CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03249779RLS/WEDUpdated Sep 4, 2019Results posted

Treatment of RLS/WED Symptoms Through Sensory Counter-stimulation

An interventional study of Scrambler in Restless Legs Syndrome and Willis-Ekbom Disease, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-04.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
8
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate, in a pilot fashion, efficacy and tolerability of electrical counter-stimulation using the Scrambler device in alleviating uncomfortable sensations and urge to move in patients with restless legs syndrome/Willis Ekbom Disease (RLS/WED).

Read the detailed description

A total of up to 10 eligible subjects will be recruited who have been diagnosed with chronic RLS/WED (Restless legs syndrome/ Willis Ekbom Disease) in the Mayo Clinic Center for Sleep Medicine. Subjects must experience daily symptoms and must typically be symptomatic during the timeframe in which Scrambler Therapy will be utilized (12-5 PM). Each patient will complete the International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS), a validated scale which assesses severity of RLS symptoms16 at baseline (pre-treatment) and before and directly after each session of Scrambler Therapy.

Patients will receive Scrambler Therapy on a daily basis for up to 10 consecutive weekdays. Electrodes will be placed proximal to the area of RLS symptomatology, with gradual downward localization until the entire area of RLS symptoms has been treated. Treatment will initially take place on one leg. Treatments will be administered by a technician trained in using the Scrambler device. A physician or nurse (with familiarity of Scrambler therapy) will be available throughout each treatment session.

Patients will complete questionnaires regarding discomfort or other side effects encountered during or after treatment. Patients will also complete surveys assessing for any changes (benefits or worsening) in RLS symptomatology between treatments.

Patients will be monitored for any adverse events associated with the study procedures. Any reported adverse events will be expediently classified by the study group as to severity level, whether it relates to the treatments in the study protocol, and whether the event was expected or unexpected. This information will allow determination of whether or not the adverse event should be reported as an expedited report or part of the routinely reported outcomes data. All adverse events which meet criteria for expedited reporting will be reported to the institutional IRB as well as external agencies as required.

If there is no evidence of clinical benefit with the first 2-4 patients, then further patients may not be recruited.

02

Conditions studied

  • Restless Legs Syndrome
  • Willis-Ekbom Disease
03

In context

Psychomotor Agitation

500 studies on the registry are indexed under Psychomotor Agitation; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 8 is below the median of 90 across 413 interventional studies indexed under Psychomotor Agitation.

Browse Psychomotor Agitation studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female patients age 18 and over diagnosed with RLS/WED by a board certified sleep medicine physician within the Mayo Clinic Center for Sleep Medicine.
  • Patients must have moderate to severe symptoms which have been present for ≥ 3 months. Patients must endorse discomfort as part of their typical RLS/WED symptomatology.
  • Patients must experience daily symptoms and must experience daily symptoms during afternoon hours (12-5 PM)
  • Patients on no medications for RLS/WED, or those who have refractory symptoms despite RLS/WED medications will be enrolled. Patients on alpha-2-delta ligands (pregabalin, gabapentin) will be asked to discontinue these medications two weeks prior to starting treatments and remain off these medications throughout the study protocol.
  • Informed consent to participate in this study needs to be obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Research authorization not provided
  • Patients who are asymptomatic (either by verbal report or completion of severity scale) at time of initiation of Scrambler Therapy treatment
  • Patients who have made changes in medication regimen during the 2 weeks prior to study initiation (including initiation of iron supplementation)
  • Prior use of Scrambler Therapy
  • Pregnant or Nursing Patients
  • Patients with implantable drug delivery systems, heart stents, or metal implants (including pacemakers and defibrillators)
  • Patients with history of epilepsy or other medical conditions that in the opinion of the investigators should be excluded
  • Patients with skin conditions or wounds in or around the area of electrode application (lower extremities)
  • Patients treated with alpha-2 delta ligands (gabapentin, pregabalin), who cannot discontinue the medications as above
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Scrambler

    All participants will receive electrical stimulation applied to the lower extremities using the Scrambler.

    Device: Scrambler

Interventions

  • DeviceScrambler

    Scrambler Therapy is a specific form of electrical stimulation which has also been utilized in chronic neurogenic pain11. This modality of therapy differs from TENS in that the goal is to mediate the patient's perception of pain, rather than masking the peripheral pain signal. The results of this modality of treatment may be longer-lasting than TENS, presumably via reduction in central signal generation. Scrambler therapy works through C fibers to retrain the peripheral sensation in the area being treated. Further description of this technology is available at: International Patent PCT/IT2007/000647 and U.S. Patent No. 8,380,317. Literature search does not yield prior studies regarding efficacy of Scrambler therapy in treating RLS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS)

    The International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) questionnaire will be used for this purpose. The IRLS is a validated patient-reported outcome measure to accurately assess disease severity of restless legs syndrome. It has questions on the primary features of restless legs syndrome, along with intensity and frequency, associated sleep problems. For this study subjects were asked to answer 10 questions on how often they experienced each symptom, using a score of 0-4, 0 being "None" and 4 being "Very severe." Answers from these questions were combined to provide a total Restless Legs Syndrome score (for a total possible range of 0-40) for each patient at each visit. Lower scores reflected fewer symptoms and higher scores reflected more symptoms.

    Time frame: baseline, 2 weeks

  2. Change in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS)

    The International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) questionnaire will be used for this purpose. The IRLS is a validated patient-reported outcome measure to accurately assess disease severity of restless legs syndrome. It has questions on the primary features of restless legs syndrome, along with intensity and frequency, associated sleep problems. For this study subjects were asked to answer 10 questions on how often they experienced each symptom, using a score of 0-4, 0 being "None" and 4 being "Very severe." Answers from these questions were combined to provide a total Restless Legs Syndrome score (for a total possible range of 0-40) for each patient at each visit. Lower scores reflected fewer symptoms and higher scores reflected more symptoms.

    Time frame: baseline, 1 week post treatment (approximately 3 weeks)

07

Results

Posted Sep 4, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneScrambler
Started8
Completed8
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS)

The International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) questionnaire will be used for this purpose. The IRLS is a validated patient-reported outcome measure to accurately assess disease severity of restless legs syndrome. It has questions on the primary features of restless legs syndrome, along with intensity and frequency, associated sleep problems. For this study subjects were asked to answer 10 questions on how often they experienced each symptom, using a score of 0-4, 0 being "None" and 4 being "Very severe." Answers from these questions were combined to provide a total Restless Legs Syndrome score (for a total possible range of 0-40) for each patient at each visit. Lower scores reflected fewer symptoms and higher scores reflected more symptoms.

Time frame:
baseline, 2 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS)
score on a scaleScrambler
Change in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS)19.5 ± 8.03
Statistical analysis
  • Scrambler · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0396
PrimaryChange in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS)

The International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) questionnaire will be used for this purpose. The IRLS is a validated patient-reported outcome measure to accurately assess disease severity of restless legs syndrome. It has questions on the primary features of restless legs syndrome, along with intensity and frequency, associated sleep problems. For this study subjects were asked to answer 10 questions on how often they experienced each symptom, using a score of 0-4, 0 being "None" and 4 being "Very severe." Answers from these questions were combined to provide a total Restless Legs Syndrome score (for a total possible range of 0-40) for each patient at each visit. Lower scores reflected fewer symptoms and higher scores reflected more symptoms.

Time frame:
baseline, 1 week post treatment (approximately 3 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS)
score on a scaleScrambler
Change in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS)20.25 ± 11.53
Statistical analysis
  • Scrambler · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.1330

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events were collected from baseline through 1 week post treatment, approximately 3 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Scrambler0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Scrambler
Mean71 (51 to 87)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Scrambler
Female4
Male4
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Scrambler
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Scrambler
United States8
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Nov 10, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03249779
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Melissa Lipford (MD, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 15, 2017
Start date
Dec 2016
Primary completion
Jun 2018
Completion
Jun 2018
Results posted
Sep 4, 2019
Last update
Sep 4, 2019

Study contacts

Melissa Lipford, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion