ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03309813Updated Oct 3, 2023Results posted

Feasibility Study of ExAblate Thalamotomy for Treatment of Chronic Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain

An interventional study of Transcranial ExAblate and Sham Transcranial ExAblate in Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain, sponsored by InSightec. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-03.

Sponsored by InSightec · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2022), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 291 studies in Neuralgia with a site in United States — 50 open to participants now, 61 under way, 5 of them phase 3. Neuralgia · United States.

Enrollment
214th of 261
10 · median 40
Started
2017
with 7 others
No phase
112 of 291
25 open now
Registered
133rd of 291
by date

Among the 291 studies in Neuralgia with a site in United States, this one is the 214th largest by enrollment of the 261 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 8 that started in 2017, is one of 112 with no phase, and was the 133rd registered.

Neuralgia

1,101 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuralgia; 242 are open to participants now.

Browse Neuralgia studies →

Open to participants now

50 of the 291 studies in Neuralgia with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

45 more — sign in →

All 50 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 153 Neuralgia studies recruiting now, 77 (50%) set no upper age limit and 44 (29%) stop at 75 or younger; 8 take children under 18; 12 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 75 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 291 studies in Neuralgia with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of ExAblate Neuro treatment of chronic trigeminal neuropathic pain.

Read the detailed description

This study is to show that for patients with treatment-refractory chronic trigeminal neuropathic pain, ExAblate Neuro focused ultrasound (FUS) can safely create lesions bilaterally in the thalamic nuclei to reduce pain and provide functional benefits in daily activities. After informed consent and screening, eligible subjects will be randomized to either an ExAblate treatment or a Sham Control procedure. Subjects who are randomized to Sham Control will undergo the same procedure and follow-up visits through their Month 3 visit. After the Month 3 assessments are complete, all subjects will be un-blinded and those in the Sham treated group will have the option for an actual ExAblate treatment in an un-blinded fashion, as long as they still qualify for ExAblate treatment.

03

Conditions studied

  • Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ExAblate
  • TcMRgFUS
  • Thalamotomy
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women, between 18 and 75 years, inclusive
  • Subjects who are able and willing to give consent and able to attend all study visits
  • Severe chronic, trigeminal neuropathic pain of ≥6 months duration.
  • Pain is medication- to adequate trials of at least 3 prescription medications commonly used for symptomatic relief of neuropathic pain with current adjunctive use of at least one medication. An adequate medication trial is defined as a therapeutic dose of each medication without sufficient effect.
  • Pain is treatment-resistant to at least one interventional therapies including injections, procedures, neuromodulation, and surgery.
  • Able to communicate sensations during the focused ultrasound treatment
  • Stable prescribed doses of all symptomatic pain medications for 30 days prior to study entry and for the duration of the 3-month blinded phase of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Craniofacial pain syndromes related to of the head and neck
  • Idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia
  • Headache syndromes like migraine, cluster headache
  • Temporomandibular joint syndrome
  • Atypical facial pain or pain related to a somatoform disorder
  • Subjects with active psychiatric illness will be excluded. For the purpose of this study, active psychiatric illness includes:

    • Exhibiting current suicide ideation and/or a history of suicide attempt within past 2 years
    • been hospitalized for the treatment of a psychiatric illness within the past 2 years
    • received transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression treatment
    • received electroconvulsive therapy for depression
  • Any presence or history of psychosis will be excluded.
  • Subjects with unstable cardiac status including:

    • Unstable angina pectoris on medication
    • Subjects with documented myocardial infarction within six months of protocol entry
    • Significant congestive heart failure defined with \< 40
    • Subjects with unstable ventricular arrhythmias
    • Subjects with atrial arrhythmias that are not rate-controlled
  • Severe hypertension (diastolic BP > 100 on medication)
  • Subjects with standard for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices including cardiac pacemakers, size limitations, etc.
  • Receiving anticoagulant (e.g. warfarin) or antiplatelet (e.g. aspirin) therapy within one week of focused ultrasound procedure or drugs known to increase risk or hemorrhage (e.g. Avastin) within one month of focused ultrasound procedure
  • Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary supine position during treatment (can be up to 4 hours of total table time.)
  • Subjects participating or have participated in another clinical trial in the last 30 days
  • Presence of systemic neurological disease or dysfunction
  • Known life-threatening systemic disease
  • Subjects with brain tumors or any significant intracranial mass. Trigeminal or cavernous sinus tumors causing neuropathic pain are not excluded.
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity
  • Subjects with a deep brain stimulation implant or with a prior stereotactic thalamic ablation
  • History of hemorrhagic stroke or cerebrovascular event within the past year of treatment exhibiting incomplete resolution
  • History of seizures within past year of treatment
  • Severe kidney disease or on dialysis
  • Subjects who are unable to tolerate medications due to intolerable side effects.
  • Subjects with pain other than craniofacial neuropathic pain.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Transcranial ExAblate

    ExAblate Transcranial MR Guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS)

    Device: Transcranial ExAblate

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Transcranial ExAblate

    ExAblate MRgFUS Sham Procedure

    Device: Sham Transcranial ExAblate · Device: Crossover Transcranial Exablate

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscranial ExAblate

    ExAblate Thalamotomy for Chronic Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain

    Also known as: MRgFUS, Thalamotomy

  • DeviceSham Transcranial ExAblate

    Sham ExAblate Thalamotomy procedure

  • DeviceCrossover Transcranial Exablate

    Subjects randomized to the Sham Exablate could opt for the Crossovover Transcranial Exablate Arm (Exablate Thalamotomy) after completing the Month 3 visit in the Sham Arm.

    Also known as: MRgFUS, Thalamotomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Severity of Device and Procedure Related Complications

    To evaluate the incidence and severity of adverse events associated with ExAblate lesioning of the bilateral medial thalamus for painful neuropathies of the face and head that are severe and treatment-refractory.

    Time frame: At the time of ExAblate Transcranial thalamotomy procedure through 3-months post-thalamotomy

  2. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) change in worst pain experienced over 24 hours before and at 3 months following bilateral FUS medial thalamotomy versus sham procedures was determined from the 11-point numeric pain rating scale with 0 as no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable. High NPRS scores are worse pain (0 is no pain, 10 is maximum). Percent change from Baseline at Month 3 was calculated as follows: 100\*(NPRS Score at Baseline - NPRS Score at Month 3)/NPRS Score at Baseline. High percent change in NPRS Score from Baseline is better (improved pain).

    Time frame: Percent Change in NPRS from before treatment to 3 Months following treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Interference Scale 8a v1.0 From the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Pain Inventory

    The Pain Interference 8a v1.0 Scale (Short Form) from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Pain Inventory is an 8-item patient completed short form with each item on a 5-point scale (0-4). The total score possible ranges from 0-32. The PROMIS pain interference scale measures the degree to which pain interferes with activities of daily living. A high percent change from Baseline at 3 Months post-treatment is better, shows improvement.

    Time frame: From pre-treatment through 3 months following treatment.

07

Results

Posted Oct 3, 2023
Limitations and caveats
This is a pilot study with limited sample size.

Participant flow

Main Randomized Study
Participant flow — Main Randomized Study
MilestoneTranscranial ExAblate (MRgFUS) OnlySham Transcranial ExAblate First, Then Optional Transcranial Exablate (MRgFUS)
Started55
Completed45
Not completed10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Crossover Transcranial Exablate
Participant flow — Crossover Transcranial Exablate
MilestoneTranscranial ExAblate (MRgFUS) OnlySham Transcranial ExAblate First, Then Optional Transcranial Exablate (MRgFUS)
Started03
Completed03
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimarySeverity of Device and Procedure Related Complications

To evaluate the incidence and severity of adverse events associated with ExAblate lesioning of the bilateral medial thalamus for painful neuropathies of the face and head that are severe and treatment-refractory.

Time frame:
At the time of ExAblate Transcranial thalamotomy procedure through 3-months post-thalamotomy

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

PrimaryNumeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) change in worst pain experienced over 24 hours before and at 3 months following bilateral FUS medial thalamotomy versus sham procedures was determined from the 11-point numeric pain rating scale with 0 as no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable. High NPRS scores are worse pain (0 is no pain, 10 is maximum). Percent change from Baseline at Month 3 was calculated as follows: 100\*(NPRS Score at Baseline - NPRS Score at Month 3)/NPRS Score at Baseline. High percent change in NPRS Score from Baseline is better (improved pain).

Time frame:
Percent Change in NPRS from before treatment to 3 Months following treatment.
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Percent changeTranscranial ExAblate (MRgFUS) OnlySham Transcranial ExAblate FirstOptional Crossover Transcranial Exablate (MRgFUS)
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)-9.7 ± 27.412.9 ± 21.74.8 ± 8.3
SecondaryPain Interference Scale 8a v1.0 From the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Pain Inventory

The Pain Interference 8a v1.0 Scale (Short Form) from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Pain Inventory is an 8-item patient completed short form with each item on a 5-point scale (0-4). The total score possible ranges from 0-32. The PROMIS pain interference scale measures the degree to which pain interferes with activities of daily living. A high percent change from Baseline at 3 Months post-treatment is better, shows improvement.

Time frame:
From pre-treatment through 3 months following treatment.
Reported as:
Mean · Percent Change
Pain Interference Scale 8a v1.0 From the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Pain Inventory
Percent ChangeTranscranial ExAblateSham Transcranial ExAblateCrossoverTranscranial Exablate
Pain Interference Scale 8a v1.0 From the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Pain Inventory12.9 ± 28.316.6 ± 30.554.7 ± 40.1

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected though 3 months post-thalamotomy.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Transcranial ExAblate (MRgFUS)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)5/5 (100%)
Sham Transcranial ExAblate First0/5 (0%)1/5 (20%)5/5 (100%)
Optional Crossover Transcranial Exablate (MRgFUS)0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)3/3 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTranscranial ExAblate (MRgFUS)Sham Transcranial ExAblate FirstOptional Crossover Transcranial Exablate (MRgFUS)
Worsening painGeneral disorders0/51/50/3
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent other events
EventTranscranial ExAblate (MRgFUS)Sham Transcranial ExAblate FirstOptional Crossover Transcranial Exablate (MRgFUS)
Nausea/vomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/51/52/3
Transient headacheGeneral disorders0/52/50/3
Sonication painGeneral disorders1/50/51/3
Numbness/tinglingGastrointestinal disorders0/51/51/3
Head painSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/51/51/3
FatigueGeneral disorders1/50/50/3
SleepinessGeneral disorders1/50/50/3
HeadacheGeneral disorders1/50/50/3
Cold sensationGeneral disorders1/50/50/3
UnsteadinessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/50/50/3

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Transcranial ExAblate (MRgFUS) OnlySham Transcranial ExAblate First, Then Optional Transcranial ExAblate (MRgFUS)Total
Age64.3 ± 8.959.6 ± 7.962.0 ± 8.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Transcranial ExAblate (MRgFUS) OnlySham Transcranial ExAblate First, Then Optional Transcranial ExAblate (MRgFUS)Total
Female358
Male202
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Transcranial ExAblate (MRgFUS) OnlySham Transcranial ExAblate First, Then Optional Transcranial ExAblate (MRgFUS)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White5510
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Transcranial ExAblate (MRgFUS) OnlySham Transcranial ExAblate First, Then Optional Transcranial ExAblate (MRgFUS)Total
United States5510
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Virginia
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2023, 70 months after the start.

Of 264 interventional studies with no phase under Neuralgia, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 41. This study's planned 70 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 5, 2017
First posted
Oct 16, 2017
StartActual
Dec 1, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2023
CompletionEst.
Oct 2023
Results first posted
Oct 3, 2023
Last update
Oct 3, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 3, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03309813
Lead sponsor
InSightec
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 16, 2017
Start date
Dec 1, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2023 (estimated)
Results posted
Oct 3, 2023
Last update
Oct 3, 2023

Study contacts

William J Elias, MD
principal investigator · University of Virginia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion