ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03298919Updated Apr 25, 2019

Efficacy of Exercise Videogames for Physical Activity Adoption and Maintenance

An interventional study of Exercise Video Games and Aerobic Exercise in Physical Activity, sponsored by The Miriam Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-25.

Sponsored by The Miriam Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2012, registered Sep 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
283
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 43 studies in Motor Activity by The Miriam Hospital — 4 open to participants now, 5 under way, none of them phase 3. Motor Activity · The Miriam Hospital.

Enrollment
7th of 41
283 · median 60
Started
2012
with 2 others
No phase
33 of 43
4 open now
Registered
26th of 43
by date

Among the 43 studies in Motor Activity by The Miriam Hospital, this one is the 7th largest by enrollment of the 41 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2012, is one of 33 with no phase, and was the 26th registered.

Motor Activity

9,798 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Activity; 1,910 are open to participants now.

Browse Motor Activity studies →

Open to participants now

4 of the 43 studies in Motor Activity by The Miriam Hospital are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 4 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 1,201 Motor Activity studies recruiting now, 517 (43%) set no upper age limit and 535 (45%) stop at 75 or younger; 180 take children under 18; 420 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 43 studies in Motor Activity by The Miriam Hospital, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a 3-arm trial to compare exercise videogames versus traditional standard exercise using stationary bikes and treadmills versus a control condition. Results will examine minutes of physical activity at 12 weeks and 6 month follow up between conditions. We will also examine changes in indicators of cardiovascular health (e.g., body mass index, lipids) and changes in psychological factors that may be predictive of continued exercise engagement.

Read the detailed description

To test the efficacy of a 12-week supervised, laboratory based program of an exercise videogame (EVG) program to increase time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and improve cardiovascular health and fitness indices compared to Standard and Control programs. Participants will be randomly assigned to (1) a supervised program of Exercise Videogames (EVG); (2) a supervised standard exercise program (Standard), using aerobic exercise equipment (e.g., treadmill, stationary bike); or (3) a Control condition. We will also examine the effect of home-based exercise videogames compared to a home-based standard PA program on MVPA maintenance during the 6-month follow up period. We will examine changes in cardiorespiratory fitness (i.e., estimated VO2max), blood pressure, resting heart rate, body composition and blood lipids at baseline, week 12 and at 6-months follow up. We will also examine changes in theoretically-based cognitive and affective constructs associated with physical activity including: enjoyment, outcome expectations, self-efficacy, motivation, and goal-orientation.

03

Conditions studied

  • Physical Activity

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age > 18,
  • In generally good health
  • No medical conditions that would interfere with exercise
  • Currently engaging in less than 60 minutes of physical activity per week

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • over 40
  • current or planned pregnancy
  • hospitalization from a physical or mental disorder in the past 6 months
  • hypertension (defined as: blood pressure ≥ 140/90)
  • anti-hypertensive medication
  • medications that may impair physical activity tolerance (e.g., beta blockers)
  • current cardiovascular disease
  • current pulmonary disease
  • diabetes
  • thyroid disorders
  • renal or liver disease
  • orthopedic conditions that would prevent or limit exercise
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
283 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Exercise Videogames

    Exercise videogames 3 times weekly for 12 weeks followed by 6 months of home practice

    Behavioral: Exercise Video Games · Behavioral: Home exercise videogames

  • Active comparator
    Standard Exercise

    Exercise using aerobic equipment such as stationary bikes and treadmills 3 times weekly for 12 weeks followed by home practice

    Behavioral: Aerobic Exercise · Behavioral: Home Standard Exercise

  • No intervention
    Wellness Control

    Weekly mailings on general health and wellness topics for 12 weeks followed by monthly mailings for 6 months.

Interventions

  • BehavioralExercise Video Games

    12 weeks laboratory based exercise videogames

  • BehavioralAerobic Exercise

    Stationary bike and/or treadmill walking for 12 weeks

  • BehavioralHome exercise videogames

    videogame console and active videogames

  • BehavioralHome Standard Exercise

    Personalized physical activity promotion materials

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. MVPA

    moderate to vigorous physical activity minutes

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. MVPA Maintenance

    moderate to vigorous physical activity minutes

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Miriam Hospital- CORO building
    Providence, Rhode Island 02903, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Serber ER, Ciccolo J, Palmer K, Cobb V, Tilkemeier PL, Bock BC. The feasibility of exercise videogames for cardiovascular risk reduction among adults: a pilot for "Wii heart fitness". J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016 Mar;56(3):319-27. Epub 2015 Feb 18. PubMed 25692860 ↗
  • Bock BC, Thind H, Dunsiger SI, Serber ER, Ciccolo JT, Cobb V, Palmer K, Abernathy S, Marcus BH. Exercise videogames for physical activity and fitness: Design and rationale of the Wii Heart Fitness trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 May;42:204-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 17. PubMed 25896114 ↗
  • Bock BC, Dunsiger SI, Ciccolo JT, Serber ER, Wu WC, Tilkemeier P, Walaska KA, Marcus BH. Exercise Videogames, Physical Activity, and Health: Wii Heart Fitness: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Prev Med. 2019 Apr;56(4):501-511. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.11.026. Epub 2019 Feb 16. PubMed 30777705 ↗
  • Bock BC, Dunsiger SI, Ciccolo JT, Serber ER, Wu WC, Sillice M, Marcus BH. Mediators of physical activity between standard exercise and exercise video games. Health Psychol. 2019 Dec;38(12):1107-1115. doi: 10.1037/hea0000791. Epub 2019 Sep 12. PubMed 31512923 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2012 to primary completion in Aug 2016, 47 months.

Of 5,147 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Motor Activity, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 36. This study's 47 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 5,207 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 27, 2017
First posted
Oct 2, 2017
StartActual
Sep 1, 2012
Primary completionActual
Aug 29, 2016
CompletionActual
Sep 30, 2017
Last update
Apr 25, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 25, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03298919
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 2, 2017
Start date
Sep 1, 2012
Primary completion
Aug 29, 2016
Completion
Sep 30, 2017
Last update
Apr 25, 2019

Study contacts

Beth Bock, PhD
principal investigator · The Miriam Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion