An interventional study of simulation types in Simulation-based Medical Education, Ultrasound Simulation and Education, Professional, sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-11.
Sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
This study aims to explore the impact of different simulator characteristics on transfer of learning.
During an ISUOG basic training course, participants will be randomly assigned to 30 minutes of simulator training during which time they will practice the 2nd trimester US scan. A total of four different simulators are being used for training. After completing the practical basic training session, they shift the type of simulator that they trained on to one of the remaining three simulators. On this simulator, they are required to perform selected planes for the 2nd-trimester scan. The planes produced are recorded and evaluated by fetal medicine specialists using the ISUOG 20 planes checklist. The performances of participants coming from each of the four simulators are examined and the role of 1) type of simulator interaction (physical mannequin vs. virtual abdomen vs. fixed-point scan) and 2) the type of image acquisition (real US images vs. computer-generated images) are examined.
ISUOG course participants
Exclusion Criteria:
More than 50 independent 2nd trimester US scan before attending the course.
VR simulator with physical mannequin and probe. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE INTERVENTIONS BEING COMPARED ARE DIFFERENT TYPES OF SIMULATORS - NOT A DRUG!
Other: simulation types
VR simulator with virtual mannequin / abdomen PLEASE NOTE THAT THE INTERVENTIONS BEING COMPARED ARE DIFFERENT TYPES OF SIMULATORS - NOT A DRUG!
Other: simulation types
US images are acquired through real US volumes from patients PLEASE NOTE THAT THE INTERVENTIONS BEING COMPARED ARE DIFFERENT TYPES OF SIMULATORS - NOT A DRUG!
Other: simulation types
US images are acquired through computer-generated images. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE INTERVENTIONS BEING COMPARED ARE DIFFERENT TYPES OF SIMULATORS - NOT A DRUG!
Other: simulation types
Different types of simulation interfaces and image acquisitions
Correct planes
Number of correct planes produced
Time frame: 30 minutes
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is withdrawn, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark