ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03272126Updated May 24, 2018

Importance of Dosing Regimen for the Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation

A Phase 3 interventional study of Vitamin D and Placebo in Hypovitaminosis D, sponsored by University of Tromso. Completed at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-24.

Sponsored by University of Tromso · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
61
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 154 studies testing Vitamin D in Vitamin D Deficiency — 15 open to participants now, 16 under way, none of them phase 3. Vitamin D · Vitamin D Deficiency.

Enrollment
86th of 153
61 · median 75
Started
2017
with 10 others
Phase 3
8 of 154
none open now
Registered
88th of 154
by date

Among the 154 studies testing Vitamin D in Vitamin D Deficiency, this one is the 86th largest by enrollment of the 153 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 11 that started in 2017, is one of 8 in phase 3, and was the 88th registered.

Vitamin D Deficiency

801 studies on the registry are indexed under Vitamin D Deficiency; 60 are open to participants now.

Browse Vitamin D Deficiency studies →

Open to participants now

15 of the 154 studies testing Vitamin D in Vitamin D Deficiency are open now, in 8 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

10 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 15 open studies →

About Vitamin D

No approval found in the FDA or EMA files read. How studies give it is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 37 Vitamin D Deficiency studies recruiting now, 16 (43%) set no upper age limit and 18 (49%) stop at 75 or younger; 10 take children under 18; 11 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 20 Years to 70 Years · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 154 studies testing Vitamin D in Vitamin D Deficiency, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Vitamin D is a hormone with effects not only on the skeleton, but on most tissues in the body. Lack of vitamin D is associated with cardio-vascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes, cancer, infectious and immunological diseases, as well as risk factors for these diseases. However, intervention studies with vitamin D have been inconclusive regarding diseases and risk factors. This could be due to inclusion of subjects already vitamin D sufficient, and short and underpowered studies. In addition, there are indications that the dosing regimens may be important, so that daily doses with vitamin D are more efficient than intermittent doses, which so far have been generally used. This could be related to the concentration of circulating and thereby intracellular vitamin D concentrations, which probably is dependent on daily vitamin D doses. This will be tested in the present study where 60 subjects will be randomized to vitamin D 160 000 once, vitamin D 4000 IU/day, or placebo for four weeks. The primary endpoints will be effects on serum hepcidin and plasma cathelicidin after 4 weeks, with effects on serum PTH, RNA expression and microRNA in peripheral blood, telomerase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and the ration between serum 1,25(OH)2D and 24,25(OH)2D as secondary endpoints.

03

Conditions studied

  • Hypovitaminosis D

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • vitamin D
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:- Males and females 20 - 70 years

  • 20 kg/m2 > \< 35 kg/m2
  • systolic BP \< 175 mmHg, diastolic BP \< 105 mmHg
  • Serum 25(OH)D level \< 50 nmol/L. Serum 25(OH)D \< 50 nmol/L is considered as vitamin D deficiency, and accordingly, effects of vitamin D supplementation will be easier to detect than if the included subjects were vitamin D sufficient.
  • , SR, CRP, creatinine \< 130 umol/L in males, \< 120 umol/L in females, calcium, FT4 and TSH within the normal reference range; ASAT \< 90 mU/L ALAT \< 140 U/L, \< 6.6 %
  • The subjects must agree not to take any vitamin D supplementation, including cod liver oil or "mølje", use solarium or go on sunny vacation during the intervention period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • subjects allergic to peanuts
  • subjects with primary hyperparathyroidism
  • granulomatous diseases (sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, Wegner's granulomatosis)
  • diabetes
  • renal stones the last five years
  • subjects seriously ill (or with chronic disease) and unfit for participation in the study (as judged by one of the study doctors)
  • subjects using vitamin D supplements exceeding 800 IU per day or active vitamin D drugs (Rocaltrol or Etalpha)
  • pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
61 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    vitamin D bolus

    vitamin D 160 000 IU given as bolus

    Drug: Vitamin D

  • Experimental
    vitamin D daily

    vitamin D 4000 IU daily for 28 days

    Drug: Vitamin D

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    identical looking as vitamin d

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • vitamin D given as bolus versus daily dosing

  • DrugPlacebo

    identical looking as vitamin D

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hepcidin change

    Difference between vitamin D given as a bolus 160 000IU vs 4000 IU regarding change in serum hepcidin

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in serum PTH after 1 month

    Difference between vitamin D given as a bolus 160 000IU vs 4000 IU regarding change in serum PTH, cathelicidin, RNA expression and micro RNA in peripheral blood, telomerase activity and the ratio between 1,25(OH)2D and 24,25(OH)2D, after 1 month

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Difference in micro RNA Expression after 1 month

    Difference between vitamin D given as a bolus 160 000IU vs 4000 IU

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Difference in serum cathelicidin after 1 month

    Difference between vitamin D given as a bolus 160 000IU vs 4000 IU

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Difference in RNA Expression after 1 month

    Difference between vitamin D given as a bolus 160 000IU vs 4000 IU

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  5. Difference in telomerase Activity after 1 month

    Difference between vitamin D given as a bolus 160 000IU vs 4000 IU

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  6. Difference in ratio between 1,24(OH)2D and 24,24(OH)2D after 1 month

    Difference between vitamin D given as a bolus 160 000IU vs 4000 IU

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital of North Norway
    Tromsø, 9038, Norway
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2017 to primary completion in Apr 2018, 4 months.

Of 18 phase 3 interventional studies under Vitamin D Deficiency, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 43. This study's 4 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 15, 2017
First posted
Sep 5, 2017
StartActual
Dec 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Apr 1, 2018
CompletionActual
May 1, 2018
Last update
May 24, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 24, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03272126
Lead sponsor
University of Tromso
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 5, 2017
Start date
Dec 1, 2017
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2018
Completion
May 1, 2018
Last update
May 24, 2018

Study contacts

rolf jorde, MD PhD
principal investigator · UiT, Tromsø

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Vitamin D

Start the discussion