ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03308916SIPHONUpdated Sep 1, 2022

Screening At-risk Populations for Hepatic Fibrosis With Non-invasive Markers

An interventional study of transient elastography and Enhanced liver fibrosis test in Liver Diseases, Alcoholic and Fibrosis, sponsored by Maja Thiele. Recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-01.

Sponsored by Maja Thiele · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2017; still recruiting 9 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6,500
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
30 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Prospective screening study at Odense University Hospital to assess the effect of transient elastography and other serum and imaging markers of liver fibrosis to detect advanced fibrosis (Kleiner Fibrosis score F3-F4) in patients at risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, alcoholic fatty liver disease, with a control group of participants recruited from the general population.

Read the detailed description

This protocol describes a prospective screening study at Odense University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. The investigators will use liver stiffness measurements with transient elastography to screen 3000 participants from at-risk populations and 3500 participants from the general population for advanced liver fibrosis. At-risk is defined as either (A) a prior or current alcohol overuse (≥21 units/week for men and ≥14 units/week for women) for more than 5 years, or (B) presence of the metabolic syndrome with or without concomitant type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The study goal is to evaluate the aptitude of transient elastography as a screening tool for advanced liver fibrosis, based on analyses of benefit, harm, detection rate, technical applicability and prognostic potential. Secondary aims are to compare novel serum markers of liver fibrosis as potential screening tools against transient elastography: The Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test, neoepitope markers of extracellular matrix turnover, cytokeratin-18 based markers and indirect indices of fibrosis from algorithms combining routine liver blood test. Screened participants with elevated liver stiffness (≥8.0 kiloPascal; estimated 400 participants with alcoholic liver disease, 400 participants with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and 280 participants from the general population) will be investigated with 2-dimensional shear-wave elastography and abdominal ultrasonography and a liver biopsy to confirm or reject presence of advanced fibrosis.

All participants with a positive screening elastography will be invited for repeated liver stiffness measurements and serum fibrosis markers after a minimum of one year from inclusion.

Participants at risk of alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver disease, independent of liver stiffness measurement at inclusion, will be invited for repeated liver stiffness measurements and serum fibrosis markers after a minimum of one year from inclusion. At-risk participants with elevated liver stiffness measurements at a follow-up visit (>6.0 kiloPascal) will be offered a liver biopsy, however no earlier than two years after the index biopsy.

All participants will be followed for 10 years to assess liver-related outcomes and all-course mortality.

02

Conditions studied

  • Liver Diseases, Alcoholic
  • Fibrosis

Keywords

  • elastography
  • screening
  • non-invasive markers
  • microbiome
  • gut-liver-axis
  • cost-benefit
  • fibroscan
  • aixplorer
  • ultrasound elastography
  • liver fibrosis
  • alcoholic liver disease
  • advanced fibrosis
  • enhanced liver fibrosis test
  • direct liver fibrosis markers
  • ELF
  • cytokeratin-18
  • neoepitopes
  • collagen
  • NAFLD
  • ALD
  • metabolomics
  • non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
03

In context

Liver Diseases, Alcoholic

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Diseases, Alcoholic; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 6,500 is above the median of 85 across 43 interventional studies indexed under Liver Diseases, Alcoholic.

Browse Liver Diseases, Alcoholic studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Maja Thiele as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patients are eligible for screening if the following inclusion criteria are fulfilled:

  • Age 30-75 years (except the general population, which should be aged 40-75)
  • to study investigations
  • Ability to read and write Danish AND (only at-risk patients)
  • Prior or current alcohol overuse, defined as an average intake of ≥24 grams/day (14 units/week) for women and ≥36 grams/day (21 units/week) for men, for at least 5 years; OR
  • Presence of the metabolic syndrome defined by central obesity plus any two of the following four metabolic risk factors: (a) raised triglycerides, (b) reduced HDL cholesterol, (c) raised blood pressure and (d) raised fasting plasma glucose;[38] OR
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus defined by either fasting plasma glucose ≥7 mmol/L, ≥48 mmol/mol, a random plasma glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L in the presence of classic diabetes or an oral glucose tolerance test with fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L and/or 2 hour plasma glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L.

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

We will exclude patients from screening in case of:

  • Evidence of decompensated liver disease, defined by clinically obvious ascites, overt hepatic encephalopathy, jaundice or large esophageal varices with/without variceal bleeding.
  • Known concurrent liver disease other than ALD and NAFLD.
  • Cancer or other debilitating disease with an expected survival of less than 12 months.
  • Inability to comply with the study protocol.

In screened patients with liver stiffness ≥8 kPa we will abstain from a liver in case of:

  • for a percutaneous liver biopsy
  • Severe alcoholic hepatitis or other hepatic inflammation evidenced by transaminase elevation of more than three times the .
  • Hepatic congestion or bile duct dilation evidenced by ultrasound.
  • Decrease of TE below 6.0 kPa from screening to time of planned liver biopsy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
6,500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Liver stiffness measurement

    Transient elastography in fasting state

    Diagnostic Test: transient elastography · Diagnostic Test: Enhanced liver fibrosis test · Diagnostic Test: Indirect serum markers of liver fibrosis · Diagnostic Test: Direct serum markers of liver fibrosis · Diagnostic Test: LiverTRAIL · Diagnostic Test: Cytokeratin 18 · Diagnostic Test: Omics markers

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testtransient elastography

    Ultrasound elastography using shear-wave elastography to measure liver stiffness as a marker of liver fibrosis. Patients with transient elastography above 8.0 kPa selected for liver biopsy to detect advanced liver fibrosis

    Also known as: FibroScan, TE

  • Diagnostic testEnhanced liver fibrosis test

    Patented, commercially available algorithm of hyaluronic acid (HA), N-terminal propeptide of collagen type 3 (P3NP) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1)

    Also known as: ELF

  • Diagnostic testIndirect serum markers of liver fibrosis

    Diagnostic markers using combination of routine liver biochemistry: age, AST, ALT, platelet count, cholesterol, GGT

    Also known as: Forns index, FIB-4, APRI, AST-ALT ratio, Age-platelet ratio

  • Diagnostic testDirect serum markers of liver fibrosis

    Serum markers that reflect liver extracellular matrix turnover and -accumulation

    Also known as: Neoepitopes, Collagen products, Extracellular matrix

  • Diagnostic testLiverTRAIL

    Software that contain 199 diagnostic algorithms, containing combinations of routine tests: age, AST, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, GGT, INR, platelet count, cholesterol and sodium, and specialist tests: transient elastography and direct serum markers of fibrosis.

  • Diagnostic testCytokeratin 18

    Cytokeratin 18 from liver cell cytoskeleton; when cells undergo apoptosis, caspase-cleaved CK18 is released (M30), whereas full-length CK18 is realised during necrosis (M65)

    Also known as: CK18, M30, M65

  • Diagnostic testOmics markers

    Markers combining signatures of liver fibrosis and hepatic inflammation from many 'omics technologies

    Also known as: Multi-omics markers, Lipidomics, Microbiomics, Genomics, Metagenomics, Metatranscriptomics, Transcriptomics, miRNA-omics, Metabolomics, Proteomics

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Biopsy-verified advanced fibrosis

    Number of patients with biopsy-verified, advanced fibrosis (Kleiner fibrosis score ≥F3) detected by screening

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Liver-related outcomes

    Number of liver-related clinical outcomes during 10 years of follow up after the first screened patient, compared to a matched, historical control group (The Inter99 study and the Copenhagen and Odense alcohol rehabilitation cohorts). Liver-related outcomes are defined as liver-related death, liver transplant, progression to liver-related complications (ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, jaundice, bleeding from esophagastric varices, hepatocellular carcinoma) or MELD-Na score \>15

    Time frame: 10 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Liver related outcomes

    Number of liver-related clinical outcomes during 10 years of follow up after the first screened patient, compared to a matched, historical control group (The Inter99 study and the Copenhagen and Odense alcohol rehabilitation cohorts). Liver-related outcomes are defined as liver-related death, liver transplant, progression to liver-related complications (ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, jaundice, bleeding from esophagastric varices, hepatocellular carcinoma) or MELD-Na score \>15

    Time frame: 10 years

  2. Mortality

    Overall number of deaths during 10 years of follow up after the first screened patient, compared to a matched, historical control group (The Inter99 study and the Copenhagen and Odense alcohol rehabilitation cohorts).

    Time frame: 10 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Odense University Hospital
    Odense, 5000, Denmark
    Recruiting
    • Maja Thiele, MD, PhD · Contactmaja.thiele@rsyd.dk · 65412752
    • Maja Thiele, MD PhD · Principal investigator
    • Aleksander Krag, MD PhD Professor · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — OPEN - Odense Patient Exploratory data Network, managed by Odense University Hospital

Supporting information: Study protocol, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: After publication of study results

Access criteria: Accessible after contact to OPEN, who will pass on the request to primary investigator. No criteria.

Data sharing details ↗ · open.rsyd.dk

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 98 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 4, 2016
First posted
Oct 13, 2017
StartActual
Oct 6, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Oct 30, 2035
Last update
Sep 1, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03308916
Lead sponsor
Maja Thiele
Collaborators
Horizon 2020 - European Commission, Novo Nordisk A/S, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg University Hospital of South-West Jutland, Odense Municipality Alcohol Rehabilitation Unit, Svendborg Municipality Alcohol Rehabilitation Unit, University of Copenhagen, University of Oslo, Nordic Bioscience A/S, VLV Bio, Peviva AB, Manatee APS, Siemens Healthcare A/S, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, EMBL, University of Heidelberg
Responsible party
Maja Thiele (Associate professor, Odense University Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 13, 2017
Start date
Oct 6, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2035 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 1, 2022

Study contacts

Maja Thiele, MD, PhD, Professor
Contact
maja.thiele@rsyd.dk
+4524998068
Maja Thiele, MD, PhD, Professor
principal investigator · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Odense University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion