CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03306186INTELLIGENCE-1Updated May 15, 2018

Hemospec Device for the Diagnosis of Sepsis

An interventional study of HemoSpec in Sepsis, sponsored by University of Athens. Completed at 5 sites in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-15.

Sponsored by University of Athens · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
183
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A diagnostic devise, namely HemoSpec, had been developed that integrates clinical information, along with information on circulating protein biomarkers and the morphology of white blood cells to achieve early diagnosis of sepsis. The current study is aiming to validate and improve performance of HemoSpec for the rapid assessment of the critically ill patient.

Read the detailed description

Sepsis is a life-threating organ dysfunction resulting from the dysregulated response of the host to an infection. It is estimated that 1.5 million people present with sepsis annually in Northern America and another 1.5 million people in Europe; 30 to 50% of them die making sepsis the leading cause of death. The key-point in the management of sepsis is the early resuscitation with broad-spectrum antimicrobials and intravenous fluids, if possible within the first hour. The great mortality of sepsis indicates that this goal is not easy to be achieved for two main reasons: the first is the delay in recognition of the septic patients and the second is the resistance of the implicated pathogen to broad-spectrum antimicrobials.

In an attempt to improve the failure of physicians for early sepsis recognition, several markers have been developed. Some of them rely on clinical signs of the host and others on the measurements of circulating biomarkers. Recently, qSOFA (quick SOFA score) has been introduced to help the early recognition of sepsis in patients who present with infection outside the Intensive care Unit (ICU) i.e. either in the community or during hospitalization in the general ward1. However, there are concerns of the sensitivity of qSOFA and many introduce the need to measure biomarkers in serum. These biomarkers are usually protein molecules that are over-produced in the host as a result of the interaction with an infective insult. However, these protein molecules are produced by white blood cells. What is currently known is that although most of patients present with a similar phenotype, their pathophysiology is diverse. More precisely, although the majority of patients with sepsis present with high concentrations of protein molecules like interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in their blood, in some patients circulating white blood cells remain over-active and in other patients they are significantly anergic, a situation often known as sepsis-induced immunoparalysis. Another molecule, called soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), is the shed uPAR receptor on neutrophils and is released in the circulation as a result of neutrophil activation; concentrations greater than 12 ng/ml can trace with negative predictive value almost 95% the patient at great chance of unfavorable outcome. As such, the robust diagnosis of sepsis may rely on a combination of clinical assessment, measurement of protein biomarkers and validation of the activity of circulating white blood cells.

One FrameWork 7-funded initiative from seven European countries aims to develop a rapid score that can integrate all clinical and laboratory information and provide early diagnosis whether a patient has sepsis or not. The vision of this initiative is to build a device that is called HemoSpec. With this approach, whole blood coming from patients will be in parallel analyzed into three aspects: a) absolute white blood cell counting; b) information on the fluidity and activity of the white blood cells using Raman spectroscopy; and c) measurement of serum levels of IL-6, CRP, PCT and suPAR. The end result is building a diagnostic algorithm where clinical information is also taken into consideration.

The project was started in November 2013 and the HemoSpec device is anticipated to be ready by February 2017. The diagnostic performance of HemoSpec is currently based on preliminary data coming from 60 patients (20 controls, 20 with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and 20 with sepsis) hospitalized in Jena University Hospital. The current study is aiming to validate and improve performance of HemoSpec for the rapid assessment of the critically ill patient in a larger phase II diagnostic study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • diagnosis
  • prognosis
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age above or equal to 18 years old
  • Both genders
  • Written consent provided from patients or their first-degree relatives for patients unable to consent
  • Patients with acute pancreatitis or post-operative or with clinical signs of infection
  • Considerable risk of death as as indicated by the presence of at least one of the following: i) sudden alteration of mental status; ii) systolic blood pressure less than 100 mmHg; and iii) high respiratory rate defined as more than or equal to 22 breaths per minute.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known infection by the human immunodeficiency virus-1;
  • Neutropenia defined as an absolute neutrophil count lower than 1000 neutrophils/mm3 due to reasons other than an infection.
  • Single trauma or multiple injuries
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
183 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HemoSpec

    Diagnosis of sepsis using HemoSpec device

    Device: HemoSpec

Interventions

  • DeviceHemoSpec

    Blood sampling for analysis

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of HemoSpec for the diagnosis of sepsis

    The sensitivity of HemoSpec output to diagnose the presence of sepsis compared to the absence of sepsis. HemoSpec output will be considered to provide a satisfactory diagnosis of sepsis if sensitivity for the diagnosis is greater than 85%.

    Time frame: 3 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic performance for sepsis

    The diagnostic performance of HemoSpec output to diagnose the presence of sepsis compared to the absence of sepsis. The diagnostic performance is composed by the aggregation of specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.

    Time frame: 3 days

  2. Prognostics performance for sepsis

    The prognostic performance of HemoSpec output to predict unfavorable outcome compared to survivors. The prognostic performance is composed by the aggregation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.

    Time frame: 28 days

  3. Prognostic performance for organ dysfunction

    The prognostic performance of HemoSpec output to predict progression into organ dysfunction. The prognostic performance is composed by the aggregation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.

    Time frame: 28 days

  4. Diagnostic performance over qSOFA

    The aggregation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of HemoSpec output to indicate patients with infection among those scoring positive for qSOFA.

    Time frame: 3 days

  5. Diagnostic performance and microbiology

    The diagnostic performance of HemoSpec output to diagnose the presence of sepsis between patients with microbiologically-proven infection and patients without microbiologically-proven infection. The diagnostic performance is composed by the aggregation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.

    Time frame: 3 days

06

Study locations

5 sites
  • 1st Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Ippokration General Hospital
    Athens, 11521, Greece
  • Intensive Care Unit, Ippokration General Hospital
    Athens, 11521, Greece
  • 4th Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital
    Athens, 12462, Greece
  • Intensive Care Unit, Aghia Olga Konstantopouleion General Hospital
    Athens, 14232, Greece
  • Intensive Care Unit, Tzanio Hospital of Piraeus
    Piraeus, 18536, Greece
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. PubMed 26903338 ↗
  • Becker KL, Snider R, Nylen ES. Procalcitonin assay in systemic inflammation, infection, and sepsis: clinical utility and limitations. Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):941-52. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E318165BABB. PubMed 18431284 ↗
  • Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Norrby-Teglund A, Mylona V, Savva A, Tsangaris I, Dimopoulou I, Mouktaroudi M, Raftogiannis M, Georgitsi M, Linner A, Adamis G, Antonopoulou A, Apostolidou E, Chrisofos M, Katsenos C, Koutelidakis I, Kotzampassi K, Koratzanis G, Koupetori M, Kritselis I, Lymberopoulou K, Mandragos K, Marioli A, Sunden-Cullberg J, Mega A, Prekates A, Routsi C, Gogos C, Treutiger CJ, Armaganidis A, Dimopoulos G. Risk assessment in sepsis: a new prognostication rule by APACHE II score and serum soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor. Crit Care. 2012 Aug 8;16(4):R149. doi: 10.1186/cc11463. PubMed 22873681 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03306186
Lead sponsor
University of Athens
Collaborators
Ippokration General Hospital, Tzanion General Hospital of Piraeus, Aghia Olga Konstantopouleion General Hospital
Responsible party
Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, M.D. (Associate Professor of Internal Medicine, University of Athens) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 10, 2017
Start date
Oct 9, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2017
Completion
Mar 31, 2018
Last update
May 15, 2018

Study contacts

Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis, MD, PhD
study chair · National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Konstantinos Toutouzas, MD, PhD
principal investigator · National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Athanasios Prekates, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Tzaneion General Hospital
Stylianos Karatzas, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Ippokration General Hospital
Christos Mathas, MD
principal investigator · Aghia Olga General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion