ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03272698Updated Jan 23, 2025

ECT with Ketamine Anesthesia Vs High Intensity Ketamine with ECT Rescue for Treatment-Resistant Depression

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ketamine and ECT in Treatment Resistant Depression and Ketamine, sponsored by University of Saskatchewan. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-23.

Sponsored by University of Saskatchewan · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2017; still recruiting 9 years 1 month later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To determine if an high intensity ketamine with ECT rescue (HIKER) approach for treatment resistant depression will: 1) reduce patient suffering by hastening disease remission, 2) have fewer side effects, 3) reduce the need for ECT, and 4) be preferred by most patients. Half of participants will be randomized to the HIKER arm and receive high intensity ketamine treatment for eight consecutive days, and the other half will be assigned to the ECT with ketamine anesthesia (EAST) arm and receive 8 ECT treatments (2-3 treatment/week)

Read the detailed description

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric illness that will affect at least 15% of the population. The burden of MDD is staggering, considered by the World Health Organization to be the leading cause of disability in developed countries for people aged 15-44.

Oral antidepressant therapy for MDD is notoriously ineffective. At least 3 weeks of treatment is usually required to achieve response rates that rarely exceed 40% (only 10% better than placebo); furthermore, treatment can be complicated by serious side effects serious (e.g. falls, weight gain) including increased suicidality. Up to 15% of patients will eventually be diagnosed as having treatment-resistant depressions (TRD), defined as the failure to respond to at least two antidepressants from different pharmacologic classes after adequate treatment duration at therapeutic dosages. The gold standard therapy for TRD is electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) with general anaesthesia (GA), which produces rapid antidepressant effects after only a few sessions. Propofol is the traditional anaesthetic agent used in GA for ECT, although recently this research group showed that ECT with ketamine as the primary anaesthetic produced faster depression remission compared to ECT with propofol.

Despite its efficacy, ECT is associated with considerable problems. More than 10% of patients will experience amnesia and confusion, which can persist for weeks. These cognitive side effects limit the frequency of ECT treatments to two or three times per week. There is also a risk of rare but devastating cardiorespiratory adverse events, at least part of which can be attributed to the need to induce chemical paralysis (for safety) and administer opioids (for pain control) during ECT with GA. Lastly, ECT requires specialized psychiatric expertise, dedicated resources, specially trained nurses, and an anaesthesiologist - requirements that are both costly and not readily available in many settings.

In contrast to ECT, daily short-acting anaesthesia, including ketamine, is well tolerated. A recent study found that only three treatments of intravenous ketamine produced a greater early improvement in depression scores compared to ECT under non-ketamine-based GA. This suggests a possibility of achieving early disease remission in TRD with ketamine-only infusions while avoiding the safety risks and treatment delays associated with ECT under GA.

The efficacy, feasibility, and improved side-effect profile of frequent successive ketamine treatments suggest it may be the preferred treatment for TRD compared to ECT with ketamine-based GA. There may, however, be a small subgroup of TRD patients who do not respond to ketamine alone and require ECT, although with a daily treatment regimen, ketamine non-responders could be quickly identified and given a standard course of ECT. The researchers propose that a treatment protocol of daily High Intensity Ketamine with ECT Rescue (HIKER) will be superior to ECT Therapy with ketamine anesthesia standard therapy (EAST) in facilitating early disease remission, while at the same time yielding similar overall remission rates by allowing ketamine non-responders to be quickly identified and given ECT.

02

Conditions studied

  • Treatment Resistant Depression
  • Ketamine

Keywords

  • ketamine
  • treatment-resistant depression
  • electroconvulsive therapy
03

In context

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

472 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; 151 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 62 is above the median of 51 across 397 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant.

Browse Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Saskatchewan is the lead sponsor of 243 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of greater than 20) planned for ECT therapy.
  • Subjects must meet clinical criteria for TRD defined as failure to respond to at least 2 standard-of-care drug therapies of adequate treatment duration.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects will be ineligible if they cannot provide informed consent
  • American Society of Anesthesiology physical status score of four or greater
  • Implanted medical device with electronic parts (e.g. pacemaker, defibrillator, intrathecal pump, spinal cord stimulator, deep brain stimulator)
  • Schizoaffective disorder
  • Women of child-bearing potential will be asked to undergo a commercial urine pregnancy screening test. Those who refuse or screen positive will be excluded.
  • Allergic to any of the study drugs or their carrier components
  • Any serious physical condition prior to randomization deemed by the attending psychiatrist or consulting anesthetist to be a contraindication to ECT such as cardiovascular disease (including untreated hypertension), respiratory disease, cerebrovascular disease, intracranial hypertension (including glaucoma), or seizures.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
62 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ketamine (HIKER)

    Patients in the HIKER arm will receive a single dose of ketamine 0.50 mg/kg, which is enough to achieve a full anaesthetic effect (i.e., unconsciousness mimicking the GA regimen above), on 8 successive weekdays.

    Drug: Ketamine

  • Active comparator
    Ketamine-ECT (EAST)

    Patients in the EAST arm will initially receive intravenous ketamine 0.75 mg/kg, remifentanil 1 mcg/kg (to reduce discomfort), and succinylcholine 0.75 mg/kg (for safety). Based on patients' anaesthetic response, the attending anaesthesiologist is given the freedom to vary the dose of remifentanil and succinylcholine as well as administer propofol to achieve safe and acceptable anaesthetic conditions. As per the Saskatoon Health Region's care standard, patients in the EAST arm will receive eight ECT sessions (on a bi/triweekly schedule) delivered by the attending psychiatrist with either unilateral or bilateral electrode placement and monitoring of seizure threshold by the half-age method.

    Drug: Ketamine · Procedure: ECT

Interventions

  • IV Ketamine 0.50 mg/kg

    Also known as: Ketalar

  • ProcedureECT

    ECT with unilateral or bilateral electrode placement and monitoring of seizure threshold by the half-age method

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of treatments required to reach disease remission

    The primary outcome is number of treatments required to reach disease remission, as defined by a reduction of MADRS score to under 10

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of disease remission or after 8 treatments, assessed up to 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of rescue ECT in the HIKER arm

    Percent of patients in the HIKER arm who do not achieve a 25% reduction in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) after the third treatment.

    Time frame: From date of randomization up to 6 days

  2. Suicidal ideation

    Suicidal ideation as measured by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of disease remission or after 8 treatments and at 30 days following last treatment, assessed up to 8 weeks

  3. Cognitive Impairment

    Cognitive Impairment as measured by Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE)

    Time frame: MMSE will be assessed at baseline, final treatment, and 30 day post-treatment follow-up

  4. Self- and clinician rated improvement

    Patients will rate their condition on the patient-rated clinical global impression - improvement scale (PGI-I)

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of disease remission or after 8 treatments and at 30 days following last treatment, assessed up to 8 weeks

  5. Patient satisfaction with treatment

    Satisfaction with treatment will be assessed by the 2-item treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication-version II (TSQM-GS-II).

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of disease remission or after 8 treatments and at 30 days following last treatment, assessed up to 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Royal University Hospital
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W8, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):593-602. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593. PubMed 15939837 ↗
  • Mathers C, Fat DM, Boerma JT. The global burden of disease: 2004 update: World Health Organization; 2008.
  • Kirsch I, Deacon BJ, Huedo-Medina TB, Scoboria A, Moore TJ, Johnson BT. Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. PLoS Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):e45. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050045. PubMed 18303940 ↗
  • Skolnick P, Layer RT, Popik P, Nowak G, Paul IA, Trullas R. Adaptation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors following antidepressant treatment: implications for the pharmacotherapy of depression. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1996 Jan;29(1):23-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-979537. PubMed 8852530 ↗
  • Berlim MT, Turecki G. Definition, assessment, and staging of treatment-resistant refractory major depression: a review of current concepts and methods. Can J Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;52(1):46-54. doi: 10.1177/070674370705200108. PubMed 17444078 ↗
  • Fink M. Is Catatonia a Primary Indication for ECT? Convuls Ther. 1990;6(1):1-4. No abstract available. PubMed 11941041 ↗
  • Bundy BD, Hewer W, Andres FJ, Gass P, Sartorius A. Influence of anesthetic drugs and concurrent psychiatric medication on seizure adequacy during electroconvulsive therapy. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;71(6):775-7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04971gre. Epub 2009 Dec 29. PubMed 20051218 ↗
  • Comparing Ketamine and Propofol Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy [database on the Internet]. 2013 [cited 2017 Jan 1]
  • Datto CJ. Side effects of electroconvulsive therapy. Depress Anxiety. 2000;12(3):130-4. doi: 10.1002/1520-6394(2000)12:33.0.CO;2-C. PubMed 11126187 ↗
  • Ghasemi M, Kazemi MH, Yoosefi A, Ghasemi A, Paragomi P, Amini H, Afzali MH. Rapid antidepressant effects of repeated doses of ketamine compared with electroconvulsive therapy in hospitalized patients with major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Feb 28;215(2):355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.12.008. Epub 2013 Dec 13. PubMed 24374115 ↗
  • Metriyakool K. Methohexital as alternative to propofol for intravenous anesthesia in children undergoing daily radiation treatment: a case report. Anesthesiology. 1998 Mar;88(3):821-2. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199803000-00035. No abstract available. PubMed 9523828 ↗
  • Irwin SA, Iglewicz A, Nelesen RA, Lo JY, Carr CH, Romero SD, Lloyd LS. Daily oral ketamine for the treatment of depression and anxiety in patients receiving hospice care: a 28-day open-label proof-of-concept trial. J Palliat Med. 2013 Aug;16(8):958-65. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0617. Epub 2013 Jun 27. PubMed 23805864 ↗
  • Diamond PR, Farmery AD, Atkinson S, Haldar J, Williams N, Cowen PJ, Geddes JR, McShane R. Ketamine infusions for treatment resistant depression: a series of 28 patients treated weekly or twice weekly in an ECT clinic. J Psychopharmacol. 2014 Jun;28(6):536-44. doi: 10.1177/0269881114527361. Epub 2014 Apr 3. PubMed 24699062 ↗
  • Rush AJ, Blacker D. Handbook of psychiatric measures: American Psychiatric Pub; 2008
  • Gipson PY, Agarwala P, Opperman KJ, Horwitz A, King CA. Columbia-suicide severity rating scale: predictive validity with adolescent psychiatric emergency patients. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Feb;31(2):88-94. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000225. PubMed 25285389 ↗
  • Atkinson MJ, Kumar R, Cappelleri JC, Hass SL. Hierarchical construct validity of the treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM version II) among outpatient pharmacy consumers. Value Health. 2005 Nov-Dec;8 Suppl 1:S9-S24. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00066.x. PubMed 16336491 ↗
  • Guy W. Clinical global impression scale. The ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology-Revised Volume DHEW Publ No ADM. 1976;76(338):218-22

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03272698
Collaborators
Royal University Hospital Foundation
Responsible party
Jonathan Gamble (M.D., University of Saskatchewan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 5, 2017
Start date
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 23, 2025

Study contacts

Una Goncin
Contact
ung039@usask.ca
3066551183
Jonathan Gamble, MD
principal investigator · University of Saskatchewan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion