CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03282890CHRP-BBUpdated Aug 17, 2025Results posted

Testing an Integrated Bio-Behavioral Primary HIV Prevention Intervention Among High-Risk People Who Use Drugs

An interventional study of CHRP-BB in Risk Behavior, HIV/AIDS and Medication Adherence, sponsored by University of Connecticut. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-17.

Sponsored by University of Connecticut · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
237
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of CHRP-BB - an integrated bio-behavioral approach that incorporates the use of PrEP - with an evidence-based behavioral approach aimed at enhancing PrEP adherence and HIV risk reduction among high risk PWUD.

Read the detailed description

PWUD remain a priority population as they represent a critical conduit for new HIV infections, which are transmitted through preventable drug- and sex-related HIV risk behaviors. Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) - the daily self-administration of antiretroviral medication - has enormous potential to bolster primary HIV prevention outcomes among PWUD. PrEP is a FDA-approved biomedical HIV prevention strategy recommended by the CDC and WHO for key populations, including PWUD. Despite unequivocal evidence supporting PrEP, its scale-up has been nearly absent among high risk PWUD. Moreover, adherence to PrEP is crucial if it is to be effective with high risk individuals. Recent research, however, indicates that optimal PrEP adherence may be compromised by neurocognitive impairment (NCI), particularly among PWUD. Due to chronic drug use, related lifestyle experiences, and other health challenges, many PWUD experience NCI to the extent that it impedes medication adherence, HIV risk reduction, and treatment retention. In a recent HIV prevention trial, over a third of high risk PWUD on opioid replacement therapy (ORT) had moderate to high levels of NCI and, moreover, were less likely to reduce their HIV transmission risk vs. those without NCI. The potentially disruptive impact of NCI must therefore be addressed when designing contemporary intervention strategies targeting PWUD. Contemporary approaches must also be cost-effective and usable in real-world treatment settings, such as methadone maintenance programs (MMPs) where high risk PWUD are concentrated and can be readily reached with primary prevention. To date, however, primary prevention efforts have largely relied on singular strategies (e.g., methadone or PrEP alone) with modest HIV risk reduction outcomes for PWUD. Instead, advancing combination approaches capable of harnessing the synergy and efficiency possible via multiple evidence-based strategies is most effective. This combination strategy is especially important when intervening with high risk PWUD with NCI due to the potential decreased effectiveness of PrEP when adherence is suboptimal, thereby necessitating behavioral interventions that focus on reducing HIV risk and increasing PrEP adherence. Building on promising preliminary work, the proposed trial will fill a critical void by testing an integrated bio-behavioral approach that incorporates the use of PrEP with an evidence-based behavioral approach and, using innovative strategies, enhances PrEP adherence and HIV risk behavior in a manner that accommodates NCI among PWUD.

02

Conditions studied

  • Risk Behavior
  • HIV/AIDS
  • Medication Adherence
  • Substance Abuse

Keywords

  • HIV
  • Substance Abuse
  • Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
  • HIV Risk Behavior
  • Methadone Maintenance
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Meet DSM-V criteria for opioid-dependence and are enrolled in methadone maintenance drug treatment at the APT Foundation, Inc.
  • Were confirmed to be HIV-negative and started on PrEP in the past week
  • Report unsafe injection drug use practices or unprotected sex within the past 3 months
  • Have a cell phone
  • Are able to read and understand the questionnaires, ACASI, and informed consent form
  • Available for the full duration of the study with no anticipated circumstances impeding participation (e.g., pending charges, jail term).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have an untreated bipolar or psychotic disorder
  • Are actively suicidal or homicidal as assessed by trained research staff under the supervision of a licensed clinical psychologist
  • Cannot speak English
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
237 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CHRP-BB

    Patients assigned to the CHRP-BB will receive a weekly HIV risk reduction and PrEP adherence group level intervention led by two facilitators trained and supervised by the PI, a licensed clinical psychologist. It is a substantially shortened version of the comprehensive Holistic Health Recovery Program (HHRP)-based interventions that have been identified as demonstrating evidence of effectiveness in two randomized clinical trials. The CHRP-BB, which includes four 50-minute groups (1 group per week), will contain only content that relates explicitly to drug- or sex-related HIV risk reduction and PrEP adherence. Participants in both conditions will receive routine clinical services (i.e., daily methadone and case management).

    Other: CHRP-BB

  • No intervention
    Control Condition

    The time-and-attention-matched control condition for the proposed research will be a time and contact-matched, non-contaminating support group for individuals in recovery modeled after similar groups offered in the community. There will be no overlap between the content of the comparison intervention and experimental intervention although the basic structure will be the same. Thus, each participant will be asked to attend four 50-minute weekly group sessions led by two trained facilitators. Participants in both conditions will receive routine clinical services (i.e., daily methadone and case management).

Interventions

  • OtherCHRP-BB

    The CHRP-BB intervention is a theory-based, manual-guided, HIV risk reduction and PrEP adherence intervention. It is an integrated evidence-based intervention that uses a coping skills training approach to primary prevention and is delivered in a small group modality by two trained intervention facilitators using a motivational enhancement therapeutic style to address high risk drug- and sex-related HIV risk behaviors and PrEP adherence. Importantly, the CHRP-BB intervention includes specific behavioral and mHealth strategies designed and tested to accommodate difficulties stemming from moderate to severe neuro-cognitive impairment (NCI).

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Adherence Behavior

    The Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence behavior scale is an 11-item categorical self-report measure designed to assess how confident a participant is about properly taking their PrEP medication (e.g., "How confident are you that you could make PrEP part of your daily routine?"). The scale requires participants to respond to each of the 11 items about adherence by selecting whether they are either 'Not at all confident', 'Somewhat confident', 'Moderately confident', 'Very confident', or 'Completely confident' about the behavior. The 11 items are summed to create a total score, with higher scores indicating a better PrEP adherence behavior outcome. The possible range of total scores is 0-44.

    Time frame: This is measured immediately post-intervention, and then at 3-months, 6-months, and 9 months post-intervention. Results are reported in the table at 9-months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. HIV Risk Reduction Behavior

    HIV risk reduction behavior was assessed using a 4-item categorical self-report measure designed to assess the participant's self-efficacy about engaging in behaviors to reduce their HIV risk (e.g., 'How hard would it be for you to always use condoms or latex protection if you have oral, vaginal, or anal sex?"). The measure requires participants to select one of five possible responses for each of the four items, indicating whether a behavior would be either 'Very hard to do', 'Fairly hard to do', 'Neither hard nor easy to do', 'Somewhat easy to do', or 'Very easy to do'. Responses to the four items were summed and reversed to create a total score, with higher scores indicating a better HIV risk reduction outcome.The possible range of total HIV risk reduction behavior scores is 4 to 20.

    Time frame: This was assessed immediately post-intervention, and then at 3-months, 6-months, and 9 months post-intervention. Results are reported in the table at 9-months.

06

Results

Posted Aug 17, 2025
Limitations and caveats
This study examines an innovative approach, as the first PrEP-focused intervention tailored to the cognitive profiles of individuals on MOUD, but there are some limitations worth mentioning. This study only recruited participants who could understand, speak, and read the English language, and participants who had a phone for communicating daily text messages in English. Future studies should measure cognitive functioning more frequently in order to improve the precision of this measurement.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCHRP-BB (Experimental Condition)Active Control Condition
Started120117
Post-test105104
3-month follow-up102101
6-month follooup7475
9-month follow-up6864
Completed6864
Not completed5253

Outcome measures

PrimaryPre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Adherence Behavior

The Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence behavior scale is an 11-item categorical self-report measure designed to assess how confident a participant is about properly taking their PrEP medication (e.g., "How confident are you that you could make PrEP part of your daily routine?"). The scale requires participants to respond to each of the 11 items about adherence by selecting whether they are either 'Not at all confident', 'Somewhat confident', 'Moderately confident', 'Very confident', or 'Completely confident' about the behavior. The 11 items are summed to create a total score, with higher scores indicating a better PrEP adherence behavior outcome. The possible range of total scores is 0-44.

Time frame:
This is measured immediately post-intervention, and then at 3-months, 6-months, and 9 months post-intervention. Results are reported in the table at 9-months.
Reported as:
Mean · score
Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Adherence Behavior
scoreCHRP-BB (Experimental Condition)Active Control Condition
Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Adherence Behavior25.9 (20.4 to 31.3)22.8 (18.9 to 26.7)
SecondaryHIV Risk Reduction Behavior

HIV risk reduction behavior was assessed using a 4-item categorical self-report measure designed to assess the participant's self-efficacy about engaging in behaviors to reduce their HIV risk (e.g., 'How hard would it be for you to always use condoms or latex protection if you have oral, vaginal, or anal sex?"). The measure requires participants to select one of five possible responses for each of the four items, indicating whether a behavior would be either 'Very hard to do', 'Fairly hard to do', 'Neither hard nor easy to do', 'Somewhat easy to do', or 'Very easy to do'. Responses to the four items were summed and reversed to create a total score, with higher scores indicating a better HIV risk reduction outcome.The possible range of total HIV risk reduction behavior scores is 4 to 20.

Time frame:
This was assessed immediately post-intervention, and then at 3-months, 6-months, and 9 months post-intervention. Results are reported in the table at 9-months.
Reported as:
Mean · score
HIV Risk Reduction Behavior
scoreCHRP-BB (Experimental Condition)Active Control Condition
HIV Risk Reduction Behavior17.5 (16.8 to 18.1)16.2 (15.3 to 17.0)

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected from each participant at baseline, immediately following the 8-week intervention period, and then 3m, 6m, and 9-months post intervention. The adverse event time frame was 11/20/2017 - 10/13/2023.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CHRP-BB0/120 (0%)0/120 (0%)0/120 (0%)
Control Condition0/117 (0%)0/117 (0%)0/117 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)CHRP-BBActive Control ConditionTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years120117237
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CHRP-BBActive Control ConditionTotal
Median44 (19 to 64)44 (19 to 64)44 (19 to 64)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CHRP-BBActive Control ConditionTotal
Gender — Female5856114
Gender — Male6261123
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)CHRP-BBActive Control ConditionTotal
Hispanic or Latino231336
Not Hispanic or Latino9697193
Unknown or Not Reported178
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)CHRP-BBActive Control ConditionTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American202949
White7668144
More than one race231336
Unknown or Not Reported178
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)CHRP-BBActive Control ConditionTotal
United States120117237
Currently unemployed
Currently unemployed(Participants)CHRP-BBActive Control ConditionTotal
Number474289
07

Study locations

1 site
  • APT Foundation
    New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shrestha R, Altice F, Karki P, Copenhaver M. Developing an Integrated, Brief Biobehavioral HIV Prevention Intervention for High-Risk Drug Users in Treatment: The Process and Outcome of Formative Research. Front Immunol. 2017 May 11;8:561. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00561. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28553295 ↗
  • Shrestha R, Karki P, Altice FL, Huedo-Medina TB, Meyer JP, Madden L, Copenhaver M. Correlates of willingness to initiate pre-exposure prophylaxis and anticipation of practicing safer drug- and sex-related behaviors among high-risk drug users on methadone treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Apr 1;173:107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.12.023. Epub 2017 Feb 2. PubMed 28214391 ↗
  • Huedo-Medina TB, Shrestha R, Copenhaver M. Modeling a Theory-Based Approach to Examine the Influence of Neurocognitive Impairment on HIV Risk Reduction Behaviors Among Drug Users in Treatment. AIDS Behav. 2016 Aug;20(8):1646-57. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1394-x. PubMed 27052845 ↗
  • Fisher JD, Fisher WA. Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychol Bull. 1992 May;111(3):455-74. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.455. PubMed 1594721 ↗
  • Shrestha R, Huedo-Medina TB, Altice FL, Krishnan A, Copenhaver M. Examining the Acceptability of mHealth Technology in HIV Prevention Among High-Risk Drug Users in Treatment. AIDS Behav. 2017 Nov;21(11):3100-3110. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1637-x. PubMed 28025735 ↗
  • Copenhaver MM, Lee IC, Margolin A. Successfully integrating an HIV risk reduction intervention into a community-based substance abuse treatment program. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2007;33(1):109-20. doi: 10.1080/00952990601087463. PubMed 17366251 ↗
  • Copenhaver MM, Lee IC, Baldwin P. A randomized controlled trial of the community-friendly health recovery program (CHRP) among high-risk drug users in treatment. AIDS Behav. 2013 Nov;17(9):2902-13. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0539-4. PubMed 23835735 ↗
  • Avants SK, Margolin A, Usubiaga MH, Doebrick C. Targeting HIV-related outcomes with intravenous drug users maintained on methadone: a randomized clinical trial of a harm reduction group therapy. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004 Mar;26(2):67-78. doi: 10.1016/S0740-5472(03)00159-4. PubMed 15050083 ↗
  • Shrestha R, Karki P, Altice FL, Dubov O, Fraenkel L, Huedo-Medina T, Copenhaver M. Measuring Acceptability and Preferences for Implementation of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Using Conjoint Analysis: An Application to Primary HIV Prevention Among High Risk Drug Users. AIDS Behav. 2018 Apr;22(4):1228-1238. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1851-1. PubMed 28695388 ↗
  • Shrestha R, Karki P, Huedo-Medina TB, Copenhaver M. Intent to Use Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), HIV Risk Behaviors, and Self-Report Neurocognitive Symptoms by High-Risk Drug Users: A Mediation Analysis. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2017 Jul-Aug;28(4):612-621. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 19. PubMed 28478870 ↗
  • Shrestha R, Altice FL, Huedo-Medina TB, Karki P, Copenhaver M. Willingness to Use Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP): An Empirical Test of the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) Model among High-Risk Drug Users in Treatment. AIDS Behav. 2017 May;21(5):1299-1308. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1650-0. PubMed 27990587 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 10, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03282890
Lead sponsor
University of Connecticut
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), APT Foundation, Inc.
Responsible party
Michael Copenhaver (Professor, University of Connecticut) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 14, 2017
Start date
Nov 20, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 13, 2023
Completion
Oct 13, 2023
Results posted
Aug 17, 2025
Last update
Aug 17, 2025

Study contacts

Michael Copenhaver, PhD
principal investigator · University of Connecticut

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion