ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03250481Updated Aug 15, 2019

Responsiveness Index Versus the RASS Based Method for Adjusting Sedation in Critically Ill Patients

An interventional study of Propofol in Critical Illness, sponsored by Helsinki University Central Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Finland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-15.

Sponsored by Helsinki University Central Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2013, registered Aug 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Systematic evaluation of pain, agitation and delirium in ICU-patients is recommended and deep sedation should be avoided. Sedation is still monitored with clinical assessments, like RASS. The Responsiveness Index (RI) is a recently described method for ICU sedation monitoring. It is based on processed frontal EMG and reflects the interaction between a patient's conscious state and the intensity and frequency of stimulations during treatment. RI has not been randomly compared to RASS to titrate sedation to target at a clinically adequate sedation state. In this open randomized controlled pilot study of 32 critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients, investigators will evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of RI based sedation compared to standard RASS based titration of sedation. Investigators hypothesize first that RI controlled sedation will be safe and, second that RI controlled sedation will associate with increased number of ventilator free days alive in 30 days without excess adverse events.

Read the detailed description

Sedation of intensive care patients is needed for patient's safety but deep sedation is associated with adverse outcomes. Frontal electromyogram based Responsiveness Index (RI) aims to quantify patient's arousal. RI monitoring together with staff education may have potential to improve sedation quality. Investigators will evaluate the safety of RI based sedation versus standard care using Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) for sedation.

Methods: randomized study, critically ill adult patients with mechanical ventilation and administration of sedation to either RI- or RASS-guided sedation. Propofol (and midazolam combined with if needed) as a hypnotic drug and oxycodone as an analgesic drug. Investigators will follow standardized sedation protocol in both groups to achieve the predetermined target sedation level: either RI 40-80 (RI-group) or RASS -3-0 (RASS group). RI measurement is continuous in both groups, but blinded in the RASS group. Accordingly, RI group is blinded to RASS assessments. State Entropy (SE) will register in both groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Critical Illness

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sedation, Responsiveness Index, Electromyogram
03

In context

Critical Illness

1,780 studies on the registry are indexed under Critical Illness; 442 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 90 across 926 interventional studies indexed under Critical Illness.

Browse Critical Illness studies →

Lead sponsor

Helsinki University Central Hospital is the lead sponsor of 311 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Intensive care patients
  • Need of mechanical ventilation and sedation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • to propofol or oxycodone
  • hypoxic or traumatic brain injury
  • intracranial hemorrhage
  • status epilepticus
  • drug overdose as admission diagnosis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Care provider)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    'Sedation guidance with RASS-group

    Sedation is guided with RASS. Targeted sedation level is RASS -3 - 0. Propofol: an initial rate of 2.4 mg/kg/h for one hour. Thereafter, the infusion rate of propofol is 0.8-4 mg/kg/h to reach or maintain the target RASS score. Propofol bolus of 20-40 mg is allowed. Oxycodone as 3-6 mg boluses for pain management. Other opiates are not allowed. Midazolam may given if the maximum dose of propofol is reached and pain management by oxycodone restricted achievement of the target sedation level. Midazolam will supply intravenously in boluses of 1-2 mg (based on the weight of the patient), starting at 3 boluses/h for the first hour. Dexmedetomidine and other sedatives are not allowed.

    Drug: Propofol

  • Experimental
    'Sedation guidance with RI

    Sedation is guided with RI. Targeted sedation level is RI 40-80. Propofol: an initial rate of 2.4 mg/kg/h for one hour. Thereafter, the infusion rate of propofol is 0.8-4 mg/kg/h to reach or maintain the target RI score. Propofol bolus of 20-40 mg is allowed. Oxycodone as 3-6 mg boluses for pain management. Other opiates are not allowed. Midazolam may given if the maximum dose of propofol is reached and pain management by oxycodone restricted achievement of the target sedation level. Midazolam will supply intravenously in boluses of 1-2 mg (based on the weight of the patient), starting at 3 boluses/h for the first hour. Dexmedetomidine and other sedatives are not allowed.

    Drug: Propofol

Interventions

  • Sedation targeted to RASS -3-0 or RI 20-40

    Also known as: Oxycodone, Midazolame

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with sedation or sedation monitoring related predetermined adverse events

    Predetermined adverse events hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia, tachypnea, anxiety, unintended catheter removal, gas exchange deficiency, skin irritation caused by electrodes, hemodynamic instability

    Time frame: Up to 96 hours (starting when RI-monitoring begins)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Increased ventilator free days

    Time alive without mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • HelsinkiUCH
    Helsinki, Finland
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2013 to primary completion in Aug 2017, 53 months.

Of 400 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Critical Illness, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 40. This study's 53 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 404 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 40.

Critical Illness covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 8, 2017
First posted
Aug 15, 2017
StartActual
Mar 2013
Primary completionActual
Aug 28, 2017
CompletionActual
Aug 28, 2017
Last update
Aug 15, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 15, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03250481
Responsible party
Ville Pettilä (Professor, Helsinki University Central Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 15, 2017
Start date
Mar 2013
Primary completion
Aug 28, 2017
Completion
Aug 28, 2017
Last update
Aug 15, 2019

Study contacts

Johanna Wennervirta, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 340, 00029 Helsinki, Finland

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Propofol

Start the discussion