ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03297788ENCEPHALONUpdated Jan 5, 2024

Whole Brain Radiation Therapy Alone vs. Radiosurgery for SCLC Patients With 1-10 Brain Metastases

An interventional study of SRS and WBRT in SCLC and Brain Metastases, sponsored by Juergen Debus. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-05.

Sponsored by Juergen Debus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients suffering from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are at high risk for developing brain metastases (BM). To prevent a clinical manifestation of preexisting microscopic brain dissemination, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is offered to both limited and extensive disease patients, if they respond to first line regime, thus being at risk or at chance to develop clinical brain metastases. However, up to 10-15% of patients present with BM at initial diagnosis. If MRI is used as a diagnostic tool for initial staging the number even increases up to 15-20%. Additionally, between 40 - 50% of patients develop BM until time of death and the risk of developing BM further increases with prolonged survival. Treatment options are usually limited to WBRT and palliative chemotherapy but the actual effect of therapeutic WBRT has mainly been studied in small retrospective and nonrandomized studies. WBRT has been established as the treatment standard in patients with cerebral metastases from SCLC, however, it has only modest efficacy. Results might be improved by additional dose escalation. A SRS to cerebral metastases may be indicated in patients with intracranial disease, and the current protocol is aimed at exploring the neurocognition and efficacy of SCLC in patients with brain metastases treated with SRS or WBRT.

The present trial aims to exploratory investigate the treatment response to ´conventional whole brain radiotherapy´ (WBRT) and ´stereotactic radiotherapy´(SRS) in SCLC patients.

Read the detailed description

Scientific Background: Patients suffering from BM from SCLC have a poor prognosis with a median survival ranging between 2-14 months. Treatment options for BM in SCLC are usually limited to WBRT, steroids or palliative chemotherapy. SCLC patients demonstrate an exception in the treatment of BM, because treatment options for a limited number of BM from other solid tumors commonly include surgery or SRS with or without WBRT. Even though SCLC is a radiosensitive tumor, higher doses are commonly not applied. Locally ablative treatments like SRS or surgery are less frequently used in patients with BM from SCLC as compared to other types of cancer due to the high incidence of brain metastases in SCLC and the increased likelihood of a diffuse failure pattern. It is of general belief that BM from SCLC are rarely solitary and usually occur at multiple sites. The investigators could not confirm these findings from this analysis as they found 1-5 BM in 39 % of their patients. WBRT, with a treatment time of about two weeks, is commonly the technique of choice for SCLC patients with any number of BM. In a recent Japanese trial, prophylactic cranial irradiation did not result in longer overall survival compared with observation in patients with early disease (ED) SCLC. PCI is therefore no longer recommended for patients with ED SCLC when patients receive regularly MRI examinations during follow-up.

Though, the initial response to cranial irradiation is good, especially in the synchronous setting, SCLC patients are at high risk of developing intracranial recurrence. In the investigators´ retrospective analysis median Overall survival (OS) after re-WBRT was only 2 months and the median OS after SRS was 6 months. These results are similar as compared to results for re-irradiation after PCI. In a recent analysis the investigators reported a prolonged survival for patients treated with SRS in the recurrent setting after previous PCI with a median survival of 5 months.

Therefore, the number of patients with oligometastatic cerebral disease might rise. Based on recursive partitioning Analysis (RPA) classification, the investigators found a median survival after WBRT of 17 months in RPA class I, 7 months in class II and 3 months in class III (p\<0.0001), which is comparable to previous analyses using graded prognostic assessment (GPA) scoring. This is further of special interest as patients in RPA class I had a comparable or even better outcome than patients with non-cerebral disease treated with PCI. On the other hand, patients with RPA class III should be carefully selected for WBRT and treatment should be weighed against supportive therapy with steroids alone. This implicates that patient selection is mandatory, even in SCLC, and that the general paradigm of WBRT needs to be reevaluated.

Trial Objectives: The purpose of this trial is to explore the neurocognitive response in patients with brain metastases from SCLC treated with WBRT or SRS. The investigators proposed that patients treated with SRS would have inferior neurocognitive function based on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) compared with patients treated with SRS alone.

Patients Selection: Patients with a diagnosis of brain metastases from SCLC will be evaluated and screened based on the protocol. All patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be informed about the possibility to participate in the study. Registration for the study must be performed prior to beginning of RT. 56 patients will be enrolled in this exploratory clinical trial.

Trial Design: This pilot trial will be conducted as a single-center prospective, randomized, two-arm Phase II study.

02

Conditions studied

  • SCLC
  • Brain Metastases

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • SCLC
  • Brain Metastases
  • SRS (stereotactic radiosurgery)
  • WBRT (whole brain radiotherapy)
03

In context

Brain Neoplasms

2,440 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Neoplasms; 540 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is above the median of 40 across 1,831 interventional studies indexed under Brain Neoplasms.

Browse Brain Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Juergen Debus is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • confirmed small cell lung cancer (SCLC)
  • Magentic resonance (MR)-imaging confirmed cerebral (no resection, max. number of 10)
  • age ≥ 18 years of Age
  • For women with , (and men) adequate .
  • Ability of subject to understand character and individual consequences of the clinical trial
  • Written (must be available before enrolment in the trial)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

refusal of the patients to take part in the study

  • previous radiotherapy of the brain
  • Patients who have not yet recovered from acute high-grade toxicities of prior therapies
  • Known carcinoma \< 5 years ago (excluding Carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin) requiring immediate treatment interfering with study therapy
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Participation in another competing clinical study or observation period of competing trials, respectively
  • MRI (i.e. cardiac pacemaker, implanted defibrillator, certain cardiac valve replacements, certain metal implants)
  • score (KPS) \<60
  • Simultaneous cytotoxic chemotherapy
  • Last application of chemotherapy/immunotherapy/targeted therapy \<1 week before cerebral radiotherapy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm A: SRS

    Patient receive stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), dose prescription according to the size of radiated brain metastases

    Radiation: SRS

  • Active comparator
    Arm B: WBRT

    Patients receive whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT)

    Radiation: WBRT

Interventions

  • RadiationSRS

    For SRS the dose prescription to the PTV will be as follows: * 20 Gy to the 70%-isodose (lesions \< 2 cm max. diameter) * 18 Gy to the 70%-isodose (lesions 2 - 3 cm max. diameter) * 6 x 5 Gy to the conformally surrounding isodose (lesions \> 3 cm max. diameter)

  • RadiationWBRT

    WBRT will be applied in 10 fractions with single doses of 3 Gy to the whole brain.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neurocognition

    Drop of at least 5 Points from baseline in HVLT-R test (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised)

    Time frame: 3 month after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intracranial progression

    number of new cerebral metastases

    Time frame: up to 12 month after treatment

  2. Intracranial progression

    Change in tumor size

    Time frame: up to 12 month after treatment

  3. Overall survival (OS)

    Duration of survival defined as the interval between the date of RT begin and the date of death or date of leaving the study e.g., lost to follow up) whatever occurs first.

    Time frame: 12 month OS

  4. Death due to brain metastases

    Death which directly connects to existing brain metastases

    Time frame: up to 12 month after treatment

  5. Locally progression-free survival

    12 month Progression-fee survival referring to local tumour progression

    Time frame: up to 12 month after treatment

  6. Progression-free survival (PFS)

    12 month Progression-free survival

    Time frame: 12 month PFS

  7. Changes in other cognitive performance measures

    HVLT_R

    Time frame: up to 12 month after treatment

  8. Quality of life

    BN20 QoL Questionaire

    Time frame: up to 12 month after treatment

  9. Quality of life

    EORTC QoL Questionaire PAL (palliative)

    Time frame: up to 12 month after treatment

  10. Changes in other cognitive performance measures

    CANTAB Test

    Time frame: up to 12 month after treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital of Heidelberg, Department of Radiation Oncology
    Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Aoyama H, Shirato H, Tago M, Nakagawa K, Toyoda T, Hatano K, Kenjyo M, Oya N, Hirota S, Shioura H, Kunieda E, Inomata T, Hayakawa K, Katoh N, Kobashi G. Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2483-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.21.2483. PubMed 16757720 ↗
  • Auperin A, Arriagada R, Pignon JP, Le Pechoux C, Gregor A, Stephens RJ, Kristjansen PE, Johnson BE, Ueoka H, Wagner H, Aisner J. Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Overview Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 12;341(7):476-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908123410703. PubMed 10441603 ↗
  • Bentzen SM, Constine LS, Deasy JO, Eisbruch A, Jackson A, Marks LB, Ten Haken RK, Yorke ED. Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040. PubMed 20171515 ↗
  • Bergqvist M, Brattstrom D, Bennmarker H, Wagenius G, Riska H, Brodin O. Irradiation of brain metastases from lung cancer: a retrospective study. Lung Cancer. 1998 Apr;20(1):57-63. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(98)00015-4. PubMed 9699188 ↗
  • Bernhardt D, Adeberg S, Bozorgmehr F, Opfermann N, Hoerner-Rieber J, Repka MC, Kappes J, Thomas M, Bischoff H, Herth F, Heussel CP, Debus J, Steins M, Rieken S. Nine-year Experience: Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation in Extensive Disease Small-cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2017 Jul;18(4):e267-e271. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.11.012. Epub 2016 Dec 2. PubMed 28027850 ↗
  • Bernhardt D, Adeberg S, Bozorgmehr F, Opfermann N, Hoerner-Rieber J, Konig L, Kappes J, Thomas M, Herth F, Heussel CP, Warth A, Debus J, Steins M, Rieken S. Outcome and prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases from small-cell lung cancer treated with whole brain radiotherapy. J Neurooncol. 2017 Aug;134(1):205-212. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2510-0. Epub 2017 May 30. PubMed 28560661 ↗
  • Bernhardt D, Bozorgmehr F, Adeberg S, Opfermann N, von Eiff D, Rieber J, Kappes J, Foerster R, Konig L, Thomas M, Debus J, Steins M, Rieken S. Outcome in patients with small cell lung cancer re-irradiated for brain metastases after prior prophylactic cranial irradiation. Lung Cancer. 2016 Nov;101:76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Sep 14. PubMed 27794411 ↗
  • van Buuren S. Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification. Stat Methods Med Res. 2007 Jun;16(3):219-42. doi: 10.1177/0962280206074463. PubMed 17621469 ↗
  • Carmichael J, Crane JM, Bunn PA, Glatstein E, Ihde DC. Results of therapeutic cranial irradiation in small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988 Mar;14(3):455-9. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(88)90260-x. PubMed 2830211 ↗
  • Chang EL, Wefel JS, Hess KR, Allen PK, Lang FF, Kornguth DG, Arbuckle RB, Swint JM, Shiu AS, Maor MH, Meyers CA. Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Nov;10(11):1037-44. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70263-3. Epub 2009 Oct 2. PubMed 19801201 ↗
  • Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. PubMed 19097774 ↗
  • Fertil B, Malaise EP. Intrinsic radiosensitivity of human cell lines is correlated with radioresponsiveness of human tumors: analysis of 101 published survival curves. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985 Sep;11(9):1699-707. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90223-8. PubMed 4030437 ↗
  • Gaspar L, Scott C, Rotman M, Asbell S, Phillips T, Wasserman T, McKenna WG, Byhardt R. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Mar 1;37(4):745-51. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00619-0. PubMed 9128946 ↗
  • Giannone L, Johnson DH, Hande KR, Greco FA. Favorable prognosis of brain metastases in small cell lung cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Mar;106(3):386-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-386. PubMed 3028222 ↗
  • Herfarth KK, Izwekowa O, Thilmann C, Pirzkall A, Delorme S, Hofmann U, Schadendorf D, Zierhut D, Wannenmacher M, Debus J. Linac-based radiosurgery of cerebral melanoma metastases. Analysis of 122 metastases treated in 64 patients. Strahlenther Onkol. 2003 Jun;179(6):366-71. doi: 10.1007/s00066-003-1050-z. PubMed 12789461 ↗
  • Hochstenbag MM, Twijnstra A, Wilmink JT, Wouters EF, ten Velde GP. Asymptomatic brain metastases (BM) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC): MR-imaging is useful at initial diagnosis. J Neurooncol. 2000 Jul;48(3):243-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1006427407281. PubMed 11100822 ↗
  • Kochhar R, Frytak S, Shaw EG. Survival of patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer who have only brain metastases at initial diagnosis. Am J Clin Oncol. 1997 Apr;20(2):125-7. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199704000-00003. PubMed 9124183 ↗
  • Komaki R, Cox JD, Whitson W. Risk of brain metastasis from small cell carcinoma of the lung related to length of survival and prophylactic irradiation. Cancer Treat Rep. 1981 Sep-Oct;65(9-10):811-4. PubMed 6268295 ↗
  • Lassen U, Kristjansen PE, Hansen HH. Brain metastases in small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 1995 Nov;6(9):941-4. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059363. No abstract available. PubMed 8624299 ↗
  • Marks LB, Yorke ED, Jackson A, Ten Haken RK, Constine LS, Eisbruch A, Bentzen SM, Nam J, Deasy JO. Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1754. PubMed 20171502 ↗
  • Newman SJ, Hansen HH. Proceedings: Frequency, diagnosis, and treatment of brain metastases in 247 consecutive patients with bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer. 1974 Feb;33(2):492-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197402)33:23.0.co;2-o. No abstract available. PubMed 4812766 ↗
  • Nugent JL, Bunn PA Jr, Matthews MJ, Ihde DC, Cohen MH, Gazdar A, Minna JD. CNS metastases in small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: increasing frequency and changing pattern with lengthening survival. Cancer. 1979 Nov;44(5):1885-93. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197911)44:53.0.co;2-f. No abstract available. PubMed 227582 ↗
  • Postmus PE. Brain Metastases From Small Cell Lung Cancer: Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, or Both? Semin Radiat Oncol. 1995 Jan;5(1):69-73. doi: 10.1054/SRAO00500069. PubMed 10717129 ↗
  • Quan AL, Videtic GM, Suh JH. Brain metastases in small cell lung cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2004 Jul;18(8):961-72; discussion 974, 979-80, 987. PubMed 15328892 ↗
  • Scharp M, Hauswald H, Bischof M, Debus J, Combs SE. Re-irradiation in the treatment of patients with cerebral metastases of solid tumors: retrospective analysis. Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan 3;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-4. PubMed 24387239 ↗
  • Schwartz LH, Seymour L, Litiere S, Ford R, Gwyther S, Mandrekar S, Shankar L, Bogaerts J, Chen A, Dancey J, Hayes W, Hodi FS, Hoekstra OS, Huang EP, Lin N, Liu Y, Therasse P, Wolchok JD, de Vries E. RECIST 1.1 - Standardisation and disease-specific adaptations: Perspectives from the RECIST Working Group. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jul;62:138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.082. Epub 2016 May 26. PubMed 27237360 ↗
  • Schwer AL, Gaspar LE. Update in the treatment of brain metastases from lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2006 Nov;8(3):180-6. doi: 10.3816/CLC.2006.n.045. PubMed 17239293 ↗
  • Shibamoto Y, Baba F, Oda K, Hayashi S, Kokubo M, Ishihara S, Itoh Y, Ogino H, Koizumi M. Incidence of brain atrophy and decline in mini-mental state examination score after whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases: a prospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Nov 15;72(4):1168-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.054. Epub 2008 May 19. PubMed 18495375 ↗
  • Slotman B, Faivre-Finn C, Kramer G, Rankin E, Snee M, Hatton M, Postmus P, Collette L, Musat E, Senan S; EORTC Radiation Oncology Group and Lung Cancer Group. Prophylactic cranial irradiation in extensive small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 16;357(7):664-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071780. PubMed 17699816 ↗
  • Soffietti R, Kocher M, Abacioglu UM, Villa S, Fauchon F, Baumert BG, Fariselli L, Tzuk-Shina T, Kortmann RD, Carrie C, Ben Hassel M, Kouri M, Valeinis E, van den Berge D, Mueller RP, Tridello G, Collette L, Bottomley A. A European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase III trial of adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation in patients with one to three brain metastases from solid tumors after surgical resection or radiosurgery: quality-of-life results. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 1;31(1):65-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.0639. Epub 2012 Dec 3. PubMed 23213105 ↗
  • Son CH, Jimenez R, Niemierko A, Loeffler JS, Oh KS, Shih HA. Outcomes after whole brain reirradiation in patients with brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 1;82(2):e167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.020. Epub 2011 May 27. PubMed 21620583 ↗
  • Sperduto PW, Chao ST, Sneed PK, Luo X, Suh J, Roberge D, Bhatt A, Jensen AW, Brown PD, Shih H, Kirkpatrick J, Schwer A, Gaspar LE, Fiveash JB, Chiang V, Knisely J, Sperduto CM, Mehta M. Diagnosis-specific prognostic factors, indexes, and treatment outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases: a multi-institutional analysis of 4,259 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jul 1;77(3):655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.025. Epub 2009 Nov 26. PubMed 19942357 ↗
  • Sperduto PW, Kased N, Roberge D, Xu Z, Shanley R, Luo X, Sneed PK, Chao ST, Weil RJ, Suh J, Bhatt A, Jensen AW, Brown PD, Shih HA, Kirkpatrick J, Gaspar LE, Fiveash JB, Chiang V, Knisely JP, Sperduto CM, Lin N, Mehta M. Summary report on the graded prognostic assessment: an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 1;30(4):419-25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.0527. Epub 2011 Dec 27. PubMed 22203767 ↗
  • Takahashi T, Yamanaka T, Seto T, Harada H, Nokihara H, Saka H, Nishio M, Kaneda H, Takayama K, Ishimoto O, Takeda K, Yoshioka H, Tachihara M, Sakai H, Goto K, Yamamoto N. Prophylactic cranial irradiation versus observation in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 May;18(5):663-671. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30230-9. Epub 2017 Mar 23. PubMed 28343976 ↗
  • Tsao MN, Lloyd N, Wong RK, Chow E, Rakovitch E, Laperriere N, Xu W, Sahgal A. Whole brain radiotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple brain metastases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD003869. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003869.pub3. PubMed 22513917 ↗
  • Welzel G, Fleckenstein K, Schaefer J, Hermann B, Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, Mai SK, Wenz F. Memory function before and after whole brain radiotherapy in patients with and without brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Dec 1;72(5):1311-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 Apr 28. PubMed 18448270 ↗
  • Wong WW, Schild SE, Sawyer TE, Shaw EG. Analysis of outcome in patients reirradiated for brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Feb 1;34(3):585-90. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)02156-6. PubMed 8621282 ↗
  • Bernhardt D, Hommertgen A, Schmitt D, El Shafie R, Paul A, Konig L, Mair-Walther J, Krisam J, Klose C, Welzel T, Horner-Rieber J, Kappes J, Thomas M, Heussel CP, Steins M, Kieser M, Debus J, Rieken S. Whole brain radiation therapy alone versus radiosurgery for patients with 1-10 brain metastases from small cell lung cancer (ENCEPHALON Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Jul 16;19(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2745-x. PubMed 30012190 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2017 to primary completion in Oct 2023, 70 months.

Of 306 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Brain Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 65 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 36 and three quarters within 125. This study's 70 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 317 studies reached it within 64 months; a quarter within 35 and three quarters within 125.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 19, 2017
First posted
Sep 29, 2017
StartActual
Dec 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Oct 1, 2023
CompletionActual
Dec 1, 2023
Last update
Jan 5, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03297788
Lead sponsor
Juergen Debus
Responsible party
Juergen Debus (Director of the Department Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 29, 2017
Start date
Dec 1, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2023
Completion
Dec 1, 2023
Last update
Jan 5, 2024

Study contacts

Stefan Rieken, PD.Dr.
principal investigator · chief senior physician in the department of Radiation Oncology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion