ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03307824Procolle 2Updated Feb 20, 2024

Operative Time During the Use of the Synthetic Glue IFABONDTM in Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

An interventional study of Synthetic glue IfabondTM and Glue-Free Suture Technique in Prolapse, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-20.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy has now become the gold standard technique for correction of anterior and apical prolapse. In order to provide an alternative to stapling system and sutures involving vaginal erosion and shrinkage phenomena, there is a technique to fix material meshes by the use of a liquid, tissue, synthetic adhesive and sterile. The investigator hypothesizes that the use of IFABOND ™ adhesive in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy significantly reduces the time of surgery compared to the classic suture technique. The prospective, randomized, multicenter study therefore aims to compare the time of surgery when using the IFABOND™ synthetic adhesive and the technique by sutures to fix material meshes in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prolapse

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic Surgery
  • synthetic glue IFABONDTM
  • time of surgery
03

In context

Prolapse

93 studies on the registry are indexed under Prolapse; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is below the median of 70 across 65 interventional studies indexed under Prolapse.

Browse Prolapse studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,866 studies on the registry; 448 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Woman aged 18 years or more
  • Stage III or IV medial and/or anterior genital prolapse on the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) classification (hysterocele and/or cystocele) requiring surgical correction
  • Patient requesting surgery for the trouble caused by the prolapse

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prolapse of POP-Q stage \<III or without functional impact
  • Unacceptable postoperative risk disclosed on interview: coagulation disorder, immune disorder, evolutive disease, etc.
  • Impaired lower-limb range of motion preventing positioning for surgery
  • Pregnancy or intended pregnancy during study period
  • Evolutive or latent infection or signs of tissue necrosis on clinical examination
  • Non-controlled diabetes ( >8%)
  • Treatment impacting immune response (immunomodulators), ongoing or within previous month
  • History of pelvic region radiation therapy, at any time
  • History of pelvic cancer
  • Non-controlled evolutive spinal pathology
  • Known to one of the implant components (polypropylene)
  • Cyanoacrylate hypersensitivity
  • Formaldehyde hypersensitivity
  • Inability to understand information provided
  • No national health insurance cover; prisoner, or ward of court
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IfabondTM

    Use of the synthetic glue IfabondTM

    Device: Synthetic glue IfabondTM

  • Active comparator
    sutures

    Glue-Free Suture Technique

    Procedure: Glue-Free Suture Technique

Interventions

  • DeviceSynthetic glue IfabondTM

    Use of the synthetic glue IfabondTM

  • ProcedureGlue-Free Suture Technique

    Suture Technique

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. duration of surgery

    time of surgery in minutes (measured by chronometers)

    Time frame: Day 0

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage prolapse correction failure

    A correction failure correspond to a patient with stage ≥ II prolapse on the POP-Q classification

    Time frame: at 1 months post-surgery

  2. Percentage prolapse correction failure

    A correction failure correspond to a patient with stage ≥ II prolapse on the POP-Q classification

    Time frame: at 12 months post-surgery

  3. Percentage prolapse correction failure

    A correction failure correspond to a patient with stage ≥ II prolapse on the POP-Q classification

    Time frame: at 24 months post-surgery

  4. complications

    Time frame: at day 0

  5. complications

    Time frame: at 1 months post-surgery

  6. complications

    Time frame: at 12 months post-surgery

  7. complications

    Time frame: at 24 months post-surgery

  8. pain

    assessed by visual analog scale (VAS)

    Time frame: at day 0

  9. pain

    assessed by visual analog scale (VAS)

    Time frame: at 1 months post-surgery

  10. pain

    assessed by visual analog scale (VAS)

    Time frame: at 12 months post-surgery

  11. pain

    assessed by visual analog scale (VAS)

    Time frame: at 24 months post-surgery

  12. quality of life

    assessed by the questionnaires Short Form Health Survey-12 (SF-12)

    Time frame: at 1 months post-surgery

  13. quality of life

    assessed by the questionnaires Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory -20 (PFDI-20)

    Time frame: at 1 months post-surgery

  14. quality of life

    assessed by the questionnaires Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7)

    Time frame: at 1 months post-surgery

  15. quality of life

    assessed by the questionnaires Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

    Time frame: at 1 months post-surgery

  16. quality of life

    assessed by the questionnaires SF-12

    Time frame: at 12 months post-surgery

  17. quality of life

    assessed by the questionnaires PFDI-20

    Time frame: at 12 months post-surgery

  18. quality of life

    assessed by the questionnaires PFIQ-7

    Time frame: at 12 months post-surgery

  19. quality of life

    assessed by the questionnaires PGI-I

    Time frame: at 12 months post-surgery

  20. quality of life

    assessed by the questionnaires SF-12

    Time frame: at 24 months post-surgery

  21. quality of life

    assessed by the questionnaires PFDI-20

    Time frame: at 24 months post-surgery

  22. quality of life

    assessed by the questionnaires PFIQ-7

    Time frame: at 24 months post-surgery

  23. quality of life

    assessed by the questionnaires PGI-I

    Time frame: at 24 months post-surgery

  24. sexuality score

    assessed by the questionnaire french version of Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12)

    Time frame: at 1 months post-surgery

  25. sexuality score

    assessed by the questionnaire PISQ-12

    Time frame: at 12 months post-surgery

  26. sexuality score

    assessed by the questionnaire PISQ-12

    Time frame: at 24 months post-surgery

  27. percentage of dyspareunia

    Time frame: at 1 months post-surgery

  28. percentage of dyspareunia

    Time frame: at 12 months post-surgery

  29. percentage of dyspareunia

    Time frame: at 24 months post-surgery

  30. percentage of urinary incontinence

    Time frame: at 1 months post-surgery

  31. percentage of urinary incontinence

    Time frame: at 12 months post-surgery

  32. percentage of urinary incontinence

    Time frame: at 24 months post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Gynaecology Department, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant
    Bron, 69500, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03307824
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 12, 2017
Start date
Nov 20, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2023
Completion
Dec 15, 2023
Last update
Feb 20, 2024

Study contacts

Géry LAMBLIN, MD
principal investigator · Gynaecology Department, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, HCL

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion