CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03254420RCMIGIUpdated Jun 23, 2026Results posted

Evaluation of Late Toxicity Following Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Two Image-Guided Strategies With Corresponding Treatment Margins.

An interventional study of Calypso beacon implant and moderate hypofractionation Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-23.

Sponsored by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
74
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The Calypso® System (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) is a recent technology using electromagnetic transponders implanted within the prostate. It is a real-time target tracking system that takes into account both inter- and intrafractional target motion. So the exact position and movement of the prostate can be determined during radiation therapy treatment.

The aim of this study is to assess pelvic late toxicity rate after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) when using the Calypso® System with a reduction of treatment margins. In this randomized study, patients will receive IGRT treatment using the Calypso system or a conventional IGRT treatment.

Read the detailed description

Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer in men. Radiotherapy is one of the reference treatments for localized prostate cancer. Prostate was initially thought to be a non-moving target, but the newest reports have raised the contrary as evidence. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is a current standard treatment for localized prostate cancer which enables to take into account interfractional prostate motion before treatment.

The Calypso® System (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) is a recent technology using electromagnetic transponders implanted within the prostate. It is a real-time target tracking system that takes into account both inter- and intrafractional target motion. So the exact position and movement of the prostate can be determined during radiation therapy treatment.

As Planned Target Volume (PTV) margins integrate set-up margins and the management of organ motion, margin reduction can reasonably be considered in case of target motion management improvement.

To date, no prospective randomized clinical data is available using this technique for the treatment of low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients with modern standard fractionation radiotherapy and image guidance.

The aim of this study is to assess pelvic late toxicity rate after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) when using the Calypso® System with a reduction of treatment margins. In this randomized study, patients will receive IGRT treatment using the Calypso system or a conventional IGRT treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Localized prostate cancer, histologically proven.
  • No evidence of metastases (M0). No evidence of lymph nodes involvement (N0) (bilateral lymph node dissection is not mandatory if lymph node involvement risk is low according to the Partin tables).
  • Low-risk or intermediate clinical stage according to the D'Amico classification (T1-T2 and Gleason \< 8 and PSA \< 20 ng/ml) (appendix 3).
  • No grade > 2 urinary or rectal clinical sign or symptom according to the CTCAE V4.03 scale.
  • Performance status ECOG ≤ 1.
  • No hip prosthesis or metallic vascular graft near the prostate.
  • No endopenian stent.
  • No pace maker, implanted defibrillator or neurostimulator.
  • No allergy to local anesthetics.
  • No irreversible anticoagulation or antiplatelet treatment for the implantation period.
  • Pelvic and abdominal anatomy compatible with the use of the Calypso® system (predictive detector to fiducials distance less than 19 cm, evaluated on planning CT-scan) (distance from skin surface to prostate center less than 17 cm).
  • Patient aged ≥ 18 and less than 80 years old.
  • Dated and signed written informed consent available.
  • Patients must be affiliated to a French Social Security System.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Indication of pelvic nodes irradiation.
  • Prior pelvic irradiation.
  • Biopsy-proven seminal vesicle invasion.
  • Prior bilateral orchiectomy.
  • Prior radical prostatectomy.
  • Other malignancy except adequately-treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin or other malignancy from which the patient has been disease-free for at least 5 years.
  • Psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial.
  • Other uncontrolled systemic disease (cardiovascular, renal, liver, pulmonary embolism, etc.).
  • Known VIH positive patients (no specific test needed).
  • Known homozygote ATM Mutation (Ataxia telengiectasia).
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
74 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) with standard margins

    moderate hypofractionation during 4 weeks

    Radiation: moderate hypofractionation Radiotherapy

  • Experimental
    Calypso tracking system with margin reduction

    moderate hypofractionation during 4 weeks after calypso beacon implant 10 days before

    Device: Calypso beacon implant · Radiation: moderate hypofractionation Radiotherapy

Interventions

  • DeviceCalypso beacon implant

    Calypso beacon implant before radiotherapy

  • Radiationmoderate hypofractionation Radiotherapy

    moderate hypofractionation Radiotherapy

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of Grade > 2 Late Pelvic Toxicities

    assessment of grade \> 2 late pelvic toxicities between 3 months and 2 years after radiation period

    Time frame: between 3 months and 2 years after radiation period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Biological Relapse-free Survival

    evaluate at 5 years with PSA dosage

    Time frame: at 5 years after the radiotherapy

  2. Uncomplicated Survival (Local Recurrence or Metastatic Recurrence)

    evaluate et 5 years after the treatment with radiological exam

    Time frame: at 5 years after the radiotherapy

  3. Overall Survival

    number of death from baseline to 5 years after the treatment

    Time frame: from the baseline to 5 years after the radiotherapy

06

Results

Posted Feb 6, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneImage-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) With Standard MarginsCalypso Tracking System With Margin Reduction
Started2945
Completed2644
Not completed31

Outcome measures

PrimaryAssessment of Grade > 2 Late Pelvic Toxicities

assessment of grade \> 2 late pelvic toxicities between 3 months and 2 years after radiation period

Time frame:
between 3 months and 2 years after radiation period
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Assessment of Grade > 2 Late Pelvic Toxicities
ParticipantsImage-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) With Standard MarginsCalypso Tracking System With Margin Reduction
failure55
success2139
SecondaryBiological Relapse-free Survival

evaluate at 5 years with PSA dosage

Time frame:
at 5 years after the radiotherapy
Reported as:
Number · participants
Biological Relapse-free Survival
participantsImage-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) With Standard MarginsCalypso Tracking System With Margin Reduction
Biological Relapse-free Survival2637
SecondaryUncomplicated Survival (Local Recurrence or Metastatic Recurrence)

evaluate et 5 years after the treatment with radiological exam

Time frame:
at 5 years after the radiotherapy
Reported as:
Number · participants
Uncomplicated Survival (Local Recurrence or Metastatic Recurrence)
participantsImage-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) With Standard MarginsCalypso Tracking System With Margin Reduction
Uncomplicated Survival (Local Recurrence or Metastatic Recurrence)2641
SecondaryOverall Survival

number of death from baseline to 5 years after the treatment

Time frame:
from the baseline to 5 years after the radiotherapy
Reported as:
Number · participants
Overall Survival
participantsImage-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) With Standard MarginsCalypso Tracking System With Margin Reduction
Overall Survival02

Adverse events

Collected over adverse event data were collected from the baseline to 5 years after the radiotherapy. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Image-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) With Standard Margins0/26 (0%)2/26 (7.7%)26/26 (100%)
Calypso Tracking System With Margin Reduction2/44 (4.5%)9/44 (20.5%)44/44 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventImage-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) With Standard MarginsCalypso Tracking System With Margin Reduction
prostatitis grade 3Reproductive system and breast disorders0/262/44
hemovhromatosisMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/260/44
lithiasis choledocholithiasis grade 3Hepatobiliary disorders1/260/44
thrombocytopenia grade 4Blood and lymphatic system disorders0/261/44
basela cell carcinoma grade 2Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/261/44
vascular stent stenosis grade 3General disorders0/261/44
peripheral artery stenosis grade 3Vascular disorders0/261/44
malignant melanoma grade 2Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/261/44
colon cancer metastatic grade 5Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/261/44
cerebral hematoma grade 3Nervous system disorders0/261/44
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent other events
EventImage-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) With Standard MarginsCalypso Tracking System With Margin Reduction
renal and urinary disordersRenal and urinary disorders26/2642/44
reproductive system and breast disordersReproductive system and breast disorders19/2631/44
gastrointestinal disordersGastrointestinal disorders16/2628/44
general disorders and reaction at the site of administrationGeneral disorders10/2613/44
vascular disordersVascular disorders8/2610/44
psychiatric disordersPsychiatric disorders6/2613/44
neoplasms malignantNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/264/44
skin and cubcutaneous tissue disordersSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/261/44
musculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/262/44
ocular infectionEye disorders1/260/44

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Image-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) With Standard MarginsCalypso Tracking System With Margin ReductionTotal
Mean68 (52 to 78)70 (51 to 78)69.5 (51 to 78)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Image-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) With Standard MarginsCalypso Tracking System With Margin ReductionTotal
Female000
Male294574
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Image-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) With Standard MarginsCalypso Tracking System With Margin ReductionTotal
Count of participants——0
07

Study locations

1 site
  • Institut regional du Cancer - Val d Aurelle
    Montpellier, 34298, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jereczek-Fossa BA, Orecchia R. Evidence-based radiation oncology: definitive, adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2007 Aug;84(2):197-215. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.04.013. Epub 2007 May 29. PubMed 17532494 ↗
  • Zaorsky NG, Harrison AS, Trabulsi EJ, Gomella LG, Showalter TN, Hurwitz MD, Dicker AP, Den RB. Evolution of advanced technologies in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Nat Rev Urol. 2013 Oct;10(10):565-79. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.185. Epub 2013 Sep 10. PubMed 24018567 ↗
  • Budaus L, Bolla M, Bossi A, Cozzarini C, Crook J, Widmark A, Wiegel T. Functional outcomes and complications following radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol. 2012 Jan;61(1):112-27. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.027. Epub 2011 Oct 6. PubMed 22001105 ↗
  • Ohri N, Dicker AP, Showalter TN. Late toxicity rates following definitive radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Can J Urol. 2012 Aug;19(4):6373-80. PubMed 22892261 ↗
  • Pardo Y, Guedea F, Aguilo F, Fernandez P, Macias V, Marino A, Hervas A, Herruzo I, Ortiz MJ, Ponce de Leon J, Craven-Bratle J, Suarez JF, Boladeras A, Pont A, Ayala A, Sancho G, Martinez E, Alonso J, Ferrer M. Quality-of-life impact of primary treatments for localized prostate cancer in patients without hormonal treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4687-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3245. Epub 2010 Oct 4. PubMed 20921463 ↗
  • de Crevoisier R, Fiorino C, Dubray B. [Dosimetric factors predictive of late toxicity in prostate cancer radiotherapy]. Cancer Radiother. 2010 Oct;14(6-7):460-8. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2010.07.225. Epub 2010 Aug 24. French. PubMed 20797890 ↗
  • Valdagni R, Rancati T, Fiorino C. Predictive models of toxicity with external radiotherapy for prostate cancer: clinical issues. Cancer. 2009 Jul 1;115(13 Suppl):3141-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24356. PubMed 19544543 ↗
  • Yu JB. Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Further Evidence to Tip the Scales. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 10;35(17):1867-1869. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7016. Epub 2017 Mar 29. No abstract available. PubMed 28355114 ↗
  • Dearnaley D, Syndikus I, Mossop H, Khoo V, Birtle A, Bloomfield D, Graham J, Kirkbride P, Logue J, Malik Z, Money-Kyrle J, O'Sullivan JM, Panades M, Parker C, Patterson H, Scrase C, Staffurth J, Stockdale A, Tremlett J, Bidmead M, Mayles H, Naismith O, South C, Gao A, Cruickshank C, Hassan S, Pugh J, Griffin C, Hall E; CHHiP Investigators. Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1047-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30102-4. Epub 2016 Jun 20. PubMed 27339115 ↗
  • Lee WR, Dignam JJ, Amin MB, Bruner DW, Low D, Swanson GP, Shah AB, D'Souza DP, Michalski JM, Dayes IS, Seaward SA, Hall WA, Nguyen PL, Pisansky TM, Faria SL, Chen Y, Koontz BF, Paulus R, Sandler HM. Randomized Phase III Noninferiority Study Comparing Two Radiotherapy Fractionation Schedules in Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 10;34(20):2325-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.0448. Epub 2016 Apr 4. PubMed 27044935 ↗
  • Incrocci L, Wortel RC, Alemayehu WG, Aluwini S, Schimmel E, Krol S, van der Toorn PP, Jager H, Heemsbergen W, Heijmen B, Pos F. Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1061-1069. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30070-5. Epub 2016 Jun 20. PubMed 27339116 ↗
  • Arcangeli G, Saracino B, Arcangeli S, Gomellini S, Petrongari MG, Sanguineti G, Strigari L. Moderate Hypofractionation in High-Risk, Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer: Final Results of a Phase III Randomized Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 10;35(17):1891-1897. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.4189. Epub 2017 Mar 29. PubMed 28355113 ↗
  • Catton CN, Lukka H, Gu CS, Martin JM, Supiot S, Chung PWM, Bauman GS, Bahary JP, Ahmed S, Cheung P, Tai KH, Wu JS, Parliament MB, Tsakiridis T, Corbett TB, Tang C, Dayes IS, Warde P, Craig TK, Julian JA, Levine MN. Randomized Trial of a Hypofractionated Radiation Regimen for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 10;35(17):1884-1890. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.7397. Epub 2017 Mar 15. PubMed 28296582 ↗
  • Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet J, Henry AM, van der Kwast TH, Lam TB, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Moris L, Oprea-Lager DE, van der Poel HG, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, Wiegel T, Willemse PM, Cornford P. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Nov 7. PubMed 33172724 ↗
  • Rodin D, Tawk B, Mohamad O, Grover S, Moraes FY, Yap ML, Zubizarreta E, Lievens Y. Hypofractionated radiotherapy in the real-world setting: An international ESTRO-GIRO survey. Radiother Oncol. 2021 Apr;157:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Jan 14. PubMed 33453312 ↗
  • Chapet O, Decullier E, Bin S, Faix A, Ruffion A, Jalade P, Fenoglietto P, Udrescu C, Enachescu C, Azria D. Prostate hypofractionated radiation therapy with injection of hyaluronic acid: acute toxicities in a phase 2 study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Mar 15;91(4):730-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.11.027. PubMed 25752385 ↗
  • Palombarini M, Mengoli S, Fantazzini P, Cadioli C, Degli Esposti C, Frezza GP. Analysis of inter-fraction setup errors and organ motion by daily kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography in intensity modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2012 Apr 2;7:56. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-56. PubMed 22472040 ↗
  • Tanyi JA, He T, Summers PA, Mburu RG, Kato CM, Rhodes SM, Hung AY, Fuss M. Assessment of planning target volume margins for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the prostate gland: role of daily inter- and intrafraction motion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Dec 1;78(5):1579-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 May 14. PubMed 20472357 ↗
  • Nguyen NP, Davis R, Bose SR, Dutta S, Vinh-Hung V, Chi A, Godinez J, Desai A, Woods W, Altdorfer G, D'Andrea M, Karlsson U, Vo RA, Sroka T; International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group. Potential applications of image-guided radiotherapy for radiation dose escalation in patients with early stage high-risk prostate cancer. Front Oncol. 2015 Feb 2;5:18. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00018. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25699239 ↗
  • Crehange G, Martin E, Supiot S, Chapet O, Mazoyer F, Naudy S, Maingon P. [Image-guided radiotherapy in prostate cancer: concepts and implications]. Cancer Radiother. 2012 Sep;16(5-6):430-8. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2012.07.183. Epub 2012 Aug 23. French. PubMed 22921961 ↗
  • Bernchou U, Agergaard SN, Brink C. Radiopaque marker motion during pre-treatment CBCT as a predictor of intra-fractional prostate movement. Acta Oncol. 2013 Aug;52(6):1168-74. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.747698. Epub 2012 Dec 17. PubMed 23244674 ↗
  • Badakhshi H, Wust P, Budach V, Graf R. Image-guided radiotherapy with implanted markers and kilovoltage imaging and 6-dimensional position corrections for intrafractional motion of the prostate. Anticancer Res. 2013 Sep;33(9):4117-21. PubMed 24023358 ↗
  • Tong X, Chen X, Li J, Xu Q, Lin MH, Chen L, Price RA, Ma CM. Intrafractional prostate motion during external beam radiotherapy monitored by a real-time target localization system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Mar 8;16(2):5013. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5013. PubMed 26103174 ↗
  • Das S, Liu T, Jani AB, Rossi P, Shelton J, Shi Z, Khan MK. Comparison of image-guided radiotherapy technologies for prostate cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec;37(6):616-23. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31827e4eb9. PubMed 23428948 ↗
  • Foster RD, Pistenmaa DA, Solberg TD. A comparison of radiographic techniques and electromagnetic transponders for localization of the prostate. Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jun 21;7:101. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-101. PubMed 22720845 ↗
  • Korreman S, Rasch C, McNair H, Verellen D, Oelfke U, Maingon P, Mijnheer B, Khoo V. The European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology-European Institute of Radiotherapy (ESTRO-EIR) report on 3D CT-based in-room image guidance systems: a practical and technical review and guide. Radiother Oncol. 2010 Feb;94(2):129-44. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Feb 12. PubMed 20153908 ↗
  • Santanam L, Malinowski K, Hubenshmidt J, Dimmer S, Mayse ML, Bradley J, Chaudhari A, Lechleiter K, Goddu SK, Esthappan J, Mutic S, Low DA, Parikh P. Fiducial-based translational localization accuracy of electromagnetic tracking system and on-board kilovoltage imaging system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Mar 1;70(3):892-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.005. PubMed 18262100 ↗
  • Langen KM, Willoughby TR, Meeks SL, Santhanam A, Cunningham A, Levine L, Kupelian PA. Observations on real-time prostate gland motion using electromagnetic tracking. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jul 15;71(4):1084-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.054. Epub 2008 Feb 14. PubMed 18280057 ↗
  • Willoughby TR, Kupelian PA, Pouliot J, Shinohara K, Aubin M, Roach M 3rd, Skrumeda LL, Balter JM, Litzenberg DW, Hadley SW, Wei JT, Sandler HM. Target localization and real-time tracking using the Calypso 4D localization system in patients with localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jun 1;65(2):528-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.050. PubMed 16690435 ↗
  • Mayyas E, Chetty IJ, Chetvertkov M, Wen N, Neicu T, Nurushev T, Ren L, Lu M, Stricker H, Pradhan D, Movsas B, Elshaikh MA. Evaluation of multiple image-based modalities for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate carcinoma: a prospective study. Med Phys. 2013 Apr;40(4):041707. doi: 10.1118/1.4794502. PubMed 23556877 ↗
  • Noel C, Parikh PJ, Roy M, Kupelian P, Mahadevan A, Weinstein G, Enke C, Flores N, Beyer D, Levine L. Prediction of intrafraction prostate motion: accuracy of pre- and post-treatment imaging and intermittent imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Mar 1;73(3):692-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.076. Epub 2008 Aug 7. PubMed 18692324 ↗
  • Zhu M, Bharat S, Michalski JM, Gay HA, Hou WH, Parikh PJ. Adaptive radiation therapy for postprostatectomy patients using real-time electromagnetic target motion tracking during external beam radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 15;85(4):1038-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 25. PubMed 23021439 ↗
  • Su Z, Zhang L, Murphy M, Williamson J. Analysis of prostate patient setup and tracking data: potential intervention strategies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 1;81(3):880-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.1978. Epub 2010 Oct 8. PubMed 20934274 ↗
  • Kupelian P, Willoughby T, Mahadevan A, Djemil T, Weinstein G, Jani S, Enke C, Solberg T, Flores N, Liu D, Beyer D, Levine L. Multi-institutional clinical experience with the Calypso System in localization and continuous, real-time monitoring of the prostate gland during external radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 15;67(4):1088-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.026. Epub 2006 Dec 21. PubMed 17187940 ↗
  • Klayton T, Price R, Buyyounouski MK, Sobczak M, Greenberg R, Li J, Keller L, Sopka D, Kutikov A, Horwitz EM. Prostate bed motion during intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Sep 1;84(1):130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.041. Epub 2012 Feb 11. PubMed 22330987 ↗
  • Mantz C. A Phase II Trial of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Using a Non-Robotic Linear Accelerator and Real-Time Target Tracking: Report of Toxicity, Quality of Life, and Disease Control Outcomes with 5-Year Minimum Follow-Up. Front Oncol. 2014 Nov 14;4:279. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00279. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25452933 ↗
  • Sandler HM, Liu PY, Dunn RL, Khan DC, Tropper SE, Sanda MG, Mantz CA. Reduction in patient-reported acute morbidity in prostate cancer patients treated with 81-Gy Intensity-modulated radiotherapy using reduced planning target volume margins and electromagnetic tracking: assessing the impact of margin reduction study. Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1004-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.072. Epub 2010 Feb 13. PubMed 20153881 ↗
  • Ozsahin M, Crompton NE, Gourgou S, Kramar A, Li L, Shi Y, Sozzi WJ, Zouhair A, Mirimanoff RO, Azria D. CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocyte apoptosis can predict radiation-induced late toxicity: a prospective study in 399 patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Oct 15;11(20):7426-33. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2634. PubMed 16243816 ↗
  • Azria D, Betz M, Bourgier C, Jeanneret Sozzi W, Ozsahin M. Identifying patients at risk for late radiation-induced toxicity. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012 Dec;84 Suppl 1:e35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Sep 24. PubMed 20869261 ↗
  • Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365. PubMed 8433390 ↗
  • Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997 Jun;49(6):822-30. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00238-0. PubMed 9187685 ↗
  • Nyaga VN, Arbyn M, Aerts M. Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health. 2014 Nov 10;72(1):39. doi: 10.1186/2049-3258-72-39. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25810908 ↗
  • Riou O, Fenoglietto P, Jarlier M, Prunaretty J, Ailleres N, Poinas G, Debuire P, Gourgou S, Meignant L, Segui B, Llacer Moscardo C, Charissoux M, Azria D. Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy with reduced margins in patients with prostate cancer: Results of the RCMIGI randomized phase II trial. Radiother Oncol. 2026 Feb;215:111322. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2025.111322. Epub 2025 Dec 7. PubMed 41365376 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 22, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All data will be available after publication of the results in peer-reviewed revues, and in national and international meetings. It includes all de-identified participants' data, the study protocol, the statistical analysis plan and the clinical study report. The corresponding author will provide data and datasets generated and/or analyzed during the study upon reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03254420
Lead sponsor
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 18, 2017
Start date
Aug 30, 2016
Primary completion
Sep 15, 2022
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Results posted
Feb 6, 2025
Last update
Jun 23, 2026

Study contacts

Riou Olivier
study chair · Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion