ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03292315Updated Mar 14, 2023

Once Weekly GLP-1 in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury

A Phase 4 interventional study of Semaglutide 1MG Injection [Ozempic] and No Intervention in Spinal Cord Injuries, Insulin Resistance and Pre Diabetes, sponsored by James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 69 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-14.

Sponsored by James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Mar 2020, 6 years 8 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 69 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 38 studies in Spinal Cord Injuries by James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center — 3 open to participants now, 5 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Spinal Cord Injuries · James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Enrollment
26th of 30
5 · median 21
Started
2018
with 4 others
Phase 4
8 of 38
none open now
Registered
28th of 38
by date

Among the 38 studies in Spinal Cord Injuries by James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, this one is the 26th largest by enrollment of the 30 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2018, is one of 8 in phase 4, and was the 28th registered.

Spinal Cord Injuries

2,026 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 538 are open to participants now.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Open to participants now

3 of the 38 studies in Spinal Cord Injuries by James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 3 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 375 Spinal Cord Injuries studies recruiting now, 166 (44%) set no upper age limit and 158 (42%) stop at 75 or younger; 41 take children under 18; 52 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 69 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 38 studies in Spinal Cord Injuries by James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) results in adverse soft tissue body composition changes and an extremely sedentary lifestyle. These abrupt changes often lead to a high prevalence of cardiometabolic diseases, such as impaired glucose tolerance/diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, conditions which predispose those with SCI to an increased risk for cardiovascular disease compared to the general population. Due to paralysis and wheel chair dependence, maintaining an adequate level of physical activity to counteract these deleterious metabolic changes presents a unique obstacle because conventional first line interventions are lifestyle modifications (e.g., diet and exercise), which may be difficult to achieve. Recently, a new medication has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration to improve glycemic control in individuals with diabetes mellitus, and it has also been investigated as an off-label treatment to induce weight loss. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists are a class of drugs designed to mimic the endogenous incretin hormones released from the gut in a glucose dependent manner following a meal. The mechanisms of action for this drug class of medications include stimulation of glucose-dependent insulin secretion, inhibiting glucagon release, slowed gastric emptying, and reduction of postprandial glucose excursions following food intake. In addition to improved glycemic control, this class of medications also shows promise for its non-glycemic action of facilitating weight loss. The method of delivery of the GLP-1's is by self-administered injections once daily or once weekly, depending on the severity of the clinical case and therapeutic targets for a specific patient.

Read the detailed description

Obesity is an underlying condition that predisposes to the development of several medical disorders and diseases. It is well appreciated that obesity has reached pandemic proportions in Western societies. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 1.9 billion adults worldwide are overweight and 600 million of these individuals are further sub-classified as obese, with a 44% estimated burden for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) being attributed to being overweight/obese, as well as a 23% estimated burden for heart disease ("Obesity and overweight," 2016). Excess adipose tissue is assumed to play an integral role in the pathogenesis of vascular dysfunction and the development of T2DM (Lau, Dhillon, Yan, Szmitko, \& Verma, 2005).

During the acute and chronic phases of SCI, marked adverse changes occur in soft tissue body composition and associated carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. After an initial rapid loss of lean tissue below the neurological level of injury, a more insidious and progressive lean tissue loss is observed (Modlesky et al., 2004; Spungen et al., 2003), which is accompanied by an increased total body adiposity (Spungen et al., 2003), with accumulation of fat in the abdominal (e.g., visceral) compartment (Gorgey, Mather, Poarch, \& Gater, 2011). These adverse changes to body composition contribute to, and are associated with, a higher prevalence of insulin resistance and disorders of carbohydrate metabolism (e.g., impaired glucose tolerance and T2DM) than that reported in the general population (Bauman \& Spungen, 1994). The primary approach to treat T2DM in the general population is diet and exercise (i.e., lifestyle modification). Of note, the profound inactivity and adverse soft tissue body composition changes that occur in individuals after SCI result in metabolic morbidity which is extremely difficult to manage with lifestyle modification alone. Conventional therapeutic strategies employed in the adjunctive treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders in the general population include several pharmacological approaches to maintain and improve glycemic control are in standard practice and include reducing the serum glucose concentration (i.e., insulin, sulphonylureas, thiazolidinediones or glitazones), suppressing hepatic gluconeogenesis (i.e., insulin, biguanides), stimulating endogenous insulin secretion (i.e., sulphonylureas), and/or by inhibiting glucose renal reabsorption and increasing glycosuria (i.e., SGLT-2 inhibitors).

In 2005 a new class of drugs was approved for the treatment for T2DM by targeting the GLP-1 receptor. Exenatide is a GLP-1 agonist that acts as an incretin hormone, and it belongs to a class of gastrointestinal hormones which are released from the L cells of the intestines in response to food ingestion that, as one of its mechanisms of action, increase insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells (Vilsboll et al., 2003). This phenomenon that was coined "the incretin effect" in the 1960's described the significantly higher plasma insulin levels following orally versus intravenously administered glucose, which can account for 50 to 70% of the insulin secretion observed after food intake (Baggio \& Drucker, 2007). Treatment with GLP-1's has increased over the past several years because of their mechanism of action to increase insulin secretion, inhibit glucagon release in a glucose-dependent manner, thus minimizing the risk for hypoglycemia (Baggio \& Drucker, 2007; Nauck, Stockmann, Ebert, \& Creutzfeldt, 1986; Vilsboll, Krarup, Madsbad, \& Holst, 2002). Numerous multi-ethnic and multi-national trials have been performed with exenatide, but none have been reported in persons with SCI. Previous investigation with exenatide once-weekly in able-bodied individuals has resulted in weight loss ranging from 1.6 to 3.9 kg following 24 weeks of intervention (Bergenstal et al., 2010; Blevins et al., 2011; Buse et al., 2013; Chiquette, Toth, Ramirez, Cobble, \& Chilton, 2012; Davies et al., 2013; Diamant et al., 2010; Drucker et al., 2008; Inagaki, Atsumi, Oura, Saito, \& Imaoka, 2012; Ji et al., 2013; Russell-Jones et al., 2012). As such, to date there is no evidence of the potential efficacy of exenatide to result in weight loss, improve glycemic control, and/or reduce insulin resistance in persons with SCI.

03

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injuries
  • Insulin Resistance
  • Pre Diabetes
  • Obesity

Keywords

  • Glucagon-Like Peptide-1
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 69 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female, age 18 to 69;
  2. Chronic (e.g., duration of injury greater than 3 years) stable SCI (regardless of level of neurological injury);
  3. ASIA A-D (non-ambulatory defined as not able to weight bear for more than 20% of the day);
  4. Obese Percent Body Fat defined as > 25% for men and > 35% for women (as determined by screening DXA scan);
  5. Insulin Resistant as determined at screening: (FPI, ≥15 µU/ml); -OR-
  6. Pre-diabetic, as determined by any one of the following:

    1. ≥ 5.7% and \< 6.4%; or
    2. Impaired glucose tolerance by FSG ≥100 mg/dl and \< 125 mg/dl and/or the 2 hour serum glucose concentration (after an OGTT) ≥ 140 mg/dl and \< 200 mg/dl

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Personal history of or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma;
  2. History of multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2;
  3. History of pancreatitis;
  4. Existing diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, or the results from screening OGTT that identify diabetes mellitus (previously undiagnosed); laboratory thresholds for exclusion will be as follows: ≥6.5%, fasting plasma glucose >126 mg/dl, or 2 hour value >200 mg/dl;
  5. Receiving treatment for impaired glucose metabolism (i.e., insulin, secretagogues, or other agents to modify peripheral insulin sensitivity or serum glucose concentration);
  6. Reduced kidney function (by (GFR \<60 ml/min) or liver function tests (any single LFT ≥ 2.5 times above the ) as determined by test results at screening and any time point of the study;
  7. Elevated calcitonin level (as determined at screening to rule out thyroid cancer);
  8. Pregnancy or women who may become pregnant during the course of the study, or those who are nursing;
  9. Medically unstable;
  10. Acute illness or infection;
  11. Diminished mental capacity; and
  12. Inability or unwillingness of subject to provide .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Semaglutide 1MG Injection [Ozempic]

    20 subjects will be randomized to receive once weekly injection of Semaglutide (Ozempic1mg) for 26 weeks.

    Drug: Semaglutide 1MG Injection [Ozempic]

  • Other
    No Intervention

    10 subjects will be randomized to receive no intervention for 26 weeks.

    Other: No Intervention

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Body Weight

    Efficacy of GLP-1 to reduce total body weight determined by Dual Energy Absorptiometry (DXA)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 13, Week 26

  2. Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

    Efficacy of GLP-1 to reduce HOMA-IR

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 13, Week 26

  3. Homeostatic Model Assessment of Beta-Cell Function (HOMA-B)

    Efficacy of GLP-1 to increase HOMA-B

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 13, Week 26

Secondary outcomes

  1. Body Fat

    Efficacy of GLP-1 to reduce total body fat determined by Dual Energy Absorptiometry (DXA)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 13, Week 26

  2. Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1C)

    Efficacy of GLP-1 to reduce HbA1C

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 13, Week 26

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation
    West Orange, New Jersey 07052, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2018 to primary completion in Mar 2020, 16 months.

Of 19 phase 4 interventional studies under Spinal Cord Injuries, half reached primary completion within 42 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 63. This study's 16 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 20, 2017
First posted
Sep 25, 2017
StartActual
Oct 16, 2018
Primary completionActual
Mar 1, 2020
CompletionActual
Mar 1, 2023
Last update
Mar 14, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03292315
Lead sponsor
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Collaborators
Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation
Responsible party
William A. Bauman, M.D. (Director, Clinical Investigator, National Center for the Medical Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury, James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 25, 2017
Start date
Oct 16, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2020
Completion
Mar 1, 2023
Last update
Mar 14, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Semaglutide

Start the discussion