ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03254394Updated Mar 9, 2022Results posted

Lidocaine for Oxaliplatin-induced Neuropathy

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Lidocaine Hydrochloride and Placebo in Neuropathy, Painful, Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy and Colorectal Cancer, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-09.

Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy is a major dose-limiting side effect in patients with colorectal cancer treated with the FOLFOX chemotherapy regimen. Hypersensitivity to cold is the sensory hallmark of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy, and it can predict the development of long-term neuropathy. In this study, the investigators aim to determine whether intravenous lidocaine can prevent oxaliplatin-induced cold hypersensitivity.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States, with an estimated incidence of 130.000 cases per year. Oxaliplatin is the first-line chemotherapy regimen for gastro-intestinal cancers. Despite its efficacy, oxaliplatin causes peripheral neuropathy in 72% of the treated patients. Acute oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy [OIPN] is the most common dose-limiting side effect of oxaliplatin and characterized by profound cold allodynia in the extremities. In about 21% of the patients acute OIPN exacerbates into chronic neuropathic pain, which is treatment resistant to currently approved drugs, pointing towards a great need to identify an effective strategy in preventing OIPN. Recent literature suggests that certain methods of assessing sensory nerve function in neuropathic pain patients may provide a prediction to an individual analgesic response; however, no placebo-controlled studies have been performed with the primary goal of identifying treatment response predictors in preventing OIPN.

In this pilot study we will both determine the tolerability and the efficacy of intravenous Lidocaine, for preventing oxaliplatin-induced cold hypersensitivity in the setting of mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer.

The proposed study will be conducted in two phases. The tolerability phase is an open-label study to determine the tolerable dose regimen of IV lidocaine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving oxaliplatin chemotherapy. The efficacy pilot phase is a randomized, double-blinded, controlled study comparing the outcomes between IV lidocaine versus placebo in the same setting of colorectal cancer. Consented subjects will attend a screening visit and six intervention visits, during which they will undergo sensory testing and receive intravenous lidocaine or placebo infusion. Cold hypersensitivity and spontaneous pain will be assessed at baseline, daily for 12 weeks and at follow-up visits. At enrollment, each patient will be assigned a study number, which will match a previously prepared computer-generated list of randomization numbers to determine the interventions lidocaine or placebo. The participants and all other study personnel will be blinded to the treatment allocation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neuropathy, Painful
  • Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
  • Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

  • Oxaliplatin
  • Cold hypersensitivity
  • Neuropathy
  • Colorectal cancer
  • CIPN
  • Neuropathic Pain
03

In context

Neuropathy, Painful

23 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuropathy, Painful; 2 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 63 across 17 interventional studies indexed under Neuropathy, Painful.

Browse Neuropathy, Painful studies →

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 1,803 studies on the registry; 271 are open to participants now.

Of its 329 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 216 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Stage III and IV colorectal cancer.
  • Scheduled for oxaliplatin treatment in mFOLFOX6-based chemotherapy regimen.
  • Able to understand and willing to sign an IRB-approved written document.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Renal insufficiency (defined as calculated \< 30mL/min)
  • Moderate to severe liver failure (defined as or AST > 3 times if no liver are present; ALT or AST > 5 times upper limit of normal if liver metastases are present).
  • Presence of .
  • Patients with currently uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias (non-sinus rhythm).
  • Patients with history of arrhythmias under pharmacological/pacemaker control will be allowed, except if receiving antiarrhythmic medication listed in " medications".
  • Contraindication or allergy to intravenous lidocaine.
  • Pre-existing symmetric peripheral painful neuropathy.
  • Treated with chemotherapy within the past 12 months.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Currently treated with any of the following contraindicated medications: Saquinavir, Lopinavir, Amprenavir, Atazanavir, Delavirdine, Mexiletine (and other types of sodium-channel blocker antiarrhythmics), Phenytoin, Carbamazepine, Oxcarbazepine, Lamotrigine, Amiodarone, Dronedarone, Dihydroergotamine, Cimetidine
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo + FOLFOX

    Intravenous infusion of D5W solution over a 130 minute period. FOLFOX: Oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 IV over 2h, Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 2h, 5-FU 400mg/m2 IV bolus, followed by a 1200mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 2 days.

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: FOLFOX regimen

  • Active comparator
    Lidocaine + FOLFOX

    Intravenous infusion of lidocaine hydrochloride solution in D5W over a 130 minute period. FOLFOX: Oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 IV over 2h, Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 2h, 5-FU 400mg/m2 IV bolus, followed by a 1200mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 2 days.

    Drug: Lidocaine Hydrochloride · Drug: FOLFOX regimen

Interventions

  • Intravenous lidocaine will be dosed as a brief 1 mg/kg infusion (based on Ideal Body Weight (IBW)) over 10 minutes, followed by a 0.04 mg/kg/min infusion over additional 120 minutes, resulting in a total dose of 5.8 mg/kg IBW. If this dose is tolerable in four consecutive sessions of mFOLFOX6 in six or more of the eight patients in the tolerability phase, we will initiate the randomized efficacy pilot study.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Dextrose 5% in water will be administered as active comparator.

  • Each cycle (repeated every 14 days): Oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 IV over 2h, Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 2h, 5-FU 400mg/m2 IV bolus, followed by a 1200mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 2 days.

    Also known as: mFOLFOX6

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Intensity of Oxaliplatin-induced Cold Pain/Unpleasantness vs Time

    The intensity of cold pain and cold unpleasantness is evaluated separately, assessed daily on a 0-10 scale, upon holding a pre-cooled (\~8°C) metal cylinder for 10 seconds. the area under the curve of cold pain and cold unpleasantness vs time is calculated per chemotherapy cycle (every two weeks) and serves as a primary outcome measure. For intervention (lidocaine+FOLFOX) and control (placebo+FOLFOX) groups, the average of cold pain AUC and cold unpleasantness AUC over 7 cycles was calculated. The average AUCs over 7 cycles were compared between study arms. The AUC is measured as a score on a 0-10 scale multiplied by 14 days and may range between 0 and 140. Higher AUC values represent more intense cold pain/unpleasantness.

    Time frame: 14 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. CIPN Score on EORTC QLQ-CIPN20

    Change in CIPN (Chemotherapy-induced peripheral Neuropathy) score (on EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 tool ) from baseline to the Cycle 6 (12 weeks), and from baseline to last follow-up (34-36 weeks). EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (worst symptoms). A higher score represents worse neuropathy. The changes in scores are compared between study arms. EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 tool is a quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for evaluation of CIPN.

    Time frame: 12 weeks and 34-36 weeks

  2. Changes in NPSI Score.

    Changes in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) descriptors of neuropathic pain over time from baseline to cycle 3(6 weeks), cycle 6 (12 weeks), and the last follow-up (34-36 weeks). The total NPSI score ranges from 0 to 100; a higher NPSI total score represents a worse neuropathy outcome. The changes in scores from baseline are compared between study arms.

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 34-36 weeks

  3. The Cumulative Dose of Oxaliplatin

    The cumulative dose of oxaliplatin received over the course (up to 12 cycles) of mFOLFOX6 treatment regimen. It corresponds to the absolute summed up quantity of Oxaliplatin administered to the patient over time. There is no range for this measure. Since this is a dose-limiting neuropathy prevention study, the higher value can be interpreted as better outcome.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

07

Results

Posted Mar 9, 2022
Limitations and caveats
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the study finished earlier than planned. The total number of patients enrolled was 26 instead of 30.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlacebo + FOLFOXLidocaine + FOLFOX
Started1214
Completed1212
Not completed02
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject02

Outcome measures

PrimaryArea Under the Curve (AUC) of Intensity of Oxaliplatin-induced Cold Pain/Unpleasantness vs Time

The intensity of cold pain and cold unpleasantness is evaluated separately, assessed daily on a 0-10 scale, upon holding a pre-cooled (\~8°C) metal cylinder for 10 seconds. the area under the curve of cold pain and cold unpleasantness vs time is calculated per chemotherapy cycle (every two weeks) and serves as a primary outcome measure. For intervention (lidocaine+FOLFOX) and control (placebo+FOLFOX) groups, the average of cold pain AUC and cold unpleasantness AUC over 7 cycles was calculated. The average AUCs over 7 cycles were compared between study arms. The AUC is measured as a score on a 0-10 scale multiplied by 14 days and may range between 0 and 140. Higher AUC values represent more intense cold pain/unpleasantness.

Time frame:
14 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale*days
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Intensity of Oxaliplatin-induced Cold Pain/Unpleasantness vs Time
score on a scale*daysPlacebo + FOLFOXLidocaine + FOLFOX
pain AUC16.4 ± 18.39.5 ± 14.4
unpleasantness AUC33.1 ± 27.825.4 ± 22.6
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo + FOLFOX vs Lidocaine + FOLFOX · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.318 (p-value was not adjusted for any parameter.) · Mean difference (final values): 6.88 · 95% CI -7.09 to 20.85
  • Placebo + FOLFOX vs Lidocaine + FOLFOX · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.466 (p-value was not adjusted for any parameter.) · Mean difference (final values): 7.67 · 95% CI -13.76 to 29.10
SecondaryCIPN Score on EORTC QLQ-CIPN20

Change in CIPN (Chemotherapy-induced peripheral Neuropathy) score (on EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 tool ) from baseline to the Cycle 6 (12 weeks), and from baseline to last follow-up (34-36 weeks). EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 100 (worst symptoms). A higher score represents worse neuropathy. The changes in scores are compared between study arms. EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 tool is a quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) for evaluation of CIPN.

Time frame:
12 weeks and 34-36 weeks
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
CIPN Score on EORTC QLQ-CIPN20
score on a scalePlacebo + FOLFOXLidocaine + FOLFOX
122 (0 to 8.3)4 (0 to 4)
34-36 weeks17.0 (5.5 to 39.8)37.0 (7.4 to 47.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo + FOLFOX vs Lidocaine + FOLFOX · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.338 (p-value was not adjusted for any parameter.) · Median difference (final values): 20
  • Placebo + FOLFOX vs Lidocaine + FOLFOX · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.759 (p-value was not adjusted for any parameter.) · Median difference (final values): 2
SecondaryChanges in NPSI Score.

Changes in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) descriptors of neuropathic pain over time from baseline to cycle 3(6 weeks), cycle 6 (12 weeks), and the last follow-up (34-36 weeks). The total NPSI score ranges from 0 to 100; a higher NPSI total score represents a worse neuropathy outcome. The changes in scores from baseline are compared between study arms.

Time frame:
6 weeks, 12 weeks, 34-36 weeks
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Changes in NPSI Score.
score on a scalePlacebo + FOLFOXLidocaine + FOLFOX
6 weeks visit0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)
12 weeks visit0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)
last follow-up visit3.0 (0.8 to 7.3)13.5 (0 to 17.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo + FOLFOX vs Lidocaine + FOLFOX · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.581 (p-value was not adjusted for any parameter.) · Median difference (final values): 0
  • Placebo + FOLFOX vs Lidocaine + FOLFOX · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.962 (p-value was not adjusted for any parameter.) · Median difference (final values): 0
  • Placebo + FOLFOX vs Lidocaine + FOLFOX · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.365 (p-value was not adjusted for any parameter.) · Median difference (final values): 10.50
SecondaryThe Cumulative Dose of Oxaliplatin

The cumulative dose of oxaliplatin received over the course (up to 12 cycles) of mFOLFOX6 treatment regimen. It corresponds to the absolute summed up quantity of Oxaliplatin administered to the patient over time. There is no range for this measure. Since this is a dose-limiting neuropathy prevention study, the higher value can be interpreted as better outcome.

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg
The Cumulative Dose of Oxaliplatin
mgPlacebo + FOLFOXLidocaine + FOLFOX
The Cumulative Dose of Oxaliplatin1161.8 ± 300.21294.8 ± 221.6
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo + FOLFOX vs Lidocaine + FOLFOX · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.730 · Mean difference (final values): 57.68 · 95% CI -1771 to 1886

Adverse events

Collected over 16 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo + FOLFOX0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)6/12 (50%)
Lidocaine + FOLFOX0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)12/14 (85.7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo + FOLFOXLidocaine + FOLFOX
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/126/14
DizzinessNervous system disorders4/124/14
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/123/14
ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders2/121/14
ItchingSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/121/14
ParesthesiaNervous system disorders1/122/14
LightheadednessNervous system disorders1/122/14
Blurred visionEye disorders1/121/14
SomnolenceNervous system disorders0/121/14

Baseline characteristics

This includes only patients who are enrolled and randomized into 2 groups.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Placebo + FOLFOXLidocaine + FOLFOXTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years101020
>=65 years246
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Placebo + FOLFOXLidocaine + FOLFOXTotal
Mean52.3 ± 16.450.9 ± 13.251.5 ± 14.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo + FOLFOXLidocaine + FOLFOXTotal
Female61117
Male639
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo + FOLFOXLidocaine + FOLFOXTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White121325
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Placebo + FOLFOXLidocaine + FOLFOXTotal
United States121426
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes Jewish Hospital
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Seretny M, Currie GL, Sena ES, Ramnarine S, Grant R, MacLeod MR, Colvin LA, Fallon M. Incidence, prevalence, and predictors of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2014 Dec;155(12):2461-2470. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.020. Epub 2014 Sep 23. PubMed 25261162 ↗
  • Attal N, Rouaud J, Brasseur L, Chauvin M, Bouhassira D. Systemic lidocaine in pain due to peripheral nerve injury and predictors of response. Neurology. 2004 Jan 27;62(2):218-25. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000103237.62009.77. PubMed 14745057 ↗
  • Attal N, Gaude V, Brasseur L, Dupuy M, Guirimand F, Parker F, Bouhassira D. Intravenous lidocaine in central pain: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, psychophysical study. Neurology. 2000 Feb 8;54(3):564-74. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.3.564. PubMed 10680784 ↗
  • Ventzel L, Madsen CS, Jensen AB, Jensen AR, Jensen TS, Finnerup NB. Assessment of acute oxaliplatin-induced cold allodynia: a pilot study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2016 Feb;133(2):152-155. doi: 10.1111/ane.12443. Epub 2015 Jun 2. PubMed 26032776 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD will be shared 6 months after publication of the results in a peer-reviewed journal, upon submission of a robust data analysis plan to the study investigators.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: 6 months after publication

Access criteria: IPD will be shared 6 months after publication of the results in a peer-reviewed journal, upon submission of a robust data analysis plan to the study investigators.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2017 to primary completion in Sep 2020, 36 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2022, 1 year 5 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 9, 2017
First posted
Aug 18, 2017
StartActual
Sep 15, 2017
Primary completionActual
Sep 28, 2020
CompletionActual
Apr 1, 2021
Results first posted
Mar 9, 2022
Last update
Mar 9, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 9, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03254394
Responsible party
simon.haroutounian (Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 18, 2017
Start date
Sep 15, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 28, 2020
Completion
Apr 1, 2021
Results posted
Mar 9, 2022
Last update
Mar 9, 2022

Study contacts

Simon Haroutounian, PhD
principal investigator · Washington University School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lidocaine

Start the discussion