ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03305575Updated Aug 25, 2020Results posted

Intrathecal Chloroprocaine vs. Bupivacaine for Cervical Cerclage

A Phase 4 interventional study of Chloroprocaine and Bupivacaine in Cervical Incompetence, sponsored by Tufts Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-25.

Sponsored by Tufts Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aims to compare the effect of chloroprocaine vs. bupivacaine on duration of motor block and duration until meeting discharge criteria in patients undergoing cervical cerclage. The hypothesis is that chloroprocaine will result in faster resolution of motor block.

Read the detailed description

Cervical cerclage is an ambulatory surgical procedure of short duration commonly performed under spinal anesthesia. Bupivaciane and chlororpocaine are both commonly used, but how their use impacts clinical care, in particular patient flow, is not well studied.

This is a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial. Participants meeting inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to receive spinal anesthesia with either chloroprocaine or bupivacaine.

Patients will then be assessed for motor block and sensory level until they are discharged from the recovery room.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Incompetence

Keywords

  • Cervical Cerclage
  • Bupivacaine
  • Chloroprocaine
  • spinal anesthesia
03

In context

Uterine Cervical Incompetence

37 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Incompetence; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 70 across 22 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Incompetence.

Browse Uterine Cervical Incompetence studies →

Lead sponsor

Tufts Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 200 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • II or III females
  • Age: 18-45 years old
  • ≤ 50 kg/m2
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Simple prophylactic cervical cerclage
  • Planning neuraxial anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Abdominal and complex cervical cerclage (e.g. bulging bag)
  • to neuraxial anesthesia
  • Known to chloroprocaine (a.k.a. Ester allergy), paraaminobenzoic acid (PABA) or bupivacaine (a.k.a. Amide allergy)
  • Pseudocholinesterase deficiency
  • Concomitant use with ergot-type oxytocic drugs
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Chloroprocaine

    Patients assigned to chlorprocaine will receive a single spinal injection of 40 mg of chloroprocaine PF. (other name: pure Nesacaine MPF 3% in a total volume of 2ml)

    Drug: Chloroprocaine

  • Active comparator
    Bupivacaine

    Patients assigned to bupivacaine will receive a single spinal injection of 7.5 mg of bupivacaine. (other name: pure Sensorcaine 0.75% diluted with normal saline to a total volume of 2ml).

    Drug: Bupivacaine

Interventions

  • The patient will be randomly selected to receive either Chloroprocaine or Bupivacaine as the local medication for in spinal anesthesia, with a 50% chance to receive either drug. During the cervical cerclage procedure and in the recovery room, the patient will be checked for motor block (the ability to move feet and legs) and for sensory block(the ability to feel) using a plastic tip, every 5 minutes in the first hour, and at 10 minutes intervals afterwards until the anesthesia wears off completely. The patient will also be asked to walk and urinate after the local anesthetic wears off to ensure complete resolution of local anesthesia.

    Also known as: Sensorcaine

  • The patient will be randomly selected to receive either Chloroprocaine or Bupivacaine as the local medication for in spinal anesthesia, with a 50% chance to receive either drug. During the cervical cerclage procedure and in the recovery room, the patient will be checked for motor block (the ability to move feet and legs) and for sensory block(the ability to feel) using a plastic tip, every 5 minutes in the first hour, and at 10 minutes intervals afterwards until the anesthesia wears off completely. The patient will also be asked to walk and urinate after the local anesthetic wears off to ensure complete resolution of local anesthesia.

    Also known as: Marcaine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration of Motor Block

    The time difference between local anesthetic injection and complete resolution of motor block -as measured on the Bromage scale: I = free movement of feet, legs and hip = No block II = able to flex knees, with free movement of feet = Mild block III = unable to flex knees, but with free movement of feet = Moderate block IV = unable to move legs or feet = Complete block

    Time frame: 6 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of Sensory Block

    The time difference between local anesthetic injection and complete resolution of sensory block. The sensory level was tested using a blunt needle tip along the patient's demratomal distribution of the spinal anesthetic.

    Time frame: 6 hours

  2. Time to Ambulation

    The time difference between local anesthetic injection and patient's walking for the first time postoperatively.

    Time frame: 6 hours

  3. Time to Micturation

    The time difference between local anesthetic injection and the patient's voiding for the first time postoperatively.

    Time frame: 6 hours

07

Results

Posted Aug 25, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneChloroprocaineBupivacaine
Started55
Completed45
Not completed10
Withdrew: Physician decision10

Outcome measures

PrimaryDuration of Motor Block

The time difference between local anesthetic injection and complete resolution of motor block -as measured on the Bromage scale: I = free movement of feet, legs and hip = No block II = able to flex knees, with free movement of feet = Mild block III = unable to flex knees, but with free movement of feet = Moderate block IV = unable to move legs or feet = Complete block

Time frame:
6 hours
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Duration of Motor Block
minutesChloroprocaineBupivacaine
Duration of Motor Block75 ± 5.799 ± 48.0
SecondaryDuration of Sensory Block

The time difference between local anesthetic injection and complete resolution of sensory block. The sensory level was tested using a blunt needle tip along the patient's demratomal distribution of the spinal anesthetic.

Time frame:
6 hours
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Duration of Sensory Block
minutesChloroprocaineBupivacaine
Duration of Sensory Block127 ± 20.6210 ± 56.1
SecondaryTime to Ambulation

The time difference between local anesthetic injection and patient's walking for the first time postoperatively.

Time frame:
6 hours
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Time to Ambulation
minutesChloroprocaineBupivacaine
Time to Ambulation110 ± 1.4179 ± 2.6
SecondaryTime to Micturation

The time difference between local anesthetic injection and the patient's voiding for the first time postoperatively.

Time frame:
6 hours
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Time to Micturation
minutesChloroprocaineBupivacaine
Time to Micturation111 ± 1.3233 ± 1.7

Adverse events

Collected over until the subjects were discharged form the post anesthesia care unit up to 6 hours.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Chloroprocaine0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)
Bupivacaine0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ChloroprocaineBupivacaineTotal
Mean33 ± 4.529 ± 3.831 ± 4.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ChloroprocaineBupivacaineTotal
Female5510
Male000
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)ChloroprocaineBupivacaineTotal
Count of participants——0
BMI
BMI(Kg/m^2)ChloroprocaineBupivacaineTotal
Mean30.4 ± 5.929.7 ± 5.930 ± 5.4
ASA
ASA(Scores on a scale)ChloroprocaineBupivacaineTotal
Mean2.3 ± 0.582 ± 02.1 ± 0.38
Gestational age
Gestational age(weeks)ChloroprocaineBupivacaineTotal
Mean16 ± 3.914.8 ± 3.715.4 ± 3.7
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Tufts Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Concepcion M, Covino BG. Rational use of local anaesthetics. Drugs. 1984 Mar;27(3):256-70. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198427030-00005. PubMed 6705717 ↗
  • Lacasse MA, Roy JD, Forget J, Vandenbroucke F, Seal RF, Beaulieu D, McCormack M, Massicotte L. Comparison of bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia for outpatient surgery: a double-blind randomized trial. Can J Anaesth. 2011 Apr;58(4):384-91. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9450-x. Epub 2011 Jan 4. PubMed 21203878 ↗
  • Yoos JR, Kopacz DJ. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: a comparison with small-dose bupivacaine in volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb;100(2):566-572. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143356.17013.A1. PubMed 15673895 ↗
  • Casati A, Fanelli G, Danelli G, Berti M, Ghisi D, Brivio M, Putzu M, Barbagallo A. Spinal anesthesia with lidocaine or preservative-free 2-chlorprocaine for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison. Anesth Analg. 2007 Apr;104(4):959-64. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000258766.73612.d8. PubMed 17377114 ↗
  • Beilin Y, Zahn J, Abramovitz S, Bernstein HH, Hossain S, Bodian C. Subarachnoid small-dose bupivacaine versus lidocaine for cervical cerclage. Anesth Analg. 2003 Jul;97(1):56-61, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000068940.36040.54. PubMed 12818944 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2017 to primary completion in Aug 2018, 10 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2020, 2 years after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 4, 2017
First posted
Oct 10, 2017
StartActual
Oct 13, 2017
Primary completionActual
Aug 24, 2018
CompletionActual
Aug 24, 2018
Results first posted
Aug 25, 2020
Last update
Aug 25, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03305575
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 10, 2017
Start date
Oct 13, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 24, 2018
Completion
Aug 24, 2018
Results posted
Aug 25, 2020
Last update
Aug 25, 2020

Study contacts

Dan Drzymalski, MD
principal investigator · Tufts Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Chloroprocaine

Start the discussion