CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03264703HUMANUpdated Dec 16, 2020

Study in Patients With Moderated to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Failed to Combination Therapy of Conventional Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (cDMARDs) to cDMARD Plus ANti-TNF Versus cDMARDs in Real World

An observational study in Arthritis, Rheumatoid, sponsored by Eisai Korea Inc.. Completed at 15 sites in Korea, Republic of. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-16.

Sponsored by Eisai Korea Inc. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
212
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will be conducted to observe the disease activity change of Conventional Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (cDMARD) plus anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) from baseline to 6 months compared with cDMARDs, as measured by the disease activity score with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR).

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Keywords

  • Joint pain
  • Joint stiffness
  • Joint redness
  • Loss of joint function
  • Swollen joints
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Male and female participants diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who have no experience with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and who have experienced two or more Conventional Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (cDMARDs) of a stable dose for at least 3 months.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis within 3 years
  • Participants who have no experience with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF)
  • Participants who have experienced two or more Conventional Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (cDMARDs) of a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to informed consent
  • Participants who change the treatment regimen to one of the following according to the opinion of the investigator:

    1. One cDMARD plus anti-TNF
    2. Two or more cDMARDs: Modifications or additions of cDMARDs that have been treated prior to informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who may be pregnant or lactating women
  • Participants who have contraindication to anti-TNF
  • Participants who had participated in this study
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
212 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Participants with RA with cDMARD, but no anti-TNF experience

    Male and female participants diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who have no experience with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and who have experienced two or more Conventional Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (cDMARDs) of a stable dose for at least 3 months.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in the disease activity score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate DAS28-ESR at Month 6

    DAS28 is a quantitative tool used to measure and monitor disease activity and "the treatment" of rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28 uses a formula that includes the number of tender joints and swollen joints for a maximum of 28 joints. DAS28 is used to assess whether an individual participant has a significant improvement of the disease activity, compared to baseline. A DAS28 score greater than 5.1 implies active disease, a score less than 3.2 implies low disease activity, and a score less than 2.6 implies remission.

    Time frame: Baseline; Month 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in the DAS28-ESR at Month 3

    DAS28 is a quantitative tool used to measure and monitor disease activity and "the treatment" of rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28 uses a formula that includes the number of tender joints and swollen joints for a maximum of 28 joints. DAS28 is used to assess whether an individual participant has a significant improvement of the disease activity, compared to baseline. A DAS28 score greater than 5.1 implies active disease, a score less than 3.2 implies low disease activity, and a score less than 2.6 implies remission.

    Time frame: Baseline; Month 3

  2. Change from Baseline in the DAS28-ESR at Month 12

    DAS28 is a quantitative tool used to measure and monitor disease activity and "the treatment" of rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28 uses a formula that includes the number of tender joints and swollen joints for a maximum of 28 joints. DAS28 is used to assess whether an individual participant has a significant improvement of the disease activity, compared to baseline. A DAS28 score greater than 5.1 implies active disease, a score less than 3.2 implies low disease activity, and a score less than 2.6 implies remission.

    Time frame: Baseline; Month 12

  3. Clinical remission rate measured by DAS28-ESR

    Clinical remission is defined as no tender or swollen joints and a normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate. DAS28 will be used to measure disease activity.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  4. Success rates of dose-reduction and discontinuation of steroid(s)

    Dose reduction is defined as a reduction by more than 50% compared to baseline.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  5. Scores on the Korean Health Assessment Questionnaire (KHAQ-20), as a measure of quality of life

    The KHAQ-20 is a participant-assessed measure of health assessment comprised of 8 indices. Scores for each index range from 0 (no difficulty to do) to 3 (unable to do). The total score is a sum of the 8 index score and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

06

Study locations

15 sites
  • Eisai Trial Site # 1
    Ilsan, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of
  • Eisai Trial Site # 1
    Busan, Korea, Republic of
  • Eisai Trial Site # 2
    Busan, Korea, Republic of
  • Eisai Trial Site # 3
    Busan, Korea, Republic of
  • Eisai Trial Site # 4
    Busan, Korea, Republic of
  • Eisai Trial Site # 1
    Daegu, Korea, Republic of
  • Eisai Trial Site # 2
    Daegu, Korea, Republic of
  • Eisai Trial Site # 1
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Eisai Trial Site # 2
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Eisai Trial Site # 3
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Eisai Trial Site # 4
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Eisai Trial Site # 5
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Eisai Trial Site # 6
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Eisai Trial Site # 7
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Eisai Trial Site # 8
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03264703
Lead sponsor
Eisai Korea Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 29, 2017
Start date
Sep 11, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 17, 2019
Completion
Jul 17, 2019
Last update
Dec 16, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion