ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03275870Updated Apr 2, 2020Results posted

Hydroxychloroquine for the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Hydroxychloroquine in Hidradenitis Suppurativa, Hidradenitis and Acne Inversa, sponsored by Elena Gonzalez Brant, MD. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-02.

Sponsored by Elena Gonzalez Brant, MD · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an under-recognized and debilitating disease. Patients suffer from recurring painful abscesses and scarring in their armpits, under the breasts, groin and other areas of the body. The cause of the disease is still unknown and common treatments are only sometimes effective. Overactivity of the immune system has been associated with HS and molecules that cause inflammation have been found in the skin from people with HS. Current therapies have long-term risks including antibiotic resistance and the investigators aim to find new safe and effective therapies for HS.

Hydroxychloroquine is a medication that has been used safely in other diseases for many years. The investigators believe that hydroxychloroquine has the potential to improve HS through multiple mechanisms. Patients enrolled in this study will be treated with hydroxychloroquine for 6 months. The investigators also aim to look at the blood of patients with HS to look for inflammatory molecules that we could possibly target for the treatment of HS. Blood samples will be taken at baseline and following 6 months of treatment.

Read the detailed description

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a debilitating and mutilating disease and its pathogenesis is still poorly understood. It involves the development of recurrent, painful nodules in intertriginous areas that become inflamed, form abscesses that may rupture, and develop chronic fistula tracts. The cause of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is thought to be multifactorial and may begin with follicular occlusion and rupture, leading to a cascade of inflammatory responses in susceptible individuals. The disease has been associated with high body mass index, smoking and genetic predisposition. There is a known association between HS and the metabolic syndrome, an association that remains after controlling for body mass index. HS predominantly affects women and ethnic minorities and the prevalence is thought to be as high as 2%, although embarrassment and lack of awareness may lead to an underestimate of the true burden of disease.

Although HS is a fairly common disease, relatively little is understood about its pathogenesis. Immune dysregulation is thought to play a role in disease development. Increased levels of interleukin (IL)-12, IL-17, IL-23, tumor necrosis factor α, IL-10 and IL-1β were found to be expressed in lesional skin of HS patients. Recent studies have also identified elevated levels of IL-17 in the serum of patients with HS.

HS is associated with a significant impact on patient quality of life. Patients suffer from both the physical and psychological impact of disease. Many therapies have been used to treat HS, from topical antibiotics to oral retinoids to radical surgeries, but all have limited efficacy. Despite efforts to control disease, many patients live with chronic wounds and disability. The decision about appropriate therapy for HS, especially in the early stages, is mainly based on expert opinion, anecdotal evidence, and small studies. Topical and systemic antimicrobial treatments are often used as first line therapies, although studies have repeatedly shown that the abscesses of HS are sterile or contain only normal flora. The mechanism of improvement with antimicrobials may be through alterations in the local microbiome. Significant improvement in disease has been seen with dual therapy with twice daily use of 300mg rifampicin and 300mg clindamycin, neither of which have an FDA indication for use in HS. Doxycycline is used frequently in HS, but little evidence supports this. Despite success with the above therapies, the risk of antimicrobial resistance is real, and is increased with frequent and prolonged use of these medications in HS. Teratogenic effects, gastrointestinal upset, and photosensitivity with use of tetracyclines, risk for clostridium difficile colitis with clindamycin, and antimicrobial resistance with rifampicin highlight a need for safer and effective therapeutic options for the treatment of early HS.

For more advanced disease (Hurley stage II and III), the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor adalimumab is the only FDA approved biologic treatment for HS. It has shown promise in severe disease, but only \~50% of patients achieved a clinical response at 12 weeks, and this clinical response declined over time. Additionally, newer biologic therapies have been used in small numbers of patients with HS with variable results. Importantly, the cost of these medications is considerable.

Hydroxychloroquine, initially developed as an antimalarial, has been used successfully for over 70 years in the treatment of autoimmune disease. Its mechanism of action is still poorly understood, but it has been shown to have many varied immunomodulatory properties. Evidence suggests that hydroxychloroquine has an effect on inflammatory disease through decreasing levels of TNFα and Th-17 cytokines (including IL-6, IL-17, and IL-22). Additionally, studies have shown a beneficial effect of hydroxychloroquine on lipid metabolism and glucose. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (which similarly to HS has an independent association with cardiovascular disease) who were treated with hydroxychloroquine had an overall decreased incidence of cardiovascular events. Hydroxychloroquine has a relatively benign safety profile, with retinopathy being the most concerning long term side effect. The retinopathy caused by hydroxychloroquine is reversible if identified early, and standard protocols for the use of this medication include yearly ophthalmologic examination.

Patients with HS suffer daily from the physical and psychological effects of their disease. Despite insufficient data about disease progression and prognosis, early intervention with safe and effective therapies is our goal. Hydroxychloroquine has never been used to treat HS, but the good safety profile, based on many years of usage in other autoimmune diseases, and known ability to modify many of the aberrant metabolic and inflammatory components of HS make it an ideal candidate therapy for this debilitating disease.

Research activities:

  1. Treatment with hydroxychloroquine 200mg twice daily. Treatment length will be 6 months. Patients will be allowed to continue or initiate use of topical therapies during the study.
  2. Telephone call to assess toxicity after 1 month of treatment
  3. Assessment of hidradenitis suppurativa disease activity using Sartorius scoring at baseline, and after 3 and 6 months of treatment
  4. Collection of patient serum at baseline and after 6 months of treatment
  5. Quality of life questionnaire at baseline, 3 and 6 months
  6. Follow up telephone call at \~9 and 12 months (3 and 6 months after therapy completion) to assess for toxicity
  7. Baseline ophthalmologic exam for patients on hydroxychloroquine will be conducted within the first year of treatment
02

Conditions studied

  • Hidradenitis Suppurativa
  • Hidradenitis
  • Acne Inversa
  • Boils
  • Follicular Occlusion Triad
  • Follicular Occlusion Tetrad
03

In context

Hidradenitis Suppurativa

284 studies on the registry are indexed under Hidradenitis Suppurativa; 87 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 17 is below the median of 45 across 199 interventional studies indexed under Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

Browse Hidradenitis Suppurativa studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Elena Gonzalez Brant, MD as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa Hurley stage I or II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current systemic , current use of biologic medication or use of these medications in the prior 3 months, patients with known retinal disease, hepatic disease (, cirrhosis, or alanine aminotransferase > 2 times the ), psoriasis, porphyria cutanea tarda, \< 50,000/ul, leukocytes \<4000/ul, or \<8g/dl), pregnant patients or women trying to conceive
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
17 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hydroxychloroquine treatment

    Hydroxychloroquine 200mg BID for 6 months

    Drug: Hydroxychloroquine

Interventions

  • Treatment of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa with hydroxychloroquine 200mg BID for 6 months

    Also known as: Plaquenil

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Disease Severity

    Comparison of baseline and post-treatment Sartorius severity scoring Sartorius scoring: minimum 0, no maximum, higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Quality of Life

    Comparison of baseline and post-treatment self-reported quality of life Dermatology Life Quality Index score: minimum 0, maximum 30. higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Mar 24, 2020
Limitations and caveats
We did not reach the target number of participants needed to achieve target power and statistically reliable results leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHydroxychloroquine Treatment
Started17
Completed3
Not completed14

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Disease Severity

Comparison of baseline and post-treatment Sartorius severity scoring Sartorius scoring: minimum 0, no maximum, higher scores mean a worse outcome

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Disease Severity
score on a scaleHydroxychloroquine Treatment
Baseline sartorius score23.3 ± 16.2
6 month sartorius score17.7 ± 14.4
Statistical analysis
  • Hydroxychloroquine Treatment · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.042 (p value \<0.05 used as threshold for significance)
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life

Comparison of baseline and post-treatment self-reported quality of life Dermatology Life Quality Index score: minimum 0, maximum 30. higher scores mean worse outcome.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Quality of Life
score on a scaleHydroxychloroquine Treatment
Baseline DLQI score14.7 ± 11
6 month DLQI score6 ± 7.9
Statistical analysis
  • Hydroxychloroquine Treatment · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.213 (P value of \<0.05 used as threshold for significance)

Adverse events

Collected over 13 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Hydroxychloroquine Treatment0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)6/17 (35.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventHydroxychloroquine Treatment
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/17
headacheNervous system disorders1/17
urticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/17
DepressionPsychiatric disorders1/17
blurred visionEye disorders1/17

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Hydroxychloroquine Treatment
Mean38.9 (19 to 64)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Hydroxychloroquine Treatment
Female14
Male3
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Hydroxychloroquine Treatment
Caucasian14
Black3
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Hydroxychloroquine Treatment
United States17
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Gonzalez-Lopez MA, Hernandez JL, Lacalle M, Mata C, Lopez-Escobar M, Lopez-Mejias R, Portilla V, Fuentevilla P, Corrales A, Gonzalez-Vela MC, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Blanco R. Increased prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Aug;75(2):329-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.03.025. Epub 2016 Jun 8. PubMed 27287248 ↗
  • Nicola WG, Khayria MI, Osfor MM. Plasma testosterone level and the male genital system after chloroquine therapy. Boll Chim Farm. 1997 Jan;136(1):39-43. PubMed 9080720 ↗
  • Garg A, Lavian J, Lin G, Strunk A, Alloo A. Incidence of hidradenitis suppurativa in the United States: A sex- and age-adjusted population analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jul;77(1):118-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Mar 9. PubMed 28285782 ↗
  • Schlapbach C, Hanni T, Yawalkar N, Hunger RE. Expression of the IL-23/Th17 pathway in lesions of hidradenitis suppurativa. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Oct;65(4):790-798. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.07.010. PubMed 21641076 ↗
  • van der Zee HH, de Ruiter L, van den Broecke DG, Dik WA, Laman JD, Prens EP. Elevated levels of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1beta and IL-10 in hidradenitis suppurativa skin: a rationale for targeting TNF-alpha and IL-1beta. Br J Dermatol. 2011 Jun;164(6):1292-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10254.x. Epub 2011 May 17. PubMed 21332464 ↗
  • Matusiak L, Szczech J, Bieniek A, Nowicka-Suszko D, Szepietowski JC. Increased interleukin (IL)-17 serum levels in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: Implications for treatment with anti-IL-17 agents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Apr;76(4):670-675. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.10.042. Epub 2016 Dec 29. PubMed 28041632 ↗
  • von der Werth JM, Jemec GB. Morbidity in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol. 2001 Apr;144(4):809-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04137.x. PubMed 11298541 ↗
  • Andersen RK, Jemec GB. Treatments for hidradenitis suppurativa. Clin Dermatol. 2017 Mar-Apr;35(2):218-224. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2016.10.018. Epub 2016 Oct 27. PubMed 28274363 ↗
  • Fischer AH, Haskin A, Okoye GA. Patterns of antimicrobial resistance in lesions of hidradenitis suppurativa. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Feb;76(2):309-313.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Oct 11. PubMed 27742173 ↗
  • Kimball AB, Okun MM, Williams DA, Gottlieb AB, Papp KA, Zouboulis CC, Armstrong AW, Kerdel F, Gold MH, Forman SB, Korman NJ, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Crowley JJ, Lynde C, Reguiai Z, Prens EP, Alwawi E, Mostafa NM, Pinsky B, Sundaram M, Gu Y, Carlson DM, Jemec GB. Two Phase 3 Trials of Adalimumab for Hidradenitis Suppurativa. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):422-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504370. PubMed 27518661 ↗
  • Rainsford KD, Parke AL, Clifford-Rashotte M, Kean WF. Therapy and pharmacological properties of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis and related diseases. Inflammopharmacology. 2015 Oct;23(5):231-69. doi: 10.1007/s10787-015-0239-y. Epub 2015 Aug 6. PubMed 26246395 ↗
  • van den Borne BE, Dijkmans BA, de Rooij HH, le Cessie S, Verweij CL. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine equally affect tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin 6, and interferon-gamma production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Rheumatol. 1997 Jan;24(1):55-60. PubMed 9002011 ↗
  • Silva JC, Mariz HA, Rocha LF Jr, Oliveira PS, Dantas AT, Duarte AL, Pitta Ida R, Galdino SL, Pitta MG. Hydroxychloroquine decreases Th17-related cytokines in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013 Jun;68(6):766-71. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(06)07. PubMed 23778483 ↗
  • Hage MP, Al-Badri MR, Azar ST. A favorable effect of hydroxychloroquine on glucose and lipid metabolism beyond its anti-inflammatory role. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Aug;5(4):77-85. doi: 10.1177/2042018814547204. PubMed 25343023 ↗
  • Sharma TS, Wasko MC, Tang X, Vedamurthy D, Yan X, Cote J, Bili A. Hydroxychloroquine Use Is Associated With Decreased Incident Cardiovascular Events in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jan 4;5(1):e002867. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002867. PubMed 26727968 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2017 to primary completion in Jun 2019, 21 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2020, 8 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 31, 2017
First posted
Sep 8, 2017
StartActual
Sep 28, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2019
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2019
Results first posted
Mar 24, 2020
Last update
Apr 2, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03275870
Lead sponsor
Elena Gonzalez Brant, MD
Responsible party
Elena Gonzalez Brant, MD (Principal Investigator, University of Pittsburgh) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 8, 2017
Start date
Sep 28, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2019
Completion
Jun 30, 2019
Results posted
Mar 24, 2020
Last update
Apr 2, 2020

Study contacts

Elena M Gonzalez Brant, MD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Hydroxychloroquine

Start the discussion