ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03280628Updated Jul 17, 2023Results posted

Trial Comparing Cosmetic Outcomes of Pediatric Laceration Closure Using Skin Glue, Medical Tape Versus Stitches

An interventional study of Absorbable Sutures and Steri-Strips in Laceration, sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-17.

Sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The COVID-19 pandemic made prospective enrollment no longer possible
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
55
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There are several methods of closing a skin cut: stitches, skin glue, and medical tape. Stitches have been used for a long time to close skin cuts. Skin glue (invented in the 1970s) and medical tape (invented in the 1960s) are two newer methods to close skin cuts. The purpose of this study is to find out which method (stitches, skin glue, or medical tape) of closing skin cuts results in the least amount of scarring. Other things the investigators will be looking at are which method is the cheapest, which causes the least pain, which requires the least amount of sedation, and which method patients and parents like the best.

Read the detailed description

When a child comes in to the Emergency Room with a skin cut, if the child and their parents consent to being in the study, they will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: stitches, skin glue, or medical tape. There will be about 30 kids in each group, and thus a goal of 90 kids total in the study.

In the Emergency Room, a lidocaine ointment will be placed on the child's cut to decrease pain. The cut will be cleaned out with sterile saline. Then, depending on which method is used, the cut will be closed with either stitches, skin glue, or medical tape by their doctor. The participants will be asked to answer a short questionnaire. Finally, they will be given discharge instructions and sent home. At 3 months, the investigators will call parents for a quick questionnaire over the phone and parents will be asked to take a picture of the patient's scar and send it to the study staff.

Once all 90 pictures have been collected, two Plastic Surgeons will be asked to rate the scars in terms of how they look. The Plastic Surgeons will not know which method was used to close which cut. Once all of the scars have been rated, the averages of scars will be compared for each closure method. The investigators will also look at how much each method cost, how much extra pain medications or sedation each group used, and which method was liked best.

02

Conditions studied

  • Laceration

Browse trials for

03

In context

Lacerations

140 studies on the registry are indexed under Lacerations; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 55 is below the median of 79 across 111 interventional studies indexed under Lacerations.

Browse Lacerations studies →

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 833 studies on the registry; 159 are open to participants now.

Of its 124 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Medical complaint of laceration
  • Single, linear laceration
  • Laceration less than 5 cm in length and 0.5 cm in width
  • Laceration less than 12 hours old
  • Laceration minimally contaminated (no visible dirt in wound)
  • Parents and child speak English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant medical history that may impact wound healing (hematologic or oncologic diagnosis requiring chemotherapy, ichthyosis, epidermolysis bullosa, etc.)
  • Use of oral steroids (more than 5 days in the past month)
  • History of keloid formation
  • Allergy to skin glue, medical tape, or topical anesthetics
  • Lacerations requiring deep sutures
  • Lacerations caused by animal bites or scratches
  • Lacerations located on the scalp, eyebrow, eyelid, lip, mucosa, joint or nail bed
  • No access to photographic capabilities (camera or smartphone) and/or e-mail, OR unable to return to the Vanderbilt Children's Hospital Emergency Room to have a picture taken at 3 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
55 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Absorbable Sutures

    Patients will have their laceration closed with sutures that absorb on their own and do not need to be removed.

    Procedure: Absorbable Sutures

  • Experimental
    Steri-Strips

    Patients will have their laceration closed with a special medical tape called "Steri-Strips."

    Procedure: Steri-Strips

  • Experimental
    Dermabond

    Patients will have their laceration closed with a special skin glue called "Dermabond"

    Procedure: Dermabond

Interventions

  • ProcedureAbsorbable Sutures

    The patient's doctor will close the patient's laceration with absorbable sutures.

    Also known as: Stitches

  • ProcedureSteri-Strips

    The patient's doctor will close the patient's laceration with Steri-Strips.

    Also known as: Medical tape

  • ProcedureDermabond

    The patient's doctor will close the patient's laceration with Dermabond.

    Also known as: Skin glue

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cosmetic Outcome of Scar at 3 Months

    Two blinded Plastic Surgeons will rate the cosmetic outcome of the laceration using a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "worst scar" and a score of 100 corresponding to "best scar"

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Experienced by Patient as Reported by Parent

    Parents will each be asked to score how much pain they felt the patient experienced using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "No pain" and a score of 100 corresponding to "Terrible pain."

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Satisfaction With Time in the Emergency Department

    Parents will report their satisfaction with Emergency Department length of stay using a 100-point visual analog scale with "100" meaning completely satisfied and "0" meaning not at all satisfied

    Time frame: Baseline to wound closure, up to 30 minutes

  3. Likelihood That Parent Would Recommend Laceration Closure Method

    Parents will be asked to rate how likely they would be to recommend the closure method used for their child using a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "Extremely unlikely" and a score of 100 corresponding to "Extremely likely"

    Time frame: Post-wound closure, approximately 30 minutes

  4. Number of Complications of the Wound Site

    Parents will be asked by phone at 3 months if there were any complications with their child's cut (infection, opening of the wound, etc.). Investigators will count the number of complications reported.

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Parental Reported Satisfaction With the Cosmetic Appearance of the Scar

    Parents will rate the cosmetic outcome of the laceration using a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "worst scar" and a score of 100 corresponding to "best scar".

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Presence of Train Tracks at the Scar Site

    Plastic Surgeons will record if a scar appears to have "train tracks" (or small dots on either side of a scar, all along the scar, usually caused by stitches) as they are rating each photo of the scar at 3 months post-closure. Surgeons will answer "yes" or "no".

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Results

Posted Jul 17, 2023
Limitations and caveats
Early termination of the study due to limitation regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and prospective enrollment of pediatric patients in the Emergency Department. There were also only 55% of subjects who performed 3 month follow-up thus our primary outcome can only be measured on these subjects.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAbsorbable SuturesSteri-StripsDermabond
Started201718
Completed12117
Not completed8611
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up8611

Outcome measures

PrimaryCosmetic Outcome of Scar at 3 Months

Two blinded Plastic Surgeons will rate the cosmetic outcome of the laceration using a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "worst scar" and a score of 100 corresponding to "best scar"

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Median · units on a visual analog scale
Cosmetic Outcome of Scar at 3 Months
units on a visual analog scaleAbsorbable SuturesSteri-StripsDermabond
Cosmetic Outcome of Scar at 3 Months64.00 (51.00 to 76.00)54.00 (35.50 to 66.75)48.50 (29.50 to 78.75)
SecondaryPain Experienced by Patient as Reported by Parent

Parents will each be asked to score how much pain they felt the patient experienced using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "No pain" and a score of 100 corresponding to "Terrible pain."

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Pain Experienced by Patient as Reported by Parent
units on a scaleAbsorbable SuturesSteri-StripsDermabond
Pain Experienced by Patient as Reported by Parent17.00 (1.50 to 51.50)22.00 (9.00 to 28.00)11.00 (3.00 to 24.50)
SecondarySatisfaction With Time in the Emergency Department

Parents will report their satisfaction with Emergency Department length of stay using a 100-point visual analog scale with "100" meaning completely satisfied and "0" meaning not at all satisfied

Time frame:
Baseline to wound closure, up to 30 minutes
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Satisfaction With Time in the Emergency Department
units on a scaleAbsorbable SuturesSteri-StripsDermabond
Satisfaction With Time in the Emergency Department89.50 (45.25 to 98.50)92.00 (83.00 to 100.00)94.00 (71.25 to 100.00)
SecondaryLikelihood That Parent Would Recommend Laceration Closure Method

Parents will be asked to rate how likely they would be to recommend the closure method used for their child using a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "Extremely unlikely" and a score of 100 corresponding to "Extremely likely"

Time frame:
Post-wound closure, approximately 30 minutes
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Likelihood That Parent Would Recommend Laceration Closure Method
units on a scaleAbsorbable SuturesSteri-StripsDermabond
Likelihood That Parent Would Recommend Laceration Closure Method99.50 (88.00 to 100.00)99.00 (95.00 to 100.00)99.50 (94.50 to 100.00)
SecondaryNumber of Complications of the Wound Site

Parents will be asked by phone at 3 months if there were any complications with their child's cut (infection, opening of the wound, etc.). Investigators will count the number of complications reported.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Number · complications
Number of Complications of the Wound Site
complicationsAbsorbable SuturesSteri-StripsDermabond
Number of Complications of the Wound Site000
SecondaryParental Reported Satisfaction With the Cosmetic Appearance of the Scar

Parents will rate the cosmetic outcome of the laceration using a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "worst scar" and a score of 100 corresponding to "best scar".

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Parental Reported Satisfaction With the Cosmetic Appearance of the Scar
units on a scaleAbsorbable SuturesSteri-StripsDermabond
Parental Reported Satisfaction With the Cosmetic Appearance of the Scar70.50 (59.75 to 76.75)67.00 (55.00 to 78.00)85.00 (73.00 to 90.00)
SecondaryPresence of Train Tracks at the Scar Site

Plastic Surgeons will record if a scar appears to have "train tracks" (or small dots on either side of a scar, all along the scar, usually caused by stitches) as they are rating each photo of the scar at 3 months post-closure. Surgeons will answer "yes" or "no".

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Number · scars with train tracks
Presence of Train Tracks at the Scar Site
scars with train tracksAbsorbable SuturesSteri-StripsDermabond
Presence of Train Tracks at the Scar Site443

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline to 3 months post-procedure.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Absorbable Sutures0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
Steri-Strips0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)
Dermabond0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Absorbable SuturesSteri-StripsDermabondTotal
Median3.50 (2.75 to 5.00)3.00 (2.00 to 5.00)4.00 (3.00 to 5.00)3.00 (2.75 to 5.00)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Absorbable SuturesSteri-StripsDermabondTotal
Female35412
Male17121443
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Absorbable SuturesSteri-StripsDermabondTotal
Hispanic or Latino2013
Not Hispanic or Latino18161650
Unknown or Not Reported0112
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Absorbable SuturesSteri-StripsDermabondTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American53412
White14121036
More than one race1135
Unknown or Not Reported0112
Laceration Length (cm)
Laceration Length (cm)(cm)Absorbable SuturesSteri-StripsDermabondTotal
Median1.50 (1.19 to 2.00)1.00 (1.00 to 1.50)1.50 (1.00 to 2.00)1.50 (1.00 to 1.94)
Laceration Width (cm)
Laceration Width (cm)(cm)Absorbable SuturesSteri-StripsDermabondTotal
Median0.50 (0.30 to 0.50)0.50 (0.30 to 0.50)0.50 (0.50 to 0.50)0.50 (0.30 to 0.50)
Training Level of Proceduralist
Training Level of Proceduralist(Participants)Absorbable SuturesSteri-StripsDermabondTotal
Resident7111028
Fellow4217
Nurse Practitioner63413
Attending3137
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Vanderbilt Children's Hospital
    Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Barton MS, Chaumet MSG, Hayes J, Hennessy C, Lindsell C, Wormer BA, Kassis SA, Ciener D, Hanson H. A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Guardian-Perceived Cosmetic Outcome of Simple Lacerations Repaired With Either Dermabond, Steri-Strips, or Absorbable Sutures. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 Oct 1;40(10):700-704. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003244. Epub 2024 Aug 2. PubMed 39141836 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 10, 2017
  • Informed consent form · Jun 3, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03280628
Responsible party
Holly Hanson (Asst Professor of Clinical Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 12, 2017
Start date
Sep 23, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2021
Completion
Feb 1, 2021
Results posted
Jul 17, 2023
Last update
Jul 17, 2023

Study contacts

Holly R Hanson, MD
principal investigator · Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion