An interventional study of Cerebral neuroinflammation evaluation in Depressive Disorder, sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse. Status unknown at 4 sites in France. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-30.
Sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
the investigators make the following assumptions: 1) neuroinflammation in MDD can be measured by the [18 F ] DPA- 714 ; 2) it is accompanied by anatomical and functional changes in the frontal subcortical loops, strongly involved in MDD ; 3) neuroinflammation in patients might be a biomarker related to resistance to treatment in patients with MDD. If this assumptions are validated, then this study will enable a better understanding of the neuroinflammatory processes. This breakthrough could have a long term therapeutic impact, helping to target more specifically antidepressant drugs with anti-inflammatory action and / or drugs targeting neuroinflammation.
The most widespread pathophysiological hypothesis in major depressive disorder (MDD), is the hypothesis of monoamine deficit. The most used antidepressants in everyday clinical practice act by inhibiting the reuptake of monoamines. However, meta-analyzes evaluating the efficacy of antidepressants suggest that they are ineffective in 30 to 40% of patients. Inflammatory mechanisms might be related to the deficiency of monoamines, compromising the effectiveness of conventional antidepressants. Newly developed specific radiotracers allow the use of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging techniques to evaluate neuroinflammation. It has recently demonstrated the relevance of the [18F] DPA- 714 as a biomarker of neuroinflammation in humans in several neurological diseases.
Inclusion criteria for all groups:
Inclusion criteria for the experimental group:
Inclusion criteria for the pathological control group :
Inclusion criteria for the control group :
Exclusion criteria for all groups:
Exclusion criteria for control group:
The density of TSPO (which is an inflammation maker) is evaluated by the tracer's brain distribution volume (\[18F\] DPA-714).
Diagnostic Test: Cerebral neuroinflammation evaluation
Pet scan following an injection of the radiotracer (\[18F\]DPA-714), to evaluate the neuroinflammation. MRI to evaluate functional and structural integrities. Blood test to analyze various inflammation marker (IL-6, Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) alpha, CRPus, and TSPO). And psychological scales to assess the depressive symptoms.
distribution pattern of neuroinflammation in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) data
Assessed between patients with MDD (experimental group), patients who have had a MDD and being in remission for at least 8 weeks, still treated with antidepressants, matched in age and gender with the experimental group (pathological control group) and control subjects, matched in gender and age with both patients' groups (control group).
Time frame: Day 7
distribution pattern of neuroinflammation in PET data across all groups
Across all groups (i.e. experimental group, pathological control group and control group).
Time frame: Day 7
patients with depressive symptoms and neuroinflammation (i.e. PET data).
Depressive symptoms are assessed by the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) and the Columbia-Suicide severity rating scale (CSSRS). Correlation across all groups (experimental group, pathological control group and control group).
Time frame: Day 7
patients with neuroinflammation (i.e. PET analysis) and MRI parameters for functional and structural integrities.
Correlation across all groups (experimental group, pathological control group and control group).
Time frame: Day 7
patients with neuroinflammation (i.e. PET analysis) and biological markers of neuroinflammation (i.e. cytokines).
Correlation across all groups (experimental group, pathological control group and control group).
Time frame: Day 7
Plan to share: No
This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Hospital, Toulouse