ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03257319CLIN-AEROMORPHUpdated Feb 6, 2026

Inhaled vs IV Opioid Dosing for the Initial Treatment of Severe Acute Pain in the Emergency Department

A Phase 3 interventional study of inhaled titration of morphine chlorhydrate and IV placebo in Pain, Acute, Emergencies and Morphine, sponsored by University Hospital, Rouen. Completed at 20 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-06.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Rouen · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
226
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Prospective single-blind, multicenter, national, randomized, controlled trial in 15 Emergency Department to compare two ways of morphine titration. The eligible patient is included immediately after his arrival in the Emergency Department, after being questioned by the triage nurse about the presence and the intensity of pain, when the VAS is greater than 70 (or EN>7) and after written consent.

After installation into the examination room, patient is randomized in one of two parallel groups (stratified by sex and center using software) and receives one of the two treatments, either inhaled morphine + IV placebo or IV morphine+ inhaled placebo (control group).

In both groups, titration is defined by a dose of repeated boluses as long as the relief is not achieved (VAS> 30 or EN >3) and the criteria to stop titration are not met.

A 5 minutes time interval between the boluses is chosen. Each aerosol takes 5 minutes at a constant air flow, aerosol mask, plastic tubing and PVC transparent tank are used.

Thus patient receives a maximum of 3 aerosol (one aerosol every 10 minutes) and a maximum of 6 IV injections (one injection every 5 minutes) The stopping criteria, except pain relief, are linked to the occurrence of side effects and specific cares are described into the protocol (in case of severe ventilatory depression naloxone titration is provided). Exit criteria from the emergency room and from the hospital are defined. An information sheet is delivered.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Acute
  • Emergencies
  • Morphine
03

In context

Acute Pain

1,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Pain; 166 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 226 is above the median of 86 across 902 interventional studies indexed under Acute Pain.

Browse Acute Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Rouen is the lead sponsor of 418 studies on the registry; 106 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 and \<75 years old;
  • EVA ≥ 70/100 or EN ≥ 7/10;
  • Patient who received clear information from the investigator and read and signed the consent form;
  • Patient affiliated with, or beneficiary of a social security category;
  • For women:

O of childbearing age: effective (oral contraception, intrauterine device or use of condoms) O menopausal status (amenorrhoea less than 12 months before the inclusion visit) O objectivized sterility (diagnosis or surgically)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic pain (> 3 months)
  • Taking opioids longer than 10 days (including "weak" opioids tramadol and / or codeine);
  • Taking Rifampicin;
  • Impaired ability to discern, cognitive impairment;
  • Morphine-related :

O Obstructive chronic obstructive or restrictive respiratory failure known or suspected compensated or not, O to the active substance or to any of the , O Severe hepatocellular insufficiency (known or suspected), O Chronic renal failure known or suspected, O Uncontrolled epilepsy, O Cranial trauma (intracranial hypertension), O Associations with buprenorphine, nalbuphine, pentazocine and naltrexone

  • Active drug history or practice (s);
  • Evidence of reduced fracture or dislocation in emergency rooms;
  • Suspected occlusive syndrome
  • SaO2 \<95%;
  • FR \<12 / min;
  • Glasgow \<15 or other alertness disorders;
  • HR heart rate \<50 bpm and / or Auriculo-Ventricular block (PR XML File Identifier: zR6XOYKSEQ9GjQHghP8c465EwF0= Page 15/30 interval> 200 ms);
  • Arterial hypotension with systolic blood pressure TA syst \<100 mm Hg;
  • Pregnant or nursing
  • Persons deprived of their liberty by an administrative or judicial decision, a person placed under the safeguard of justice, guardianship;
  • Patients with poor comprehension of spoken or written French;
  • Patients participating in another interventional clinical study;
  • Contra-indication related to the use of saline solution
  • Contra-indications related to the use of aerosol:

O Necessity to access the face O Allergy known to plastic

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
226 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    inhaled morphine + IV placebo

    Arm A: inhaled titration of morphine chlorhydrate+ IV placebo

    Drug: inhaled titration of morphine chlorhydrate · Drug: IV placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    IV morphine +inhaled placebo

    Arm B:IV titration of morphine chlorhydrate + inhaled placebo

    Device: Inhaled placebo · Drug: IV titration of morphine chlorhydrate

Interventions

  • Druginhaled titration of morphine chlorhydrate

    Patient in arm A will receive 1 to 3 titration

    Also known as: IV placebo

  • DrugIV placebo

    Patient in arm A will receive 1 to 6 injection

    Also known as: inhaled titration of morphine chlorhydrate

  • DeviceInhaled placebo

    Patient in arm B will receive 1 to 3 titration

    Also known as: IV titration of morphine chlorhydrate

  • DrugIV titration of morphine chlorhydrate

    Patient in arm BA will receive 1 to 6 injection

    Also known as: Inhaled placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of relief obtained or "success rate" at 1 hour from the start of drug administration, and not at the end of titration, such as EVA1 ≤ 30/100 (or EN1 ≤ 3/10).

    Rate of relief obtained or "success rate" at 1 hour from the start of drug administration, and not at the end of titration, such as EVA1 ≤ 30/100 (or EN1 ≤ 3/10).

    Time frame: 1 hour after the initiation of the titration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate antalgic efficacy criteria

    Quantity of morphine administered from the beginning of the titration until the end of the titration

    Time frame: From the beginning of the titration until the end of the titration- assessed within one day

  2. Evaluate antalgic efficacy criteria

    Delay between first administration of Morphine and EVA ≤ 30 or EN ≤ 3 obtained

    Time frame: From the beginning of the titration until the end of the titration- assessed up to one day

  3. Evaluate antalgic efficacy criteria

    Delay between first administration of Morphine and EVA ≤ 30 or EN ≤ 3 obtained for patient treated only with morphine IV

    Time frame: From the beginning of the titration until the end of the titration- assessed up to one day

  4. Evaluate antalgic efficacy criteria

    Number of patients with EVA ≤ 30 or EN ≤ 3 at the end of titration

    Time frame: From the beginning of the titration until the end of the titration- assessed up to one day

  5. Evaluate antalgic efficacy criteria

    Number of patients with EVA ≤ 30 or EN ≤ 3 at 30 minutes

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the initiation of the titration

  6. Evaluate antalgic efficacy criteria

    Number of patients treated only by exclusive inhalation titration with EVA ≤ 30 or EN ≤ 3

    Time frame: From the beginning of the titration until the end of the titration- assessed up to one day

  7. Evaluate antalgic efficacy criteria

    Quantity of of co-analgesia administered from the beginning of the titration

    Time frame: From the beginning of the titration until the end of the titration- assessed up to one day

  8. Evaluate antalgic efficacy criteria

    Number of patients with EVA ≤ 30 or EN ≤ 3 after 60 minutes

    Time frame: 1hour after the initiation of the titration

  9. Evaluate antalgic efficacy criteria

    Number of patients with EVA ≤ 30 or EN ≤ 3 after 120 minutes

    Time frame: 2hours after the initiation of the titration

  10. Assess the feasibility of an aerosol titration (compliance to the protocol)

    Number of deviations from protocol

    Time frame: From the beginning of the titration until the end of the aerosol titration- within one hour after the start of the titration

  11. Safety-Proportion of Sleepy patients (Ramsay score = 3) (adverse events)

    Proportion of Sleepy patients (Ramsay score = 3)

    Time frame: Until 3hours after the end of the titration

  12. Safety- incidence of minor side effects in each arm of which neurovegetative usually known and related to opiates (nausea, vomiting, urine retention, ...)

    incidence of minor side effects in each arm of which neurovegetative usually known and related to opiates (nausea, vomiting, urine retention, ...)

    Time frame: Until 3hours after the end of the titration

  13. Safety- Proportion of serious adverse events in each arm

    Proportion of serious adverse events in each arm

    Time frame: Until 3hours after the end of the titration

07

Study locations

20 sites
  • CH Agen-Nérac
    Agen, France
  • CHI Robert Ballanger
    Aulnay-sous-Bois, France
  • AP-HP
    Bobigny, France
  • CHU Hôpitaux BORDEAUX
    Bordeaux, France
  • CHU de Caen
    Caen, France
  • CHU Gabriel Montpied
    Clermont-Ferrand, France
  • CH Eure Seine Hôpital d'Evreux
    Évreux, France
  • CHU Grenoble
    Grenoble, France
  • GH Le Havre
    Le Havre, France
  • CH Le Mans
    Le Mans, France
  • CHRU de Lille
    Lille, France
  • Hospices civils de Lyon
    Lyon, France
  • CHU Nice
    Nice, France
  • Hopital COCHIN
    Paris, France
  • Hôpital Lariboisière
    Paris, France
  • La Pitié Salpétrière
    Paris, France
  • CHU-Hôpitaux de Rouen
    Rouen, 76031, France
  • Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard
    Saint-Ouen, France
  • Chu Strasbourg
    Strasbourg, France
  • chu de Toulouse
    Toulouse, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lvovschi VE, Joly J, Lemaire N, Maignan M, Canavaggio P, Leroi AM, Tavolacci MP, Joly LM. Nebulized versus intravenous morphine titration for the initial treatment of severe acute pain in the emergency department: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective randomized and controlled trial, CLIN-AEROMORPH. Trials. 2019 Apr 11;20(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3326-3. PubMed 30975187 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2017 to primary completion in Jul 2022, 58 months.

Of 25 non-industry phase 3 interventional studies under Acute Pain, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 27. This study's 58 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 53 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 25.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 20, 2017
First posted
Aug 22, 2017
StartActual
Sep 19, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jul 29, 2022
CompletionActual
Jul 29, 2022
Last update
Feb 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03257319
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 22, 2017
Start date
Sep 19, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 29, 2022
Completion
Jul 29, 2022
Last update
Feb 6, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion