol violation01

Outcome measures

PrimaryQuantification of Actinic Keratosis Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group

Clinical counting of new actinic keratosis at 3 month intervals for a total duration of 6 months. Patient's actinic keratosis were counted at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 months. The average number of actinic keratosis at 6 months is only reported.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · lesions
Quantification of Actinic Keratosis Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group
lesionsDevice: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorStandard of Care Counseling
Quantification of Actinic Keratosis Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group4.53 (0 to 14)4.74 (0 to 22)
Statistical analysis
  • Device: SHADE Ultraviolet Sensor vs Standard of Care Counseling · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.8
SecondaryQuantification of Non Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group

Clinical counting of new non melanoma skin cancers at 3 month intervals for a total duration of 6 months. Patient's non melanoma skin cancers were counted at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 months. The average number of non melanoma skin cancers at 6 months is only reported.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · lesions
Quantification of Non Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group
lesionsDevice: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorStandard of Care Counseling
Quantification of Non Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group0.04 (0 to 1)0.232 (0 to 2)
Statistical analysis
  • Device: SHADE Ultraviolet Sensor vs Standard of Care Counseling · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.03
SecondaryImpact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Depression

PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) surveys will be given to patients at at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 month . Specifically we will include questions about anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. The surveys will be scored on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 indicates never, 5 indicates always. An example of a question would be "I felt fearful" and the patient would score this question on a scale of 1-5 as indicated above. The results are scored using item-level calibrations via HealthMeasures.net Scoring Service. The total raw score (aggregate of the scores) is rescaled into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months. data at baseline and 6 months will be reported
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Impact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Depression
units on a scaleDevice: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorStandard of Care Counseling
baseline44.2 (38 to 62)43.6 (38 to 55)
6 months45.3 (38 to 62)43.7 (38 to 59)
Statistical analysis
  • Device: SHADE Ultraviolet Sensor vs Standard of Care Counseling · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.6
  • Device: SHADE Ultraviolet Sensor vs Standard of Care Counseling · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.3
SecondaryImpact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Anxiety

PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) surveys will be given to patients at at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 month . Specifically we will include questions about anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. The surveys will be scored on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 indicates never, 5 indicates always. An example of a question would be "I felt fearful" and the patient would score this question on a scale of 1-5 as indicated above. The results are scored using item-level calibrations via HealthMeasures.net Scoring Service. The total raw score (aggregate of the scores) is rescaled into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months. data at baseline and 6 months will be reported
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Impact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Anxiety
units on a scaleDevice: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorStandard of Care Counseling
baseline46.2 (37 to 63)44.1 (37 to 65)
6 months46.3 (37 to 66)44.7 (37 to 63)
Statistical analysis
  • Device: SHADE Ultraviolet Sensor vs Standard of Care Counseling · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.2
  • Device: SHADE Ultraviolet Sensor vs Standard of Care Counseling · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.4
SecondaryImpact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities

PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) surveys will be given to patients at at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 month . Specifically we will include questions about anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. The surveys will be scored on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 indicates never, 5 indicates always. An example of a question would be "I felt fearful" and the patient would score this question on a scale of 1-5 as indicated above. The results are scored using item-level calibrations via HealthMeasures.net Scoring Service. The total raw score (aggregate of the scores) is rescaled into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months. data at baseline and 6 months will be reported
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Impact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities
units on a scaleDevice: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorStandard of Care Counseling
baseline57 (34 to 65)60 (44 to 65)
6 months55.8 (36 to 65)62.1 (47 to 65)
Statistical analysis
  • Device: SHADE Ultraviolet Sensor vs Standard of Care Counseling · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.07
  • Device: SHADE Ultraviolet Sensor vs Standard of Care Counseling · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0002
SecondaryQuantification of Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group

Clinical counting of new non melanoma skin cancers at 3 month intervals for a total duration of 6 months. Patient's melanoma skin cancers were counted at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 months. The number of melanoma skin cancers at each time point is reported.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · lesions
Quantification of Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group
lesionsDevice: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorStandard of Care Counseling
baseline01
3 months01
6 months01

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse effects were evaluated over the course of the study which was 6 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Device: SHADE Ultraviolet Sensor0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)
Standard of Care Counseling0/47 (0%)0/47 (0%)0/47 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

We are posting the results of patients without a transplant (97).

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorStandard of Care CounselingTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years251237
>=65 years253560
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorStandard of Care CounselingTotal
Female142034
Male362763
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorStandard of Care CounselingTotal
Hispanic or Latino202
Not Hispanic or Latino454792
Unknown or Not Reported303
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorStandard of Care CounselingTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White494796
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported101
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorStandard of Care CounselingTotal
United States504797
Baseline measurement of Actinic keratosis
Baseline measurement of Actinic keratosis(lesions)Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorStandard of Care CounselingTotal
Mean6.42 (0 to 36)6.212 (0 to 25)6.319 (0 to 36)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Weill Medical College of Cornell University
    New York, New York 10024, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data will be available through publications, presentations at scientific symposia and seminars. Efforts will be made to publish our research findings in scientific journals. All final peer-reviewed manuscripts that arise from this proposal will be submitted to the digital archive PubMed Central. To encourage use of the data, subject level device data will be made available on request to qualified researchers including to NIH staff who agree to restrictions against public release of the data, attempts to identify study participants, destruction of the data after analyses are completed, reporting responsibilities, restrictions on the redistribution of the data to third parties, and proper acknowledgement of the data resource.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: 1-5 years

Access criteria: Requests will be made directly to SHADE by email through contact information to be provided on its web site and included in each publication based on these data. These data will be shared without fee through a single use web link which will enable the secure download of subject level device data in .csv format.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2017 to primary completion in Jan 2019, 15 months.

Results were first posted in Nov 2019, 9 months after primary completion.

Of 94 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Skin Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 49. This study's 15 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 116 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 66.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 11, 2017
First posted
Oct 20, 2017
StartActual
Oct 11, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jan 31, 2019
CompletionActual
Mar 31, 2019
Results first posted
Nov 7, 2019
Last update
Dec 18, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 18, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03315286
Collaborators
YouV Labs Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 20, 2017
Start date
Oct 11, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2019
Completion
Mar 31, 2019
Results posted
Nov 7, 2019
Last update
Dec 18, 2019

Study contacts

George Varghese, MD
principal investigator · Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion