ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03289637D-HeartUpdated Mar 7, 2018

Supplementation With Vitamin D to Patients With Heart Failure (D-Heart).

An interventional study of Vitamin D in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Vitamin D Deficiency, sponsored by Linkoeping University. Status unknown at 1 site in Sweden. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-07.

Sponsored by Linkoeping University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 154 studies testing Vitamin D in Vitamin D Deficiency — 15 open to participants now, 16 under way, none of them phase 3. Vitamin D · Vitamin D Deficiency.

Planned enrollment
17th of 153
200 · median 75
Started
2018
with 9 others
No phase
87 of 154
12 open now
Registered
91st of 154
by date

Among the 154 studies testing Vitamin D in Vitamin D Deficiency, this one is the 17th largest by planned enrollment of the 153 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 10 that started in 2018, is one of 87 with no phase, and was the 91st registered.

Vitamin D Deficiency

801 studies on the registry are indexed under Vitamin D Deficiency; 60 are open to participants now.

Browse Vitamin D Deficiency studies →

Open to participants now

15 of the 154 studies testing Vitamin D in Vitamin D Deficiency are open now, in 8 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

10 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 15 open studies →

About Vitamin D

No approval found in the FDA or EMA files read. How studies give it is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 37 Vitamin D Deficiency studies recruiting now, 16 (43%) set no upper age limit and 18 (49%) stop at 75 or younger; 10 take children under 18; 11 take healthy volunteers.

This study: all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 154 studies testing Vitamin D in Vitamin D Deficiency, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

In 200 patients with documented systolic heart failure give supplementation with vitamin D in those with a 25-OH- vitamin D \< 50nmol/L - or placebo.

In those with a vitamin D level \<25nmol/L a substitution of 2400IU will be given, and in those with a vitamin D level 25-50nmol/L a substitution of 1600IU will be given.

Intervention time 12 months. Biomarkers of heart function, quality of life, and hospitalisation will be analysed.

Read the detailed description

In a population with a systolic heart failure with an EF\<40%, the levels of vitamin D will be analysed. In those with a 25-OH-vitamin D level \<50nmol/L the patients that accept participation, will be randomised into active supplementation as described below, or placebo.

  • In those with a 25-OH-vitamin D level \<25nmol/L there will be a supplementation of 2400IU daily
  • In those with a vitamin D level 25-50nmol/L there will be a supplementation of 1600IU daily,
  • or placebo. Thus based on the basal level of vitamin D the screened patients will either be excluded due to high level of vitamin D, or given one ot the two options of vitamin D dosage based on the basal patient level - or placebo.

The intervention time will be 12 months. In the project 200 heart failure patients will be included. Blood samples including heart failure biomarkers, and biomarkers for inflammation and oxidative stress will be drawn at 3,6, 9 and 12 months.

Health related quality of life will be evaluated by use of Euro-QoL-5D Minnesota Living with Heart Failure.Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory 20 questionnaire, as also hospitalisation during the project time.

Cardiac function according to echocardiography will be analysed at start, and study end.

03

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
  • Vitamin D Deficiency

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with documented and stable systolic heart failure and connected to an outpatient clinic at the Dept of Cardiology in Linköping, or Jönköping, Sweden, and with a 25-OH-vitamin D \<50nmol/L

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with unstable heart failure
  • Patients with significant valvular disease, or ischemic heart disease planned for operation
  • Patients with significant renal or /and liver impairment.
  • Patients that do not understand that study information, or that are not willing to participate
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active intervention

    In the group randomised to active treatment and with a screening level of 25-OH-vitamin D 25-50nmol/L an intervention with 1600IE daily of vitamin D will be given. In those randomised to active treatment and with a screening level of 25-OH-vitamin D of \<25nmol/L, an intervention of 2400IE of vitamin D will be given.

    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    In the group randomised to placebo and with a screening level of 25-OH-vitamin D \<50 mol/L, the participants will be given placebo.

    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementVitamin D

    Vitamin D intervention tested against placebo in a population with heart failure and a 25-OH-vitamin D level\<50nmol/L at screening

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction in the composite endpoint for heart failure

    Reduction in biomarkers for heart failure(Nt-proBNP, Copeptin, MR-proADM and Chromogranin A) and in hospitalisation that comprised the composite endpoint

    Time frame: Follow-up 12 months after stop of intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Influence on quality of life in patients with heart failure by the intervention

    Effect on health related quality of life as measured by the Euro-QoL-5D Minnesota Living with Heart Failure. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory 20 questionnaires

    Time frame: Follow-up 12 months after stop of intervention

Other outcomes

  1. Influence on quality of life in patients with heart failure by the intervention

    Effect on health related quality of life as measured by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure

    Time frame: Follow-up 12 months after termination of the intervention

  2. Influence on symptoms of depression in patients with heart failure by the intervention

    Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: Follow-up 12 months after termination of intervention

  3. Influence on perceived fatigue in patients with heart failure by the intervention

    Effect on as measured using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory 20

    Time frame: Follow-up 12 months after termination of the intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2019, 12 months after the start.

Of 168 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Vitamin D Deficiency, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 29. This study's planned 12 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 170 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 29.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 6, 2017
First posted
Sep 21, 2017
StartActual
Feb 1, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Feb 1, 2019
CompletionEst.
Feb 1, 2020
Last update
Mar 7, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 7, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03289637
Responsible party
Urban Alehagen (Professor, MD., Linkoeping University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2017
Start date
Feb 1, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 7, 2018

Study contacts

Urban Alehagen, Prof
Contact
urban.alehagen@liu.se
+46-10-1030000
Peter Johansson, Ass Prof
Contact
peter.b.johansson@liu.se
+46-10-1030000
Urban Alehagen, Prof
principal investigator · University of Linköping

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Vitamin D

Start the discussion