CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03286140EVRAUpdated May 20, 2024Results posted

Early Venous Reflux Ablation Ulcer Trial

An interventional study of Early endovenous ablation and Delayed endovenous intervention in Venous Leg Ulcer, sponsored by Imperial College London. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-20.

Sponsored by Imperial College London · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
450
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The EVRA study evaluates the effects of early endovenous ablation on ulcer healing in patients with chronic venous ulceration. Half the patients are randomised to receive early endovenous ablation (within 2 weeks) and half to standard care

Read the detailed description

A large number of patients (around 1% of the adult population) suffer from an ulcer (break in the skin surface) near the ankle. In most people, such an injury should heal up within a week or two. However, when there is an underlying problem with the skin, ulcers do not heal and may result in longstanding (chronic), painful, smelly and embarrassing wounds. The ulcers are often due to varicose veins in the legs, which can cause skin breakdown and ulcer formation. To get the ulcer to heal, the current best treatment is to wear a tight compression bandage with multiple layers, with which about 60% of these ulcers will heal within 24 weeks. There is evidence that treatment of the varicose veins by surgery will prevent the ulcer from returning after it has healed. Recent studies have suggested that newer techniques of treating varicose veins, such as injecting a medicine into the varicose vein (sclerotherapy) or treating the vein with heat ablation to seal it (using laser or radiofrequency), in an outpatient setting may help the ulcers to heal more quickly and (like surgery) reduce the chance of the ulcer coming back. These techniques can be carried out in the outpatient setting and are much better tolerated by patients in comparison to surgery. The aim of this study is to see whether early treatment of varicose veins using sclerotherapy or heat ablation helps with healing.

02

Conditions studied

  • Venous Leg Ulcer

Keywords

  • endovenous ablation
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Current leg ulceration of greater than 6 weeks, but less than 6 months duration
  • Able to give informed consent to participate in the study after reading the patient information documentation
  • Patient age > 18 years
  • Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) ≥ 0.8
  • Superficial venous disease on colour duplex assessment deemed to be significant enough to warrant ablation by the treating clinician (either primary or recurrent venous reflux)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of deep venous occlusive disease or other conditions precluding superficial venous intervention (at the discretion of local research team)
  • Patients who are unable to tolerate any multilayer compression bandaging / stockings will be excluded. However, concordance with compression therapy can be variable for patients at different times. Patients who are generally compliant with compression, but unable to tolerate the bandages for short periods will still be eligible to inclusion. A period of non-compliance with compression bandages will not be considered a protocol violation, but a normal variation within the spectrum of 'standard therapy'.
  • Inability of the patient to receive prompt endovenous intervention by recruiting centre
  • Pregnancy (female participants of reproductive age will be eligible for inclusion in the study, subject to a negative pregnancy test prior to randomisation)
  • Leg ulcer of non-venous aetiology (as assessed by responsible clinician)
  • Patient deemed to require skin grafting
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
450 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard therapy arm

    Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)

    Procedure: Delayed endovenous intervention

  • Experimental
    Early arm

    Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy

    Procedure: Early endovenous ablation

Interventions

  • ProcedureEarly endovenous ablation
  • ProcedureDelayed endovenous intervention
05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Ulcer Healing From Date of Randomisation to Date of Healing up to 365 Days

    For the purposes of this study, ulcer healing is defined as complete re-epithelialisation of all ulceration on the randomised (reference) leg in the absence of a scab (eschar) with no dressing required.

    Time frame: time from date of randomisation to date of healing up to 365 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Ulcer Healing

    Healing rate will be reported at 24 weeks using the percentage of participants with a healed ulcer

    Time frame: 24 weeks & time to ulcer healing up to 365 days

  2. Ulcer Recurrence / Ulcer Free Time

    Will be calculated up to 1 year for each study arm and with the extension, up to 5 years (median approximately 3.7 years). This will allow a very practical and easily understood assessment of the clinical difference between the 2 arms of the study. This will also allow comparison with other studies that have reported this outcome. In order to facilitate accurate calculation of reoccurrence / ulcer free time, clinical follow up will be continued after ulcer healing up to 1 year after randomisation.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months (and with the extension, up to 5 years (median approximately 3.7 years))

  3. Quality Of Life Questionnaire up to 365 Days

    Disease specific (AVVQ) quality of life The Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) is a validated patient-reported disease-specific health questionnaire to assess quality of life in patients with varicose veins. The AVVQ comprises a diagram on which patients draw on their varicose veins and a questionnaire with 12 questions, half of which require a response for each leg. The scores range from 0 to 100 (no effect to severe effect).

    Time frame: 6 weeks post randomisation, 6 months, 12 months

  4. Generic (SF-36) Quality of Life Assessment

    Generic (SF-36) quality of life assessment The Short Form questionnaire-36 items (SF-36) is a generic quality-of-life tool used to determine people's physical and mental health. It has been validated in many patient groups, including those with varicose veins. The physical domain measures physical functioning, physical role limitations, body pain and general health, whereas the mental dimension measures vitality, social functioning, mental health role limitations and general mental health. Two separate scores are produced (separate physical/mental component summary scores), in addition to the eight separate domain scores. Each score is measured on a scale of 0 to 100 (worst to best). Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved.

    Time frame: 6 weeks post randomisation, 6 months, 12 months

  5. EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)

    The EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) is a widely recognised, generic tool to measure health outcomes and has been validated in a variety of patient groups, including those with venous leg ulcers. The EQ-5D questionnaire comprises two sections; the first assesses the participant's mobility, self-care, ability to perform usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression levels, and the second records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical score of 0 to 100.

    Time frame: 6 weeks post randomisation, 6 months, 12 months

  6. Health Economic Assessment

    A within-RCT cost effectiveness analysis will be carried out based on the data collected in the trial, Resource use items in hospital and community care related to the treatment of venous ulceration or complications will be recorded for each patient at each follow-up. Resource use will be multiplied by UK unit costs obtained from published literature, HRG costs, and manufacturers' list prices to calculate overall costs. A standard tariff will be applied for each bandage change. Utilities (QALYs) will be calculated from the EQ-5D questionnaire administered to patients

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months

  7. Clinical Success - Presence of Residual / Recurrent Reflux in the Veins

    The presence of residual / recurrent varicose veins remaining on the venous duplex. Any reflux detected by the vascular scientists (as per local scanning policies) is recorded as presence of residual reflux and therefore considered incomplete clinical success. No presence of residual reflux is considered clinical success. (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology) ranges from C0 which means absolutely no venous disease that can be seen or felt in the legs to C6 which means an open and active venous leg ulcer. For this outcome measure: Healed venous leg ulcer (C5), Active venous leg ulcer (C6).

    Time frame: at 6 weeks

  8. Clinical Success - VCSS

    The Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) is a component of the Venous Severity Scoring System designed in 2000 by an ad hoc American Venous Forum committee consensus, in order to compliment the CEAP classification and quantify the severity of disease and subsequent improvement or decline. The VCSS has 10 components (pain, varicose veins, venous oedema, skin pigmentation, inflammation, induration, compression used and active ulcer, duration, number and size), each with four categories assigned values of 0-3. The overall scores can range from 0 (lowest severity) to 30 (highest severity).

    Time frame: at 6 weeks

  9. Clinical Success - Complications

    Number of complications related to the endovenous intervention

    Time frame: up to 12 months

06

Results

Posted May 20, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStandard Therapy ArmEarly Arm
Started226224
6-week follow-up224223
6-month follow-up215213
12-month follow-up203204
Completed211208
Not completed1516
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject105
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up510
Withdrew: Failure to comply01

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime to Ulcer Healing From Date of Randomisation to Date of Healing up to 365 Days

For the purposes of this study, ulcer healing is defined as complete re-epithelialisation of all ulceration on the randomised (reference) leg in the absence of a scab (eschar) with no dressing required.

Time frame:
time from date of randomisation to date of healing up to 365 days
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Ulcer Healing From Date of Randomisation to Date of Healing up to 365 Days
daysStandard Therapy ArmEarly Arm
Time to Ulcer Healing From Date of Randomisation to Date of Healing up to 365 Days82 (69 to 92)56 (49 to 66)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Ulcer Healing

Healing rate will be reported at 24 weeks using the percentage of participants with a healed ulcer

Time frame:
24 weeks & time to ulcer healing up to 365 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Ulcer Healing
percentage of participantsStandard Therapy ArmEarly Arm
Percentage of Participants With Ulcer Healing76.3 (70.5 to 81.5)85.6 (80.6 to 89.8)
SecondaryUlcer Recurrence / Ulcer Free Time

Will be calculated up to 1 year for each study arm and with the extension, up to 5 years (median approximately 3.7 years). This will allow a very practical and easily understood assessment of the clinical difference between the 2 arms of the study. This will also allow comparison with other studies that have reported this outcome. In order to facilitate accurate calculation of reoccurrence / ulcer free time, clinical follow up will be continued after ulcer healing up to 1 year after randomisation.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months (and with the extension, up to 5 years (median approximately 3.7 years))
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Ulcer Recurrence / Ulcer Free Time
ParticipantsStandard Therapy ArmEarly Arm
Ulcer Recurrence / Ulcer Free Time3224
SecondaryQuality Of Life Questionnaire up to 365 Days

Disease specific (AVVQ) quality of life The Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) is a validated patient-reported disease-specific health questionnaire to assess quality of life in patients with varicose veins. The AVVQ comprises a diagram on which patients draw on their varicose veins and a questionnaire with 12 questions, half of which require a response for each leg. The scores range from 0 to 100 (no effect to severe effect).

Time frame:
6 weeks post randomisation, 6 months, 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Quality Of Life Questionnaire up to 365 Days
score on a scaleStandard Therapy ArmEarly Arm
6-week AVVQ41.2 ± 9.339.4 ± 10.2
6-month AVVQ39.5 ± 10.334.6 ± 9.4
12-month AVVQ34.3 ± 10.432.4 ± 8.3
SecondaryGeneric (SF-36) Quality of Life Assessment

Generic (SF-36) quality of life assessment The Short Form questionnaire-36 items (SF-36) is a generic quality-of-life tool used to determine people's physical and mental health. It has been validated in many patient groups, including those with varicose veins. The physical domain measures physical functioning, physical role limitations, body pain and general health, whereas the mental dimension measures vitality, social functioning, mental health role limitations and general mental health. Two separate scores are produced (separate physical/mental component summary scores), in addition to the eight separate domain scores. Each score is measured on a scale of 0 to 100 (worst to best). Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved.

Time frame:
6 weeks post randomisation, 6 months, 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Generic (SF-36) Quality of Life Assessment
score on a scaleStandard Therapy ArmEarly Arm
6-week SF-3645.6 ± 9.245.7 ± 9.1
6-month SF-3644.5 ± 10.144.9 ± 9.8
12-month SF-3645.1 ± 1045.3 ± 10
SecondaryEuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)

The EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) is a widely recognised, generic tool to measure health outcomes and has been validated in a variety of patient groups, including those with venous leg ulcers. The EQ-5D questionnaire comprises two sections; the first assesses the participant's mobility, self-care, ability to perform usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression levels, and the second records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical score of 0 to 100.

Time frame:
6 weeks post randomisation, 6 months, 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)
score on a scaleStandard Therapy ArmEarly Arm
6-week EQ-5D71.1 ± 18.772.7 ± 18.6
6-month EQ-5D71.4 ± 19.674.1 ± 15.8
12-month EQ-5D73.7 ± 17.474.8 ± 16.9
SecondaryHealth Economic Assessment

A within-RCT cost effectiveness analysis will be carried out based on the data collected in the trial, Resource use items in hospital and community care related to the treatment of venous ulceration or complications will be recorded for each patient at each follow-up. Resource use will be multiplied by UK unit costs obtained from published literature, HRG costs, and manufacturers' list prices to calculate overall costs. A standard tariff will be applied for each bandage change. Utilities (QALYs) will be calculated from the EQ-5D questionnaire administered to patients

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · Costs (pounds) at one year
Health Economic Assessment
Costs (pounds) at one yearStandard Therapy ArmEarly Arm
Health Economic Assessment2516 ± 32422514 ± 2770
SecondaryClinical Success - Presence of Residual / Recurrent Reflux in the Veins

The presence of residual / recurrent varicose veins remaining on the venous duplex. Any reflux detected by the vascular scientists (as per local scanning policies) is recorded as presence of residual reflux and therefore considered incomplete clinical success. No presence of residual reflux is considered clinical success. (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology) ranges from C0 which means absolutely no venous disease that can be seen or felt in the legs to C6 which means an open and active venous leg ulcer. For this outcome measure: Healed venous leg ulcer (C5), Active venous leg ulcer (C6).

Time frame:
at 6 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Success - Presence of Residual / Recurrent Reflux in the Veins
ParticipantsStandard Therapy ArmEarly Arm
CEAP 511
CEAP 6225224
SecondaryClinical Success - VCSS

The Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) is a component of the Venous Severity Scoring System designed in 2000 by an ad hoc American Venous Forum committee consensus, in order to compliment the CEAP classification and quantify the severity of disease and subsequent improvement or decline. The VCSS has 10 components (pain, varicose veins, venous oedema, skin pigmentation, inflammation, induration, compression used and active ulcer, duration, number and size), each with four categories assigned values of 0-3. The overall scores can range from 0 (lowest severity) to 30 (highest severity).

Time frame:
at 6 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Clinical Success - VCSS
score on a scaleStandard Therapy ArmEarly Arm
Clinical Success - VCSS12.6 ± 4.410.5 ± 4.7
SecondaryClinical Success - Complications

Number of complications related to the endovenous intervention

Time frame:
up to 12 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Clinical Success - Complications
participantsStandard Therapy ArmEarly Arm
Clinical Success - Complications2428

Adverse events

Collected over AEs collected over 12-months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Standard Therapy Arm4/226 (1.8%)51/226 (22.6%)83/226 (36.7%)
Early Arm3/224 (1.3%)40/224 (17.9%)67/224 (29.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventStandard Therapy ArmEarly Arm
Hospitalisation RequiredGeneral disorders50/22638/224
OtherGeneral disorders1/2262/224
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventStandard Therapy ArmEarly Arm
New ulcerVascular disorders83/22667/224

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Standard Therapy ArmEarly ArmTotal
Mean68.9 ± 1467 ± 15.568 ± 14.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Standard Therapy ArmEarly ArmTotal
Female10697203
Male120127247
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Standard Therapy ArmEarly ArmTotal
White208206414
Mixed011
Asian121123
Black538
Other134
Weight (kg)
Weight (kg)(kg)Standard Therapy ArmEarly ArmTotal
Mean88.8 ± 24.189.5 ± 25.689.1 ± 24.9
Height (cm)
Height (cm)(cm)Standard Therapy ArmEarly ArmTotal
Mean170.5 ± 10.8171.9 ± 11.1171.2 ± 11.0
BMI (kg/m2 )
BMI (kg/m2 )(kg/m2)Standard Therapy ArmEarly ArmTotal
Mean30.4 ± 7.430.1 ± 7.830.3 ± 7.6
Smoking
Smoking(Participants)Standard Therapy ArmEarly ArmTotal
Current192342
Former10186187
Never106115221
Previous ulcer
Previous ulcer(participants)Standard Therapy ArmEarly ArmTotal
Yes117118235
No108106214
Not completed101
07

Study locations

1 site
  • Imperial College London
    London, W68RF, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gohel MS, Mora MSc J, Szigeti M, Epstein DM, Heatley F, Bradbury A, Bulbulia R, Cullum N, Nyamekye I, Poskitt KR, Renton S, Warwick J, Davies AH; Early Venous Reflux Ablation Trial Group. Long-term Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Early Endovenous Ablation in Venous Ulceration: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2020 Dec 1;155(12):1113-1121. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3845. PubMed 32965493 ↗
  • Gohel MS, Heatley F, Liu X, Bradbury A, Bulbulia R, Cullum N, Epstein DM, Nyamekye I, Poskitt KR, Renton S, Warwick J, Davies AH. Early versus deferred endovenous ablation of superficial venous reflux in patients with venous ulceration: the EVRA RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2019 May;23(24):1-96. doi: 10.3310/hta23240. PubMed 31140402 ↗

Related links

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Apr 6, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 26, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — At completion of the study, data will be shared in accordance with the NIHR HTA guidance on study outputs as per the research contract between the secretary of state for health research and Imperial College London. Only anonymised data will be shared under the terms of the consent forms. Data and associated documentation will be available to users only under a data-sharing agreement that provides for the following: 1. A commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; 2. A commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; 3. A commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed. All requests are dealt with on a case-by-case basis. Any request should be submitted to the corresponding author who will then review with the Trial Management Group and sponsor. A record of all access to data will be maintained by the Imperial College Archive team.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03286140
Lead sponsor
Imperial College London
Collaborators
University of Birmingham, Universidad de Granada, University of Manchester, University of Warwick
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 18, 2017
Start date
Sep 1, 2013
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2019
Completion
Mar 31, 2019
Results posted
May 20, 2024
Last update
May 20, 2024

Study contacts

Gerard Stansby
study chair · Newcastle University
Julie Brittenden
study chair · University of Glasgow

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion