ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03271528Updated Jun 3, 2021Results posted

Lacosamide Effects on Alcohol Self Administration and Craving in Heavy Drinkers

A Phase 1 interventional study of Lacosamide and Placebo oral capsule in Alcohol Use Disorder, sponsored by Boston Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-03.

Sponsored by Boston Medical Center · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover design trial tested the effect of lacosamide on alcohol self-administration and craving following a priming dose of alcohol. The specific objective of this study was to determine whether lacosamide, a novel anticonvulsant that is FDA-approved for treating partial seizures, has effects on alcohol craving and consumption.

Read the detailed description

The present proposal was intended to answer the call for accelerating drug development by exploring the potential of a novel anticonvulsant, lacosamide, as a candidate medication for the treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD). This drug, which is approved for the treatment of seizure disorders, has unique pharmacological actions that include enhancement of slow sodium channel inactivation and inhibition of collapsin response mediator protein-2 (CRMP-2). Alcohol consumption in mice that had knockdown of CRMP-2 within the nucleus accumbens was decreased from levels seen in control animals. In rodent studies, lacosamide administration has produced reductions in 'excessive' drinking and has experimentally-induced decreased expression of the CRMP-2 protein. These findings implicate CRMP-2 as playing a role in the regulation of alcohol consumption. None of the FDA-approved AUD medications or medications commonly used off-label to treat AUD target this CRMP-2 pathway, making lacosamide a promising compound for AUD drug development. The aims of this study were to: 1) test the effects of lacosamide on alcohol self-administration and craving, 2) test the effects of 7 days of lacosamide administration on cognitive function, and 3) test the effects of lacosamide on alcohol consumption and craving during a 7-day period of exposure. The effects of 7 days of lacosamide (300mg) or placebo were evaluated in a human laboratory using an alcohol self-administration methodology. In this within-subjects crossover design, heavy drinkers (N=27) were randomized to the order of exposure (lacosamide or placebo) prior to completing two alcohol self-administration trials. Subjects received a priming drink of alcohol and had access to 8 alcoholic drinks over a 2-hour period. The investigators anticipated that subjects would consume less alcohol during an alcohol self-administration trial when receiving lacosamide compared to when they are receiving placebo. Significant lacosamide-induced reductions in the quantity of alcohol self-administered are considered to be an indication that this drug may have value as an AUD medication. This study may provide a rationale for phase II clinical studies testing lacosamide with a treatment-seeking AUD population. These results should also help to spur further pre-clinical investigation into the role play by CRMP-2 in regulating both alcohol consumption and alcohol seeking behaviors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcohol Use Disorder

Keywords

  • Lacosamide
  • Alcohol craving
  • Alcohol Urge Questionnaire
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale
  • Visual Analog Scale
  • Alcohol consumption
  • Alcohol use disorder
03

In context

Alcoholism

1,674 studies on the registry are indexed under Alcoholism; 331 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 66 is below the median of 88 across 1,428 interventional studies indexed under Alcoholism.

Browse Alcoholism studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 323 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.

Of its 34 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 28 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Subject Inclusion Criteria

  1. 21-55 years of age
  2. Can provide proof of age with state-issued or federal picture ID
  3. Exceeds safe weekly drinking limits (≥14 drinks for women or ≥21 drinks for men per week)
  4. Reports at least an average of one episode per week of binge drinking (>3 for women, >4 for men) in the four weeks prior to baseline screening
  5. Meets criteria for mild alcohol use disorder or greater severity.
  6. Has a smartphone to complete some of the study assessments.

Subject Exclusion Criteria

  1. Currently seeking treatment for alcohol problems
  2. Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment at >10
  3. DSM-5 diagnosis of current major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, bulimia/anorexia, dementia, or a substance use disorder other than alcohol, nicotine, marijuana or caffeine
  4. If female, pregnant, nursing, or have plans to become pregnant
  5. If female, does not agree to use an accepted form of
  6. Is currently using medications for which alcohol is a
  7. Has a medical or mental health condition for which further alcohol exposure at the planned dose range would be contraindicated.
  8. Current risk of suicidality (MINI suicidality score greater than 8 (low risk) or Yes to the ideation question #4 of the C-SSRS)
  9. Has a history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, has a risk for the development of heart block, or are taking medications that can decrease conduction through the atrial ventricular node.
  10. Has previous exposure to lacosamide
  11. Has received any form of counseling, self-help, pharmacotherapy, or other intervention to treat AUD in the past 90 days.
  12. Is unwilling to suspend use of multivitamins that contain riboflavin during study participation
  13. Has urine toxicology results positive for cocaine, opioids, amphetamines, buprenorphine, methadone, or methamphetamines
  14. Liver function values or ALT are twice the normal limit
  15. \<80 mL/min
  16. Unable to comfortably abstain from nicotine for a period of 8 hours.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lacosamide

    Lacosamide titration was done to a target dose of 300mg. Participants took 100 mg of lacosamide once on day 1, 100 mg twice per day from day 2 through day 6 (200 mg daily total), on day 7 the lacosamide dose was increased to 150 mg twice daily (300 mg daily total), and on day 8 the participant took one dose of 150 mg.

    Drug: Lacosamide

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo oral capsule

    Participants took a placebo oral capsule once on day 1, twice per day from day 2 to day 7, and once on day 8.

    Drug: Placebo oral capsule

Interventions

  • Lacosamide titration was done to a target dose of 300mg. Participants took 100 mg of lacosamide once on day 1, 100 mg twice per day from day 2 through day 6 (200 mg daily total), on day 7 the lacosamide dose was increased to 150 mg twice daily (300 mg daily total), and on day 8 the participant took one dose of 150 mg.

    Also known as: Vimpat

  • DrugPlacebo oral capsule

    Participants took a placebo oral capsule once on day 1, twice per day from day 2 to day 7, and once on day 8.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Alcohol Consumption in Alcohol Self-Administration Trials

    Alcohol consumption will be measured by using a graduated cylinder to determine the amount of alcohol given to the subject that was consumed. This outcome will be measured as standard drink units. A standard drink contains approximately 0.6 fluid ounces of pure alcohol.

    Time frame: 2 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Verbal Fluency: Controlled Word Association (COWAT)

    The Controlled Word Association (COWAT) is a verbal fluency test that measures the spontaneous production of words beginning with some designated letter. The participant is asked to name words beginning with a given letter, excluding proper nouns, for one minute and this procedure is repeated three times with a different letter each time. A different set of letters was used in each of the two alcohol self-administration trials: C-F-L and P-R-W. The examiner writes down the words provided by the participant on a piece of paper. This test is scored by counting the number of words generated by the subject for each letter, then adding the scores for each of the three letters to calculate a total test score. The lowest possible score is 0 and there is no upper limit to the score range. A higher score is indicative of better outcomes (I.e. better verbal fluency).

    Time frame: 3 minutes

  2. Cognitive Function: Spatial Span Forward

    The Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-III) Spatial Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be shown a sequence of block tapping and asked to repeat back an increasing number of tapped blocks in the same order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  3. Cognitive Function: Spatial Span Backward

    The Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-III) Spatial Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be shown a sequence of block tapping and asked to repeat back an increasing number of tapped blocks in the opposite order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  4. Cognitive Function: Digit Span Forward

    The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) Digit Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be read and asked to repeat back an increasing number of digits in the same order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  5. Cognitive Function: Digit Span Backward

    The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) Digit Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be read and asked to repeat back an increasing number of digits in the opposite order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  6. Cognitive Function: Digit Span Sequencing

    The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) Digit Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be read and asked to repeat back an increasing number of digits in ascending order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  7. Alcohol Craving: Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) Pretrial

    The Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) is a quick and reliable 14-item self-rating instrument that provides a total score that measures some cognitive aspects of alcohol craving (obsessive and compulsive drinking). Each of the 14 items is scored from 0 to 4. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 14 items. The total score range is 0-56. Higher scores are indicative of more obsessive or compulsive drinking and lower scores are indicative of less obsessive or compulsive drinking.

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  8. Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pretrial

    Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

    Time frame: 1 minute

  9. Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 10

    Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

    Time frame: 1 minute

  10. Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 20

    Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

    Time frame: 1 minute

  11. Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 30

    Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

    Time frame: 1 minute

  12. Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 40

    Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

    Time frame: 1 minute

  13. Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 30

    Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

    Time frame: 1 minute

  14. Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 60

    Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

    Time frame: 1 minute

  15. Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 90

    Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

    Time frame: 1 minute

  16. Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 120

    Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

    Time frame: 1 minute

  17. Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 30

    The Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.

    Time frame: 1 minute

  18. Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 60

    The Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.

    Time frame: 1 minute

  19. Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 90

    The Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.

    Time frame: 1 minute

  20. Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 120

    The Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.

    Time frame: 1 minute

07

Results

Posted Jun 3, 2021
Limitations and caveats
This study was terminated early at the discretion of the Principal Investigator due to COVID-19 restrictions on human subject research recruitment, leading to a smaller number of subjects analyzed than planned. At the time of termination, 19 subjects had completed the study compared to the target sample size of 28. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

Participant flow

Medication Dispense/Exposure Period 1
Participant flow — Medication Dispense/Exposure Period 1
MilestoneLacosamide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then Lacosamide
Started1314
Completed1112
Not completed22
Withdrew: Adverse event10
Withdrew: Protocol violation10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Participation discontinued due to covid-19 research pause01
Alcohol Trial 1, Washout Period 1
Participant flow — Alcohol Trial 1, Washout Period 1
MilestoneLacosamide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then Lacosamide
Started1112
Completed911
Not completed21
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up11
Withdrew: Failed urine drug screen at time of alcohol trial 110
Medication Dispense/Exposure Period 2
Participant flow — Medication Dispense/Exposure Period 2
MilestoneLacosamide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then Lacosamide
Started911
Completed811
Not completed10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Alcohol Self-Administration Trial 2
Participant flow — Alcohol Self-Administration Trial 2
MilestoneLacosamide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then Lacosamide
Started811
Completed811
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryAlcohol Consumption in Alcohol Self-Administration Trials

Alcohol consumption will be measured by using a graduated cylinder to determine the amount of alcohol given to the subject that was consumed. This outcome will be measured as standard drink units. A standard drink contains approximately 0.6 fluid ounces of pure alcohol.

Time frame:
2 hours
Reported as:
Mean · Standard Drink Units (SDU)
Alcohol Consumption in Alcohol Self-Administration Trials
Standard Drink Units (SDU)LacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Alcohol Consumption in Alcohol Self-Administration Trials3.02 ± 3.002.35 ± 2.31
SecondaryVerbal Fluency: Controlled Word Association (COWAT)

The Controlled Word Association (COWAT) is a verbal fluency test that measures the spontaneous production of words beginning with some designated letter. The participant is asked to name words beginning with a given letter, excluding proper nouns, for one minute and this procedure is repeated three times with a different letter each time. A different set of letters was used in each of the two alcohol self-administration trials: C-F-L and P-R-W. The examiner writes down the words provided by the participant on a piece of paper. This test is scored by counting the number of words generated by the subject for each letter, then adding the scores for each of the three letters to calculate a total test score. The lowest possible score is 0 and there is no upper limit to the score range. A higher score is indicative of better outcomes (I.e. better verbal fluency).

Time frame:
3 minutes
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Verbal Fluency: Controlled Word Association (COWAT)
score on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Verbal Fluency: Controlled Word Association (COWAT)38.19 ± 8.2642.25 ± 9.75
SecondaryCognitive Function: Spatial Span Forward

The Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-III) Spatial Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be shown a sequence of block tapping and asked to repeat back an increasing number of tapped blocks in the same order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).

Time frame:
10 minutes
Reported as:
Mean · correct items
Cognitive Function: Spatial Span Forward
correct itemsLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Cognitive Function: Spatial Span Forward8.44 ± 2.537.75 ± 3.70
SecondaryCognitive Function: Spatial Span Backward

The Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-III) Spatial Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be shown a sequence of block tapping and asked to repeat back an increasing number of tapped blocks in the opposite order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).

Time frame:
10 minutes
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Cognitive Function: Spatial Span Backward
score on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Cognitive Function: Spatial Span Backward7.19 ± 2.497.62 ± 3.14
SecondaryCognitive Function: Digit Span Forward

The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) Digit Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be read and asked to repeat back an increasing number of digits in the same order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).

Time frame:
10 minutes
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Cognitive Function: Digit Span Forward
score on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Cognitive Function: Digit Span Forward10.81 ± 1.9710.81 ± 2.10
SecondaryCognitive Function: Digit Span Backward

The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) Digit Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be read and asked to repeat back an increasing number of digits in the opposite order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).

Time frame:
10 minutes
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Cognitive Function: Digit Span Backward
score on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Cognitive Function: Digit Span Backward8.06 ± 1.487.62 ± 2.16
SecondaryCognitive Function: Digit Span Sequencing

The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) Digit Span test will be used to assess subjects' working memory. Subjects will be read and asked to repeat back an increasing number of digits in ascending order. Each of the 16 items on this test is scored 0 (incorrect answer) or 1 (correct answer). The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 16 items. The total score range is 0-16. Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of working memory (better outcome) and lower scores are indicative of lesser working memory function (worse outcome).

Time frame:
10 minutes
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Cognitive Function: Digit Span Sequencing
score on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Cognitive Function: Digit Span Sequencing8.12 ± 2.337.62 ± 2.36
SecondaryAlcohol Craving: Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) Pretrial

The Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) is a quick and reliable 14-item self-rating instrument that provides a total score that measures some cognitive aspects of alcohol craving (obsessive and compulsive drinking). Each of the 14 items is scored from 0 to 4. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the 14 items. The total score range is 0-56. Higher scores are indicative of more obsessive or compulsive drinking and lower scores are indicative of less obsessive or compulsive drinking.

Time frame:
5 minutes
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Alcohol Craving: Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) Pretrial
scores on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Alcohol Craving: Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) Pretrial10.19 ± 4.7912.25 ± 5.35
SecondaryAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pretrial

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame:
1 minute
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pretrial
scores on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pretrial30.25 ± 31.0031.60 ± 35.65
SecondaryAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 10

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame:
1 minute
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 10
scores on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 1026.75 ± 20.0741.87 ± 33.42
SecondaryAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 20

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame:
1 minute
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 20
scores on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 2035.31 ± 28.3339.75 ± 34.95
SecondaryAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 30

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame:
1 minute
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 30
score on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 3035.19 ± 28.8537.81 ± 36.50
SecondaryAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 40

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame:
1 minute
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 40
score on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Observation Period, Minute 4036.87 ± 26.7136.69 ± 34.50
SecondaryAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 30

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame:
1 minute
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 30
score on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 3028.00 ± 19.7331.87 ± 30.66
SecondaryAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 60

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame:
1 minute
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 60
score on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 6024.94 ± 20.7830.37 ± 30.38
SecondaryAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 90

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame:
1 minute
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 90
score on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 9021.62 ± 21.6027.81 ± 29.52
SecondaryAlcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 120

Alcohol craving was measured by self report with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a straight horizontal line with one end indicating no alcohol craving and the other end indicating intense alcohol craving. The participant marks a point on the line that matches their present amount of alcohol craving. Location of the point on the line is measured for a score range of 0-100. A lower score indicates less craving for alcohol and a higher score indicated more craving for alcohol.

Time frame:
1 minute
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 120
score on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Alcohol Craving: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 12023.62 ± 28.7829.00 ± 32.55
SecondaryAlcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 30

The Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.

Time frame:
1 minute
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 30
score on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 3024.00 ± 7.5423.94 ± 8.65
SecondaryAlcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 60

The Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.

Time frame:
1 minute
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 60
score on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 6024.88 ± 7.4926.25 ± 6.70
SecondaryAlcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 90

The Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.

Time frame:
1 minute
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 90
score on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 9022.94 ± 7.4622.00 ± 4.98
SecondaryAlcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 120

The Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is an 8-item self report that measures the participant's urge for an alcoholic drink at the time the questionnaire is completed. Questions are in the form of a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree) and the participant selects the extent to which they disagree or agree with the 8 statements relating to desire to drink, expectation of a desired outcome from drinking, and inability to avoid drinking if alcohol was available. Each of the 8 items is scored 1-7. The total score is calculated by adding the scores for each of the items. The total score range is 8-56. Lower scores indicate less urge for alcohol and higher scores indicate more urge for alcohol.

Time frame:
1 minute
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 120
score on a scaleLacosamidePlacebo Oral Capsule
Alcohol Craving: Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) Self-Administration Blocks 1 and 2, Minute 12024.94 ± 9.4525.44 ± 8.34

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 44 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lacosamide0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)7/16 (43.8%)
Placebo0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)6/16 (37.5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLacosamidePlacebo
Bright yellow urineRenal and urinary disorders2/163/16
IndigestionGastrointestinal disorders1/162/16
DrowsinessGeneral disorders1/161/16
Dry mouthGeneral disorders1/160/16
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/160/16
Mosquito bitesSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/160/16
Unpleasant taste in mouthGeneral disorders0/161/16
Mental foginessGeneral disorders0/161/16

Baseline characteristics

66 subjects were consented, 27 subjects were randomized, and 19 subjects completed the study. Three subjects that completed the study were omitted from statistical analysis due to not consuming any alcohol during either alcohol self-administration session.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Lacosamide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then LacosamideTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years7916
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Lacosamide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then LacosamideTotal
Mean34.5 ± 9.437.8 ± 8.236.4 ± 9.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Lacosamide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then LacosamideTotal
Female6814
Male112
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Lacosamide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then LacosamideTotal
Hispanic or Latino112
Not Hispanic or Latino6814
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Lacosamide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then LacosamideTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American369
White314
More than one race112
Unknown or Not Reported011
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Lacosamide Then PlaceboPlacebo Then LacosamideTotal
United States7916
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Boston University Psychiatry Research Center, Clinical Studies Unit
    Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2018 to primary completion in Aug 2020, 28 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2021, 9 months after primary completion.

Of 63 non-industry phase 1 interventional studies under Alcoholism, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 49. This study's 28 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 75 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 31, 2017
First posted
Sep 5, 2017
StartActual
Apr 15, 2018
Primary completionActual
Aug 31, 2020
CompletionActual
Aug 31, 2020
Results first posted
Jun 3, 2021
Last update
Jun 3, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 3, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03271528
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 5, 2017
Start date
Apr 15, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2020
Completion
Aug 31, 2020
Results posted
Jun 3, 2021
Last update
Jun 3, 2021

Study contacts

Eric Devine, PhD
principal investigator · Assistant Professor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lacosamide

Start the discussion