ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03311165Updated Jan 9, 2020

Epidemiological Study of Neonatal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

An observational study in Neonatal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome(ARDS), sponsored by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University. Completed at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 1 Minute to 1 Month. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-09.

Sponsored by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000
Ages
1 Minute to 1 Month
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 11 studies in Respiratory Distress Syndrome by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University — 2 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Respiratory Distress Syndrome · Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University.

Started
2018
with 1 other
Observational
2 of 11
1 open now
Registered
7th of 11
by date

Among the 11 studies in Respiratory Distress Syndrome by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University, this one is one of 2 that started in 2018, is one of 2 observational ones, and was the 7th registered.

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,387 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 100 across 475 observational studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Open to participants now

2 of the 11 studies in Respiratory Distress Syndrome by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University are open now, in 1 country. Each count lists the studies.

All 2 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 193 Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies recruiting now, 118 (61%) set no upper age limit and 48 (25%) stop at 75 or younger; 51 take children under 18; 8 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 1 Minute to 1 Month · all sexes.

The full table on the hub →
Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 11 studies in Respiratory Distress Syndrome by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) is a rare but often severe respiratory disorder. The incidence remains unclear and mortality is about 30%-60%. It is characterized by acute, refractory hypoxemia, persistent respiratory distress and decreased lung compliance. Evaluation and comparison of various clinical studies conducted were hindered by a lack of uniformity in diagnostic criteria.

Read the detailed description

In 2017, the neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) Consortium Working Group has proposed diagnostic criteria for neonatal ARDS. The study consists of a prospective, multicentre, web-based,cohort study in China in which neonates who fulfil the new criteria definition are enrolled in order to: describe the epidemiology, clinical course, and prognosis of neonates affected by neonatal ARDS; identify a list of risk factors for neonatal ARDS, as it exists for adults and older children with ARDS; and guide future studies.

03

Conditions studied

  • Neonatal Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome(ARDS)

Keywords

  • neonate
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • prognosis
  • risk factor
  • clinical course
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Minute to 1 Month
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

the definition of neonatal ARDS applies to infants from birth until 44 weeks, post-menstrual age or until 4 weeks, postnatal age (for neonates born after 40 weeks, post-menstrual age) to account for the role of prematurity; ARDS in infants older than these age limits should be diagnosed according to PALICC definition

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Acute onset (ie, within one week) from a known or suspected clinical insult
  • Exclusion criteria: RDS, TTN, or congenital anomalies as a primary current acute respiratory condition
  • Diffuse, bilateral, and irregular opacities or infiltrates, or complete opacification of the lungs, which are not fully explained by local effusions, atelectasis, RDS, TTN, or congenital anomalies
  • Absence of congenital heart disease explaining the oedema (this includes ductus arteriosus with pulmonary overflow if no acute pulmonary haemorrhage exists). Echocardiography is needed to verify the origin of oedema.
  • Mild ARDS: 4≤OI\<8;Moderate ARDS: 8≤OI\<16;Severe ARDS: OI≥16

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hyaline Membrane Disease defined as:

Mandatory criteria : defined as respiratory distress syndrome appearing within the first 24 hours of life, with response to surfactant and / or volume recruitment. Additional criteria : Lung imaging Supporting the diagnosis and / or lamellar body counts \< 30,000 / mm3.

  • Transient tachypnea of the neonate (wet lung) defined as:

Mandatory criteria : defined as mild ( Silverman score ≤3 ) respiratory distress appearing within the first 24 hours of life and ending within the first 48 hours of life, needing only oxygen administration and / or CPAP. Additional criteria : Lung imaging Supporting the diagnosis and / or lamellar body counts > 30,000 / mm3.

  • Patients beyond the first month of life
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
2 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Interventions

  • Otherno intervention

    no intervention was given

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. bronchopulmonary dysplasia(BPD)

    the incidence of BPD in infants with neonatal ARDS

    Time frame: before discharge or 36 weeks' gestational age

Secondary outcomes

  1. risk factors for ARDS

    to determine risk factors leading to ARDS

    Time frame: before discharge or 36 weeks' gestational age

  2. death

    the mortality in infants with neonatal ARDS

    Time frame: before discharge or 36 weeks' gestational age

  3. epidemiological characteristics in infants with neonatal ARDS

    to describe the epidemiological characteristics in infants with neonatal ARDS

    Time frame: before discharge or 36 weeks' gestational age

  4. intraventricular hemorrhage(IVH)

    the incidence of IVH in infants with neonatal ARDS

    Time frame: before discharge or 36 weeks' gestational age

  5. retinopathy of prematurity(ROP)

    the incidence of ROP in infants with neonatal ARDS

    Time frame: before discharge or 36 weeks' gestational age

  6. sepsis

    the incidence of sepsis in infants with neonatal ARDS

    Time frame: before discharge or 36 weeks' gestational age

  7. bronchopulmonary dysplasia(BPD) and/or death

    the incidence of BPD and/or death in infants with neonatal ARDS

    Time frame: before discharge or 36 weeks' gestational age

  8. necrotizing enterocolitis(NEC)

    the incidence of NEC in infants with neonatal ARDS

    Time frame: before discharge or 36 weeks' gestational age

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Department of Pediatrics, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University
    Chongqing, Chongqing 400042, China
  • Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University
    Chongqing, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chen L, Li J, Shi Y; Chinese Neonatal ARDS (ChiNARDS) study group. Clinical characteristics and outcomes in neonates with perinatal acute respiratory distress syndrome in China: A national, multicentre, cross-sectional study. EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Nov 12;55:101739. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101739. eCollection 2023 Jan. PubMed 36386029 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in Jun 2019, 17 months.

Of 225 non-industry observational studies under Respiratory Distress Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47. This study's 17 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 231 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 49.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 4, 2017
First posted
Oct 17, 2017
StartActual
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2019
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2019
Last update
Jan 9, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 9, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03311165
Collaborators
Daping Hospital of Army Medical University, Jiulongpo No.1 People's Hospital, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Lanzhou General Hospital of PLA, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Southwest Hospital, China, Guiyang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Chengdu Women and Children's Center Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Zhujiang Hospital, People's Liberation Army No.202 Hospital, Bethune International Peace Hospital, The 251st hosptital of PLA, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, The Second Military Medical University Changhai Hospital, The PLA Rocket Force general hospital, the 252th Hospital of PLA, Hunan Children's Hospital, Wuhan general hospital of PLA, Jinan general hospital of PLA, The 306 Hospital of People's Liberation Army, The 452nd hospital of PLA, Xijing Hospital,FMMU, 307 Hospital of PLA, The 88th Hospital of PLA, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Beijing 302 Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanxi Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, the PLA General Hospital, The 155th hosptital of PLA, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Area, Guangzhou general hospital of PLA, The 211st hospital of PLA, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Maternal and Children's Healthcare Hospital of Taian, Zhengzhou Children's Hospital, China, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Shenyang General Hospital of PLA, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Yan'an Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Women and Children's Hospital, Branch of Chongqing Sanxia Central Hospital, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Ningbo Women & Children's Hospital, Shandong Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Guilin Medical College, Women and Children Hospital of Qinghai Province, Quanzhou Children's Hospital, Newborn Department of Ankang City Central Hospital of Shaanxi Province, the Second Hospital of Xian Jiao Tong University, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Hunan Maternal and Children Health Hospital, The First People's Hospital of Yinchuan, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, The People's Hospital of Dehong Autonomous Prefecture, First people Hospital of Kashi, General Hospital of Tibet Military Region, Navy General Hospital, Beijing, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Jiangxi Province Children's Hospital, the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hainan Province, Zhang Ye Pepole Hospital of HeXi University, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Hospital (T.C.M)Affiliated to Southwest Medical University, Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science &Techonlogy, South Paris University Hospitals
Responsible party
Ma Juan (Principal Investigator, Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 17, 2017
Start date
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2019
Completion
Jun 30, 2019
Last update
Jan 9, 2020

Study contacts

Shi Yuan, PhD,MD
principal investigator · Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion