CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03264482Updated Jul 27, 2021

High Power Thulium Vaporization vs Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Treatment of BPH

An interventional study of M-TURP and THUVAP in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, sponsored by Mansoura University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to male participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-07-27.

Sponsored by Mansoura University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

the investigators plan to test Thulium laser vaporization using high power ( 200w ) Front fire vaporization compared to standard M-TURP in reduction of LUTS secondary to BPH in a prospective randomized trial.

Read the detailed description

When Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) are refractory to medical therapy and bothersome enough to warrant surgical intervention, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the historical reference-standard procedures for prostate size between 30-80 ml for years.

Over the past decade, New minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST), new medications, and novel combinations of medical therapies have expanded the number of treatment options ranging from watchful waiting to open surgery. The range of treatment options is as broad as the BPH spectrum of symptoms.

These treatment options include prostate vaporization, resection and enucleation using various energy sources , however the main theme for all these new procedures that they were done using physiological saline as an irrigant nullifying the risk of TUR syndrome.

One of the biggest changes in surgical treatment of BPH over the past 2 decades has been the introduction and use of lasers. Two-micron (Thulium) continuous-wave (CW) laser may have several advantages, including sufficient homeostasis with minimal thermal injury, more precise tissue incision, and operation in CW/pulsed modes. Pieces of the prostate are vaporized small enough to evacuate through the resectoscope sheath and use of a mechanical tissue morcellator is not required.

The introduction of the latest generation of the Thulium laser namely "200w laser " raises the expectations of the prostate vaporization.

02

Conditions studied

  • Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients' age ≥50 years
  • LUTS secondary to BOO due to BPH who failed medical treatment
  • International prostate symptom scores (IPSS) >15 and bother score (QOL) ≥ 3 (according to IPSS question 8)
  • Peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) \<15 ml/sec with at least 125 ml voided volume or Patients with acute urine retention secondary to BPH who failed trial of voiding on medical treatment.
  • ASA (American society of anaesthesiologists) score ≤3.
  • TRUS prostate size between 30-80 ml

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with neurological disorder which might affect bladder function as cerebrovascular stroke, Parkinson disease
  • Active urinary tract infection,
  • Presence of active bladder pathology (within the last 2 years)
  • Known prostate cancer patients will be excluded preoperatively on the basis of digital rectal examination, prostate specific antigen level, and TRUS imaging followed by prostate biopsies if necessary.
  • Patient has a disorder of the coagulation cascade (e.g., liver cell failure) or disorders that affect platelet count or function (e.g., von Willebrand disease) that would put the subject at risk for intraoperative or postoperative bleeding.
  • Patient is unable to discontinue anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy preoperatively (3-5 d) except for low-dose aspirin (e.g., 100 mg).
  • Patient has had an acute myocardial infarction or open-heart surgery \<180 days prior to the date of informed consent
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    THUVAP

    thulium vaporization

    Procedure: THUVAP

  • Active comparator
    M-TURP

    monopolar transurethral resection

    Procedure: M-TURP

Interventions

  • ProcedureM-TURP

    endoscopic resection of the prostatic adenoma

  • ProcedureTHUVAP

    vaporization of prostatic adenoma via THULIUM laser

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. IPSS score at 12 months .

    international prostate symptom score (both voiding \& storage symptom subscores )

    Time frame: 12 months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Urology and nephrology center
    Al Manşūrah, DK 35516, Egypt
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03264482
Lead sponsor
Mansoura University
Responsible party
Ahmed Elshal (Dr, Mansoura University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 29, 2017
Start date
May 20, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 2, 2018
Completion
Dec 1, 2020
Last update
Jul 27, 2021

Study contacts

Ahmed M. Elshal, MD
principal investigator · Mansoura University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion