ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04094454DILANAUpdated Mar 10, 2026

Intrafractional Vaginal Dilation in Anal Cancer Patients Undergoing Pelvic Radiotherapy

An interventional study of special tampon with a diameter of 28mm and standard tampon with a diameter of 12-13mm in Anal Cancer, sponsored by Juergen Debus. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-10.

Sponsored by Juergen Debus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2019; still recruiting 7 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

A commercially available vaginal dilator set will be used as measuring device. The grading of vaginal stenosis will be determined as difference of the diameter of vaginal dilator to the baseline. A reduction of the diameter of \<20% is defined as vaginal stenosis Grade 1, a reduction of 20-35% as Grade 2, a reduction of >35-49% as Grade 3 and a reduction >/=50% as Grade 4. The investigators hypothesize that the rate of vaginal stenosis Grade 1 or higher 12 months after radiotherapy is lower in the group using extended vaginal dilation during radiotherapy (Arm A). Rates of vaginal stenosis of 50% have been observed in previous patient collectives and the investigators hypothesize that a reduction to 25% is possible in the experimental group.

Read the detailed description

The study is designed as a prospective, randomized, two-armed, single-center phase-II-trial. 60 patients will be included in the study. Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be randomized into one of the two arms, which differ only in the diameter of a tampon used for vaginal dilatation during treatment. All patients will receive standard (chemo)radiotherapy with a total dose of 45-50,4 Gy (single dose 1,8-2 Gy) to the pelvic and inguinal (if required) lymphatic drainage with a boost to the anal canal up to 54-60 Gy (single doses 1.8-2.2 Gy). The primary objective is the assessment of the incidence and grade of vaginal fibrosis 12 months after (chemo)radiotherapy for anal cancer depending on the extent of intrafractional vaginal dilatation. Secondary endpoints are clinical symptoms and toxicity according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 5.0, assessment of clinical feasibility of daily use of a tampon for vaginal dilatation, assessment of the compliance for the use of a vaginal dilatator and quality of life assessed with the EORTC-QLQ30/-ANL27 questionnaires.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anal Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • female patients
  • quality of life
  • vaginal dilator
  • vaginal fibrosis
03

In context

Anus Neoplasms

297 studies on the registry are indexed under Anus Neoplasms; 74 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 66 across 211 interventional studies indexed under Anus Neoplasms.

Browse Anus Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Juergen Debus is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patient
  • confirmed squamous anal cancer
  • Indication for definitive or postoperative radiotherapy
  • 0-2
  • Age > 18 years
  • Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients refusal or incapability of
  • no vaginal dilatation possible prior to radiation treatment start
  • prior pelvic irradiation (if direct field border or even overlap of radiation fields assumed)
  • participation in another clinical trial which might influence the results of the DILANA trial
  • pregnancy/nursing period or inadequate in women with child bearing potential
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tampon with extended vaginal dilatation

    Patients in arm A will use a special tampon with extended vaginal dilatation during radiotherapy

    Device: special tampon with a diameter of 28mm

  • Active comparator
    Commercially available tampon

    Patients in Arm B will use a normal commercially available tampon (diameter 12-13mm) during radiotherapy

    Device: standard tampon with a diameter of 12-13mm

Interventions

  • Devicespecial tampon with a diameter of 28mm

    patients will use a special tampon with extended vaginal dilatation (diameter 28mm) during radiotherapy

  • Devicestandard tampon with a diameter of 12-13mm

    patients in Arm B will use a normal commercially available tampon (diameter 12-13mm) during radiotherapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. incidence and grade of vaginal fibrosis

    during and after radiotherapy, clinical symptoms are assessed and graded

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after start of (chemo)radiotherapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. clinical symptoms and toxicity according to the CTC AE version 5.0. criteria

    during and after radiotherapy, clinical symptoms are assessed and graded according to the CTC AE v5.0 criteria

    Time frame: weekly during radiotherapy, at each follow-up visit

  2. clinical feasibility of daily use of a special tampon

    daily assessment of the clinical feasibility of daily use of a special tampon

    Time frame: continously during radiotherapy

  3. assessment of the compliance for the use of a vaginal dilatator

    patients will be instructed to use a vaginal dilator 3 times a week, at each follow-up visit patients are asked about the frequency of vaginal dilator use

    Time frame: continously at every follow-up visit

  4. assessment of quality of life

    EORTC-QLQ30/-ANL27 questionnaires are used to assess quality of life

    Time frame: baseline, 6-8 weeks after and 6/12 months after finishing radiotherapy

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arians N, Hafner M, Krisam J, Lang K, Wark A, Koerber SA, Hommertgen A, Debus J. Intrafractional vaginal dilation in anal cancer patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy (DILANA) - a prospective, randomized, 2-armed phase-II-trial. BMC Cancer. 2020 Jan 21;20(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6547-7. PubMed 31964381 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2026, 78 months after the start.

Of 39 interventional studies with no phase under Anus Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 52 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17. This study's planned 78 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 12, 2019
First posted
Sep 19, 2019
StartActual
Oct 1, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2026
CompletionEst.
Apr 2027
Last update
Mar 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04094454
Lead sponsor
Juergen Debus
Responsible party
Juergen Debus (Principal Ivestigator, University Hospital Heidelberg) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2019
Start date
Oct 1, 2019
Primary completion
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 10, 2026

Study contacts

Nathalie Arians, MD
Contact
nathalie.arians@med.uni-heidleberg.de
+49 6221 568202
Matthias Haefner, MD
Contact
matthias.heafner@med.uni-heidelberg.de
+49 6221 568202
Nathalie Arians, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital Heidelberg

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion