ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03255733ITUUpdated Nov 17, 2017Results posted

ITU Treatment for Chronic Epicondylitis Musculoskeletal Pain Reduction

An interventional study of Intense Therapeutic Ultrasound Treatment in Tennis Elbow, sponsored by Guided Therapy Systems. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-17.

Sponsored by Guided Therapy Systems · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2015, registered Aug 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the effectiveness, safety and patient tolerance for the use of Intense Therapeutic Ultrasound (ITU) for chronic, subcutaneous lateral Epicondylitis musculoskeletal tissue pain reduction began in July 2015 and was completed in March 2017. The More Foundation/The Core Institute: Single-blinded pivotal study for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis. A total 29 patients received 2 treatments, 4 weeks apart on subcutaneous musculoskeletal tissues along with Standard of Care treatments as prescribed by the Principal Investigator. Patients were followed for up to 6 months after the first treatment receiving a physical exam at each follow-up visit (4, 8 and 12 weeks) and provided feedback via Patient/Subject Reported Outcome Measure surveys specific to the treated anatomy at each visit and via phone follow-up at 26 weeks after the first treatment.

Read the detailed description

Intense therapeutic ultrasound (ITU) is an established ultrasound based therapy in which sound waves are concentrated and focused into selected musculoskeletal tissue, to produce selective thermal coagulative changes over a small controlled area while leaving the surrounding tissue unaffected. These coagulative changes are known to begin the body's tissue response cascade and promote collagen generation in the targeted anatomy resulting in pain reduction.

ITU has been used clinically for treating the subcutaneous musculoskeletal tissue below facial skin for the past decade and it has received CE Mark and FDA 510(k) clearance to market for non-surgical brow and submental tissue lifting. Over 3 Million patients worldwide have been treated using this technology. Clinical studies have shown that 85% of patients receiving this treatment on facial skin tissue showed an improvement in facial lifting with no significant pain, erythema, inflammation or scarring by creating the same coagulative changes to the connective tissue under the skin. Histologically, it has been shown that ITU induces the production of dermal collagen with thickening of the dermis and straightening of the elastic fibers in the reticular dermis.

On-going research in laboratory studies has shown that ITU can improve healing of damaged Achilles tendon in a rabbit model. Preliminary results showed an increase in precursor markers for collagen regeneration (e.g. Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFa), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), Interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), and Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ1)) and subsequent increase in collagen formation in injured rabbit tendons treated with ITU compared to injured, untreated rabbit tendons.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tennis Elbow

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis
  • Tennis Elbow
  • Intense Therapeutic Ultrasound (ITU)
  • Guided Therapy Systems (GTS)
  • Ardent Sound, Inc.
  • Actisound
03

In context

Tennis Elbow

297 studies on the registry are indexed under Tennis Elbow; 63 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 50 across 263 interventional studies indexed under Tennis Elbow.

Browse Tennis Elbow studies →

Lead sponsor

Guided Therapy Systems is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic Pain (>90 days) from previously diagnosed Lateral Epicondylitis, where "Standard of Care" regimens failed to relief pain in the affected anatomy.
  • No History of surgery to the affected anatomy.
  • No alternative treatment procedures within the last 90 days.
  • Unilateral Pain
  • Willingness to complete treatment and post treatment regimen as described.
  • Patients who have provided written and verbal informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients currently enrolled in any other non-conservative, device, or Investigational New Device (IND) clinical trial, or who have participated in a clinical study involving the Common Extensor Tendon, thirty days prior to study initiation;
  • Patients who have participated in any other clinical study involving an investigational product 30 days prior to enrollment that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, could affect the outcome of this study;
  • Patients who have received previous treatment in the symptomatic limb (not including conservative treatment);
  • At the Principal Investigator's discretion, any patient that should be excluded based on their current condition or medical history.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intense Therapeutic Ultrasound Treatment

    Intense Therapeutic Ultrasound applied along and length and width of the Common Extensor Tendon. 80, 1 Joule pulses were applied twice, four weeks apart.

    Device: Intense Therapeutic Ultrasound Treatment

Interventions

  • DeviceIntense Therapeutic Ultrasound Treatment

    Also known as: Guided Therapy Systems, Ardent Sound, GTS, ITU, Actisound

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients Reporting at Least 25% Overall Pain Reduction

    Percentage of Patients Reporting at least 25% pain reduction compared to baseline, using Universal Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score. VAS is a 10-point Pain Scale, where 0 = No Pain, 1 = Slight Pain and 10 = the Patients Worst Imaginable Pain. Scales in between represent 10% increments of Pain ( Range 1 - 10).

    Time frame: 12 weeks after 1st Treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Average Pain Score Change as Reported Using Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation, During Normal Activities

    Average Percentage of Pain Change as Reported using Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Survey, compared to baseline. Range (± 100%)

    Time frame: 12 weeks after 1st Treatment

07

Results

Posted Nov 17, 2017
Limitations and caveats
While the protocol involved Chronic patients, who had already failed Standard of Care regimens, it is a limitation for this investigational study to have no control group.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntense Therapeutic Ultrasound Treatment
Started29
Completed25
Not completed4
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up4

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Patients Reporting at Least 25% Overall Pain Reduction

Percentage of Patients Reporting at least 25% pain reduction compared to baseline, using Universal Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score. VAS is a 10-point Pain Scale, where 0 = No Pain, 1 = Slight Pain and 10 = the Patients Worst Imaginable Pain. Scales in between represent 10% increments of Pain ( Range 1 - 10).

Time frame:
12 weeks after 1st Treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients with less pain
Percentage of Patients Reporting at Least 25% Overall Pain Reduction
percentage of patients with less painIntense Therapeutic Ultrasound Treatment
Percentage of Patients Reporting at Least 25% Overall Pain Reduction88
SecondaryAverage Pain Score Change as Reported Using Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation, During Normal Activities

Average Percentage of Pain Change as Reported using Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Survey, compared to baseline. Range (± 100%)

Time frame:
12 weeks after 1st Treatment
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of reported pain change
Average Pain Score Change as Reported Using Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation, During Normal Activities
percentage of reported pain changeIntense Therapeutic Ultrasound Treatment
Average Pain Score Change as Reported Using Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation, During Normal Activities-58 (-100 to 100)

Adverse events

Collected over 2 Years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intense Therapeutic Ultrasound Treatment0/29 (0%)0/29 (0%)0/29 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Intense Therapeutic Ultrasound Treatment
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years28
>=65 years1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intense Therapeutic Ultrasound Treatment
Female12
Male17
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Intense Therapeutic Ultrasound Treatment
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Intense Therapeutic Ultrasound Treatment
United States29
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The More Foundation
    Phoenix, Arizona 85023, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • White WM, Makin IR, Barthe PG, Slayton MH, Gliklich RE. Selective creation of thermal injury zones in the superficial musculoaponeurotic system using intense ultrasound therapy: a new target for noninvasive facial rejuvenation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Jan-Feb;9(1):22-9. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.9.1.22. PubMed 17224484 ↗
  • Alam M, White LE, Martin N, Witherspoon J, Yoo S, West DP. Ultrasound tightening of facial and neck skin: a rater-blinded prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Feb;62(2):262-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.039. PubMed 20115948 ↗
  • Gliklich RE, White WM, Slayton MH, Barthe PG, Makin IR. Clinical pilot study of intense ultrasound therapy to deep dermal facial skin and subcutaneous tissues. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;9(2):88-95. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.9.2.88. PubMed 17372061 ↗
  • Laubach HJ, Makin IR, Barthe PG, Slayton MH, Manstein D. Intense focused ultrasound: evaluation of a new treatment modality for precise microcoagulation within the skin. Dermatol Surg. 2008 May;34(5):727-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34196.x. PubMed 18429926 ↗
  • Molloy T, Wang Y, Murrell G. The roles of growth factors in tendon and ligament healing. Sports Med. 2003;33(5):381-94. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200333050-00004. PubMed 12696985 ↗
  • Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013 Apr;35(2):121-6. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.116232. PubMed 24049221 ↗
  • DiGiovanni BF, Nawoczenski DA, Lintal ME, Moore EA, Murray JC, Wilding GE, Baumhauer JF. Tissue-specific plantar fascia-stretching exercise enhances outcomes in patients with chronic heel pain. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jul;85(7):1270-7. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200307000-00013. PubMed 12851352 ↗
  • Rompe JD, Overend TJ, MacDermid JC. Validation of the Patient-rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire. J Hand Ther. 2007 Jan-Mar;20(1):3-10; quiz 11. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2006.10.003. PubMed 17254903 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · May 4, 2015
  • Statistical analysis plan · Mar 2, 2015
  • Informed consent form · Mar 2, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2015 to primary completion in Mar 2017, 19 months.

Results were first posted in Nov 2017, 8 months after primary completion.

Of 150 interventional studies with no phase under Tennis Elbow, half reached primary completion within 9 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 22. This study's 19 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 10, 2017
First posted
Aug 21, 2017
StartActual
Jul 14, 2015
Primary completionActual
Mar 13, 2017
CompletionActual
Mar 13, 2017
Results first posted
Nov 17, 2017
Last update
Nov 17, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 17, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03255733
Lead sponsor
Guided Therapy Systems
Collaborators
More Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 21, 2017
Start date
Jul 14, 2015
Primary completion
Mar 13, 2017
Completion
Mar 13, 2017
Results posted
Nov 17, 2017
Last update
Nov 17, 2017

Study contacts

John A Kearney, MD
principal investigator · The More Foundataion

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion