ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03311854Updated May 17, 2022Results posted

A Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Emapalumab, an Anti-IFN-gamma mAb in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) or Adult-onset Still's Disease (AOSD) Developing Macrophage Activation Syndrome/Secondary HLH (MAS/sHLH)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Emapalumab in Macrophage Activation Syndrome, Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic and Arthritis, Juvenile, sponsored by Swedish Orphan Biovitrum. Completed at 5 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 0 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-17.

Sponsored by Swedish Orphan Biovitrum · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
0 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Macrophage Activation Syndrome (MAS) is a rare, life-threatening condition characterized by uncontrolled hyperinflammation which may develop on the background of systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) or Adult-onset Still's Disease (AOSD). Emapalumab is a monoclonal antibody neutralizing interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), a key cytokine which contributes to the inflammation and tissue damage seen in MAS. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of emapalumab in sJIA or AOSD participants developing MAS, presenting an inadequate response to high dose glucocorticoid treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Macrophage Activation Syndrome
  • Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic
  • Arthritis, Juvenile
  • Adult Onset Still Disease

Keywords

  • Emapalumab
  • Gamifant
  • Macrophage activation syndrome
  • Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
  • Interferon-gamma
  • Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis
  • Adult-onset Still's disease
  • MAS
  • HLH
  • sHLH
  • IFN-gamma
  • IFNγ
  • sJIA
  • AOSD
  • NI-0501-06
  • NI-0501
03

In context

Macrophage Activation Syndrome

20 studies on the registry are indexed under Macrophage Activation Syndrome; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 33 across 11 interventional studies indexed under Macrophage Activation Syndrome.

Browse Macrophage Activation Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Swedish Orphan Biovitrum is the lead sponsor of 82 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients of both genders
  • For sJIA patients: Confirmed sJIA diagnosis. For patients presenting with MAS in the context of the onset of sJIA, high presumption of sJIA will suffice for eligibility. For AOSD patients: confirmed AOSD diagnosis as per Yamaguchi criteria.
  • Diagnosis of active MAS.
  • An inadequate response to high dose i.v. treatment administered for at least 3 days as per local standard of care (including but not limited to pulses of 30 mg/kg PDN on 3 consecutive days). High dose i.v. glucocorticoid should not be lower than 2 mg/kg/day of PDN equivalent in 2 divided doses (or at least 60 mg/day in patients of 30 kg or more). In case of rapid worsening of the patient's condition and/or lab parameters, inclusion may occur within less than 3 days from starting high dose i.v. glucocorticoids.
  • Tocilizumab, TNF inhibitors and canakinumab, if administered, have to be discontinued before emapalumab initiation.
  • Having received guidance on for both male and female patients sexually active and having reached puberty. Females of require use of highly effective contraceptive measures. Males with partners(s) of child-bearing potential must agree to take appropriate precautions.
  • provided by the patient (as required by local law), or by the patient's legally authorized representative(s) with the assent of patients who are legally capable of providing it, as applicable.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of suspected or confirmed primary HLH or HLH consequent to a neoplastic disease.
  • Active mycobacteria (typical and atypical), Histoplasma Capsulatum, Shigella, Salmonella, Campylobacter and Leishmania infections.
  • Clinical suspicion of latent tuberculosis.
  • Positive serology for antibodies.
  • Presence of .
  • Patients who have another concomitant disease or malformation severely affecting the cardiovascular, pulmonary, CNS, liver or renal function that in the opinion of the Investigator may significantly affect likelihood to respond to treatment and/or assessment of emapalumab safety.
  • History of or allergy to any component of the study drug
  • Receipt of a BCG vaccine within 12 weeks prior to screening.
  • Receipt of live or attenuated (other than BCG) within 6 weeks prior to screening.
  • Pregnant or lactating female patients.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Emapalumab

    Drug: Emapalumab

Interventions

  • Emapalumab was administered at an initial dose of 6 mg/kg by intravenous infusion. Emapalumab treatment continued at a dose of 3 mg/kg, every 3 days until study day 15, and then twice-a-week for an additional 2 weeks, i.e., until study day 28. The emapalumab regimen could be adapted (the frequency between infusions shortened, the dose increased, or the treatment prolonged beyond 4 weeks) upon assessment of a favourable benefit-risk profile. There was a 4-week off-drug follow-up period (up to Week 8).

    Also known as: Gamifant

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence, Severity, Causality, and Outcomes of AEs (Serious and Nonserious)

    Time frame: Up to Week 8

  2. Evolution of Laboratory Parameters

    Shifts from baseline in the following MAS-relevant laboratory parameters are reported: * Leukocytes * Platelets * Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) * Ferritin * C-reactive protein * Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) * Prothrombin time * D-dimer * Fibrinogen

    Time frame: Up to Week 8

  3. Number of Participants Withdrawn Due to Safety Reasons

    Time frame: Up to Week 8

  4. Number of Participants Achieving MAS Remission at Week 8 After Initiation of Emapalumab Treatment

    Remission from MAS was evaluated according to the following criteria: Resolution of clinical signs and symptoms according to the investigator (MAS clinical signs and symptoms activity score ≤ 1) and Normalization of laboratory parameters relevant to MAS, as follows: * WBC count and platelet count above the LLN. * LDH below 1.5 × the ULN. * ALT and AST both below 1.5 × the ULN. * Fibrinogen higher than 100 mg/dL. * Ferritin levels decreased by at least 80 % from values at screening or baseline (whichever was higher) or below 2000 ng/mL, whichever was lower.

    Time frame: Week 8

  5. Time to First MAS Remission

    Time frame: Up to Week 8

  6. Number of Participants for Whom Glucocorticoids Could be Permanently Tapered at Any Time During the Study

    Permanently tapering by at least 50% of the equivalent dose of prednisone. This was defined as achieving reduction of 50% of the baseline dose \[SD0\] and maintaining the reduction until the end of study).

    Time frame: Up to Week 8

  7. Time to Achievement of Permanent Glucocorticoids Tapering

    Time to achievement of permanent glucocorticoid tapering by at least 50% of the equivalent dose of prednisone administered at emapalumab treatment start.

    Time frame: Up to Week 8

  8. Survival Time

    Number of participants alive at the end of the study

    Time frame: Up to Week 8

  9. Number of Participants Withdrawn From the Study Due to Lack of Efficacy

    Number of participants withdrawn from the study due to lack of efficacy

    Time frame: Up to Week 8

  10. Levels of Emapalumab Concentration

    On all infusion days, PK samples were collected before the infusion start and between 15 and 30 minutes after infusion completion. In addition, following the first emapalumab infusion, PK samples were collected approximately 24 and 48 hours post-infusion, and following the second emapalumab infusion, PK samples were collected approximately 48 hours post-infusion. Upon treatment completion, PK samples were collected on all non-infusion visits until the 4-week follow-up visit/EOS.

    Time frame: Data from the following time points are presented: SD0 (pre- and post-dose), Week 4 Visit 2 (pre- and post-dose), and 4-week follow-up visit/EoS.

  11. Pharmacodynamic Parameters

    Levels of total INF-gamma, CXCL9 and CXCL10

    Time frame: Up to Week 8

  12. Number of Participants Who Demonstrated a Presence of Circulating Antibodies Against Emapalumab to Determine Immunogenicity

    The presence of circulating antibodies against emapalumab was inferred by positive results for anti-drug antibodies (ADAs).

    Time frame: Up to Week 8

07

Results

Posted Jan 26, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAll Treated Population
Started14
Completed14
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryIncidence, Severity, Causality, and Outcomes of AEs (Serious and Nonserious)
Time frame:
Up to Week 8
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence, Severity, Causality, and Outcomes of AEs (Serious and Nonserious)
ParticipantsAll Treated Population
Number of participants with a TEAE13
Number of participants with a serious TEAE6
Number of participants with a severe TEAE2
Number of participants with a moderate TEAE10
Number of participants with a mild TEAE13
Number of participants with a TEAE related to emapalumab4
Number of participants with a TEAE unrelated to emapalumab13
Number of participants with a TEAE with an outcome of recovered/resolved13
Number of participants with a TEAE with an outcome of not recovered/not resolved3
Number of participants with a TEAE with an outcome of recovering/resolving1
Number of participants with a TEAE with an outcome of unknown1
PrimaryEvolution of Laboratory Parameters

Shifts from baseline in the following MAS-relevant laboratory parameters are reported: * Leukocytes * Platelets * Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) * Ferritin * C-reactive protein * Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) * Prothrombin time * D-dimer * Fibrinogen

Time frame:
Up to Week 8
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Evolution of Laboratory Parameters
ParticipantsAll Treated Population
Leukocytes: From a high value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 82
Leukocytes: From a low value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 84
Leukocytes: From a low value at baseline to a high value at Week 82
Platelets: From a high value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 81
Platelets: From a low value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 86
Platelets: From a low value at baseline to a high value at Week 83
LDH: From a high value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 86
ALT: From a high value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 810
ALT: From a high value at baseline to a low value at Week 81
AST: From a high value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 811
Ferritin: From a high value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 811
Ferritin: From a high value at baseline to a low value at Week 82
C-reactive protein: From a high value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 89
aPTT: From a high value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 81
aPTT: From a high value at baseline to a low value at Week 81
aPTT: From a value within the reference range at baseline to a low value at Week 83
aPTT: From a low value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 81
aPTT: From a low value at baseline to a high value at Week 81
Prothrombin time: From a high value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 85
Prothrombin time: From a high value at baseline to a low value at Week 81
Prothrombin time: From a value within the reference range at baseline to a low value at Week 83
Prothrombin time: From a low value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 81
D-dimer: From a high value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 88
Fibrinogen: From a high value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 81
Fibrinogen: From a value within the reference range at baseline to a high value at Week 81
Fibrinogen: From a low value at baseline to a value within the reference range at Week 85
Fibrinogen: From a low value at baseline to a high value at Week 81
PrimaryNumber of Participants Withdrawn Due to Safety Reasons
Time frame:
Up to Week 8
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Withdrawn Due to Safety Reasons
ParticipantsAll Treated Population
Number of Participants Withdrawn Due to Safety Reasons0
PrimaryNumber of Participants Achieving MAS Remission at Week 8 After Initiation of Emapalumab Treatment

Remission from MAS was evaluated according to the following criteria: Resolution of clinical signs and symptoms according to the investigator (MAS clinical signs and symptoms activity score ≤ 1) and Normalization of laboratory parameters relevant to MAS, as follows: * WBC count and platelet count above the LLN. * LDH below 1.5 × the ULN. * ALT and AST both below 1.5 × the ULN. * Fibrinogen higher than 100 mg/dL. * Ferritin levels decreased by at least 80 % from values at screening or baseline (whichever was higher) or below 2000 ng/mL, whichever was lower.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Achieving MAS Remission at Week 8 After Initiation of Emapalumab Treatment
ParticipantsAll Treated Population
Number of Participants Achieving MAS Remission at Week 8 After Initiation of Emapalumab Treatment11
PrimaryTime to First MAS Remission
Time frame:
Up to Week 8
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to First MAS Remission
daysAll Treated Population
Time to First MAS Remission25 (19 to 56)
PrimaryNumber of Participants for Whom Glucocorticoids Could be Permanently Tapered at Any Time During the Study

Permanently tapering by at least 50% of the equivalent dose of prednisone. This was defined as achieving reduction of 50% of the baseline dose \[SD0\] and maintaining the reduction until the end of study).

Time frame:
Up to Week 8
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants for Whom Glucocorticoids Could be Permanently Tapered at Any Time During the Study
ParticipantsAll Treated Population
Number of Participants for Whom Glucocorticoids Could be Permanently Tapered at Any Time During the Study12
PrimaryTime to Achievement of Permanent Glucocorticoids Tapering

Time to achievement of permanent glucocorticoid tapering by at least 50% of the equivalent dose of prednisone administered at emapalumab treatment start.

Time frame:
Up to Week 8
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Achievement of Permanent Glucocorticoids Tapering
daysAll Treated Population
Time to Achievement of Permanent Glucocorticoids Tapering14.5 (4 to 28)
PrimarySurvival Time

Number of participants alive at the end of the study

Time frame:
Up to Week 8
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Survival Time
ParticipantsAll Treated Population
Survival Time14
PrimaryNumber of Participants Withdrawn From the Study Due to Lack of Efficacy

Number of participants withdrawn from the study due to lack of efficacy

Time frame:
Up to Week 8
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Withdrawn From the Study Due to Lack of Efficacy
ParticipantsAll Treated Population
Number of Participants Withdrawn From the Study Due to Lack of Efficacy0
PrimaryLevels of Emapalumab Concentration

On all infusion days, PK samples were collected before the infusion start and between 15 and 30 minutes after infusion completion. In addition, following the first emapalumab infusion, PK samples were collected approximately 24 and 48 hours post-infusion, and following the second emapalumab infusion, PK samples were collected approximately 48 hours post-infusion. Upon treatment completion, PK samples were collected on all non-infusion visits until the 4-week follow-up visit/EOS.

Time frame:
Data from the following time points are presented: SD0 (pre- and post-dose), Week 4 Visit 2 (pre- and post-dose), and 4-week follow-up visit/EoS.
Reported as:
Mean · μg/L
Levels of Emapalumab Concentration
μg/LAll Treated Population
Study Day 0 (pre-dose)5455.444 ± 19985.0660
Study Day 0 (post-dose)104740.254 ± 20994.1054
Week 4 Visit 2 (pre-dose)115472.076 ± 58676.7953
Week 4 Visit 2 (post-dose)212900.657 ± 87466.3031
4-week follow-up Visit/EoS46447.462 ± 33657.0174
PrimaryPharmacodynamic Parameters

Levels of total INF-gamma, CXCL9 and CXCL10

Time frame:
Up to Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · ng/L
Pharmacodynamic Parameters
ng/LAll Treated Population: Study Day 0All Treated Population: 4-week Follow-up Visit/EoS
CXCL921986.010 ± 29405.8787255.654 ± 596.4149
CXCL107935.418 ± 9115.2857639.102 ± 1058.9589
Total IFN-γ425.528 ± 1191.83912132.656 ± 2967.4920
PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Demonstrated a Presence of Circulating Antibodies Against Emapalumab to Determine Immunogenicity

The presence of circulating antibodies against emapalumab was inferred by positive results for anti-drug antibodies (ADAs).

Time frame:
Up to Week 8
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Demonstrated a Presence of Circulating Antibodies Against Emapalumab to Determine Immunogenicity
ParticipantsAll Treated Population
Number of Participants Who Demonstrated a Presence of Circulating Antibodies Against Emapalumab to Determine Immunogenicity0

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were recorded in patients from Study Day 0 (the day of the first emapalumab administration), during emapalumab treatment, and up to and including the 4-week follow-up visit/end of study (a minimum duration of 56 days). All adverse events were followed up for outcome at end of study; all serious adverse events were followed up until resolution.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Treated Population0/14 (0%)6/14 (42.9%)13/14 (92.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAll Treated Population
Cardiopulmonary failureCardiac disorders1/14
Intracardiac thrombusCardiac disorders1/14
Juvenile myoclonic epilepsyNervous system disorders1/14
PericarditisCardiac disorders1/14
Pneumatosis intestinalisGastrointestinal disorders1/14
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/14
Still's diseaseMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/14
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/14
Cytomegalovirus infection reactivationInfections and infestations1/14
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 65
Most frequent other events
EventAll Treated Population
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders4/14
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders3/14
Cytomegalovirus infection reactivationInfections and infestations3/14
HypertensionVascular disorders3/14
HyperglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/14
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/14
Injection site reactionGeneral disorders2/14
Acanthosis nigricansSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/14
Dermatitis diaperSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/14
Dry skinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/14

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)All Enrolled Participants
<=18 years13
Between 18 and 65 years1
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Enrolled Participants
Mean9.9 ± 6.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Enrolled Participants
Female10
Male4
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)All Enrolled Participants
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American2
White11
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)All Enrolled Participants
United States3
Italy7
United Kingdom2
Spain1
France1
08

Study locations

5 sites
  • Cincinnati Children'S Hospital
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
  • Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Unité d'Immunologie-hématologie et Rhumatologie pédiatriques
    Paris, 75743, France
  • IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico, Bambino Gesù
    Rome, 00165, Italy
  • Hospital Sant Joan de Deu
    Barcelona, 08950, Spain
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children
    London, WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in May 2020, 26 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2022, 1 year 8 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in May 2021.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 21, 2017
First posted
Oct 17, 2017
StartActual
Feb 20, 2018
Primary completionActual
May 19, 2020
CompletionActual
May 19, 2020
Results delay requested
May 12, 2021
Results first posted
Jan 26, 2022
Last update
May 17, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 17, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03311854
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 17, 2017
Start date
Feb 20, 2018
Primary completion
May 19, 2020
Completion
May 19, 2020
Results posted
Jan 26, 2022
Last update
May 17, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Emapalumab

Start the discussion